Advertisement

Perceptions of Users and Carers in Supporting Diabetes Care: Practical Guidance, Support and Information for Carers

  • Mima Cattan
Chapter

Abstract

One of the difficulties older people often face is being treated as bits of chronic health problems, illnesses and illness symptoms instead of being viewed as individuals with the same needs, desires and rights as any other age or service user group. Although diabetes services have improved over the past decade, and recognise that service users and their carers with the right support are able to manage their diabetes, many people with diabetes still report that they do not have a voice in the actual planning of their care [2, 3]. Diabetes is not just a condition of old age but, because type 2 diabetes is more commonly diagnosed in adults over the age of 40, there are particular issues relating to support and care that are more relevant to older people with diabetes and their carers.

Keywords

Health Belief Model Blood Glucose Testing Patient Education Programme Ethnic Minority Community Critical Health Literacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Owen, T., Dying in Older Age, reflections and experiences from an older person’s perspective. 2005, Help the Aged: London.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Audit Commission, Testing Times. A review of diabetes services in England and Wales. 2000, The Audit Commission: London.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Commission for Health Care Audit and Inspection, Managing diabetes. Improving services for people with diabetes. 2007, Commission for Health Care Audit and Inspection: London.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Department of Health, Personal budgets for older people - making it happen. 2010, DH: London.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Skovlund, S. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs. Diabetes Voice 2004 49: 411.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mosnier-Pudar, H., Hochberg G, Eschwege E,Virally M-L, Halimi S et al., How do patients with type 2 diabetes perceive their disease? Insights from the French DIABASIS survey. Diabet Metab 2009. 35: 220–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baksi, A.K., Experiences in peer-to-peer training in diabetes mellitus: challenges and implications. Family Practice 2010. 27: I40-I45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lawson, V.L., Bundy C, Harvey JN, The influence of health threat communication and personality traits on personal models of diabetes in newly diagnosed diabetic patients. Diabet Med 2007. 24:883–891.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Visram, S. Bremner AS, Harrington B E, Hawthorne G. Factors affecting uptake of an education and physical activity programme for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Eur Diabetes Nurs 2008. 5: 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Insulin Dependent Diabetes Trust. Carers and Diabetes. 2011 05 January 2011]; Available from: http://www.iddt.org/carers-corner/carers-and-diabetes/.
  11. 11.
    Simmons, D., Voyle JA, Rush E, Dear M. The New Zealand experience in peer support interventions among people with diabetes. Family Practice, 2010. 27: I53-I61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sinclair, A.J.,Armes DG, Randhawa R, Bayer AJ. Caring for older adults with diabetes mellitus: characteristics of carers and their prime roles and responsibilities. Diabet Med 2010. 27:1055–1059.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Department of Health, National Service Framework for Diabetes. 2001, DH: London.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    GfK Health Care, Choosing to Take Control in Type 2 Diabetes. 2007, GfK Health Care, Lilly, International Diabetes Federation.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katbamna, S.,Bhatka P, Ahmad W, Baker R, Parker G Supporting South Asian carers and those they care for: the role of the primary health team. Br J Gen Pract 2002. 52: 300–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones, M., Mac Gillivray S, Kroll T, Zohoor A., How is Self-Care defined in the literature. 2005.www.sdhi.ac.uk/conference06/Martyn%20.Jonesppt.
  17. 17.
    Deakin, T.A., McShane CE, Cade JE,Williams R. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005.Issue 2 Art CD 003417Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Diabetes UK, Structured Patient Education in Diabetes. Report from the Patient Education Working Group. 2005: London.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosenstock, I.M., Strecher VJ, Becker MH, Social Learning Theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Education Quarterly, 1988. 15: 175–183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bandura, A., Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means. Health Edu Behav 2004. 31: 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prochaska, J.O, Di Clemente CC, Stages and processes of self change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983. 51: 390–395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nutbeam, D, Harris E, Theory in a Nutshell. 2004, Sydney: McGraw-Hill Australia.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ellis, S.E.,Speroff T, Dittus RS, Brown A,Pichert JW et al. Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Patient Edu Couns 2004. 52: 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Trief P.M., Teresi JA, Eimicke J, Shea S, Weinstock R. Improvement in diabetes self-efficacy and glycaemic control using telemedicine in a sample of older, ethnically diverse individuals who have diabetes: the IDEATel project. Age Ageing, 2009. 38: 219–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gambling T, Long AF, The realisation of patient-centred care during a 3-year proactive telephone counselling self-care intervention for diabetes. Patient Edu Couns 2010. 80: 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Greenhalgh, T.,Campbell-Richards D, Vijayaghavan S, Collard AP, Malik F et al., The sharing stories model of diabetes self management education for minority ethnic groups: a pilot randomised controlled trial. 2009, University College London: London.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Danish Centre for Health Technology Assessment, N.B.o.H., Patient Education – a Health Technology Assessment; summary. 2009, National Board of Health, Monitoring & Health Technology Assessment: Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    George, S.R., Thomas SP. Lived experience of diabetes among older, rural people. J Adv Nurs 2010. 66:1092–1100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Collins, M.M., Bradley CP, O’Sullivan T, Perry IJ. Self-care coping strategies in people with diabetes: a qualitative exploratory study. BMC Endocr Disord 2009. 9(6).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perry, J., Beyer S, Francis J, Holmes P. Ethical issues in the use of telecare. 2010, Social Care Institute for Excellence: London.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beauchamp, T.L., Childress JF, Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 4th ed. 1994, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jack, L., Liburd L, Spencer T, Airhihenbuwa CO. Understanding the environmental issues in diabetes self-management education research: a reexamination of 8 studies in community-based settings. Ann Intern Med 2004. 140: 964–971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grace, C. Nutrition-related health management in a Bangladeshi community. in Nutrition and health: cell to community. 2010. Edinburgh: Nutrition Soc, Scottish Section.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hawthorne, K., Robles Y, Cannings-John R, Edwards AGK Culturally appropriate health education for type 2 diabetes mellitus in ethnic minority groups (Review). 2008, The Cochrane Collaboration.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Glendinning, C., Challis D, Fernandez JL, Jacobs S, Jones K et al., Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme, summary report. 2008 Social Policy Research Unit, University of York: York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mima Cattan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Health, Community and Education StudiesNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations