Quantile-Based Reliability Analysis pp 1-28 | Cite as
Quantile Functions
Abstract
A probability distribution can be specified either in terms of the distribution function or by the quantile function. This chapter addresses the problem of describing the various characteristics of a distribution through its quantile function. We give a brief summary of the important milestones in the development of this area of research. The definition and properties of the quantile function with examples are presented. In Table 1.1, quantile functions of various life distributions, representing different data situations, are included. Descriptive measures of the distributions such as location, dispersion and skewness are traditionally expressed in terms of the moments. The limitations of such measures are pointed out and some alternative quantile-based measures are discussed. Order statistics play an important role in statistical analysis. Distributions of order statistics in quantile forms, their properties and role in reliability analysis form the next topic in the chapter. There are many problems associated with the use of conventional moments in modelling and analysis. Exploring these, and as an alternative, the definition, properties and application of L-moments in describing a distribution are presented. Finally, the role of certain graphical representations like the Q-Q plot, box-plot and leaf-plot are shown to be useful tools for a preliminary analysis of the data.
Keywords
Order Statistic Residual Life Quantile Function Life Testing Experiment Pitman ClosenessReferences
- 15.Abromowitz, M., Stegun, I.A.: Handbook of Mathematical Functions: Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables. Applied Mathematics Series, vol. 55. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC (1964)Google Scholar
- 18.Adamidis, K., Loukas, S.: A lifetime distribution with decreasing failure rate. Stat. Probab. Lett. 39, 35–42 (1998)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Arnold, B.C., Balakrishnan, N., Nagaraja, H.N.: A First Course in Order Statistics. Wiley, New York (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 41.Avinadav, T., Raz, T.: A new inverted hazard rate function. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 57, 32–40 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 47.Balakrishnan, N.: Order statistics from the half logistic distribution. J. Stat. Comput. Simulat. 20, 287–309 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Balakrishnan, N. (ed.): Handbook of the Logistic Distribution. Marcel Dekker, New York (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 49.Balakrishnan, N., Aggarwala, R.: Relationships for moments of order statistics from the right-truncated generalized half logistic distribution. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 48, 519–534 (1996)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Balakrishnan, N., Cohen, A.C.: Order Statistics and Inference: Estimation Methods. Academic, Boston (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 52.Balakrishnan, N., Davies, K., Keating, J.P., Mason, R.L.: Computation of optimal plotting points based on Pitman closeness with an application to goodness-of-fit for location-scale families. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 56, 2637–2649 (2012)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Balakrishnan, N., Kundu, D.: Hybrid censoring: Models, inferential results and applications (with discussions). Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 57, 166–209 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.Balakrishnan, N., Rao, C.R.: Order Statistics: Theory and Methods. Handbook of Statistics, vol. 16. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
- 57.Balakrishnan, N., Rao, C.R.: Order Statistics - Applications. Handbook of Statistics, vol. 17. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1998)Google Scholar
- 59.Balakrishnan, N., Sandhu, R.: Recurrence relations for single and product moments of order statistics from a generalized half logistic distribution, with applications to inference. J. Stat. Comput. Simulat. 52, 385–398 (1995)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.Balakrishnan, N., Wong, K.H.T.: Approximate MLEs for the location and scale parameters of the half-logistic distribution with Type-II right-censoring. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 40, 140–145 (1991)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.Balanda, K.P., MacGillivray, H.L.: Kurtosis: a critical review. Am. Stat. 42, 111–119 (1988)Google Scholar
- 140.Chen, G., Balakrishnan, N.: The infeasibility of probability weighted moments estimation of some generalized distributions. In: Balakrishnan, N. (ed.) Recent Advances in Life-Testing and Reliability, pp. 565–573. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1995)Google Scholar
- 154.Cohen, A.C.: Truncated and Censored Samples: Theory and Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York (1991)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 178.Dimitrakopoulou, T., Adamidis, K., Loukas, S.: A life distribution with an upside down bathtub-shaped hazard function. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 56, 308–311 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 187.Elamir, E.A.H., Seheult, A.H.: Trimmed L-moments. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 43, 299–314 (2003)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 188.Erto, P.: Genesis, properties and identification of the inverse Weibull lifetime model. Statistica Applicato 1, 117–128 (1989)Google Scholar
- 194.Falk, M.: On MAD and comedians. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 45, 615–644 (1997)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 197.Filliben, J.J.: Simple and robust linear estimation of the location parameter of a symmetric distribution. Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University, Princeton (1969)Google Scholar
- 203.Freimer, M., Mudholkar, G.S., Kollia, G., Lin, C.T.: A study of the generalised Tukey lambda family. Comm. Stat. Theor. Meth. 17, 3547–3567 (1988)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 204.Fry, T.R.L.: Univariate and multivariate Burr distributions. Pakistan J. Stat. 9, 1–24 (1993)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 206.Galton, F.: Statistics by inter-comparison with remarks on the law of frequency error. Phil. Mag. 49, 33–46 (1875)Google Scholar
- 207.Galton, F.: Enquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. MacMillan, London (1883)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 208.Galton, F.: Natural Inheritance. MacMillan, London (1889)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 215.Gilchrist, W.G.: Statistical Modelling with Quantile Functions. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 225.Greenwich, M.: A unimodal hazard rate function and its failure distribution. Statistische Hefte 33, 187–202 (1992)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 226.Greenwood, J.A., Landwehr, J.M., Matalas, N.C., Wallis, J.R.: Probability weighted moments. Water Resour. Res. 15, 1049–1054 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 227.Groeneveld, R.A., Meeden, G.: Measuring skewness and kurtosis. The Statistician 33, 391–393 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 237.Gupta, R.C., Akman, H.O., Lvin, S.: A study of log-logistic model in survival analysis. Biometrical J. 41, 431–433 (1999)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 239.Gupta, R.C., Gupta, P.L., Gupta, R.D.: Modelling failure time data with Lehmann alternative. Comm. Stat. Theor. Meth. 27, 887–904 (1998)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 240.Gupta, R.C., Gupta, R.D.: Proportional reversed hazards model and its applications. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 137, 3525–3536 (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 250.Gupta, R.D., Kundu, D.: Generalized exponential distribution. Aust. New Zeal. J. Stat. 41, 173–178 (1999)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 257.Hahn, G.J., Shapiro, S.S.: Statistical Models in Engineering. Wiley, New York (1967)Google Scholar
- 264.Hastings, C., Mosteller, F., Tukey, J.W., Winsor, C.P.: Low moments for small samples: A comparative study of statistics. Ann. Math. Stat. 18, 413–426 (1947)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 271.Hinkley, D.V.: On power transformations to symmetry. Biometrika 62, 101–111 (1975)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 273.Hogben, D.: Some properties of Tukey’s test for non-additivity. Ph.D. thesis, The State University of New Jersey, New Jersey (1963)Google Scholar
- 276.Hosking, J.R.M.: L-moments: analysis and estimation of distribution using linear combination of order statistics. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 52, 105–124 (1990)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 277.Hosking, J.R.M.: Moments or L-moments? An example comparing two measures of distributional shape. The Am. Stat. 46, 186–189 (1992)Google Scholar
- 279.Hosking, J.R.M.: Some theoretical results concerning L-moments. Research Report, RC 14492. IBM Research Division, Yorktown Heights, New York (1996)Google Scholar
- 280.Hosking, J.R.M.: On the characterization of distributions by their L-moments. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 136, 193–198 (2006)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 281.Hosking, J.R.M.: Some theory and practical uses of trimmed L-moments. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 137, 3024–3029 (2007)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 282.Hosking, J.R.M., Wallis, J.R.: Regional Frequency Analysis: An Approach based on L-Moments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 299.Joannes, D.L., Gill, C.A.: Comparing measures of sample skewness and kurtosis. The Statistician 47, 183–189 (1998)Google Scholar
- 302.Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S., Balakrishnan, N.: Continuous Univariate Distributions, vol. 2, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1995)Google Scholar
- 304.Joiner, B.L., Rosenblatt, J.R.: Some properties of the range of samples from Tukey’s symmetric lambda distribution. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66, 394–399 (1971)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 306.Jones, M.C.: On some expressions for variance, covariance, skewness and L-moments. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 126, 97–108 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 322.Kececioglu, D.B.: Reliability and Lifetesting Handbook, vol. 1. DEStech Publications, Lancaster (2002)Google Scholar
- 355.Kotz, S., Seier, E.: An analysis of quantile measures of kurtosis, center and tails. Stat. Paper. 50, 553–568 (2009)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 364.Kus, C.: A new lifetime distribution. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51, 4497–4509 (2007)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 368.Lai, C.D., Xie, M.: Stochastic Ageing and Dependence for Reliability. Springer, New York (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 372.Lan, Y., Leemis, L.M.: Logistic exponential survival function. Nav. Res. Logist. 55, 252–264 (2008)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 382.Lehmann, E.L.: The power of rank tests. Ann. Math. Stat. 24, 23–42 (1953)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 407.MacGillivray, H.L.: Skewness properties of asymmetric forms of Tukey-lambda distribution. Comm. Stat. Theor. Meth. 11, 2239–2248 (1982)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 411.Marshall, A.W., Olkin, I.: A new method of adding a parameter to a family of distributions with application to exponential and Weibull families. Biometrika 84, 641–652 (1997)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 412.Marshall, A.W., Olkin, I.: Life Distributions. Springer, New York (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 421.Moors, J.J.A.: A quantile alternative for kurtosis. The Statistician 37, 25–32 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 424.Mudholkar, G.S., Hutson, A.D.: Analogues of L-moments. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 71, 191–208 (1998)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 426.Mudholkar, G.S., Kollia, G.D.: Generalized Weibull family–a structural analysis. Comm. Stat. Theor. Meth. 23, 1149–1171 (1994)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 427.Mudholkar, G.S., Srivastava, D.K., Freimer, M.: The exponentiated Weibull family: A reanalysis of bus motor failure data. Technometrics 37, 436–445 (1995)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 429.Mudholkar, G.S., Srivastava, D.K.: Exponentiated Weibull family for analysing bathtub failure data. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 42, 299–302 (1993)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 434.Murthy, D.N.P., Xie, M., Jiang, R.: Weibull Models. Wiley, Hoboken (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 482.Paranjpe, S.A., Rajarshi, M.B., Gore, A.P.: On a model for failure rates. Biometrical J. 27, 913–917 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 484.Parzen, E.: Nonparametric statistical data modelling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74, 105–122 (1979)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 485.Parzen, E.: Unifications of statistical methods for continuous and discrete data. In: Page, C., Lepage, R. (eds.) Proceedings of Computer Science-Statistics. INTERFACE 1990, pp. 235–242. Springer, New York (1991)Google Scholar
- 487.Parzen, E.: Quality probability and statistical data modelling. Stat. Sci. 19, 652–662 (2004)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 489.Pearson, K.: Tables of Incomplete Beta Function, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1968)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 499.Quetelet, L.A.J.: Letters Addressed to HRH the Grand Duke of Saxe Coburg and Gotha in the Theory of Probability. Charles and Edwin Laton, London (1846). Translated by Olinthus Gregory DownsGoogle Scholar
- 501.Ramberg, J.S.: A probability distribution with applications to Monte Carlo simulation studies. In: Patil, G.P., Kotz, S., Ord, J.K. (eds.) Model Building and Model Selection. Statistical Distributions in Scientific Work, vol. 2. D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1975)Google Scholar
- 502.Ramberg, J.S., Dudewicz, E., Tadikamalla, P., Mykytka, E.: A probability distribution and its uses in fitting data. Technometrics 21, 210–214 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 504.Ramberg, J.S., Schmeiser, B.W.: An approximate method for generating asymmetric random variables. Comm. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 17, 78–82 (1974)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 509.Rohatgi, V.K., Saleh, A.K.Md.E.: A class of distributions connected to order statistics with nonintegral sample size. Comm. Stat. Theor. Meth. 17, 2005–2012 (1988)Google Scholar
- 517.Sankarasubramonian, A., Sreenivasan, K.: Investigation and comparison of L-moments and conventional moments. J. Hydrol. 218, 13–34 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 536.Shapiro, S.S., Wilk, M.B.: An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 52, 591–611 (1965)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 537.Sillitto, G.P.: Derivation of approximants to the inverse distribution function of a continuous univariate population from the order statistics of a sample. Biometrika 56, 641–650 (1969)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 547.Stigler, S.M.: Fractional order statistics with applications. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 72, 544–550 (1977)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 552.Suleswki, P.: On differently defined skewness. Comput. Meth. Sci. Technol. 14, 39–46 (2008)Google Scholar
- 559.Tajuddin, I.H.: A simple measure of skewness. Stat. Neerl. 50, 362–366 (1996)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 563.Tarsitano, A.: Estimation of the generalised lambda distributions parameter for grouped data. Comm. Stat. Theor. Meth. 34, 1689–1709 (2005)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 568.Tukey, J.W.: The future of data analysis. Ann. Math. Stat. 33, 1–67 (1962)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 569.Tukey, J.W.: Exploratory Data Analysis. Addisson-Wesley, Reading (1977)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 574.Vogel, R.M., Fennessey, N.M.: L-moment diagrams should replace product moment diagrams. Water Resour. Res. 29, 1745–1752 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 595.Xie, M., Tang, Y., Goh, T.N.: A modified Weibull extension with bathtub-shaped failure rate function. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 76, 279–285 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 596.Yitzhaki, S.: Gini’s mean difference: A superior measure of variability for nonnormal distributions. Metron 61, 285–316 (2003)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 604.Zimmer, W., Keats, J.B., Wang, F.K.: The Burr XII distribution in reliability analysis. J. Qual. Technol. 20, 386–394 (1998)Google Scholar