Empowerment, Advocacy and National Development Policy: A Case Study of Disabled Peoples’ Organizations in Bolivia

  • Marianne Griffiths
  • Hasheem Mannan
  • Malcolm MacLachlan
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the concepts of empowerment and advocacy and considers their relevance to promoting the inclusion of people with disabilities (PWD) in development policy. We begin by considering the “big picture” of development policy instruments, focusing on Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) as an ultimate target for the inclusion of disability on the development agenda. We then consider some pertinent theory concerning empowerment and advocacy. Next we look at what actually happens, on the ground, by presenting a case study of disability advocacy and empowerment activity by disabled peoples’ organizations (DPOs) in La Paz, Bolivia. There are considerable challenges in moving from valuable but often opportunistic and unstructured local advocacy and empowerment initiatives to less immediately rewarding inclusion in national development policy instruments. In considering what policy rhetoric says, what theory suggests and what happens in practice, our fundamental concern is with how to link daily localized advocacy activities of DPOs to longer-term strategic interests of inclusive national development.

References

  1. Atkinson, D (2000). Advocacy: A Review, York: Joseph Rowntree FoundationGoogle Scholar
  2. Bickenbach, JE, Chatterji, S, Badley, EM, & Ustun, TB (1999). ‘Models of disablement, universalism and the international classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps’, Social Science and Medicine, 48, 173–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlisle, S (2000). ‘Health promotion, advocacy and health inequalities: A conceptual framework’, Health Promotion International, 1(4), 369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. DFID (2000). Disability, Poverty and Development. DFID, downloaded February 2000, www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/disability.pdf
  5. Dube, AK (2006). ‘Participation of disabled people in the PRSP/PEAP process in Uganda’, in Albert, B (ed.) (2006) In or out of the mainstream? Lessons from research on disability and development cooperation, Leeds: The Disability Press. 119–133Google Scholar
  6. Eleweke, CJ, & Rodda, M (2002). ‘The Challenge of Enhancing Inclusive Education in Developing Countries’, Inclusive Education, 6, 113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fasil, Q, Wallace, L, Singh, G, Ali, L, & Bywaters, P (2004). ‘Empowerment and advocacy: Reflections on action research with Bangladeshi and Pakistani families who have children with severe disabilities’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 12(5), 389–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forsyth, C. & MacLachlan, M. (in press) “You just don’t open the doors and say ‘Come on in and take away all my ideas’”: NGO attitudes toward sharing organisational learning. Knowledge Management for Development Google Scholar
  9. Four Hundred Million R (2008). http://www.400millionr.org/accessed on 8th July
  10. Griffiths, M (2008). Disability advocacy in Bolivia. MSc Thesis, Centre for Global Health, Trinity College DublinGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffiths, M, Feliza, AR, & MacLachlan, M (2009). “I don’t need what you think I need, I need something else”: Advocacy and empowerment strategies used by organisations representing people with disabilities in Bolivia. Dublin: Centre for Global Health Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  12. Groce, N (1999). ‘Framing disability in local issues, concepts and beliefs’, Asia Pacific Disability Journal, 10(1), 51–53Google Scholar
  13. Handicap International/CBM (2006). Making PRSP Inclusive, Munich: Handicap InternationalGoogle Scholar
  14. Instituto Nacional De Estadística (INE) http://www.ine.gov.bo/indice/visualizador.aspx?ah=PC2031002.HTM [accessed 8th July 2008]
  15. Lindsay, G (2007). ‘Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 1–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lynn, E (2007). ‘Disability in development’, Thesis as partial completion of MSc Development Studies, University College DublinGoogle Scholar
  17. McColl, MA, & Boyce, W (2003). ‘Disability advocacy organizations: A descriptive framework’, Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(8), 380–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Newbigging, K, & McKeown, M (2007). ‘Mental health advocacy with black and minority ethnic communities: Ethical implications’, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 20(6), 558–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Page, N, & Czuba, CE (1999) ‘Empowement: What is it?’, Journal of Extension, 37(5), 1–5Google Scholar
  20. Ramcharan, P (2005). ‘Special issue on empowerment and advocacy’, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 283–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rappaport, J (1985). ‘The power of empowerment language’, Social Policy, 16, 15–22Google Scholar
  22. Stainton, T (2005). ‘Empowerment and the architecture of rights based social policy’, Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 9(4), 289–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. UNCRPD – United Nations Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2007). New York: United NationsGoogle Scholar
  24. WHO (2005). World Health Organization Report WHA58.23; Fifty Eighth World Health Assembly; Disability, including prevention, management and rehabilitation, 9th Plenary Meeting 25th May 2005Google Scholar
  25. WHO (2006). ‘Stop the Global Epidemic of Chronic Disease: A Practical Guide to Successful Advocacy’, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marianne Griffiths
    • 1
  • Hasheem Mannan
    • 1
  • Malcolm MacLachlan
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Global HealthTrinity College DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations