Bioinformatics pp 259-278 | Cite as

High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping – Data Acquisition, Transformation, and Analysis

Chapter

Abstract

The aim of applied plant biology has always been to understand how and why plants grow the way they do. In most cases, the target of research is to find correlations and dependencies between distinct factors of the biological system. Biologists often seek better measuring technologies to facilitate their research. To compensate for the invariably limited possibilities, they often developed tedious but nevertheless very successful methods of gaining and increasing knowledge about plants. Thus over long periods of time they produce exemplary results. These steps gradually create a more comprehensive model of how plants actually work and still form a broad basis of the majority of research. Nevertheless, it remains possible to gain deeper insights into “biological variation” and see how the newly discovered principles could be applied to a broad set of plants under differing conditions (light, soil, water, nutrients, plant genes, epigenetic plant history etc.).

References1

  1. Agresti A (2002) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernardo JM, Smith AFM (2002) Bayesian theory. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bioconductor (2008) http://www.bioconductor.org/. Accessed 13 July 2008
  4. Breslow NR, Clayton DG (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J Am Stat Assoc 88:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies ER (2005) Machine vision. Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. Devore JL (2000) Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences. ITP, CAGoogle Scholar
  7. Eberius M, Mennicken G, Reuter I, Vandenhirtz J (2002) Sensitivity of different growth inhibition tests – just a question of mathematical calculation? Ecotoxicology 11:293–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Hart GW (1995) Multidimensional analysis: algebras and systems for science and engineering. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of probability. Clarendom, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Kline SJ (1986) Similitude and approximation theory. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Koch CG, Carr GJ, Strokes ME, Uryniak TJ (1990) Categorical data analysis. In: Berry DA (ed) Statistical methodology in pharmaceutical sciences. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Shroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS® systems for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary NCGoogle Scholar
  16. McCllagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Nyholm N (1985) Response variable in algal growth inhibition test – biomass or growth rate? Water Res 19:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nyholm N (1990) Expression of results from growth inhibition toxicity tests with algae. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 19:518–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. PROC VARCLUS (2008) http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi26/p261-26.pdf. Accessed 19 June 2008
  20. R®-Project (2008) http://www.r-project.org. Accessed 19 June 2008
  21. Royall R (2000) Statistical evidence: a likelihood paradigm. Chapman & Hall/CRC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Russ JC (1999) The image processing handbook. CRC, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  23. SAS (1995) Logistic regression examples using the SAS system. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  24. SAS® (2004) SAS/STAT® help and documentation (release 9.1.3). SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  25. Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R (2008) Image processing, analysis and machine vision. Thomson, Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  26. Stokes M, Davis CS, Koch GG (2000) Categorical data analysis using the SAS system, 2nd edn. SAS, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  27. Wedderburn RWM (1974) Quasilikelihood methods, generalized linear models, and the Gauss-Newton method. Biometrika 61:339Google Scholar
  28. Weir BS (1996) Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lemna Tec GmbHWuerselenGermany
  2. 2.WageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations