The Power of Sacrifice

“Physical Force” and Women’s Work
  • Nicoletta F. Gullace
Chapter

Abstract

Mabel Lethbridge was only seventeen years old at the time of the accident that would change her life. In 1916 she “lied to her mother” about the type of work she planned to do and “lied about her age” to get into the munitions factory. Historian David Mitchell tells the story from rare interview with her “nearly fifty years and forty five operations later.” After working in the factory at Hayes, near London, for less than a week, “she volunteered to work one of the antiquated ‘monkey machines’ that forced a mixture of amatol and TNT down into the 18-pounder shell cases. Four girls hauled on a rope to raise a massive weight (the ‘beater’) and then, at a signal, let it drop on the mixture, until it was packed tight.” Although the Ministry of Munitions had condemned this dangerous way of handling TNT, the new machines had not yet arrived at the works, and Miss Lethbridge and her friends were forced to continue filling shells in a manner that had already resulted in numerous accidents. “Toward the end of her shift, as Mabel gave the signal to lower and the ‘beater’ descended on yet another shell, there was a frightful explosion. The workers were blown to bits or burned alive, and she was the sole survivor. Appallingly wounded, she was unconscious for ten days; her left leg was amputated, and surgeons cut and stitched and grafted away at her shattered body.” She was awarded the Order of the British Empire for her bravery, but it must have been poor consolation for the loss of that limb.1

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    David Mitchell, Women on the Warpath: The Story of the Women of the First World War (London: Jonathan Cape, 1966), pp. 247–248.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    New York Tribune, October 31, 1914, reprinted in Midge Mackenzie ed., Shoulder to Shoulder A Documentary (London: Alfred Knopf, 1975), p. 290.Google Scholar
  3. 18.
    For a lucid discussion of militant “reformist terrorism,” see Cheryl R. Jorgensen-Earp, ed., Speeches and Trials of the Militant Suffragettes: The Womens Social and Political Union, 1903–1918 (London: Associated University Presses, 1999), pp.135–137.Google Scholar
  4. 21.
    Ray Strachey, The Cause: A Short History of the Womens Movement in Great Britain (Bath: Cedrick Chivers Portway, 1928), p. 347.Google Scholar
  5. 22.
    Arthur Marwick, The Deluge: British Society and the First World War (New York: Norton, 1965), p. 89.Google Scholar
  6. 45.
    See Vera Brittain, Testament of Youth (London: Penguin [1933], 1989), p. 372.Google Scholar
  7. Anne Summers, Angels and Citizens: British Women as Military Nurses 1854–1914 (London: Routledge, 1988).Google Scholar
  8. 63.
    Angela Woollacott, On Her Their Lives Depend: Munitions Workers in the Great War, (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994), pp. 2.Google Scholar
  9. 87.
    Quoted in Susan Kingsley Kent, Making Peace: The Reconstruction of Gender in Interwar Britain (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), p. 83.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Nicoletta F. Gullace 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicoletta F. Gullace

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations