Collaboration in Augmented Reality: How to establish coordination and joint attention?

  • Christian Schnier
  • Karola Pitsch
  • Angelika Dierker
  • Thomas Hermann
Conference paper

Abstract

We present an initial investigation from a semi-experimental setting, in which an HMD-based AR-system has been used for real-time collaboration in a task-oriented scenario (design of a museum exhibition). Analysis points out the specific conditions of interacting in an AR environment and focuses on one particular practical problem for the participants in coordinating their interaction: how to establish joint attention towards the same object or referent. Analysis allows insights into how the pair of users begins to familarize with the environment, the limitations and opportunities of the setting and how they establish new routines for e.g. solving the ‘joint attention’-problem.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arthur, K. (2000): Effects of field of view on performance with head-mounted displays. Dissertation, University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  2. Azuma, R. (1997): ‘A Survey of Augmented Reality’, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 6, no. 4, August 1997, pp. 355–385.Google Scholar
  3. Billinghurst, M. and Kato, H. (2002): ‘Collaborative Augmented Reality’, Communication of the ACM, vol. 45, no. 7, 2002, pp. 64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, S., Chena, X., Dickinsona, C., Neidera, M. and Zelinsky, G. (2008): ‘Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search’, Cognition, vol. 106, no. 3, March 2008, pp. 1465–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caudell, T. and Mizell, D. (1992): Augmented Reality: An Application of Head-Up Display Technology to Manual Manufacturing Processes, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 2, January 1992, pp. 659–669.Google Scholar
  6. Deppermann, A. and Schmitt, R. (2006): ‘Koordination. Zur Begründung eines neues Forschungsgegenstands’, in: R. Schmitt (ed.): Koordination. Gunter Narr Verlag Tübingen.Google Scholar
  7. Dierker, A., Pitsch, K. and Hermann, T. (2011): An augmented-reality-based scenario for the collaborative construction of an interactive museum. Bielefeld: Bielefeld University.Google Scholar
  8. Dierker, A., Bovermann, T., Hanheide, M., Hermann, T. and Sagerer, G. (2009): A multimodal augmented reality system for alignment research, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 422–426, San Diego, USA. Google Scholar
  9. Fraser, M., Glover, T., Vaghi, I., Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Hindmarsh, J. and Heath, C. (2000): Revealing the Realities of Collaborative Virtual Reality. Google Scholar
  10. Goodwin, C. (2000): ‘Action and embodiment within situated human interaction’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 32, no. 10, September 2000, pp. 1489- 1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1980): ‘Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences’, Sociological Inquiry, vol. 50, no. 3, July 1980, pp. 303–317.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaplan, F. and Hafner, V. (2006): ‘The challanges of joint attention’, Interaction Studies, vol 7 no. 2, pp. 135–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kato, H. and Billinghurst, M. (1999): Marker tracking and hmd calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system, Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality, pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
  14. Kollenberg, T. et al. (2008). Visual Search in the (Un)Real World: How Head Mounted Displays Affect Eye Movements, Head Movements and Target Detection. ACM SIGGRAPH conference proceedings.Google Scholar
  15. Kuzuoka, H., Yamazaki, K., Yamazaki, A., Kosaka, J., Suga, Y. and Heath, C. (2004): Dual Ecologies of Robot as Communication Media: Thoughts on Coordinating Orientations and Projectability. SIGHCI conference on Human factors in computing systems.Google Scholar
  16. Luff, P. et al. (2003): ‘Fractured ecologies’, Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 18, 1, pp. 51–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luff, P., Heath, C., and Pitsch, K. (2009): ‘Indefinite precision: the use of artefacts-in-interaction in design work’, in C. Jewitt: The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, 213–224.Google Scholar
  18. Milgram, P. and Kishino, F. (1994): A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Virtual Displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E77-D, 9 (September 1994), pp. 1321–1329.Google Scholar
  19. Pitsch, K. & Krafft, U. (2010): ‘Von der emergenten Erfindung zu konventionalisiert darstellbarem Wissen. Zur Herstellung visueller Vorstellungen bei Museums-Designern’, in U. Dausendschön-Gay, Ch. Domke & S. Ohlhus (eds.): Wissen in (Inter-)Aktion. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 189–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmalstieg, D., Fuhrmann, A., Szalavari, Z. and Gervautz, M. (1996). Studierstube – An Environment for Collaboration in Augmented Reality, in CVE ´96 Workshop Proceedings, 19–20th September 1996, Nottingham, Great Britain.Google Scholar
  21. Yamashita, J., Kuzuoka, H., Yamazaki, K., Miki, H., Yamazaki, A., Kato, H. and Suzuky, H.(1999): Agora: Supporting Multi-participant Telecollaboration, Proc. of HCI, pp. 543–547.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Schnier
    • 1
  • Karola Pitsch
    • 1
  • Angelika Dierker
    • 1
  • Thomas Hermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Applied InformaticsBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations