Using a State-Space Model of the British Song Thrush Turdus philomelos Population to Diagnose the Causes of a Population Decline

  • Stephen R. BaillieEmail author
  • Stephen P. Brooks
  • Ruth King
  • Len Thomas
Part of the Environmental and Ecological Statistics book series (ENES, volume 3)


We investigated the utility of state-space models for determining the demographic causes of population declines, using the Song Thrush as an example. A series of integrated state-space models were fitted to census and ring-recovery data from the United Kingdom for the period 1968–2000. The models were fitted using Bayesian MCMC techniques with uniform priors and were ranked using the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC). Ring-reporting rates were modelled as a declining logit-linear function of year, with separate slopes for first-year birds and adults. The system process involved three demographic parameters, first-year survival, adult survival and productivity. Survival rates were modelled as year-specific, as specific to blocks with uniform population growth rates, or as logit-linear functions of weather or year. Productivity rates were modelled as random annual effects, as block-specific or as log-linear functions of year. We fitted 17 such models chosen on the basis of our prior knowledge of this system, given that it was not practical to fit all potential models. Six models within 10 points of the smallest DIC value were selected for inference. The posterior distributions from these preferred models suggest that population growth rates are best correlated with first year survival and that and that there is also a pattern of consistent but weaker correlations between population growth rate and adult survival. Correlations between population growth rates and productivity were more variable, and may have been influenced by errors in other parts of the model, as productivity is essentially measured by difference. Thus in this analysis the evidence for productivity having a substantial influence of population changes is equivocal. The interpretation of these results and the potential value of integrated state-space models for research into the population dynamics of declining populations are discussed.


