Teaching Students to Censor: How Academics Betrayed Free Speech
Today, the most insidious threats to free speech on campus do not come from legislating governments or controlling institutional managers. That some students are at the forefront of calling for debates to be cancelled, songs banned and course content to come with trigger warnings has been well documented. It would be easy to get the impression that while students seek freedom from speech and desire to turn the university into an emotional and intellectual Safe Space, academics look on in horror and champion the cause of free speech. Often, however, such students are simply putting into practice the ideas of their lecturers. Academics have taught and legitimised the notion that words and images harm, that people should be protected from offence and that restricting free speech is the best way to achieve this aim.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Dialectic of Enlightenment, by Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno, Stanford University Press, 2002, p. 29.Google Scholar
- 2.One-Dimensional Man, by Herbert Marcuse, Routledge, 1991, p. 4.Google Scholar
- 3.The Archaeology of Knowledge, by Michel Foucault, Routledge Classics, 1989, p. 54.Google Scholar
- 5.‘The Function and Field of Speech and Language in Psychoanalysis’, by Jacques Lacan, In Écrits, WW Norton & Company, 2007, p. 229.Google Scholar
- 6.Of Grammatology, by Jacques Derrida, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
- 7.Powers of Horror, by Julia Kristeva, Columbia University Press, 1984, p. 72Google Scholar
- 9.Professing Feminism, Education and Indoctrination in Women’s Studies, by Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge, Lexington Books, 2003, p. 120.Google Scholar
- 10.‘Academic Freedom versus the Intrusive University’, by John Fekete, in Academic Freedom and the Inclusive University, Sharon Kahn and Dennis Pavlich (eds), University of British Columbia Press, 2000, p. xv.Google Scholar