Advertisement

Long-term Media Socialisation and Support for Austerity

  • Mike Berry
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter further unpacks the source of beliefs about the deficit and public spending that were identified in Chap.  5. In particular, it examines how two beliefs common in my focus groups reflected recurrent themes in press reporting in the period following Labour’s re-election in 2001. These were the belief that much of Labour’s post-2001 spending increases had been wasted and that public sector pensions, immigration and welfare had become increasingly unfair and unsustainable burdens on the taxpayer. To locate the development of these narratives Nexis searches going back to 2000 were conducted in four right-wing national newspapers. These revealed that the frequency of these themes rose substantially after 2001 and then increased again when the financial crisis hit in 2008. The chapter concludes by considering the contribution of the media in relation to other factors which may have influenced public knowledge and attitudes in this area.

References

  1. Bagguley, P., & Mann, K. (1992). Idle Thieving Bastards? Scholarly Representations of the ‘Underclass’. Work, Employment & Society, 6(1), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry, M., Garcia-Blanco, I., & Moore, K. (2016). Press Coverage of the Refugee and Migrant Crisis in the EU: A Content Analysis of Five European Countries. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/56bb369c9.html. Date accessed 9 July 2018.
  3. Blackman, S., & Rogers, R. (2017). Youth Marginality in Britain: Contemporary Studies of Austerity. London: Policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Briant, E., Watson, N., & Philo, G. (2011). Bad News for Disabled People: How the Newspapers Are Reporting Disability (Project Report). Strathclyde Centre for Disability Research and Glasgow Media Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  6. Cadwalladr, C. (2011, June 5). Vajazzled! How Chavs Have Replaced Working Class People on Britain’s TV. Observer.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, R. (2018). Fear, Loss and Hope: Understanding the Drivers of Hope and Hate. Available at: https://www.hopenothate.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2018/10/FINAL-VERSION.pdf. Accessed 16 Oct 2018.
  8. Connor, S. (2007). We’re Onto You: A Critical Examination of the Department for Work and Pensions’ ‘Targeting Benefit Fraud’ Campaign. Critical Social Policy, 27(2), 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crouch, C. (2011). The Strange Non-death of Neo-liberalism. London: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Dayan, M., & Edwards, N. (2015). Fact or Fiction? The NHS Has Too Many Managers. The Nuffield Trust. Available at: https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/news-item/fact-or-fiction-the-nhs-has-too-many-managers. Date Accessed 9 July 2018.
  11. Deacon, A. (1978). The Scrounging Controversy: Public Attitudes Towards the Unemployed in Contemporary Britain. Social and Economic Administration, 12(2), 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deacon, A. (1980, February 28). Spivs, Drones and Other Scroungers. New Society.Google Scholar
  13. Dorey, P. (2014). Faltering Before the Finishing Line: The Conservative Party’s Performance in the 2010 General Election. British Politics, 5(4), 402–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dwyer, P. (2004). Creeping Conditionality in the UK: From Welfare Rights to Conditional Entitlements? Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 265–287.Google Scholar
  15. Full Fact. (2011). Labour’s Record on Welfare: Liam Byrne Fact-Check. Available at: https://fullfact.org/news/labours-record-welfare-liam-byrne-fact-check/. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  16. Full Fact. (2015). Migration and Welfare Benefits. Available at: https://fullfact.org/immigration/migration-and-welfare-benefits/
  17. Gamble, A. (1994). The Free Economy and the Strong State; The Politics of Thatcherism. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Geiger, B. B. (2012). The Positive and Negative Consequences of the Welfare State. Available at: https://inequalitiesblog.wordpress.com/2012/10/25/the-positive-and-negative-consequences-of-the-welfare-state/. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  19. George, G., & Wilding, P. (1994). Welfare and Ideology. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  20. Golding, P., & Middleton, S. (1983). Images of Welfare: Press and Public Attitude to Poverty. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Hayward, K., & Yair, M. (2006). The ‘Chav’ Phenomenon: Consumption, Media and the Construction of a New Underclass. Crime Media and Culture, 2(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hills, J. (2001). Poverty and Social Security. What Rights? What Responsibilities? In A. Park et al. (Eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 18th Report. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Hopkins, J., & Rosamond, B. (2017). Post-Truth Politics, Bullshit and Bad Ideas: ‘Deficit Fetishism’ in the UK. New Political Economy, 4, 1–15.Google Scholar
  24. Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS). (2010). Public Spending Under Labour. Available from: http://www.ifs.org.uk/bns/bn92.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  25. Ipsos-Mori. (2009). Public Spending Index – June 2009. Available from: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/migrations/en-uk/files/Assets/Docs/poll-public-spending-charts-june-2009.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  26. Ipsos-Mori. (2016). Shifting Ground 8 Key Findings from a Longitudinal Study on Attitudes Towards Immigration and Brexit. Available at: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2017-10/Shifting%20Ground_Unbound.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  27. Jayasuriya, K. (2002). The New Contractualism: Neo-liberal or Democratic? Political Quarterly, 73(3), 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones, O. (2011). Chavs: The Demonization of the Working Class. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  29. Kellner, P. (2012). Labour’s Lost Votes. Available at: https://yougov.co.uk/news/2012/10/22/labours-lost-votes/. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  30. King, D. (1999). In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the USA and Britain. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Krastev, I. (2017). After Europe. Pennsylvania: The University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Larsen, C. A., & Dejgaard, T. E. (2013). The Institutional Logic of Images of the Poor and Welfare Recipients: A Comparative Study of British, Swedish and Danish Newspapers. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(3), 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lewis, J. M. W. (2008). Thinking by Numbers: Cultural Analysis and the Use of Data. In T. Bennett & J. Frow (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Cultural Analysis (pp. 654–673). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lundström, R. (2013). Framing Fraud: Discourse on Benefit Cheating in Sweden and the UK. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 630–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lupton, R., Hills, J., Stewart, K., & Vizard, P. (2013). Labour’s Social Policy Record: Policy, Spending and Outcomes 1997–2010 (Social Policy in a Cold Climate Research Report 1). Available at: http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/spcc/rr01.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  36. McEnhill, L., & Byrne, V. (2014). ‘Beat the Cheat’: Portrayals of Disability Benefit Claimants in Print Media. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 22(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Misra, J., Moller, S., & Karides, M. (2003). Envisioning Dependency: Changing Media Depictions of Welfare in the 20th Century. Social Problems, 50(4), 482–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morris, J. (2017, February 25). Working-Class Desertion of Labour Started Before Corbyn. Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/feb/25/wings-labour-blame-electoral-collapse. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  39. Morrison, J. (2018). Scroungers: Moral Panics and Media Myths. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  40. Office for Budget Responsibility. (2013). 2013 Fiscal Sustainability Report. Available at: http://budgetresponsibility.org.uk/docs/dlm_uploads/2013-FSR_OBR_web.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  41. Office for National Statistics. (2013). Public Service Productivity Estimates: Total Public Services, 2010. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/psa/public-sector-productivity-66estimates%2D%2Dtotal-public-sector/2010/art-public-service-productivity-estimates.html. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  42. Office for National Statistics. (2017). Claimant Count and Vacancies Time Series Dataset. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peoplenotinwork/unemployment/datasets/claimantcountandvacanciesdataset. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  43. Olsen, K. M., Kalleberg, A. L., & Nesheim, T. (2010). Perceived Job Quality in the United States, Great Britain, Norway and West Germany, 1989–2005. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 16(3), 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Philo, G. (1990). Seeing and Believing: The Influence of Television. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Philo, G. (2001). Media Effects and the Active Audience. Sociology Review, 10(3), 26–29.Google Scholar
  46. Philo, G. (2004). The Mass Production of Ignorance: News Content and Audience. In C. A. Paterson & A. Sreberny (Eds.), International News in the 21st Century. Eastleigh: University of Luton Press.Google Scholar
  47. Philo, G., Briant, E., & Donald, P. (2013). Bad News for Refugees. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  48. Plant, R. (2003). Citizenship and Social Security. Fiscal Studies, 24(2), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roberts, C. (2017). The Language of “Welfare Dependency” and “Benefit Cheats”: Internalising and Reproducing the Hegemonic and Discursive Rhetoric of “Benefit Scroungers”. In A. Mooney & E. Sifaki (Eds.), The Language of Money and Debt (pp. 189–204). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rodger, J. J. (2003). Social Solidarity, Welfare and Post-Emotionalism. Journal of Social Policy, 32(3), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rutherford, T. (2013). Historical Rates of Social Security Benefits. House of Commons Library SN/SG 6762. Available from: http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN06762/SN06762.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  52. Sage, D. (2012). Fair Conditions and Fair Consequences? Exploring New Labour, Welfare Contractualism and Social Attitudes. Social Policy and Society, 11(3), 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schneider, E. C., Sarnak, D. O., Squires, D., Shah, A., & Doty, M. M. (2017). Mirror, Mirror 2017: International Comparison Reflects Flaws and Opportunities for Better U.S. Health Care. The Commonwealth Fund. Available at: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/interactives/2017/july/mirror-mirror/. Accessed 9 July 2018.
  54. Skeggs, B., & Wood, H. (2012). Reacting to Reality Television: Performance, Audience and Value. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Standing, G. (2014). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  56. Taylor-Gooby, P., & Martin, R. (2008). Trends in Sympathy for the Poor. In A. Park et al. (Eds.), British Social Attitudes: The 24th Report. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  57. Taylor-Gooby, P., & Taylor, E. (2015). Benefits and Welfare: Long-Term Trends or Short-Term Reactions? British Social Attitudes, 32. Available at: http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/media/38977/bsa32_welfare.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2018.
  58. Tyler, I. (2008). “CHAV MUM CHAV SCUM” Class Disgust in Contemporary Britain. Feminist Media Studies, 8(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vargas-Silva, C. (2017). The Fiscal Impact of Immigration in the UK. Available at: http://www.migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/resources/briefings/the-fiscal-impact-of-immigration-in-the-uk/. Accessed 10 July 2018.
  60. White, S. (2000). Social Rights and the Social Contract: Political Theory and the New Welfare Politics. British Journal of Political Science, 30(3), 507–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. YouGov. (2010a). Unavoidable Cuts. Available at: https://yougov.co.uk/news/2010/10/19/unavoidable-cuts-story/. Accessed 10 July 2018.
  62. YouGov. (2010b). YouGov/Demos Survey Results. Available at: https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/today_uk_import/YG-Archives-Pol-Demos-Govt-210510.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike Berry
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations