Managing Conflict at the End-of-Life

  • K. Hillman
  • J. Chen

Abstract

There are increasing pressures to admit patients to intensive care units (ICUs). The majority of people now die in institutions, rather than at home. Even terminally ill patients in nursing homes sometimes find their way into acute hospitals. Once in the emergency department, they are often assessed and admitted to hospital as the history and prognosis may not initially be clear; and because it is usually easier, in purely practical terms, to admit a terminally ill elderly patient rather than to arrange appropriate support in the community. Once in an acute hospital there are expectations, realistic or not, that there is some hope. The conveyor belt to intensive care is further facilitated by increasingly specialized physicians who often do not understand the way different co-morbidities and multiorgan involvement influences the patient’s prognosis.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Miller DW Jnr, Miller CG (2005) On evidence, medical and legal. J Am Phys Surg 10: 70–75Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lloyd CB, Nietert PJ, Silvestri GA (2004) Intensive care decision making in the seriously ill and elderly. Crit Care Med 32: 649–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palda VA, Bowman KW, McLean RF, Chapman MG (2005) “Futile” care: Do we provide it? Why? A semistructured, Canada-wide survey of intensive care unit doctors and nurses. J Crit Care 20: 207–213CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee A, Bishop G, Hillman KM. Daffurn K (1995) The medical emergency team. Anaesth Intensive Care 23: 183–186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones DA, McIntyre T, Baldwin I, Mercer I, Kattula A, Bellomo R (2007) The medical emergency team and end-of-life care: A pilot study. Crit Care Resus 9: 151–156Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Health Organization (2005) Preventing Chronic Diseases: A Vital Investment. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murray SA, Boyd K, Sheikh A (2005) Palliative care in chronic illness. BMJ 330: 611–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coventry PA, Grande GE, Richards DA, Todd CJ (2005) Prediction of appropriate timing of palliative care for older adults with non-malignant life-threatening disease: A systematic review. Age Ageing 34: 218–227CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murray, SA, Sheikh A (2008) Making a difference. Palliative care beyond cancer. Care for all at the end of life. BMJ 336: 958–959CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ptacek JT, Ederhardt TL (1996) Breaking bad news: A review of the literature. JAMA 276: 496–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Shannon SE, Treece PD, Engelberg RA, Rubenfeld GD (2001) The family conference as a focus to improve communication about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: Opportunities for improvement. Crit Care Med 29 (Suppl): N26–N33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, et al (2007) A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Eng J Med 356: 469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics (1994) Guidelines of foregoing lifesustaining treatment. Pediatrics 3:532–536Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Committee on Bioethics, American Academy of Pediatrics (1996) Ethics and the care of critically ill infants and children. Pediatrics 98:149–152Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    de Leeuw R, de Beaufort AJ, de Kleine MJK, et al (1996) Forgoing intensive care treatment in newborn infants with extremely poor prognoses. J Pediatr 129: 661–666CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Truog RD, Cist AF, Brackett SE, et al (2001) Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit. The Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 29: 2332–2348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rocker G, Dunbar S (2000) Withholding or withdrawal of life support: The Canadian Critical Care Society Position Paper. J Palliat Care16:S53–S63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    British Medical Association Ethics Committee (1999) Withholding and Withdrawing Lifeprolonging Medical Treatment. Guidance for Decision Making. BMJ Publishing Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    General Medical Council (2002) Withhold and Withdrawing Life-prolonging Treatments: Good Practice in Decision-Making. General Medical Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rabow MW, Hardy GE, Fair GM, et al (2000) An evaluation of the end-of-life care content in 50 textbooks from multiple specialties. JAMA 283: 771–778CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sachedina A (2005) End-of-Life: The Islamic view. Lancet 366: 774–1132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Firth S (2005) End of Life: A Hindu view. Lancet 366: 682–686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dorff EN (2005) End of Life: A Jewish perspective. Lancet 366:862–865CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keown D (2005) End of Life: The Buddhist view. Lancet 366: 952–955CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Englehardt HT Jnr, Iltis AS (2005) End of Life: The traditional Christian view. Lancet 366: 1045–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Markwell H (2005) End of Life: A Catholic view. Lancet 366: 1132–1135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hopp FP, Duffy SA (2000) Racial variations in end-of-life care. J Am Geriatr Soc 48: 658–663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    General Medical Council (2008) Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. Available at: http://www.gmc-uk.org/news/articles/Consent_guidance.pdf. Accessed Nov 208Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fine RL, Mayo TW (2003) Resolution of futility by due process: early experience with the Texas advance directives. Ann Intern Med 138: 743–746PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    American Lung Association, American Thoracic Society (1997) Official statement on the fair allocation of intensive care unit resources. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156: 1282–1301Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    The American College of Chest Physicians and Society of Critical Care Medicine. Consensus Panel (1990) Ethical and moral guidelines for the initiation, continuation and withdrawal of intensive care. Chest 97: 949–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McCullough LB (1998) A transcultural, preventive ethics approach to critical-care medicine: restoring critical care physicians power and authority. J Med Philos 23: 628–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cook D (2001) Patient autonomy versus parentalism. Crit Care Med 29:N24–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    NSW Health Department (2005) Guidelines for End-Of-Life Care and Decision-Making. Better Health Centre. Publications Warehouse, GladesvilleGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bloche MG (2005) Managing conflict at the end of life. N Engl J Med 352: 2371–2373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fisher MM, Raper RF (2005) Courts, doctors and end-of-life care. Intensive Care Med 31: 762–764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Carlet J, Thijs LG, Antonelli M, et al (2004) Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med 30: 770–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Faunce T (2005) Emerging roles for law and human rights in ethical conflicts surrounding neuro critical care. Crit Care Resus 7: 221–227Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Hillman
    • 1
  • J. Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.The Simpson Center for Health Systems ResearchLiverpool HospitalLiverpool BCAustralia

Personalised recommendations