The Production of GFC News

  • Mike Berry


This chapter explores the factors that structured the reporting of GFC news. To do this the chapter draws on a series of telephone and face to face interviews conducted with leading print and broadcast journalists between 2015 and 2018. This research finds that a wide variety of factors structured the process of news gathering. These included issues that have consistently been identified in previous studies such as the ideological preferences of newspaper proprietors, elite sourcing, public relations, information subsidies and source strategies. Although the analysis suggests there are a number of general processes at work grounded in political economy and the routines of newswork, there are also other factors that are much more organisation, subject and time specific. Ultimately, this shows that a comprehensive understanding of how news is produced needs a granular analysis that recognises the myriad and shifting complexities grounded in news production at specific times and places.


  1. Berry, M. (2013). The Today Programme and the Banking Crisis. Journalism, 14(2), 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry, M. (2015). The UK Press and the Deficit Debate. Sociology, 50(3), 542–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, M. (2016). No Alternative to Austerity: How BBC Broadcast News Reported the Deficit Debate. Media, Culture and Society, 38(6), 844–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu, B. (2015, 1 April). Two Thirds of Economists Say Coalition Austerity Harmed the Economy. Independent. Available at: Accessed 9 July 2018.
  5. Clausen, L. (2004). Localizing the Global. Media Culture and Society, 26(1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Curran, J., & Seaton, J. (1997). Power Without Responsibility. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, N. (2008). Flat Earth News. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, A. (2000). Public Relations, Business News and the Reproduction of Corporate Elite Power. Journalism, 1(3), 282–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dean, M. (2013). Democracy Under Attack: How the Media Distort Policy and Politics. London: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  10. Engelen, E., Eturk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A., Moran, M., Nilsson, A., & Williams, K. (2011). After the Great Complacence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fahy, D., O’Brien, M., & Poti, V. (2010). From Boom to Bust: A Post-Celtic Tiger Analysis of the Norms, Values and Roles of Irish Financial Journalists. Irish Communications Review, 12, 5–20.Google Scholar
  12. Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The Structure of Foreign News. Journal of Peace Research, 1, 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gandy, O. H. (1982). Beyond Agenda Setting: Information Subsidies and Public Policy. New York: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Gans, H. (1979). Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  15. Glasgow Media Group. (1985). War and Peace News. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Guardian Datablog. (2010). Newspaper Support in UK General Elections. Available at: Accessed 13 July 2018.
  17. Hallin, D. (1986). The Uncensored War: The Media and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Harcup, T., & O'Neill, D. (2001). What Is News? Galtung and Ruge Revisited. Journalism Studies, 2(2), 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (1995). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  20. Ipsos-Mori. (2016). Perceptions Are Not Reality. Available at: Accessed 9 July 2018.
  21. King, A. (2015). Who Governs Britain? London: Pelican.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, C., Chan, J., Zhongdang, P., & So, C. (2005). National Prisms of a Global ‘Media Event’. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass Media and Society (pp. 320–335). London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
  23. Manning, P. (2001). News and News Sources: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. McKnight, D. (2012). Rupert Murdoch: An Investigation of Political Power. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  25. Miliband, R. (1969). The State in Capitalist Society. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  26. Oborne, P. (2015). Why I Have Resigned from the Telegraph. Available at: Accessed 9 July 2018.
  27. Philo, G., & Berry, M. (2004). Bad News from Israel. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  28. Philo, G., & Berry, M. (2011). More Bad News from Israel. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  29. Schlesinger, P. (1990). Rethinking the Sociology of Journalism: Source Strategies and the Limits of Media-Centrism. In M. Ferguson (Ed.), Public Communication the New Imperative (pp. 61–83). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Sigal, L. V. (1973). Reporters and Officials. Lexington: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  31. Sparks, C. (2008). Extending and Refining the Propaganda Model. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 4(2), 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stanley, L. (2014). We’re Reaping What We Sowed’: Everyday Crisis Narratives and Acquiescence to the Age of Austerity. New Political Economy, 19(6), 895–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wahl-Jorgensen, K., Sambrook, R., Berry, M., Moore, K., Bennett, L., Cable, J., Garcia-Blanco, I., Kidd, J., Dencik, L., & Hintz, A. (2013). BBC Breadth of Opinion Review: Content Analysis. Available at: Accessed 10 July 2018.
  35. Wren-Lewis, S. (2015). The Austerity Con. London Review of Books, 37(4), 9–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike Berry
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations