Systematic Social Observation in Criminology

  • Stephen D. Mastrofski
  • Roger B. Parks
  • John D. McCluskey
Chapter

Abstract

Systematic social observation (SSO) came to criminology at the hand of Albert J. Reiss, Jr., who, in the 1960s, encouraged social scientists to shed some “nonsensical” views about the limits and benefits of different forms of observing social phenomena (Reiss 1968, 1971b). Reiss objected to the notion that direct observation of social phenomena in their natural setting was work for solo researchers using qualitative methods, while survey research was suitable as a group enterprise with many researchers using a systematized protocol to gather quantified data. Reiss argued that both direct social observation and survey research were in fact forms of observation that must confront the same set of challenges to produce interpretable information, that both were amenable to either solo or group practice, and that both could be used effectively for discovery or validation of propositions about social phenomena. Beyond these insights, Reiss’s important contribution to criminology was the development and practice of the techniques of SSO. Acknowledging that others before him had associated social field observation with the sorts of systematic protocols that had become popular in survey research, Reiss demonstrated how SSO could be used to answer important questions about what influences police–citizen interactions, with implications for theories about police–citizen relationships and for public policies concerning justice, race relations, and crime control. Since Reiss, criminologists have expanded the application of SSO more broadly, but it is still used relatively infrequently.

References

  1. Alpert GP, Macdonald JM, Dunham RG (2005) Police suspicion and discretionary decision making during citizen stops. Criminology 43(2):407–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrington RE (1943) Time sampling in studies of social behavior: a critical review of techniques and results with research suggestions. Psychol Bull 40(2):81–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker RG, Wright HF (1955) The Midwest and its children. Row, Peterson, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnsely JH (1972) The social reality of ethics: the comparative analysis of moral codes. Routledge and Kegan Paul, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bayley DH (1986) The tactical choices of police patrol officers. J Crim Justice 14:329–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayley DH, Garofalo J (1989) Management of violence by police patrol officers. Criminology 27:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black D (1980) The manner and customs of the police. Academic, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouffard JA, Taxman FS, Silverman R (2003) Improving process evaluations of correctional programs by using a comprehensive evaluation methodology. Eval Program Plann 26:149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulton MJ (1991) A comparison of structural and contextual features of middle school children’s playfull and aggressive fighting. Ethol Sociobiol 12:119–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyd RD, Devault MV (1966) The observation and recording of behavior. Rev Educ Res 36(5):529–551Google Scholar
  11. Brackett L, Reid DH, Green CW (2007) Effects of reactivity to observations on staff performance. J Appl Behav Anal 40:191–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buckle A, Farrington DP (1984) An observational study of shoplifting. Br J Criminol 24(1):63–73Google Scholar
  13. Buckle A, Farrington DP (1994) Measuring shoplifting by systematic observation: a replication study. Psychol Crime Law 1(2):133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buckman WH, Lamberth J (2001) Challenging racial profiles: attacking Jim Crow on the interstate. Rutgers Race Law Rev 3:83–115Google Scholar
  15. Caughy MO, O’Campo PJ, Patterson J (2001) A brief observational measure for urban neighborhoods. Health Place 7:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dabney DA, Hollinger RC, Dugan L (2004) Who actually steals? A study of covertly observed shoplifters. Justice Q 21(4):693–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellerbeck EF, Ahluwalia JS, Jolicoeur DG, Gladden J, Mosier MC (2001) Direct observation of smoking cessation activities in primary care practice. J Fam Pract 50(8). http://www.jfponline.com/toc.asp?FID = 278&issue = August%202001&folder_description = August%202001%20(Vol.%2050,%20No.%208) Accessed January 31, 2009Google Scholar
  18. Engel RS (2000) The effects of supervisory styles on patrol officer behavior. Police Q 3(3):262–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Engel RS, Calnon J (2004) Examining the influence of drivers’ characteristics during traffic stops with police: results from a national survey. Justice Q 21(1):49–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frank J, Brandl SG, Watkins RC (1997) The content of community policing: a comparison of the daily activities of community and “beat” officers. Policing Int J Police Strateg Manage 20:716–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fyfe JJ (2002) Too many missing cases: holes in our knowledge about police use of force. Report prepared for the National Research Council, Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices Data Collection Workshop, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Gould JB, Mastrofski SD (2004) Suspect searches: assessing police behavior under the constitution. Criminol Public Policy 3:316–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graham K, West P, Wells S (2000) Evaluating theories of alcohol-related aggression using observations of young adults in bars. Addiction 95:847–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graham K, Osgood D, Zibrowski E, Purcell J, Gliksman L, Leonard K, Pernanen K, Saltz R, Toomey T (2004) The effect of the Safer Bars programme on physical aggression in bars: results of a randomized controlled trial. Drug Alcohol Rev 23:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham K, Bernards S, Osgood D, Homel R, Purcell J (2005) Guardians and handlers: the role of bar staff in preventing and managing aggression. Addiction 100:755–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Graham K, Bernards S, Osgood D, Wells S (2006a) Bad nights or bad bars? Multi-level analysis of environmental predictors of aggression in late-night large-capacity bars and clubs. Addiction 101:1569–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Graham K, Tremblay PF, Wells S, Pernanen K, Purcell J, Jelley J (2006b) Harm, intent, and the nature of aggressive behavior: measuring naturally occurring aggression in barroom settings. Assessment 13(3):280–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gravlee CC, Zenk SN, Woods S, Rowe Z, Schulz AJ (2006) Handheld computers for direct observation of the social and physical environment. Field Methods 18:382–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hartmann DP, Wood DD (1982) Observational methods. In: Bellack AS, Hersen M, Kazdin AE (eds) International handbook of behavior modification and therapy. Plenum, New York, pp 109–138Google Scholar
  30. Homel R, Clark J (1994) The prediction and prevention of violence in pubs and clubs. In: Clarke RV (ed) Crime prevention studies, vol 3. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY, pp 1–46Google Scholar
  31. Homel R, Hauritz M, Wortley R, McIlwain G (1997) Preventing alcohol-related crime through community action: The Surfers Paradise Safety Action Project. In: Homel R (ed) Policing for prevention: reducing crime, public intoxication and injury. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY, pp 35–90Google Scholar
  32. Kazdin AE (1979) Unobtrusive measures in behavioral assessment. J Appl Behav Anal 12:713–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelling GL (2001) “Broken windows” vs. “A new look.” Law Enforcement News, March 15, 9Google Scholar
  34. Knutsson J (1997) Restoring public order in a city park. In: Homel R (ed) Policing for prevention: reducing crime, public intoxication and injury. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY, pp 133–151Google Scholar
  35. Langan PA, Greenfeld LA, Smith SK, Dunrose MR, Levin DJ (2001) Contacts between police and the public, findings from the 1999 national survey. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. Levine R (1997) A geography of time. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Luthans F, Lockwood D (1984) Toward an observation system for measuring leader behavior in natural settings. In: Hunt J, Hosking D, Schriesheim C, Steward R (eds) Leaders and managers: international perspective of managerial behavior and leadership. Pergamon, New York, pp 117–141Google Scholar
  38. Macintyre S, Homel R (1997) Danger on the dance floor: a study of interior design, crowding and aggression in nightclubs. In: Homel R (ed) Policing for prevention: reducing crime, public intoxication and injury. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NY, pp 91–113Google Scholar
  39. Mastrofski SD (2004) Controlling street-level police discretion. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 593:100–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mastrofski SD, Parks RB (1990) Improving observational studies of police. Criminology 28(3):475–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mastrofski SD, Snipes JB, Supina A (1996) Compliance on demand: the public’s response to specific police requests. J Res Crime Delinq 33:269–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mastrofski SD, Parks RB, Reiss AJ Jr, Worden RE, DeJong C, Snipes JB, Terrill W (1998) Systematic observation of public police: applying field research methods to policy issues. NCJ 172859. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. Mastrofski SD, Snipes JB, Parks RB, Maxwell CD (2000) The helping hand of the law: police control of citizens on request. Criminology 38:307–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mastrofski SD, Reisig M, McCluskey JD (2002) Police disrespect toward the public: an encounter-based analysis. Criminology 40:519–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maxfield MG, Babbie E (1998) Research methods for criminal justice and criminology, 2nd edn. West, Belmont, CAGoogle Scholar
  46. McCall GJ (1984) Systematic field observation. Annu Rev Sociol 10:263–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCluskey JD (2003) Police requests for compliance: coercive and procedurally just tactics. LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. McCluskey JD, Mastrofski SD, Parks RB (1999) To acquiesce or rebel: predicting citizen compliance with police requests. Police Q 2(4):389–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McIver JP, Parks RB (1983) Evaluating police performance: identification of effective and ineffective police actions. In: Bennett RR (ed) Police at work: policy issues and analysis. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 21–44Google Scholar
