Industrial Structure, Growth and Residual Flows
Chapter
Abstract
The background for economic analyses of environmental pollution is excellently presented in several recent contributions (see, e.g., Kneese et al., 1970; Russell and Spofford, 1972). It suffices here, then, to give but a brief introduction to the concepts used in the study.
Keywords
Industrial Structure Sulphur Oxide Investment Good Discharge Coefficient Residual Flow
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
- Bjerkholt, O., and Longva, S., ‘Modis IV: The Basic Framework of an Input—Output Planning Model, with a Commodity—Activity—Sector Approach’, Working Paper from the Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway (1970).Google Scholar
- d’Arge, R. C., and Kogiku, K. C., ‘Economic Growth and the Environment’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 12 (Jan 1973).Google Scholar
- Førsund, F. R., ‘Allocation in Space and Environmental Pollution’, Swedish Journal of Economics, vol. 74, no. 1 (Mar 1972).Google Scholar
- Johansen, L., A Multi-Sectoral Study of Economic Growth (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1960).Google Scholar
- Johansen, L., ‘Some Problems of Pricing and Optimal Choice of Factor Proportions in a Dynamic Setting’, Economica (May 1967).Google Scholar
- Johansen, L., ‘Explorations in long-term Projections for the Norwegian Economy’, Economics of Planning, vol. 8, no. 1–2 (1968).Google Scholar
- Keeler, E., Spence, M., and Zeckhauser, R., ‘The Optimal Control of Pollution’, Journal of Economic Theory, no. 4 (1971).Google Scholar
- Kneese, A. V., Ayres, R. A., and d’Arge, R. C., Economics and the Environment: A Materials Balance Approach (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore and London, for Resources for the Future, Inc., 1970).Google Scholar
- Leontief, W., ‘Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input—Output Approach’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 3, no. 3 (1970).Google Scholar
- Leontief, W., and Ford, D., Air Pollution and the Economic Structure: Empirical Results of Input—Output Computations (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971).Google Scholar
- Meadows, Do. and De., Randers, J., and Behrens III, W., The Limits to Growth (Pan Books Ltd., London, 1974).Google Scholar
- Peskin, Henry M., ‘National Accounting and the Environment’, Article No. 50 (Statistical Central Bureau, Oslo, 1972).Google Scholar
- Russell, C. S., and Spofford, W. O., Jr., ‘A Quantitative Framework for Residuals Management Decisions’ in Kneese, A. V., and Bower, B. (eds.), Environmental Quality Analysis (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore and London, 1972).Google Scholar
- Schreiner, P., ‘The Role of Input—Output in the Perspective Analysis of the Norwegian Economy’, in Brody, A., and Carter, A. P. (eds.), Input—Output Techniques (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1972).Google Scholar
- Smith, V. L., ‘Dynamics of Waste Accumulation: Disposals versus Recycling’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (1972).Google Scholar
- ’spesialanalyse 1, Forurensninger. Sæerskilt vedlegg til Langtidsprogrammet 1973–1977’, Report from the Ministry of Finance to the Norwegian Parliament.Google Scholar
- Spurkeland, S., ‘M.S.G.: A Tool in Long-term Planning’, paper presented at the First Seminar in Mathematical Methods and Computer Techniques, Norwegian Computing Centre (mimeographed, 1970).Google Scholar
- Strøm, S., ‘Dynamics of Pollution and Waste Treatment Activities’, Memorandum from Institute of Economics, University of Oslo, 10 May 1972.Google Scholar
- Victor, P. A., ‘Input—Output Analysis and the Study of Economic and Environmental Interaction’, Ph.D. thesis (University of British Columbia, Apr 1971).Google Scholar
Copyright information
© International Economic Association 1974