Argumentation Theory: A Very Short Introduction
Since the time of the ancient Greek philosophers and rhetoricians, argumentation theorists have searched for the requirements that make an argument correct, by some appropriate standard of proof, by examining the errors of reasoning we make when we try to use arguments. These errors have long been called fallacies, and the logic textbooks have for over 2000 years tried to help students to identify these fallacies, and to deal with them when they are encountered. The problem was that deductive logic did not seem to be much use for this purpose, and there seemed to be no other obvious formal structure that could usefully be applied to them.
KeywordsOpening Stage Argumentation Scheme Short Introduction Argumentation Theory Natural Language Text
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.D. Walton. and C. Reed and F. Macagno. Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008.Google Scholar
- 3.P. E. Dunne. Argumentation and dialogue in artificial intelligence, IJCAI 2005 tutorial notes. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, 2005.Google Scholar
- 4.P. Besnard and A. Hunter. Elements of Argumentation. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, USA, 2008.Google Scholar
- 7.C. L. Hamblin. Fallacies. Methuen, London, UK, 1970.Google Scholar
- 8.P. J. Hurley. A Concise Introduction to Logic. Belmot, Wadsworth, CA, USA, 1994.Google Scholar
- 9.R. H. Johnson and A. J. Blair. The current state of informal logic. Informal Logic, 9:147–151, 1987.Google Scholar
- 10.E. C. W. Krabbe. Nothing but objections. In H. V. Hansen and R. C. Pinto, editors, Reason Reclaimed. Vale Press, Newport News, Virginia, USA, 2007.Google Scholar
- 13.H. Prakken and G. Sartor. Formalising arguments about the burden of persuasion. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 97–106. ACM Press, New York NY, USA, 2007.Google Scholar
- 15.N. Rescher. Introduction to Logic. St. Martin’s Press, New York NY, USA, 1964.Google Scholar
- 17.F. H. van Eemeren and R. F. Grootendorst. A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.Google Scholar
- 18.D. N. Walton and E. C. W. Krabbe. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. SUNY Press, Albany NY, USA, 1995.Google Scholar
- 19.S. Wells and C. Reed. Knowing when to bargain: the roles of negotiation and persuasion in dialogue. In F. Grasso, R. Kibble, and C. Reed, editors, Proceedings of the ECAI workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA), Riva del Garda, Italy, 2006.Google Scholar