  50. Meehan AJ, Ponder MC (2002) Race and place: the ecology of racial profiling African American motorists. Justice Q 19(3):399–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mileski M (1971) Courtroom encounters: an observational study of a lower criminal court. Law Soc Rev 5:473–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mintzberg H (1972) The nature of managerial work. Harper Collins, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Brien RO (2000) Crime facts: victim and offender data. In: Sheley JF (ed) Criminology. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, pp 59–83Google Scholar
  54. Parks RB (1984) Comparing citizen and observer perceptions of police-citizen encounters In: Whitaker GP (ed) Understanding police agency performance. U.S. Government Printing office, Washington, DC, pp 121–135Google Scholar
  55. Parks RB, Mastrofski SD, Reiss AJ, Worden RE, Terrill WC, DeJong C, Stroshine M, Shepherd R (1998) St. Petersburg project on policing neighborhoods: a study of the police and the community. Indiana University, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  56. Percy S (1980) Response time and citizen evaluation of police. J Police Sci Adm 8(1):75–86Google Scholar
  57. Perkins DD, Wandersman A, Rich RC, Taylor RB (1993) The physical environment of street crime: defensible space, territoriality and incivilities. J Environ Psychol 13:29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pugh SD (2001) Service with a smile: emotional contagion in the service encounter. Acad Manage J 44(5):1018–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rafaeli A, Sutton RI (1989) The expression of emotion in organizational life. In: Cummings LL, Staw BM (eds) Research in organizational behavior. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 1–42Google Scholar
  60. Rafaeli A, Sutton RI (1990) Busy stores and demanding customers: how do they affect the display of positive emotion? Acad Manage J 33:623–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Raudenbush SW, Sampson RJ (1999) Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with applications to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociol Methodol 29:1–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reisig M, McCluskey JD, Mastrofski SD, Terrill W (2004) Suspect disrespect toward the police. Justice Q 21: 241–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reiss AJ Jr (1968) Stuff and nonsense about social surveys and observation. In: Becker HS, Geer B, Riesman D, Weiss RS (eds) Institutions and the person: papers presented to C. Everett Hughes. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, pp 351–367Google Scholar
  64. Reiss AJ Jr (1971a) The police and the public. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  65. Reiss AJ Jr (1971b) Systematic observation of natural social phenomena. In: Costner HL (ed) Sociological methodology. Jossey-Bass, Inc, San Francisco, pp 3–33Google Scholar
  66. Roethlisberger FJ, Dickson WJ (1939) Management and the worker. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  67. Rosenshine B, Furst NF (1973) The use of direct observation to study teaching. In: Gage NL (ed) Handbook of research on teaching, 2nd edn. Rand-McNally, Chicago, pp 122–183Google Scholar
  68. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW (1999) Systematic social observation of public spaces: a new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. Am J Sociol 3:603–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW (2004) Seeing disorder: neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows.” Soc Psychol Q 67(4):319–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schafer J, Mastrofski S (2005) Police leniency in traffic enforcement encounters: exploratory findings from observations and interviews. J Crim Justice 33:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Scott EJ (1981) Calls for service – Citizen demand and initial police response. NCJ 078362. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Bloomington, INGoogle Scholar
  72. Sherman LW, Weisburd D (1995) General deterrence effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: a randomized, controlled evaluation. Justice Q 12(4):625–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shrum W, Duque R, Brown T (2005) Digital video as research practice: methodology for the millennium. J Res Pract 1(1):1–19. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/6/11 Google Scholar
  74. Skogan WG (2006) Police and community in Chicago: a tale of three cities. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. Skogan W, Frydl K (eds) (2004) Fairness and effectiveness in policing: the evidence. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  76. Skolnick JH (1966) Justice without trial: law enforcement in democratic society. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Smith DA (1984) The organizational context of legal control. Criminology 22(1):19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Smith DA (1986) The neighborhood context of police behavior. In: Reiss A, Tonry M (eds) Crime and justice: a review of research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 314–332Google Scholar
  79. Smith RL, Mc Phail C, Pickens RG (1975) Reactivity to systematic observation with film: a field experiment. Sociometry 38:536–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Smith WR, Tomaskovic-Devey D, Zingraff MT, Mason HM, Warren PY, Wright CP (2004) The North Carolina highway traffic study: appendix A. National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC. http://www.ncjrs.gov/app/Publications/Abstract.aspx?ID = 204021 Accessed January 31, 2009
