How Methodology Became a Toolbox—And How it Escapes from that Box

Chapter

Abstract

The understanding that research methodology comprises an essential part of scientific theories about phenomena that are studied is not always brought into the center of theoretical reasoning. The inevitable connection of methodology and statements about the nature of the phenomenon studied becomes obvious when we ask for the proofs of theoretical statements about the phenomenon that a theory should explain. The only scientific way to give the proofs for a theory requires description of the research methodology—who was studied with what assessment methods and which was the exact procedure of data collection. If the analysis of the research methodology reveals questionable procedures or implicit restrictive theoretically not justified assumptions, all theory based on such a methodology must be questioned as well.

References

  1. Allik, J., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). A five-factor theory perspective. In R. R. McCrae & J. Allik (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality across cultures (pp. 303–322). New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality. A psychological interpretation. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Anokhin, P. K. (1975). Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional’nykh sistem. Moscow: Medicina.Google Scholar
  4. Anokhin, P. K. (1978a). Izbrannyje trudy. Filosofskije aspekty teorii funktsional’noi sistemy. In F. K. Konstantinov, B. F. Lomov, & B. V. Shvyrkov (Eds.). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
  5. Anokhin, P. K. (1978b). Metodologicheskii analiz uzlovykh problem uslovnogo refleksa. (Methodological analysis of central problems of the conditioned reflex). In F. V. Konstantinov, B. F. Lomov, & V. B. Schvyrkov (Eds.), P. K. Anokhin. Izbrannyje trudy. Filosofskije aspekty teorii funktsional’noi sistemy (pp. 152–206). Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian. Original work published 1963)Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle (1941). Metaphysics. In R. McKeon (Ed.), The basic works of Aristotle (pp. 681–926). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, R. C., Smith, E. E., Bem, D. J., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1993). Introduction to psychology (11th ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Bem, S., & Looren de Jong, H. (1997). Theoretical issues in psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Bernstein, D. A., Roy, E. J., Srull, T. K., & Wickens, C. D. (1988). Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  10. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlile, W. (1895a). Reality and causation. Part I. Mind, 4, 82–91.Google Scholar
  12. Carlile, W. (1895b). Reality and causation. Part II. Mind, 4, 213–224.Google Scholar
  13. Carlson, N. R., Buskist, W., Martin, G. N., Hogg, M., & Abrams, D. (1997). Psychology. The science of behaviour. European adaptation. Harlow, England: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  14. Case, R. (1992). The mind’s staircase. Exploring the conceptual underpinnings of children’s thought and knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Descartes, R. (1985a). Meditations on first philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch (Trans.), The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. 2, pp. 3–62). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1641)Google Scholar
  16. Descartes, R. (1985b). Objections and replies. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch (Trans.). The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. 2, pp. 66–397). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1641)Google Scholar
  17. Descartes, R. (1985c). The passions of the soul. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch (Trans.). The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 326–404). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1649)Google Scholar
  18. Descartes, R. (1985d). Principles of philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch (Trans.). The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 179–291). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1644)Google Scholar
  19. Descartes, R. (1985e). Rules for the direction of the mind. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch (Trans.). The philosophical writings of Descartes (Vol. 1, pp. 9–78). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Composed in 1628)Google Scholar
  20. Endler, N. S., & Speer, R. L. (1998). Personality psychology: Research trends for 1993–1995. Journal of Personality, 66, 622–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feldman, R. S. (1993). Understanding psychology. (3rd ed., International edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  22. Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (1998). Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 467–561). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Gleitman, H., Fridlund, A. J., & Reisberg, D. (1999). Psychology (5th ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Grusec, J. E., Lockhart, R. S., & Walters, G. C. (1990). Foundations of psychology. Toronto: Copp Clark Pitman.Google Scholar
  25. Hegel, G. W. H. (1969). Science of logic. In H. D. Lewis (Ed.), Hegel’s science of logic. New York: Humanity Books. (Original work published 1831)Google Scholar
  26. Hume, D. (1999). An enquiry concerning human understanding. In T. L. Beauchamp (Ed.), David Hume. An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1748)Google Scholar
  27. Hume, D. (2000). A treatise of human nature. In D. F. Norton & M. J. Norton (Eds.), David Hume. A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739–1740)Google Scholar
  28. James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. Authorized edition in two volumes. New York: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1890)Google Scholar
  29. Jensen, A. (1998). The g factor. The science of mental ability. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  30. Kirkpatrick, E. A. (1909). Genetic psychology. An introduction to an objective and genetic view of intelligence. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  31. Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981a). A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5, 345–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981b). A categorized list of motivation definitions, with a suggestion for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  34. Köhler, W. (1940). Dynamics in psychology. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  35. Köhler, W. (1959). Gestalt psychology. An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Mentor Books.Google Scholar
  36. Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Papers. Peabody museum of archaeology and ethnology (Vol. 47, pp. 1–223). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  37. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Külpe, O. (1909). Outlines of psychology. London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
  39. Ladd, G. T. (1894). Psychology descriptive and explanatory. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  40. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  41. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. Selected papers. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  42. Luria, A. R. (1969). Vyshije korkovyje funktsii tsheloveka i ikh narushenija pri lokal’nykh porazenijakh mozga. [Higher cortical functions in man and their disturbances in local brain lesions]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
  43. Luria, A. R. (1973). Osnovy neiropsikhologii. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo MGU.Google Scholar
  44. Luria, A. R. (1979). Jazyk i soznanije. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.Google Scholar
  45. Mackintosh, N. J. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Mallon, S. D., Kingsley, D., Affleck, G., & Tennen, H. (1998). Methodological trends in journal of personality: 1970–1995. Journal of Personality, 66, 672–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marsella, A. J., Dubanoski, J., Hamada, W. C., & Morse, H. (2000). The measurement of personality across cultures. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality. (pp. 51–87). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  49. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In A. Lawrence & O. P. J. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 139–153). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  50. Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2, 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Molenaar, P. C. M., & Valsiner, J. (2005). How generalization works through the single case: A simple idiographic process analysis of an individual psychotherapy. International Journal of Idiographic Science, Article. 1. Retrieved October 25, 2005, from http://www.valsiner.com/articles/molenvals.htm.
  52. Myers, D. G. (1995). Psychology (4th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar
  53. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality. Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Poortinga, Y. H., & van Hemert, D. A. (2001). Personality and culture: Demarcating between the common and the unique. Journal of Personality, 69, 1033–1060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Roediger, H. L., Capaldi, E. D., Paris, S. G., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (1996). Psychology (4th ed.). Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  56. Sloman, S. (2005). Causal models. How people think about the world and its alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Smith, E. E., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Fredrickson, B. L., Loftus, G. R., Bem, D. J., & Maren, S. (2003). Atkinson and Hilgard’s introduction to psychology (14th ed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  58. Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (1993). A dynamic systems approach to development. Applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, prediction, and search. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sully, J. (1892). The human mind. A text-book of psychology. In two volumes (Vol. 1). London: Longmans, Green and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thelen, E. (1995). Motor development. A new synthesis. American Psychologist, 50, 79–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  63. Titchener, E. B. (1898). Postulates of structural psychology. Philosophical Review, 7, 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Titchener, E. B. (1899). Structural and functional psychology. Philosophical Review, 8, 290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Toomela, A. (1996). How culture transforms mind: A process of internalization. Culture and Psychology, 2, 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Toomela, A. (2000a). Activity theory is a dead end for cultural-historical psychology. Culture and Psychology, 6, 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Toomela, A. (2000b). Cultural-historical psychology: Three levels of analysis. Dissertationes Psychologicae Universitatis Tartuensis, 7, University of Tartu, Tartu.Google Scholar
  68. Toomela, A. (2000c). Stages of mental development: Where to look? Trames: Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 4, 21–52.Google Scholar
  69. Toomela, A. (2003a). Culture as a semiosphere: On the role of culture in the culture-individual relationship. In I. E. Josephs (Ed.), Dialogicality in development (pp. 129–163). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  70. Toomela, A. (2003b). Development of symbol meaning and the emergence of the semiotically mediated mind. In A. Toomela (Ed.), Cultural guidance in the development of the human mind. (pp. 163–209). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  71. Toomela, A. (2003c). Relationships between personality structure, structure of word meaning, and cognitive ability: A study of cultural mechanisms of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 723–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Toomela, A. (2005). Decision-making with incomplete information: Systemic and non-systemic ways of thinking in medicine. In R. Bibace, J. Laird, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Science and medicine in dialogue: Thinking through particulars and universals (pp. 231–241). Westport, CT: Greenwood/Praeger.Google Scholar
  73. Toomela, A. (2007a). Culture of science: Strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41, 6–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Toomela, A. (2007b). History of methodology in psychology: Starting point, not the goal. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41, 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Toomela, A. (2007c). Unifying psychology: Absolutely necessary, not only useful. In A. V. B. Bastos & N. M. D. Rocha (Eds.), Psicologia: Novas direçoes no dialogo com outros campos de saber. (pp. 449–464). São Paulo: Casa do Psicologo.Google Scholar
  76. Toomela, A. (2008a). Activity theory is a dead end for methodological thinking in cultural psychology too. Culture and Psychology, 14, 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Toomela, A. (2008b). Variables in psychology: A critique of quantitative psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42, 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Toomela, A. (2008c). Vygotskian cultural-historical and sociocultural approaches represent two levels of analysis: Complementarity instead of opposition. Culture and Psychology, 14, 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Toomela, A. (2009a). Kurt Lewin’s contribution to the methodology of psychology: From past to future skipping the present. In J. Clegg (Ed.), The observation of human systems. Lessons from the history of anti-reductionistic empirical psychology (pp. 101–116). Edison, NJ: Transaction Publisher.Google Scholar
  80. Toomela, A. (2009b). Methodology of idiographic science: Limits of single-case studies and the role of typology. In S. Salvatore, et al. (Eds.), YIS: Yearbook of Idiographic Science, 2008. Rome: Giorgio Fireira.Google Scholar
  81. Toomela, A. (in press). Poverty of modern mainstream psychology in autobiography. Reflections on the A History of Psychology in Autobiography, (Vol. 9) (G. Lindzey & W. M. Runyan (Eds.) (2007). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association). Culture and Psychology. Google Scholar
  82. Valsiner, J. (2003). Assumptions and knowledge constructions: what can science learn from primate languages and cultures? In A. Toomela (Ed.), Cultural guidance in the development of the human mind (pp. 39–59). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  83. von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General systems theory. Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  84. Vygotsky, L. S. (1982a). Istoricheski smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa. In A. R. Luria & M. G. Jaroshevskii (Eds.), L. S. Vygotsky. Sobranije sochinenii. Tom 1. Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii (pp. 291–436). Moscow: Pedagogika. (Originally written in 1927)Google Scholar
  85. Vygotsky, L. S. (1982b). Psikhologija i uchenije o lokalizacii psikhicheskih funktcii. In A. R. Luria & M. G. Jaroshevskii (Eds.), L. S. Vygotsky. Sobranije sochinenii. Tom 1. Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii. (pp. 168–174). Moscow: Pedagogika. (Originally written in 1934)Google Scholar
  86. Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the cultural development of the child. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader. (pp. 57–72). Oxford: Blackwell. (Original work published 1929)Google Scholar
  87. Vygotsky, L. S. (1996). Myshlenije i rech. (Thinking and speech). Moscow: Labirint. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
  88. Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. (Originally written in 1930)Google Scholar
  89. Watson, G. (1934). Psychology in Germany and Austria. Psychological Bulletin, 31, 755–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Werner, H. (1948). Comparative psychology of mental development. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  91. Wertheimer, M. (1925). Über Gestaltheorie. Erlangen: Weltkreis-Verlag.Google Scholar
  92. Wundt, W. (1897). Outlines of psychology. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTallinn UniversityTallinnEstonia

Personalised recommendations