Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management pp 178-185 | Cite as
Dynamic Reliability Analysis for Automotive Applications
Conference paper
Abstract
Reliability and safety analysis becomes increasingly important in the development of automotive systems. Additionally to problems that can be treated with classical methods like FMEA or FTA there are applications where it seems to be useful to apply methods of Dynamic Reliability Analysis. An example of a state transition diagram is given that is analysed with Monte Carlo simulation under use of different biasing techniques.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Verband Deutscher Automobilindustrie (VDA), System FMEA, Reihe Qualitätsmanagement in der Automobilindustrie, Bd. 4 Teil 2, Germany, 1996Google Scholar
- 2.Verband Deutscher Automobilindustrie (VDA), Zuverlässigkeits-Methoden und — Hilfsmittel, Reihe Qualitätsmanagement in der Automobilindustrie, Bd. 3 Teil 2, Germany, 1996Google Scholar
- 3.Eckrich M. et al., Active Steering — Requirements for System Safety and Development Process, 11. Aachener Kolloquium Fahrzeug-und Motorentechnik, Germany, 2002Google Scholar
- 4.Meyna A., Pauli B., Taschenbuch der Zuverlässigkeits-und Sicherheitstechnik, Carl Hanser Verlag, München, 2003Google Scholar
- 5.Siu N., Risk assessment of dynamic systems: An overview, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 43, p 43–73, 1994Google Scholar
- 6.Marseguerra M., Zio E., Basics of the Monte Carlo Method with Application to System Reliability, Serving Life-Long Learning, Hagen, 2002Google Scholar
- 7.Labeau K. P., Zio E., Biasing schemes in component-based and system-based Monte Carlo algorithms in system engineering, ESREL 2001Google Scholar
- 8.Lewis E. E., Böhm F., Monte Carlo Simulation of Markov Unreliability Models, Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 77, 1984Google Scholar
- 9.Marseguerra M., Zio E., Cadini F., Biased Monte Carlo unavailability analysis for systems with time-dependent failure rates, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 76, 2002Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag London 2004