Recent Developments in Alcoholism pp 71-89

Part of the Recent Developments in Alcoholism book series (RDIA, volume 18)

The Impact of Alcoholics Anonymous on Other Substance Abuse-Related Twelve-Step Programs

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the influence of the AA model on self-help fellowships addressing problems of drug dependence. Fellowships that have adapted the twelve-step recovery model to other substances of abuse are reviewed; next similarities and differences between AA and drug-recovery twelve-step organizations are examined; finally, we present empirical findings on patterns of attendance and perceptions of AA and Narcotics Anonymous (NA) among polydrug-dependent populations, many of whom are cross-addicted to alcohol. Future directions in twelve-step research are noted in closing.

Keywords

twelve steps self-help mutual aid recovery addiction 

References

  1. Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc. (1939–2001). Alcoholics Anonymous: The story of how many thousands of men and women have recovered from alcoholism (4th ed.). NewYork: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc. (1952). Twelve steps and twelve traditions. ed. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc. (1984). Medications and other drugs. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Alcoholics Anonymous World Services Inc. (1998). Comments on A.A.'s triennial surveys, edn. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, I. (2004). 2004 Membership survey, New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  6. American Psychiatric Association (1995). Practice guidelines for the treatment of patients with substance abuse disorders: Alcohol, Cocaine, Opioids. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152 (Nov suppl.), 1–59.Google Scholar
  7. Best, D. W., Harris, J. C., Gossop, M., Manning, V. C., Man, L. H., Marshall, J., Bearn, J., & Strang, J. (2001). Are the Twelve Steps more acceptable to drug users than to drinkers? A comparison of experiences of and attitudes to Alcoholics Anonymous (A.A.) and Narcotics Anonymous (N.A.) among 200 substance misusers attending inpatient detoxification. European Addiction Research, 7, 69–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogenschutz, M., & Akin, S. (2000). 12-Step participation and attitudes towards 12-step meetings in dual diagnosis patients. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 18, 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christo, G., & Franey, C. (1995). Drug users' spiritual beliefs, locus of control and the disease concept in relation to Narcotics Anonymous attendance and six-month outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 38, 51–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cocaine Anonymous. Information about CA. 2003. 2007.Google Scholar
  11. Crystal Meth Anonymous (2007) http://www.crystalmeth.org/ Accessed May 2007.
  12. Dennis, M. L., Scott, C. K., Funk, R., & Foss, M. A. (2005). The duration and correlates of addiction and treatment careers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28 (Suppl. 1), S51–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drake, R. E., McLaughlin, P., Pepper, B., & Minkoff, K. (1991). Dual diagnosis of major mental illness and substance disorder: an overview. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 1991,(50), 3–12.Google Scholar
  14. Fiorentine, R. (1999). After drug treatment: Are 12-step programs effective in maintaining abstinence? The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25, 93–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glickman S. M., Galanter M., & Dermatis H. (2001). Methadone Anonymous: A 12-step program for methadone maintained heroin addicts. Substance Abuse, 22, 247–56.Google Scholar
  16. Hazelden (1993). The Dual Diagnosis Recovery Book. Center City, MN: Hazelden.Google Scholar
  17. Heroin Anonymous . What is Heroin Anonymous ? 2004. 2007.Google Scholar
  18. Humphreys, K. (1997). Clinicians' referral and matching of substance abuse patients to self-help groups after treatment. Psychiatric Services, 48, 1445–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Humphreys, K. (2004). Circles of recovery: Self-help organizations for addictions, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Humphreys, K., Mankowski, E., Moos, R. H., & Finney, J. W. (1999). Do enhanced friendships networks and active coping mediate the effect of self-help groups on substance use? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 54–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kessler, R. C. (1997). The national comorbidity survey: Preliminary results and future directions. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 5, 139–151.Google Scholar
  22. Kessler, R. C., Crum, R. M., Warner, L. A., Nelson, C. B., Schulenberg, J., & Anthony, J. C. (1997). Lifetime co-occurrence of DSM-III-R alcohol abuse and dependence with other psychiatric disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 54, 313–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kurtz, L. F. (1997). Self help and support groups: A handbook for practitioners (ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Kurtz, L. F., Garvin, C. D., Hill, E. M., Pollio, D., McPherson, S., & Powell, T. J. (1995). Involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous by persons with dual diagnosis. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 12, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laudet, A., Stanick, V., & Sands, B. (2007). The effect of onsite 12-step meetings on post-treatment outcomes among polysubstance-dependent outpatient clients. Evaluation Review, 31(6), 613–646.Google Scholar
  26. Laudet, A., & White, W. (2007). Predicting sustained remission from polysubstance use: A three-year follow-up study. Presented 69th Annual Scientific Meeting of the College on Problems of Drug Dependence (CPDD), Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
  27. Laudet, A. B., Morgen, K., & White, W. L. (2006). The Role of Social Supports, Spirituality, Religiousness, Life Meaning and Affiliation with 12-Step Fellowships in Quality of Life Satisfaction Among Individuals in Recovery from Alcohol and Drug Problems. Alcoholism Treament Quarterly, 24, 33–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laudet, & Storey. (2006). A comparison of the recovery experience in the US and Australia: Toward identifying ‘universal’ and culture-specific processes. Scottsdale, AZ: International NIDA Research Forum.Google Scholar
  29. Laudet, A., Stanick, V., Carway, J., & Sands, B. (2004). Perceptions of Narcotics & Alcoholics Anonymous among polysubstance users newly admitted to outpatient treatment. edn. Washington DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  30. Laudet, A. B., Magura, S., Vogel, H. S., & Knight, E. (2000a). Recovery challenges among dually diagnosed individuals. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 321–9.Google Scholar
  31. Laudet, A. B., Magura, S., Vogel, H. S., & Knight, E. (2000b). Support, mutual aid and recovery from dual diagnosis. Community Mental Health Journal, 36, 457–76.Google Scholar
  32. Makela, K., Arminen, I., Bloomfield, K., Eisenbach-Stangl, I., Bergmark, K. H., Kurube, N., Mariolini, N., Olafsdottir, H., Peterson, J. H., Phillips, M., Rehm, J., Room, R., Rosenqvist, P., Rosovsky, H., Stenius, K., Swiatkiewicz, G., Woronowicz, B., & Zielinski, A. (1996). Alcoholics Anonymous as a mutualhelp movement, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  33. Marijuana Anonymous (1992). Why Marijuana Anonymous? http://www.marijuana-anonymous. org/Pages/lit.html Accessed on may 20, 2007.
  34. McElrath, D. (1997). The Minnesota model. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 29, 141–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGonagle, D. (1994). Methadone anonymous: a 12-step program. Reducing the stigma of methadone use. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 32, 5–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McIntire, D. (2000). How well does A.A. work? An analysis of published A.A. surveys (1968–1996) and related analyses/comments. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 18, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Montgomery, H. A., Miller, W. R., & Tonigan, J. S. (1993). Differences among A.A. groups: implications for research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 54, 502–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Moos, R. H., Finney, J. W., Ouimette, P. C., & Suchinsky, R. T. (1999). A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: I. Treatment orientation, amount of care, and 1-year outcomes. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, 23, 529–36.Google Scholar
  39. Narcotics Anonymous World Services, I. (2005). Information about N.A., Van Nuys, CA: Narcotics Anonymous World Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  40. Noordsy, D. L., Schwab, B., Fox, L., & Drake, R. E. (1996). The role of self-help programs in the rehabilitation of persons with severe mental illness and substance use disorders. Community Mental Health Journal, 32, 71–81; discussion 83–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ouimette, P. C., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. H. (1997). Twelve-step and cognitive–behavioral treatment for substance abuse: A comparison of treatment effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 230–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pristach, C., & Smith, C. (1999). Attitudes towards Alcoholics Anonymous by dually-diagnosed patients. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 18, 69–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Project MATCH Research Group (1997). Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 7–29.Google Scholar
  44. Satel S. L., Becker B. K., & Dan E. (1993). Reducing obstacles to affiliation with A.A. among veterans with PTSD and alcoholism. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44, 1061–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheehan D, Lecrubier Y, Harnett-Sheehan K, Amorim P, Janavs J, Weiller E, & et al. (1998). The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 59, 22–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Toumbourou, J. W., Hamilton, M., U'Ren, A., Stevens-Jones, P., & Storey, G. (2002). Narcotics Anonymous participation and changes in substance use and social support. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23, 61–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vogel, H. S., Knight, E., Laudet, A. B., & Magura, S. (1998). Double trouble in recovery: Self-help for the dually diagnosed. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 21, 356–364.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Washton, A. M. (1988). Preventing relapse to cocaine. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 49 (Suppl.), 34–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Weiss, R. D., Griffin, M. L., Gallop, R., Onken, L. S., Gastfriend, D. R., Daley, D., Crits-Christoph, P., Bishop, S., & Barber, J. P. (2000). Self-help group attendance and participation among cocaine dependent patients. Drug Alcohol and Dependence, 60, 169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. White, B. J., & Madara, E. J. (1996). The self-help sourcebook (5th edn.). Denville, NJ: American Self-Help Clearinghouse.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for the Study of Addictions and RecoveryNational Development and Research Institutes, Inc.New York CityUSA

Personalised recommendations