Population Growth Rate Reporting Rate Adult Survival Deviance Information Criterion Nest Success 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baillie SR (1990) Integrated population monitoring of breeding birds in Britain and Ireland. Ibis 132:151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baillie SR (2001) The contribution of ringing to the conservation and management of bird populations: a review. Ardea 89 (special issue):167–184.Google Scholar
  3. Baillie SR, Green RE (1987) The importance of variation in recovery rates when estimating survival rates from ringing recoveries. In North PM (ed.), Ringing Recovery Analytical Methods. Acta Ornithologica 23:41–60.Google Scholar
  4. Baillie SR, Marchant JH, Crick HQP, Noble DG, Balmer DE, Coombes RH, Downie IS, Freeman SN, Joys AC, Leech DI, Raven MJ, Robinson RA, Thewlis RM (2006) Breeding Birds in the Wider Countryside: their conservation status 2005. BTO Research Report No. 435. BTO, Thetford. (
  5. Baillie SR, Peach WJ (1992) Population limitation in Palaearctic-African migrant passerines. Ibis 134(Suppl. 1):120–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker H, Stroud DA, Aebischer NJ, Cranswick PA, Gregory RD, McSorley CA, Noble DG, Rehfisch MM (2006) Population estimates of birds in Great Britain and the United Kingdom. British Birds 99:25–44.Google Scholar
  7. Besbeas P, Freeman SN (2006) Methods for joint inference from panel survey and demographic data. Ecology 87:1138–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Besbeas P, Freeman SN, Morgan BJT, Catchpole EA (2002) Integrating mark-recapture-recovery and census data to estimate animal abundance and demographic parameters. Biometrics 58:540–547.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Besbeas P, Freeman SN, Morgan BJT (2005) The potential of integrated population modelling. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 47:35–48.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Besbeas P, Lebreton J-D, Morgan BJT (2003) The efficient integration of abundance and demographic data. Applied Statistics 52:95–102.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Brooks SP, King R, Morgan BJT (2004) A Bayesian approach to combining animal abundance and demographic data. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 27:515–529.Google Scholar
  12. Brownie C, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Robson DS (1985) Statistical inference from band recovery data – A handbook, second edition. United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service, Resource Publication 156, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Buckland ST, Newman KB, Thomas L, Kösters N (2004) State-space models for the dynamics of wild animal populations. Ecological Modelling 171:157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caughley G (1994) Directions in conservation biology. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:215–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cave VM, Freeman SN, Brooks SP, Balmer DE (2008) On adjusting for missing visits in the indexing of abundance from ‘Constant Effort’ ringing. In: Thomson DL, Cooch EG, Conroy MJ (eds.) Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, Springer, New York, 3:949--964Google Scholar
  16. Crick HQP, Baillie SR, Leech DI (2003) The UK Nest Record Scheme: its value for science and conservation. Bird Study 50:254–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fewster RM, Buckland ST, Siriwardena GM, Baillie SR, Wilson JD (2000) Analysis of population trends for farmland birds using generalized additive models. Ecology 81:1970–1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fonnesbeck CJ, Edwards HH, Reynolds III JE (2008) Hierarchical covariate models for detection and availability of Florida manatees at a warm water aggregation site. In: Thomson DL, Cooch EG, Conroy MJ (eds.) Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, Springer, New York, 3:563--578Google Scholar
  19. Freeman SN, Crick HQP (2003) The decline of the Spotted Flycatcher Muscicapa striata in the UK: an integrated population model. Ibis 145:400–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Freeman SN, Robinson RA, Clark JA, Griffin BM, Adams SY (2007) Changing demography and population decline in the Common Starling Sturnus vulgaris: a multisite approach to integrated population monitoring. Ibis 149:587–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibbons DW, Reid JB, Chapman RA (1993) The New Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britaiin and Ireland: 1988–1991. T & A D Poyser, London.Google Scholar
  22. Green RE (1995) Diagnosing causes of bird population declines. Ibis 137(Suppl.):S47–S55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Green RE (1999) Applications of large-scale studies of demographic rates to bird conservation. Bird Study 46(Suppl.):S279–S288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoyle SD, Maunder MN, Veran S, Lebreton J-D (in prep.) A Bayesian integrated population dynamics model to evaluate the impact of fisheries on black-footed albatross using all available information.Google Scholar
  25. King R, Brooks SP, Mazzetta C, Freeman SN (2006) Identifying and diagnosing population declines: a Bayesian assessment of Lapwings in the UK. Technical Report, University of St Andrews.Google Scholar
  26. Lebreton JD (2008) Assessing density-dependence: where are we left? In: Thomson DL, Cooch EG, Conroy MJ (eds.) Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, Springer, New York, 3:19--42Google Scholar
  27. Maunder MN (2001) A general framework for integrating the standardization of catch-per-unit-of-effort into stock assessment models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 58:795–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maunder MN (2004) Population viability analysis, based on combining integrated, Bayesian, and hierarchical analyses. Acta Oecologica 26:85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morgan BJT (2008) Completing the ecological jigsaw. In: Thomson DL, Cooch EG, Conroy MJ (eds.) Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, Springer, New York, 3:513--540Google Scholar
  30. Peach WJ, Denny M, Cotton PA, Hill IF, Gruar D, Barritt D, Impey A, Mallord J (2004a) Habitat selection by song thrushes in stable and declining farmland populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peach WJ, Robinson RA, Murray KA (2004b) Demographic and environmental causes of the decline of rural song thrushes Turdus philomelos in lowland Britain. Ibis 146(Suppl. 2):50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robinson RA, Green RE, Baillie SR, Peach WJ, Thomson DL (2004) Demographic mechanisms of the population decline of the song thrush Turdus philomelos in Britain. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:670–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siriwardena GM, Baillie SR, Wilson JD (1999) Temporal variation in the annual survival rates of six granivorous birds with contrasting population trends. Ibis 41:621–636.Google Scholar
  34. Siriwardena GM, Baillie SR, Crick HQP, Wilson JD (2000) The importance of variation in the nesting success of seed-eating birds in determining their population trends on farmland. Journal of Applied Ecology 37:128–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van der Linde A (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2002 64:583–616.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas L, Buckland ST, Newman KB, Harwood J (2005) A unified framework for modelling wildlife population dynamics. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 47:19–34.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomson DL, Baillie SR, Peach WJ (1997) The demography and age-specific annual survival of song thrushes during periods of population stability and decline. Journal of Animal Ecology 66:414–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46:S120–S139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen R. Baillie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stephen P. Brooks
  • Ruth King
  • Len Thomas
  1. 1.The NunneryBritish Trust for OrnithologyThetford

Personalised recommendations