  81. Snipes J, Mastrofski SD (1990) An empirical test of Muir’s typology of police officers. Am J Crim Justice 14(4): 268–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Spano R (2005) Potential sources of observer bias in police observational data. Soc Sci Res 34:591–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Spano R (2007) How does reactivity affect police behavior? Describing and quantifying the impact of reactivity as behavioral change in a large-scale observational study of police. J Crim Justice 35:453–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Smith TF, Kelly R, Langa D, Flock SA, Jaen CR (1998) How valid are medical records and patient questionnaires for physician profiling and health services research?: a comparison with direct observation of patient visits. Med Care 36(6):851–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sykes RE (1977) Techniques of data collection and reduction in systematic field observation. Behav Res Methods Instrum 9:404–17Google Scholar
  86. Sykes RE (1978) Toward a theory of observer effect in systematic field observation. Hum Organ 37:148–56Google Scholar
  87. Sykes RE, Brent EE (1983) Policing: a social behaviorist perspective. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJGoogle Scholar
  88. Sykes RE, Whitney F (1969) Systematic observation utilizing the Minnesota interaction data coding and reduction system. Behav Sci 14:167–169Google Scholar
  89. Taylor RB (1997) Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighbor-hoods: ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. J Res Crime Delinq 34:113–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Taylor RB (2001) Crime, grime, fear, and decline. Westview Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  91. Taylor RB, Gottfredson SD, Brower S (1984) Block crime and fear: defensible space, local social ties, and territorial functioning. J Res Crime Delinq 21:303–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Taylor RB, Shumaker S, Gottfredson SD (1985) Neighborhood-level links between physical features and local sentiments: deterioration of fear of crime and confidence. J Archit Plann Res 21:261–265Google Scholar
  93. Terrill W (2001) Police coercion: application of the force continuum. LFB Scholarly Publishing, LLC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  94. Terrill W (2003) Police use of force and suspect resistance: the micro process of the police-suspect encounter. Police Q 6(1):51–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Terrill W, Mastrofski SD (2002) Reassessing situational and officer based determinants of police coercion. Justice Q 19:215–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Terrill W, Paoline EA III, Manning PK (2003) Police culture and coercion. Criminology 41(4):1003–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Thomas DS, Loomis AM, Arrington RE (1933) Observational studies of social behavior. Institute of Human Relations, Yale University, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  98. Tyler TR, Huo YJ (2002) Trust in the law: encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. Russell Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  99. Uchida CD, Maguire ER, Solomon SE, Gantley M (2004) Safe kids, safe schools: evaluating the use of iris recognition technology in New Egypt, NJ. 21st Century Solutions, Inc, Silver Spring, MDGoogle Scholar
  100. Van Maanen J (1974) Working the street: a developmental view of police behavior. In: Jacob H (ed) The potential for reform in criminal justice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 83–130Google Scholar
  101. Webb EJ, Campbell DT, Schwartz RD, Sechrest L, Grove JB (1981) Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  102. Weick KE (1968) Systematic observational methods. In: Lindsey G, Aronson E (eds) The handbook of social psychology, 2nd edn, vol 2. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp 357–451Google Scholar
  103. Weisburd D (2008) Place-based policing. Ideas in Policing. Police Foundation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  104. Weisburd D, Wyckoff LA, Ready J, Eck JE, Hinkle JC, Gajewski F (2006) Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology 44(3):549–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Whitaker GP, Mastrofski SD, Ostrom E, Parks RB, Percy SL (1982) Basic issues in police performance. National Institute of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  106. Whitehead TN (1935) Social relationships in the factory: a study of an industrial group. Hum Factor 9:381–394Google Scholar
  107. Wilcox P, Augustine MC, Clayton RR (2006) Physical environment and crime and misconduct in Kentucky schools. J Prim Prev 27(3):293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wilson D, Mastrofski S (2004) Final report: evaluation of the Biometric Inmate Tracking System at the Consolidated Navy Brig, Charleston, South Carolina. Report to the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center. Center for Justice Leadership and Management, Manassas, VAGoogle Scholar
  109. Worden RE (1996) The causes of police brutality: theory and evidence on police use of force. In: Geller WA, Toch H (eds) Police violence: understanding and controlling police use of force. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 23–51Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen D. Mastrofski
    • 1
  • Roger B. Parks
    • 2
  • John D. McCluskey
    • 3
  1. 1.Administration of Justice DepartmentGeorge Mason UniversityMannasesUSA
  2. 2.School of Public and Environmental AffairsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations