Making Meaning pp 207-228 | Cite as

Lighting the Fires Within:

Pre-service Teachers Learning in and through Drama
  • Kelli Jo Kerry-Moran
  • J. Matthew Meyer
Part of the Educating the Young Child book series (EDYC, volume 2)

Drama has been a key mode of learning and meaning making throughout recorded history; however, drama's role in teacher education is peripheral at best. Both teacher educators and pre-service teachers, because they often lack drama experience themselves, become fearful of extending themselves through such activities as creative dramatics or process drama in their classrooms. Yet creative drama is an ideal medium for developing literacy, particularly within a multi literacies paradigm. With simple, structured and progressive creative drama techniques, teacher educators can encourage pre-service teachers to become aware of the aesthetic and multi literacy benefits of drama use in their classrooms. A sample unit designed for the teacher education classroom is included.

Keywords

drama theater theatre creative drama process drama pre-service teachers teacher education literacy multi literacies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bang, M. (1999). When Sophie gets angry—really, really angry…. New York: Scholastic IncGoogle Scholar
  2. Bany-Winters, L. (1997). On stage: Theater games and activities for kids. Chicago: Chicago Review PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Barone, T. (2001). Touching eternity: The enduring outcomes of teaching. New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentley, E. (1964). The life of drama. New York: Applause Theater BooksGoogle Scholar
  5. Berghoff, B. (1998). Inquiry about learning and learners. The Reading Teacher, 51(6), 520–523Google Scholar
  6. Bolton, G. (1996). Afterward: Drama as research. In P. Taylor (Ed.) Researching drama and arts education: Paradigms & possibilities (pp. 187–194). Washington, DC: Falmer PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolton, G. (2007). A history of drama education: A search for substance. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 45–61). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Booth, D. (2003). Towards an understanding of theater in education. In K. Gallegher & D. Booth (Eds.), How theater educates convergences & counterpoints (pp. 14–22). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Cecil, N. L., & Lauritzen, P. (1994). Literacy and the arts for the integrated classroom: Alternative ways of knowing. White Plains, NY: LongmanGoogle Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Capricorn BooksGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisner, E. (1988). The primacy of experience and the politics of method. Educational Researcher, 17(5), 15–20Google Scholar
  12. Eisner, E. (2005). The role of intelligence in the creation of art in D. A. Breault & R. Breault (Eds.) Experiencing Dewey: Insights for today's classroom (pp. 106–108). Indianapolis, IN:Kappa Delta PiGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallego, M., & Hollingsworth, S. (2000). Introduction: The idea of multiple literacies. In M.Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 1–23). New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibbs, J. (2001). Tribes: A new way of learning and being together. Windsor, CA: Center Source SystemsGoogle Scholar
  15. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: DoubledayGoogle Scholar
  16. Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change.San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  17. Hull, G. & Nelson, M. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Latta, M. (2001). The possibilities of play in the classroom. New York: Peter LangGoogle Scholar
  20. McCaslin, N. (2005). Seeking the aesthetic in creative drama and theatre for young audiences.Journal of Aesthetic Education, 39(4), 12–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mavers, D. (2007). Semiotic resourcefulness: A young child's email exchange as design. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7(2), 155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moll, L., & Greenberg, J. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 319–348). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Norris, J., McGammon, L., & Miller, C. (2000). Learning to teach drama: A narrative approach.Portsmouth, NH: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  24. Saldaña, J. (1995). Drama of color: Improvisation with multiethnic folklore. Portsmouth, NH:HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  25. Sendak, M. (1963). Where the wild things are. New York: Harper CollinsGoogle Scholar
  26. Short, K. G., & Kauffman, G. (2000). Exploring sign systems within an inquiry system. In M.A.Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 42–61). New York: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Siegel, M. (2006). Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65–77Google Scholar
  28. Spolin, V. (1986). Theater games of the classroom: A teacher's handbook. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Viorst, J. (1987). Alexander and the terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day (2nd ed.). New York: Alladdin PaperbacksGoogle Scholar
  30. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Wagner, B. J. (1999/1976). Dorothy Heathcote: Drama as a learning medium (Rev. Ed.). Portsmouth, NH: HeinemanGoogle Scholar
  32. Wertsch, J. (1990). The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. In L. Moll (Ed.),Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 111–126). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelli Jo Kerry-Moran
    • 1
  • J. Matthew Meyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Indiana University of PennsylvaniaIndianaUSA

Personalised recommendations