Genetics of weed invasions

  • Spencer C. H. Barrett
Part of the Monographiae Biologicae book series (MOBI, volume 67)

Abstract

Understanding the genetics of colonization is important not only to evolutionary studies and population biology, but also to agriculture and conservation. Basic features of weediness and successful worldwide colonists are briefly reviewed with emphasis on genetic processes. Based non a detailed review of breeding system and genetic variation patterns in Echinochloa (barnyard grass) and Eichhornia (water hyacinth), two major aquatic weeds, strong evidence is found for the effects of founder events as well as strong selective pressures during colonization. Information on the genetic structure, reproductive biology, and evolutionary dynamics in the past and present would be helpful in devising effective methods of biological control. For example, there is indirect evidence for greater success in the biological control of asexually reproducing weeds. This is clearly a largely unexplored area in population biology.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Ashton, P. and D. S. Mitchell. 1989. Aquatic plants: Patterns and modes of invasion, attributes of invading species and assessment of control programmes. In: Drake, J. A. et al. (eds.) Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. John Wiley, Chester.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, H. G. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after “long-distance” dispersal. Evolution 9: 347–349.Google Scholar
  3. —. 1965. Characteristics and modes of origins weeds, pp. 141–172. In H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins (eds.). The Genetics of Colonizing Species. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  4. —. 1974. The evolution of weeds. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5:1–24.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, H. G., and G. L. Stebbins (eds.) 1965. The Genetics of Colonizing Species. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, S. C. H. 1977. Tristyly in Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms (Water Hyacinth). Biotropica 9: 230–238.Google Scholar
  7. —. 1978. Heterostyly in a tropical weed: the reproductive biology of the Turnera ulmifolia complex (Turneraceae). Can. J. Bot. 56:1713–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. —. 1979. The evolutionary breakdown of tristyly in Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms. Evolution 33: 499–510.Google Scholar
  9. —. 1980a. Sexual reproduction in Eichhornia crassipes (Water Hyacinth). I. Fertility of clones from diverse regions. J. Appl. Ecol. 17:101–112.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1980b. Sexual reproduction in Eichhornia crassipes (Water Hyacinth). II. Seed production in natural populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 17:113–124.Google Scholar
  11. —. 1982. Genetic variation in weeds, pp. 73–98. In R. Charudattan and H.L. Walker (eds.), Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  12. —. 1983. Crop mimicry in weeds. Econ. Bot. 37: 255–282.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1985a. Floral trimorphism and monomorphism in continental and island populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Spreng.) Solms (Pontederiaceae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 25: 41–60.Google Scholar
  14. —. 1985b. Ecological genetics of breakdown in tristyly, pp. 267–275. In: J. Haeck and J. W. Woldendorp (eds.), Structure and Functioning of Plant Populations 2: Phenotypic and Genotypic Variation in Plant Populations. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  15. —. 1988. Genetics and evolution of agricultural weeds, In: M. Altieri and M. Liebman (eds.), Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  16. Barrett, S. C. H., and I. W. Forno. 1982. Style morph distribution in new world populations of Eichhornia crassipes (Water Hyacinth). Aquatic Bot. 13: 299–306.Google Scholar
  17. Barrett, S. C. H. and B.C. Husband. 1989. The genetics of plant migration and colonization. In: A. H. D. Brown, M. T. Clegg, A. L. Kahler, and B. S. Weir(eds.), Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and Genetic Resources, pp. 254–277. Sinauer, Sunderland.Google Scholar
  18. Barrett, S. C. H. and B.C. Husband. 1990. Variation in outcrossing rates in Eichhornia paniculata: The role of demographic and reproductive factors. Plant Species Biol.Google Scholar
  19. Barrett, S. C. H., and B. J. Richardson. 1986. Genetic attributes of invading species, pp. 21–30. In: R. H. Groves and J. J. Burdon (eds.) Ecology of Biological Invasions: An Australian Perspective. Australian Acad. of Sci., Canberra.Google Scholar
  20. Barrett, S. C. H. and D. E. Seaman. 1980. The weed flora of Californian rice fields. Aquatic Bot. 9: 351–376.Google Scholar
  21. Barrett, S. C. H., and J. S. Shore. 1987. Variation and evolution of breeding systems in the Turnera ulmifolia complex (Turneraceae). Evolution 41: 340–354.Google Scholar
  22. Barrett, S. C. H., and J. S. Shore. 1988. Isozyme variation in colonizing species. In: D. Soltis and P. Soltis (eds.). Isozymes in Plant Biology.Google Scholar
  23. Barrett, S. C. H., and J. L. Strother. 1978. Taxonomy and natural history of Bacopa (Scrophulariaceae) in California. Syst. Bot. 3: 408–419.Google Scholar
  24. Barrett, S. C. H., and B. F. Wilson. 1981. Colonizing ability in the Echinochloa crus-galli complex (barnyard grass). I. Variation in life history. Can. J. Bot. 59:1844–1860.Google Scholar
  25. — and —. 1983. Colonizing ability in the Echinochloa crus-galli complex (barnyard grass). II. Seed biology. Can. J. Bot. 61: 556–562.Google Scholar
  26. Bleasdale, J. K. A. 1966. Plant growth and crop yield. Ann. Appl. Biol. 57:173–182.Google Scholar
  27. Bosbach, K., and H. Hurka. 1981. Biosystematic studies of Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae): Enzyme polymorphism in natural populations. Plant Syst. Evol. 137: 73–94.Google Scholar
  28. Brown, A. H. D. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theor. Pop. Biol. 15: 1–42.Google Scholar
  29. Brown, A. H. D., and J. J. Burdon. 1983. Multilocus diversity in an outbreeding weed, Echium plantagineum L. Austr. J. Biol. Sci. 36: 503–509.Google Scholar
  30. —, and —. 1987. Mating systems and colonizing success in plants, pp. 115–132. In: A. J. Gray, M. J. Crawley and P. J. Edwards (eds.), Colonization, Succession and Stability. British Ecological Soc. Symp. No. 26, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Brown, A. H. D., and D. R. Marshall. 1981. Evolutionary changes accompanying colonization in plants, pp. 351–363. In: G. G. E. Scudder and J. L. Reveal (eds.), Evolution Today, Proceedings of the Second Internationl Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology. Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  32. Burdon, J. J. 1985. Pathogens and the genetic structure of plant populations, pp. 313–326. In J. White (eds.), Studies on Plant Demography. Festsch. for John L. Harper. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  33. Burdon, J. J., and D. R. Marshall. 1981. Biological control and the reproductive mode of weeds. J. Appl. Ecol. 18: 649–658.Google Scholar
  34. Burdon, J. J., D. R. Marshall, and R. H. Groves. 1980. Isozyme variation in Chondrilla juncea L. in Australia. Aust. J. Bot. 28:193–198.Google Scholar
  35. Burdon, J. J., R. H. Groves and J. M. Cullen. 1981. The impact of biological control on the distribution and abundance of Chondrilla juncea in southeastern Australia. J. Appl. Ecol. 18:957–966.Google Scholar
  36. Burdon, J. J., D. R. Marshall and A. H. D. Brown. 1983. Demographic and genetic changes in populations of Echium plantagineum. J. Ecol. 71: 667–679.Google Scholar
  37. Clegg, M. T., and R. W. Allard. 1972. Pattern of genetic differentiation in the slender wild oat species Avena barbata. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69:1820–1824.Google Scholar
  38. Clegg, M. T., and A. H. D. Brown. 1983. The founding of plant populations, pp. 216–228. In: C. M. Schonewald-Cox, S. M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and W. L. Thomas (eds.), Genetics and Conservation. Benjamin/Cummings, California.Google Scholar
  39. Clegg, M. T., D.J. Schoen and B. K. Epperson. 1985. The interactions between phenotypic diversity and mating patterns in plant populations, pp. 287–298. In: J. Haeck and J. W. Woldendorp (eds.), Structure and Functioning of Plant Populations. 2. Phenotypic and Genotypic Variation in Plant Populations. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  40. Crafts, A. S. and W. W. Robbins. 1962. Weed Control, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Crawley, M. J. 1986. The population biology of invaders. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 314: 711–731.Google Scholar
  42. Cullen, J. M. and R. H Groves. 1977. The population biology of Chondrilla juncea L. in Australia. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Austr. 10:121–134.Google Scholar
  43. Faegri, K. and L. van der Pijl. 1971. The Principles of Pollination Ecology (2nd ed.) Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Firbank, L. G., and A. R. Watkinson. 1986. Modelling the population dynamics of an arable weed and its effect upon crop yield. J. Appl. Ecol. 23:147–159.Google Scholar
  45. Giles, B. E. 1983. A comparison between quantitative and biochemical variation in the wild barley Hordeum murinum. Evolution 38: 34–41.Google Scholar
  46. Glover, D. E., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1987. Genetic variation in continental and island populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Heredity 59: 7–17.Google Scholar
  47. Gray, A. 1879. The pertinacity and predominance of weeds. Amer. J. Sci. 118:161–167.Google Scholar
  48. Gressel, J., and L. A. Segel. 1978. The paucity of plants evolving genetic resistance to herbicides: possible reasons and implications. J. Theor. Biol. 75: 349–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Hamrick, J. L., Y. B. Linhart, and J. B. Mitton. 1979. Relationships between life history characteristics and electrophoretically detectable genetic variation in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:173–200.Google Scholar
  50. Harper, J. L. 1956. The evolution of weeds in relation to resistance to herbicides. Proc. 3rd British Weed Control Conf. 1:179–186.Google Scholar
  51. —. 1960. Biology of Weeds. British Ecol. Soc. Symp. No. 1, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  52. —. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  53. Heiser, C. B. Jr. 1965. Sunflowers, weeds and cultivated plants, pp. 391–401. In: H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins (eds.). The Genetics of Colonizing Species. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  54. Holm, L.G., D.L. Plucknett, J.V. Pancho, and J. P. Herberber. 1977. The World’s Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  55. Husband, B.C. and S. C. H. Barrett. 1991. Colonization history and population genetic structure of Eichlornia paniculata in Jamaica. Heredity (in press).Google Scholar
  56. Jain, S. K. 1969. Comparative ecogenetics of two Avena species occurring in Central California. Evol. Biol. 3: 73–118.Google Scholar
  57. —. 1983. Genetic characteristics of populations, pp. 240–256. In: H. A. Mooney and M. Gordon, (eds.), Ecological Studies: Analysis and Synthesis. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  58. Jain, S. K., and P. S. Martins. 1979. Ecological genetics of the colonizing ability of rose clover (Trifolium hirtum All.). Amer. J. Bot. 66: 361–366.Google Scholar
  59. Kadereit, J. W., and D. Briggs. 1985. Speed of development of radiate and non-radiate plants of Senecio vulgaris L. from habitats subject to different degrees of weeding pressure. New Phytol. 99:155–169.Google Scholar
  60. Kahler, A. L., and R. W. Allard, M. Krzakowa, C. F. Wehrhahn, and E. Nevo. 1980. Associations between isozyme phenotypes and environment in the slender wild oat (Avena barbata) in Israel. Theor. Appl. Genet. 56: 31–47.Google Scholar
  61. King, L. J. 1966. Weeds of the World: Biological Control. Hill, London.Google Scholar
  62. Kluge, R. L., H. G. Zimmerman, C. J. Culliers, and G. B. Harding. 1986. Integrated control of invasive alien weeds. In: I. A. W. Macdonald, F. J. Kruger, and A. A. Ferrar (eds.) The Ecology and Management of Biological Invasions in Southern Africa, pp. 295–303. Oxford, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  63. Lande, R. 1977. The influence of the mating system on the maintenance of genetic variability in polygenic characteristics. Genetics 86: 485–498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Law, R. 1981. The dynamics of a colonizing population of Poa annua. Ecology 62: 1267–1277.Google Scholar
  65. Law, R., A. D. Bradshaw, and P. D. Putwain. 1977. Life history variation in Poa annua. Evolution 31: 233–246.Google Scholar
  66. LeBaron, H. M., and J. Gressel (eds.). 1982. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  67. Lewontin, R. C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.Google Scholar
  68. —. 1984. Detecting population differences in quantitative characters as opposed to gene frequencies. Amer. Nat. 123:115–124.Google Scholar
  69. Lloyd, D. G. 1980. Demographic factors and mating patterns in Angiosperms, pp. 67–88. In: O. T. Solbrig (ed.), Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  70. Loveless, M. D., and J. L. Hamrick. 1984. Ecological determinants of genetic structure in plant populations. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 65–95.Google Scholar
  71. Lyman, J. C, and N. C. Ellstrand. 1984. Clonal diversity in Taraxacum officinale (Compositae), an apomict. Heredity 50:1–10.Google Scholar
  72. Mack, R. N. and D. A. Pyke. 1983. The demography of Bromus tectorum: variation in time and space. J. Ecol. 71: 69–93.Google Scholar
  73. Marshall, D. R., J. J. Burdon, and A. H. D. Brown. 1980. Optimal sampling strategies in the biological control of weeds. Proc. V Intern. Symp. Biol. Control of Weeds. Brisbane, pp. 103–111.Google Scholar
  74. Martins, P. S. and S. K. Jain. 1978. The role of genetic variation in the colonizing ability of rose clover (Trifolium hirtum All.). Amer. Nat. 114: 591–595.Google Scholar
  75. Maun, M.A. and S. C. H. Barrett. 1986. The biology of Canadian weeds. 74. Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65: 739–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. McIntyre, S., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1986. A comparison of weed communities of rice in Australia and California. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Austr. 14: 237–250.Google Scholar
  77. McNeill, J. 1976. The taxonomy and evolution of weeds. Weeds Res. 16: 399–413.Google Scholar
  78. Michael, P. W. 1983. Taxonomy and distribution of Echinochloa species with special reference to their occurrence as weeds of rice, pp. 391–306. In Weed Control in Rice. Proc. Conf. Int. Rice Res. Inst. Los Banos, Philippines.Google Scholar
  79. Moran, G. F., D. R. Marshall, and W. J. Muller. 1981. Phenotypic variation in the colonizing species Xanthium strumarium L. (Noogoora Burr). Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 34:639–648.Google Scholar
  80. Mortimer, A.M. 1983. On weed demography, pp. 3–41. In W.W. Fletcher (ed.), Recent Advances in Weed Research. Commonwealth Agric. Bur., Farnum Royal.Google Scholar
  81. Mulcahy, D. L. 1975. The reproductive biology of Eichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae). Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 102:18–21.Google Scholar
  82. Musik, T. J. 1970. Weed Biology and Control. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  83. Myers, J. H., and M. D. Sabath. 1980. Genetic and phenotypic variability, and the success of establishment of insect introductions for the biological control of weeds, pp. 91–102. In: Proc. V Intern. Symp. Biol. Control of Weeds, Brisbane, Australia, CSIRO, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  84. Naylor, J. M., and S. Jana. 1976. Genetic adaptation for seed dormancy in Avena fatua. Can. J. Bot. 54: 306–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Newsome, A. E., and I. R. Noble. 1986. Ecological and Physiological Characters of Invading Species, pp. 1–20. In R. H. Groves and J.J. Burdon (eds.). Ecology of Biological Invasions: An Australian Perspective Austr. Acad. of Sci., Canberra.Google Scholar
  86. Popay, A. I., and E. H. Roberts. 1970. Factors involved in the dormancy and germination of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik and Senecio vulgaris L. J. Ecol. 58:103–122.Google Scholar
  87. Price, S. C, J. E. Hill, and R.W. Allard. 1983. Genetic variability for herbicide reaction in plant populations. Weed Sci. 31: 652–657.Google Scholar
  88. Price, S.C., K. M. Shumaker, A. L. Kahler, R.W. Allard, and J. E. Hill. 1984. Estimates of population differentiation obtained from enzyme polymorphisms and quantitative characteristics. J. Heredity 75: 141–142.Google Scholar
  89. Price, S. C, and S. K. Jain. 1981. Are inbreeders better colonizers? Oecologia 49: 283–286.Google Scholar
  90. Putwain, P. D., K. R. Scott, and R.J. Holliday. 1982. The nature of resistance to triazine herbicides; case histories of phenology and population studies, pp. 115–132. In: H. M. LeBaron and J. Gressel (eds.), Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  91. Richards, A. J. 1986. Plant Breeding Systems. George Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  92. Rick, C. M., J. F. Fobes, and S. D. Tanksley. 1979. Evolution of mating systems in Lycopersicum hirsutum as deduced from genetic variation in electrophoretic and morphological characters. Pl. Syst. Evol. 132: 279–298.Google Scholar
  93. Roberts, H. A. 1964. Emergence and longevity in cultivated soil of seeds of some annual weeds. Weed Res. 4: 296–307.Google Scholar
  94. Roughgarden, J., R. M. May, and S. A. Levin (eds.). 1989. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  95. Sagar, G. R. 1968. Weed biology—a future? Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 16:155–164.Google Scholar
  96. Salisbury, E. J. 1961. Weeds and Aliens. Collins, London.Google Scholar
  97. Sarukhan, J. 1974. Studies on plant demography in Ranunculus repens L., R. bulbosus L. and R. acris L. II. Reproductive strategies and seed population dynamics. J. Ecol. 62: 151–177.Google Scholar
  98. Schemske, D. W., and R. Lande. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39: 41–52.Google Scholar
  99. Schoen, D. J. 1982. Genetic variation and the breeding system of Gilia achilleifolia. Evolution 36: 361–370.Google Scholar
  100. Solbrig, O. T., and B. B. Simpson. 1974. Components of regulation of a population of dandelions in Michigan. J. Ecol. 62:473–486.Google Scholar
  101. —, and —. 1977. A garden experiment on competition between biotypes of the common dandelion Taraxacum offlcinale. J. Ecol. 65: 427–430.Google Scholar
  102. Stebbins, G. L. 1965. Colonizing species of native Californian flora, pp. 173–192. In H. G. Baker and G. L. Stebbins (eds.). The Genetics of Colonizing Species. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  103. Thai, K. M., S. Jana, and J. M. Naylor. 1985. Variability for response to herbicides in wild oat Avena fatua populations. Weed Sci. 33: 829–835.Google Scholar
  104. Vrijenhock, R. C. 1990. Genetic diversity and the ecology of asexual populations, pp, 175–198. In: K. Wohrmann and S. Jain (eds.) Population Biology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  105. Warburg, E. F. 1960. Some taxonomic problems in weedy species, pp. 43–47. In J. L. Harper (eds.), The Biology of Weeds. British Ecol. Soc. Symp. No. 1, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  106. Warwick, S. I. 1980. The genecology of lawn weeds. VII. The response of different growth forms of Plantago major L. and Poa annua L. to simulated trampling. New Phytol. 85: 461–469.Google Scholar
  107. Warwick, S. I., B. K. Thompson and L. D. Black. 1987. Genetic variation in Canadian and European populations of colonizing weed species Apera spica-venti. New Phytol. 106: 301–318.Google Scholar
  108. Weiner, J. 1990. Plant population ecology in agriculture, pp. 235–262. In: C. R. Carroll, J. H. Vandermeet, and P. M. Rosset (eds.) Agroecology. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  109. Zinger, H. B. 1909. On species of Camelina and Spergularia occurring as weeds in sowings of flax and their origin. Trudy Bot. Muz. Imp. Akad. Nauk 6:1–303.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Spencer C. H. Barrett
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations