Skip to main content

Mechanism Design for Incentivizing Social Media Contributions

  • Chapter
Social Media Modeling and Computing

Abstract

Despite recent advancements in user-driven social media platforms, tools for studying user behavior patterns and motivations remain primitive. We highlight the voluntary nature of user contributions and that users can choose when (and when not) to contribute to the common media pool. A Game theoretic framework is proposed to study the dynamics of social media networks where contribution costs are individual but gains are common. We model users as rational selfish agents, and consider domain attributes like voluntary participation, virtual reward structure, network effect, and public-sharing to model the dynamics of this interaction. The created model describes the most appropriate contribution strategy from each user’s perspective and also highlights issues like ‘free-rider’ problem and individual rationality leading to irrational (i.e. sub-optimal) group behavior. We also consider the perspective of the system designer who is interested in finding the best incentive mechanisms to influence the selfish end-users so that the overall system utility is maximized. We propose and compare multiple mechanisms (based on optimal bonus payment, social incentive leveraging, and second price auction) to study how a system designer can exploit the selfishness of its users, to design incentive mechanisms which improve the overall task-completion probability and system performance, while possibly still benefiting the individual users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The use of perceived changes in games to try and influence agent interaction is well studied under hyper-game theory [24].

  2. 2.

    Strictly speaking, system designer needs to provide the lowest cost agent with a bonus that is just a fraction above its cost (i.e. b=c 1+ε). This will make the ‘Do’ strategy dominate for the user. However, in a cooperative setting, it is often considered better to grant a ‘fair share’ of the additional benefit the agent brings to the system by participating. Further still, the extra bonus serves as an implicit signaling mechanism to ensure overall system gains.

References

  1. Dellarocas, C.: Reputation mechanism design in online trading environments with pure moral hazard. Inf. Syst. Res. 16(2), 209–230 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Diamond, P.A., Mirrlees, J.A.: Optimal taxation and public production II: Tax rules. Am. Econ. Rev. 61(3), 261–278 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman, E., Halpern, J., Kash, I.: Efficiency and Nash equilibria in a scrip system for p2p networks. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Google Image Labeler: http://images.google.com/imagelabeler/, Last accessed: 07/06/2009

  5. Harper, F.M., Li, S.X., Chen, Y., Konstan, J.A.: Social comparisons to motivate contributions to an online community. Persuasive Technology, 4744/2007, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  6. Howe, J.: The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag. 14(6), 1–4 (2006)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahneman, D.: Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 93(5), 1449–1475 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, O., Walker, M.: The free rider problem: Experimental evidence. Public Choice 43(1), 3–24 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lévy, P.: Collective Intelligence: Mankind’s Emerging World in Cyberspace. Perseus Books, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maia, M., Almeida, J., Almeida, V.: Identifying user behavior in online social networks. In: SocialNets ’08: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Social Network Systems, pp. 1–6 (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Microsoft photo-synth project: http://photosynth.net/, Last accessed: 07/06/2009

  12. New York Times launches ‘citizen journalism’ sites: http://washingtonsquarepark.wordpress.com/2009/03/03/new-york-times-launches-citizen-journalism-sites/, Last accessed: 07/06/2009

  13. Nov, O., Naaman, M., Ye, C.: Motivational, structural, and tenure factors that impact online community photo sharing. In: Proceedings of the Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM 2009). Retrieved November, vol. 13, p. 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Olson, M.: The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Onnela, J.-P., Reed-Tsochas, F.: Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Osborne, M.J.: An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Park, J., van der Schaar, M.: A game theoretic analysis of incentives in content production and sharing over peer-to-peer networks. In: IEEE Thematic Meetings on Signal Processing: Signal and Information Processing for Social Networks, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schelling, T.C.: Micromotives and Macrobehavior. Norton, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schroer, J., Hertel, G.: Voluntary engagement in an open web-based encyclopedia: Wikipedians and why they do it. Media Psychol. 12(1), 96–120 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shirky, C.: Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. Penguin, Baltimore (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singh, V., Jain, R., Kankanhalli, M.: Motivating contributors in social media networks. In: Proceedings of the first SIGMM Workshop on Social Media, pp. 11–18. ACM, New York (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun, L., Vassileva, J.: Social visualization encouraging participation in online communities. In: Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  23. Terdiman, D.: The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Second Life: Making Money in the Metaverse. Sybex, Berkeley (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vane, R.: Advances in hypergame theory. In: Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents—Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  25. von Ahn, L.: Games with a purpose. Computer 39(6), 92–94 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wikipedia: http://www.wikipedia.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek K. Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Singh, V.K., Jain, R., Kankanhalli, M. (2011). Mechanism Design for Incentivizing Social Media Contributions. In: Hoi, S., Luo, J., Boll, S., Xu, D., Jin, R., King, I. (eds) Social Media Modeling and Computing. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-436-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-436-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-435-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-436-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics