The Serious Leisure Perspective
The serious leisure perspective (SLP) can be described, in simplest terms, as the theoretical framework that synthesizes three main forms of leisure showing, at once, their distinctive features, similarities, and interrelationships. The forms consist of the (1) serious pursuits (i.e., serious leisure [amateurism, hobbyism, and serious volunteering] and devotee work), (2) casual leisure, and (3) project-based leisure. The serious pursuits are distinguished by six qualities, are motivated by several special rewards, sometimes including flow, and offer a leisure career. Eight types of casual leisure are presented along with their benefits. Project-based leisure fits into leisure lifestyle in its own peculiar way as interstitial activity, like some casual leisure but not like most serious leisure. It can therefore help shape a persons optimal leisure lifestyle.
KeywordsAmateurs casual leisure devotee work flow hobbyists leisure career project-based leisure serious leisure serious leisure perspective volunteers
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arai, S.M., & Pedlar, A.M. (1997). Building Communities through leisure: Citizen participation in a healthy communities initiative. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 167–182.Google Scholar
- Bowen, C.D. (1935). Friends and fiddlers. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Dubin, R. (1992). Central life interests: Creative individualism in a complex world. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
- The Economist (2005). Up off the couch. October 22, p. 35.Google Scholar
- Gerson, J.(2010). Video games keep kids fit. Calgary Herald, Wednesday, December 8, B1.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- New World Encyclopedia (2008). Edutainment. (http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Edutainment, retrieved March 3, 2012).
- Scott, D. (2003). Constraints. In J.M. Jenkins & J.J. Pigram (Eds.), Encyclopedia of leisure and outdoor recreation (pp. 75–78). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Stebbins, R.A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. Montreal, QC and Kingston, ON: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
- Stebbins, R.A. (2001). Volunteering — mainstream and marginal: Preserving the leisure experience. In M. Graham & M. Foley (Eds.), Volunteering in leisure: Marginal or inclusive? (Vol. 75, pp. 1–10). Eastbourne, UK: Leisure Studies Association.Google Scholar
- Stebbins, R.A. (2001a). New directions in the theory and research of serious leisure, Meilen Studies in Sociology, Vol. 28. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Meilen.Google Scholar
- Stebbins, R.A. (2001b). Exploratory research in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Stebbins, R.A. (2002). The organizational basis of leisure participation: A motivational exploration. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.Google Scholar
- Stebbins, R.A. (2004/2014). Between work and leisure: The common ground of two separate worlds. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (paperback edition with new Preface, 2014).Google Scholar
- Stebbins, R.A. (2005b). Challenging mountain nature: Risk, motive, and lifestyle in three hobbyist sports. Calgary, AB: Detselig.Google Scholar
- Stebbins, R.A. (2007/2015). Serious leisure: A perspective for our time. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction (paperback edition with new Preface, 2015).Google Scholar
- Williams, R.M., Jr. (2000). American society. In E.F. Borgatta, & R.J.V. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology, 2nd ed., Vol. 1 (pp. 140–148). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Yoder, D.G. (1997). A model for commodity intensive serious leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 407–429.Google Scholar