Estimated Visual Magnitudes of the EISCAT UHF Meteors

  • Csilla Szasz
  • Johan Kero
  • Asta Pellinen-Wannberg
  • David D. Meisel
  • Gudmund Wannberg
  • Assar Westman
Chapter 3: Meteor-Atmosphere Interactions

Abstract

We have investigated the conditions for simultaneous meteor observations with the EISCAT UHF radar system and telescopic optical devices. The observed characteristics of 410 meteors detected by all three UHF receivers are compared with model simulations and their luminosity is calculated as a part of a meteoroid ablation model using a fifth order Runge–Kutta numerical integration technique. The estimated absolute visual magnitudes are in the range of +9 to +5. The meteors should therefore be observable using intensified CCD or EMCCD (Electron Multiplying CCD) cameras with telephoto lenses. A possible setup of a coordinated radar and optical campaign is suggested.

Keywords

Meteor EISCAT HPLA Radar Magnitude Optical detection 

Abbreviations

EISCAT

European incoherent scatter facility

HPLA

High power large aperture

EMCCD

Electron multiplying CCD

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V.A. Bronshten, Physics of Meteoric Phenomena. (D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1983)Google Scholar
  2. Z. Ceplecha, J. Borovička, W.G. Elford, D.O. Revelle, R.L. Hawkes, V. Porubčan, M. Šimek, Space Sci. Rev. 84, 327–471 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. S. Close, M. Oppenheim, S. Hunt, L. Dyrud, J. Geophys. Res. (Space Phys.) 107, 9–1 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Close, P. Brown, M. Campbell-Brown, M. Oppenheim, P. Colestock, Icarus. 186, 547–556 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. J.M.A. Danby, Fundamentals of celestial mechanics, 2nd. rev. and enlarged edn. (Willmann-Bell, 1988)Google Scholar
  6. A.E. Hedin, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 1159–1172 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. K.A. Hill, L.A. Rogers, R.L. Hawkes, Astron. Astrophys. 444, 615–624 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. W. Jones, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 288, 995–1003 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Jones, A.R. Webster, Planet. Space Sci. 39, 873–878 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. S.G. Love, D.E. Brownlee, Icarus. 89, 26–43 (1991)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. K. Nishimura, T. Sato, T. Nakamura, M. Ueda, IEICE Trans. Commun. E84-C(12), 1877–1884 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. E.J. Öpik, Physics of meteor flight in the atmosphere, No. 6 in Interscience tracts on physics and astronomy (Interscience Publishers, Inc., 1958)Google Scholar
  13. A. Pellinen-Wannberg, A. Westman, G. Wannberg, K. Kaila, Annales Geophysicae 16, 1475–1485 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. L.A. Rogers, K.A. Hill, R.L. Hawkes, Planet. Space Sci. 53, 1341–1354 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. A.G.G.M. Tielens, C.F. McKee, C.G. Seab, D.J. Hollenbach, Astrophys. J. 431, 321–340 (1994)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Westman, G. Wannberg, A. Pellinen-Wannberg, Annales Geophysicae 22, 1575–1584 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Csilla Szasz
    • 1
  • Johan Kero
    • 1
  • Asta Pellinen-Wannberg
    • 2
  • David D. Meisel
    • 3
  • Gudmund Wannberg
    • 4
  • Assar Westman
    • 4
  1. 1.Swedish Institute of Space PhysicsKirunaSweden
  2. 2.Umeå University and Swedish Institute of Space PhysicsKirunaSweden
  3. 3.SUNY GeneseoGeneseoUSA
  4. 4.EISCAT Scientific AssociationKirunaSweden

Personalised recommendations