Making Meaning pp 207-228 | Cite as
Lighting the Fires Within:
Drama has been a key mode of learning and meaning making throughout recorded history; however, drama's role in teacher education is peripheral at best. Both teacher educators and pre-service teachers, because they often lack drama experience themselves, become fearful of extending themselves through such activities as creative dramatics or process drama in their classrooms. Yet creative drama is an ideal medium for developing literacy, particularly within a multi literacies paradigm. With simple, structured and progressive creative drama techniques, teacher educators can encourage pre-service teachers to become aware of the aesthetic and multi literacy benefits of drama use in their classrooms. A sample unit designed for the teacher education classroom is included.
Keywords
drama theater theatre creative drama process drama pre-service teachers teacher education literacy multi literaciesPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bang, M. (1999). When Sophie gets angry—really, really angry…. New York: Scholastic IncGoogle Scholar
- Bany-Winters, L. (1997). On stage: Theater games and activities for kids. Chicago: Chicago Review PressGoogle Scholar
- Barone, T. (2001). Touching eternity: The enduring outcomes of teaching. New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
- Bentley, E. (1964). The life of drama. New York: Applause Theater BooksGoogle Scholar
- Berghoff, B. (1998). Inquiry about learning and learners. The Reading Teacher, 51(6), 520–523Google Scholar
- Bolton, G. (1996). Afterward: Drama as research. In P. Taylor (Ed.) Researching drama and arts education: Paradigms & possibilities (pp. 187–194). Washington, DC: Falmer PressGoogle Scholar
- Bolton, G. (2007). A history of drama education: A search for substance. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 45–61). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Booth, D. (2003). Towards an understanding of theater in education. In K. Gallegher & D. Booth (Eds.), How theater educates convergences & counterpoints (pp. 14–22). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
- Cecil, N. L., & Lauritzen, P. (1994). Literacy and the arts for the integrated classroom: Alternative ways of knowing. White Plains, NY: LongmanGoogle Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Capricorn BooksGoogle Scholar
- Eisner, E. (1988). The primacy of experience and the politics of method. Educational Researcher, 17(5), 15–20Google Scholar
- Eisner, E. (2005). The role of intelligence in the creation of art in D. A. Breault & R. Breault (Eds.) Experiencing Dewey: Insights for today's classroom (pp. 106–108). Indianapolis, IN:Kappa Delta PiGoogle Scholar
- Gallego, M., & Hollingsworth, S. (2000). Introduction: The idea of multiple literacies. In M.Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 1–23). New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
- Gibbs, J. (2001). Tribes: A new way of learning and being together. Windsor, CA: Center Source SystemsGoogle Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar
- Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change.San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
- Hull, G. & Nelson, M. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
- Latta, M. (2001). The possibilities of play in the classroom. New York: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
- McCaslin, N. (2005). Seeking the aesthetic in creative drama and theatre for young audiences.Journal of Aesthetic Education, 39(4), 12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mavers, D. (2007). Semiotic resourcefulness: A young child's email exchange as design. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7(2), 155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moll, L., & Greenberg, J. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 319–348). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Norris, J., McGammon, L., & Miller, C. (2000). Learning to teach drama: A narrative approach.Portsmouth, NH: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
- Saldaña, J. (1995). Drama of color: Improvisation with multiethnic folklore. Portsmouth, NH:HeinemannGoogle Scholar
- Sendak, M. (1963). Where the wild things are. New York: Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
- Short, K. G., & Kauffman, G. (2000). Exploring sign systems within an inquiry system. In M.A.Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 42–61). New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
- Siegel, M. (2006). Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–77Google Scholar
- Spolin, V. (1986). Theater games of the classroom: A teacher's handbook. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar
- Viorst, J. (1987). Alexander and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day (2nd ed.). New York: Alladdin PaperbacksGoogle Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
- Wagner, B. J. (1999/1976). Dorothy Heathcote: Drama as a learning medium (Rev. Ed.). Portsmouth, NH: HeinemanGoogle Scholar
- Wertsch, J. (1990). The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. In L. Moll (Ed.),Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 111–126). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar