Post-Modern Reflections on the Ethics of Naming

  • George Khushf
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 40)


The attempt to model diagnosis according to the epistemological criteria of the pure sciences leads to an objectivization of the patient that undermines the clinical goal of addressing human need ([7], pp. 183–4). In order to do justice to humanistic concerns, there has been an attempt in bioethics to redescribe or “model” medical reality in such a way as to avoid the transformation of the patient into an object ([22], [25]). However, the problem facing any such attempt is formidable: The paradox of the history of medicine is that the humanistic goal of addressing the patient’s needs has been in large part furthered by way of a process in which the patient has been increasingly objectified and depersonalized ([23], p. 96). The challenge facing bioethics is thus to model diagnosis in a way that does justice to both the epistemological concerns intimately connected with objectivity as well as the ethical concerns associated with regarding the patient as a subject. Instead of rejecting “objectivity”, we msut find a way to rightly place it within a broader context.


Observer Bias Moral Community Good Diagnosis Medical Reality Epistemological Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Amundsen, D.W.: 1992, ‘Some Conceptual and Metholodological Observations on the History of Ethics of Diagnosis’, in this volume, pp. 47–61.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Augustine: 1983, On Christian Doctrine, J.F. Shaw (tr.), in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers Vol.II, R. Schaff (ed.), Wm.B Eardmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carson, R.A.: 1990, ‘Interpretive Bioethics: The Way of Discernment’, Theoretical Medicine 11, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Derrida, J.: 1974, Of Grammatology, G.C. Spivak (tr), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Derrida, J.: 1978, Writing and Dfference, A. Bass (tr.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engelhardt, H. T.: 1982, ‘Goals of Medical Care: A Reappraisal’, in N.K. Bell (ed.), Who Decides: Conflicts of Rights in Health Care, The Humana Press, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engelhardt, H.T.: 1986, The Foundations of Bioethics, Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Engelhardt, H.T. and Caplan, A.L.: 1987, ‘Patterns of Controversy and Closure: The Interplay of Knowledge, Values, and Political Forces’, in H.T. Engelhardt and A.L. Caplan (eds.), Scientific Controversies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Engelhardt, H.T.: 1991, Bioethics and Secular Humanism: The Search for a Common Morality, SCM Press, London and Trinity Press International, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Engelhardt, H.T.: 1992, ‘Observer Bias: The Emergence of the Ethics of Diagnosis’, in this volume, pp. 63–71.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foucault, M.: 1975, The Birth of the Clinic, A.M. Smith (trans.), Vintage Books, New York.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gadamer, H.-G.: 1986, Wahrheit und Methode: Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik, J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gadamer, H.-G.: 1986, Wahrheit und Methode: Ergänzungen Register, J.C.B. Mohr, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gadow, S.: 1980, ‘Body and self: A Dialectic’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5(3), 172–185.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gogel, E.L. and Terry, J.S.: 1987, ‘Medicine as Interpretation: The Uses of Literary Metaphors and Methods’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12, 205–217.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harding, S.: 1978, ‘Knowledge, Technology, and Social Relations’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 3(4), 346–358.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Havelock, E.A.: 1967, Preface to Plato, Grosset and Dunlap by arrangement with the Harvard University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Havelock, E.A.: 1976, Origins of Western Literacy, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Illingworth, P.M.L.: 1988, ‘The Friendship Model of Physician/Patient Relationship and Patient Autonomy’, Bioethics 2(1), 22–36.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kass, L.R.: 1981, ‘Regarding the End of Medicine and the Pursuit of Health’, in A.L. Caplan et al., Concepts of Health and Disease, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., London, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laín-Entralgo, p.: 1992, ‘The Ethics of Diagnosis in Ancient Greek Medicine’, in this volume, pp. 13–18.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leder, D.: 1990, ‘Clinical Interpretation: The Hermeneutics of Medicine’, Theoretical Medicine 11, 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leder, D.: 1992, ‘The Experience of Pain and its Clinical Implications’, in this volume, pp. 95–105.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levinas, E.: 1969, Totality and Infinity, A. Lingis (tr.), Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lock, J.D.: 1990, ‘Some Aspects of Medical Hermeneutics: The Role of Dialectic and Narrative’, Theoretical Medicine 11, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mainetti, J.A.: 1992 ‘Embodiment, Pathology and Diagnosis’, in this volume, pp. 79–93.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Murphey, M.G.: 1961, The Development of Peirce’s Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Murphy, E.A: 1978, ‘Some Epitemological Aspects of the Model in Medicine’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 3(4), 273–292.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ong, W.J.: 1958, Ramus: Method, and the Decay of Dailogue, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ong, W.J.: 1982, Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, Methuen & Co., Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pellegrino, E.D.: 1992 ‘Value Desiderata in the Logical Structuring of Computer Diagnosis’, in this volume, pp. 173–195.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reiser, S.J.: 1978, Medicine and the Reign of Technology, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reiser, S.J.: 1978, ‘The Decline of the Clinical Dialogue’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 3(4), 305–313.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Romanell, P.: 1987, John Locke and Medicine, Prometheus Books, New York.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sanchez-Gonzalez, M.A.: 1990, ‘Medicine in John Locke’s Philosophy’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15, 6775–695.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sass, H.-M.: 1992, ‘Diagnosing the Eleven Month Pregnancy’, in this volume, pp. 153–162.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saussure, F.: 1966, Course in General Linguistics, W. Baskin (trans.), McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Spicker, S. (ed.): 1970, The Philosophy of the Body: Rejections of Cartesian Dualism, Quadrangle/New York Times Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Spicker, S.: 1992, ‘Ethics in Diagnosis: Bodily Integrity, Trust-Telling, and the Good Physician’, in this volume, pp. 107–122.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sydenham, T.: 1981, ‘Preface to the Third Edition, Observations Medicae’ in A. Caplan, et al. (eds.), Concepts of Health and Disease, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., London, pp. 145–156.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Turner, B.: 1987, Medical Power and Social Knowledge, Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wartofsky, M.W.: 1978, ‘Editorial’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 3(4), 265–272.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wartofsky, M.W. and Zaner, R.M.: 1980, ‘Editorial’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 5(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Williams, W.C.: 1961, The Farmers Daughters, New Directives, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Khushf
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of ReligionHouston

Personalised recommendations