From Collegial Governance to Boardism: Reconfiguring Governance in Higher Education

  • Amélia Veiga
  • António Magalhães
  • Alberto Amaral

Abstract

Until the last quarter of the 20th century, many European universities had been primarily governed by academics, and the state acted as a buffer protecting higher education institutions and academics from the interference of external interests (Neave, 2012) and held ruling power over non-academic matters. From a normative stance, less than half a century ago, Moodie and Eustace still considered that in universities, ‘the supreme authority … must … continue to rest with the academics’ (Moodie and Eustace, 1974, p. 233), and Burton Clark (1983) argued that the adoption of models based on the metaphor of organized anarchy would be more appropriate for allowing individuals and research teams to liberate their inventive capacity and to produce innovative ideas.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Hoxby, C. M., Mas-Colell, A. and A. Sapir (2009) The governance and performance of research universities: evidence from Europe and the U.S. (Vol. Working Paper 14851): National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amaral, A. and A. Magalhães (2001) ‘On markets, autonomy and regulation the Janus Head revisited’, Higher Education Policy, 14(1), 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amaral, A., Tavares, O. and C. Santos (2013) ‘Higher education reform in Portugal: A historical and comparative perspective of the new legal framework for public universities’, Higher Education Policy, 26, 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackmore, J., Brennan, M. and L. Zipin (2010) ‘Re-positioning university governance and academic work: an overview’, in J. Blackmore, M. Brennan and L. Zipin (eds) Re-positioning University Governance and Academic Work (pp. 1–16) (Rotterdam: Sense Publishers).Google Scholar
  5. Bleiklie, I. (2009) ‘Norway: from tortoise to eager beaver’, in C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie and E. Ferlie (eds) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives (pp. 127–152) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleiklie, I. and M. Kogan (2007) ‘Organization and governance of universities’, Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bleiklie, I., Enders, J. and B. Lepori (2013) ‘Special Issue: transforming universities in Europe’, Higher Education, 65(1).Google Scholar
  8. Boston, J. (2011) ‘Basic NPM ideas and their development’, in T. Cristensen and P. Laegreid (eds) The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management (pp. 17–32) (Surrey: Ashgate Publishing).Google Scholar
  9. Brunsson, N. and K. Sahlin-Andersen (2000) ‘Constructing organizations: the example of public sector reform’, Organization Studies, 21, 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CABSS Working Party on Corporate and Academic Governance (2013) Corporate and Academic Governance in the New Regulatory Environment. University of Western Sydney: Conference of Chairs of Academic Boards and Senates.Google Scholar
  11. CHEPS (2007) The extent and impact of higher education governance reform across Europe — final report to the Directorate-General for Education and Culture of the European Commission (Vol. 1) (Enschede).Google Scholar
  12. Clark, B. (1983) The Higher Education System (California: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  13. Crellin, M. A. (2010) ‘The future of shared governance’, New Directions for Higher Education, 2010(151), 71–81. doi: 10.1002/he.402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Boer, H., Enders, J. and L. Leisyte (2007) ‘Public sector reform in Dutch higher education: the organizational transformation of the university’, Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dennis, J. G., Bhoendradatt Tewarie, A. and J. Quinton White (2003) ‘Governance in the twenty-first-century university: approaches to effective leadership and strategic management’, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 30(1).Google Scholar
  16. Dill, D., Teixeira, P., Jongbloed, B. and A. Amaral (2004) ‘Conclusion’, in P. Teixeira, J. Jongbloed, D. Dill and A. Amaral (eds) Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or Reality? (pp. 327–353) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Enders, J., de Boer, H. and E. Weyer (2013) ‘Regulatory autonomy and performance: the reform of higher education re-visited’, Higher Education, 65(1), 5–23. doi: 10.1007/s10734–012–9578–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. European Students’ Union (ESU) (2012) Bologna with Student Eyes. Brussels: ESU.Google Scholar
  19. Ferlie, E., Musselin, C. and G. Andresani (2009) ‘The governance of higher education systems: a public management perspective’, in C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie and E. Ferlie (eds) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspective (pp. 1–19) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fisher, D., Locke, W. and K. Cummings (2011) ‘Comparative perspectives: emerging findings and further investigations’, in W. Locke, K. Cummings and D. Fisher (eds) Changing Governance and Management in Higher Education. The Perspectives of the Academy (pp. 369–379) (Dordrecht: Springer).Google Scholar
  21. Gallos, J. V. (2009) ‘Reframing shared governance: rediscovering the soul of campus collaboration’, Journal of Management Inquiry. doi: 10.1177/1056492608326326Google Scholar
  22. Gornitzka, Å., Kyvik, S. and B. Stensaker (2005) ‘Implementation analysis in higher education’, in A. Gornitzka, M. Kogan and A. Amaral (eds) Reform and Change in Higher Education (pp. 35–56) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones, G. A. (2002) ‘The structure of university governance in Canada: a policy network approach’, in A. Amaral, G. A. Jones and B. Karseth (eds) Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance (pp. 213–234) (Dorderecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones, W. A. (2011) ‘Faculty involvement in institutional governance: a literature review’, Journal of the Professoriate, 6(1), 117–135.Google Scholar
  25. Kells, H. R. (1992) Self-Regulation in Higher Education (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers).Google Scholar
  26. Kerr, C. (2001) The Uses of the University (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  27. Kretek, P., Dragšić, Ž. and B. Kehm (2013) ‘Transformation of university governance: on the role of university board members’, Higher Education, 65(1), 39–58. doi: 10.1007/s10734–012–9580-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Magalhães, A. and A. Veiga (2013) ‘What about education in higher education?’ in L. Smith (ed) Higher Education: Recent Trends, Emerging Issues and Future Outlook (pp. 57–72) (New York: Nova Science Publishers).Google Scholar
  29. Magalhães, A., Veiga, A., Amaral, A., Sousa, S. and F. Ribeiro (2013) ‘Governance of governance in higher education: practices and lessons drawn from the Portuguese case’, Higher Education Quarterly, 67(3), 295–311, doi: 10.111/hequ12021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Magalhães, A., Veiga, A. and A. Amaral (2014) The Changing Role of External Stakeholders: Effective Actors, Imaginary Friends or Non-Interfering Friends? Paper presented at the International Research Society for Public Management (IRSPM), Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  31. Marginson, S. and M. Considine (2000) The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Re-invention in Australia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  32. Meek, L. (2003) ‘Introduction’, in A. Amaral, V. L. Meek and I. M. Larsen (eds) The Higher Education Managerial Revolution? (pp. 1–29) (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meek, L. and D. Davies (2009) ‘Policy dynamics in higher education and research: concepts and observations’, in V. L. Meek, U. Teichler and M. L. Kearney (eds) Higher Education Research and Innovation: Changing Dynamics (Kassel: UNESCO Forum on Higher Education).Google Scholar
  34. Minor, J. T. (2004) ‘Understanding faculty senates: moving from mystery to models’, Review of Higher Education, 27(3), 343-+. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2004.0004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moodie, G. C. and R. B. Eustace (1974) Power and Authority in British Universities (Oxford: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
  36. Moscati, R. (2009) ‘The implementation of Bologna process in Italy’, in A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin and P. Maassen (eds) European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research (pp. 207–225) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Musselin, C. and C. Paradeise (2009) ‘France: from incremental transitions to institutional change’, in C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie and E. Ferlie (eds) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspective (pp. 21–49) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neave, G. (2012) ‘Change, leverage, suasion and intent: an historical excursion across three decades of change in higher education’, in Western Europe Managing Reform in Universities — The Dynamics of Culture, Identity and Organizational Change (pp. 19–40) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  39. Olson, G. A. (2009) ‘Exactly what is “Shared Governance”?’ The Chronicle of Higher Education, July 23, 2009, http://chronicle.com/article/Exactly-What-Is-Shared/47065/
  40. Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I. and E. Ferlie (2009) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Paradeise, C., Reale, E. and G. Gostellec (2009) ‘A comparative approach to higher education reforms in western European countries’, in C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie and E. Ferlie (eds) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives (pp. 197–225) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reale, E. and B. Potí (2009) ‘Italy: local policy legacy and moving to an “in between” configuration’, in C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie and E. Ferlie (eds) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspective (Dordrecht: Springer).Google Scholar
  43. Ritzen, J. (2011) A Framework for Scoring the Empowerment of Universities in the EU Member States. Paper presented at the University Policy for Strengthening Competitiveness and Social Cohesion, Maastricht.Google Scholar
  44. Schimank, U. and S. Lange (2009) ‘Germany: a latercomer to new public management’, in C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie and E. Ferlie (eds) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives (pp. 51–76) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schuetz, P. (1999) ‘Shared governance in community colleges’, Eric Digests, 4.Google Scholar
  46. Seeber, M., Lepori, B., Montauti, M., Enders, J., de Boer, H., Weyer, E., Bleiklie, K., Hope, S., Michelsen, G., Mathisen, N., Frølich, L., Scordato, B., Stensaker, E., Waagene, Z., Dragsic, P., Kretek, G., Krücken, A., Magalhães, F., Ribeiro, S., Sousa, A., Veiga, R., Santiago, G., Marini, and E. Reale (2014) ‘European universities as complete organizations? understanding identity, hierarchy and rationality in public organizations’, Public Management Review, 1–31. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2014.943268Google Scholar
  47. Shattock, M. (2006) Good Governance in Higher Education (Berkshire: Open University Press).Google Scholar
  48. Shattock, M. (2012) ‘University governance’, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 16(2), 56–61. doi: 10.1080/13603108.2011.645082Google Scholar
  49. Stoessel, J. W. (2013) ‘Conceptualizing the shared governance model in American higher education: considering the governing board, President and faculty’, Student Pulse, 5(12). http://www.studentpulse.com/a?id=818
  50. Trakman, L. (2008) ‘Modelling University Governance’, Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1–2), 63–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00384.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trow, M. (1985) ‘Comparative reflections on leadership in higher education’, European Journal of Education, 20(2/3), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vilkinas, T. and M. Peters (2013) ‘Academic governance provided by academic boards within the Australian higher education sector’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 36(1), 15–28. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2013.825419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Westerheijden, D., de Boer, H. and J. Enders (2009) ‘An “Echternach” Procession in different directions: oscillating steps towards reform’, in C. Paradeise, E. Reale, I. Bleiklie and E. Ferlie (eds) University Governance: Western European Comparative Perspectives (pp. 103–125) (Dordrecht: Springer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Amélia Veiga, António Magalhães and Alberto Amaral 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amélia Veiga
  • António Magalhães
  • Alberto Amaral

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations