Attractors for Nonautonomous Navier–Stokes System and Other Partial Differential Equations

L. Amerio and G. Prouse, Abstract Almost Periodic Functions and Functional Equations, Van Nostrand, New York, 1971.Google Scholar

J. Arrieta, A. N. Carvalho, and J. K. Hale, A damped hyperbolic equation with critical exponent, Commun. Partial Differ. Equations 17 (1992), 841–866.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

A. V. Babin, Attractors of Navier–Stokes equations In: Handbook of Mathematical Fluid Dynamics. Vol. II. Amsterdam, North-Holland, 2003, pp. 169–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A. V. Babin and M. I. Vishik, Attractors of evolutionary partial differential equations and estimates of their dimensions, Russian Math. Surv. 38 (1983), no. 4, 151–213.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. V. Babin and M. I. Vishik, Regular attractors of semigroups and evolution equations, J. Math. Pures Appl. 62 (1983), no. 4, 441–491.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. V. Babin and M. I. Vishik, Maximal attractors of semigroups corresponding to evolution differential equations, Math. USSR Sbornik 54 (1986), no. 2, 387–408.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

A. V. Babin and M. I. Vishik, Unstable invariant sets of semigroups of non-linear operators and their perturbations, Russian Math. Surv. 41 (1986), 1–41.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. V. Babin and M. I. Vishik, Uniform finite-parameter asymptotics of solutions of nonlinear evolutionary equations, J. Math. Pures Appl. 68 (1989), 399–455.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. V. Babin and M. I. Vishik, Attractors of Evolution Equations, North Holland, 1992.Google Scholar

M. V. Bartucelli, P. Constantin, C. R. Doering, J. D. Gibbon, and M. Gisselfält, On the possibility of soft and hard turbulence in the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation, Physica D 44 (1990), 412–444.Google Scholar

J. E. Billotti and J. P. LaSalle, Dissipative periodic processes, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 77 (1971), 1082–1088.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. A. Blinchevskaya and Yu. S. Ilyashenko, Estimate for the entropy dimension of the maximal attractor for k-contracting systems in an infinite-dimensional space, Russian J. Math. Phys. 6 (1999), no. 1, 20–26.MATHGoogle Scholar

S. M. Borodich, On the behavior as t → +∞ of solutions of some nonautonomous equations, Moscow Univ. Math. Bull. 45 (1990), no. 6, 19–21.Google Scholar

D. N. Cheban and D. S. Fakeeh, Global Attractors of the Dynamical Systems without Uniqueness [in Russian], Sigma, Kishinev, 1994.Google Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and A. A. Ilyin, A note on the fractal dimension of attractors of dissipative dynamical systems, Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 44 (2001), no. 6, 811–819.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and A. A. Ilyin, On the fractal dimension of invariant sets; applications to Navier–Stokes equations, Discr. Cont. Dyn. Syst. 10 (2004), no. 1-2, 117-135.Google Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov, A. Yu. Goritsky, and M. I. Vishik, Integral manifolds and attractors with exponential rate for nonautonomous hyperbolic equations with dissipation, Russian J. Math. Phys. 12 (2005), no. 1, 17–39.MATHGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Nonautonomous dynamical systems and their attractors, Appendix in: M. I. Vishik, Asymptotic Behavior of Solutions of Evolutionary Equations, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Nonautonomous evolution equations with almost periodic symbols, Rend. Semin. Mat. Fis. Milano LXXII (1992), 185–213.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors for nonautonomous evolution equations with almost periodic symbols, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I 316 (1993), 357–361.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Families of semiprocesses and their attractors, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I 316 (1993), 441–445.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Dimension estimates for attractors and kernel sections of nonautonomous evolution equations, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I 317 (1993), 367–370.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Nonautonomous evolution equations and their attractors, Russian J. Math. Phys. 1, (1993), no. 2, 165–190.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, A Hausdorff dimension estimate for kernel sections of nonautonomous evolution equations, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 42 (1993), no. 3, 1057–1076.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors of nonautonomous dynamical systems and their dimension, J. Math. Pures Appl. 73 (1994), no. 3, 279–333.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Periodic processes and nonautonomous evolution equations with time-periodic terms, Topol. Meth. Nonl. Anal. J. Juliusz Schauder Center 4 (1994), no. 1, 1–17.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors of nonautonomous evolution equations with translation-compact symbols, In: Operator Theory: Advances and Applications 78, Bikhäuser, 1995, pp. 49–60.Google Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Nonautonomous evolutionary equations with translation compact symbols and their attractors, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I 321 (1995), 153–158.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors of nonautonomous evolutionary equations of mathematical physics with translation compact symbols, Russian Math. Surv. 50 (1995), no. 4.Google Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Trajectory attractors for evolution equations, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I 321 (1995), 1309–1314.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Trajectory attractors for reaction-diffusion systems, Topol. Meth. Nonl. Anal. J. Juliusz Schauder Center 7 (1996), no. 1, 49–76.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Trajectory attractors for 2D Navier–Stokes systems and some generalizations, Topol. Meth. Nonl. Anal. J. Juliusz Schauder Center 8 (1996), 217–243.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Evolution equations and their trajectory attractors, J. Math. Pures Appl. 76 (1997), no. 10, 913–964.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Attractors for Equations of Mathematical Physics, Am. Math. Soc., Providence RI, 2002.Google Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov and M. I. Vishik, Nonautonomous 2D Navier–Stokes system with a simple global attractor and some averaging problems, El. J. ESAIM: COCV 8 (2002), 467–487.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. V. Chepyzhov, M. I. Vishik, and W. L. Wendland, On Nonautonomous sine-Gordon type equations with a simple global attractor and some averaging, Discr. Cont. Dyn. Syst. 12 (2005), no. 1, 27–38.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

I. D. Chueshov, Global attractors of nonlinear problems of mathematical physics, Russian Math. Surv. 48 (1993), no. 3, 133–161.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

I. D. Chueshov, Introduction to the Theory of Infinite-Dimensional Dissipative Systems [in Russian] Acta, Kharkov, 1999.Google Scholar

P. Constantin and C. Foias, Global Lyapunov exponents, Kaplan–Yorke formulas and the dimension of the attractors for 2D Navier–Stokes equations, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 38 (1985), 1–27.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

P. Constantin and C. Foias, Navier–Stokes Equations, Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago– London, 1989.Google Scholar

P. Constantin, C. Foias, and R. Temam, Attractors representing turbulent flows, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 53, 1985.Google Scholar

P. Constantin, C. Foias, and R. Temam, On the dimension of the attractors in two-dimensional turbulence, Physica D 30 (1988), 284–296.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

J. H. Conway and N. J. A. Sloan, Sphere Packing, Lattices and Groups, Springer-Verlag, New York, etc., 1988.Google Scholar

C. M. Dafermos, Semiflows generated by compact and uniform processes, Math. Syst. Theory 8 (1975), 142–149.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

C. M. Dafermos, Almost periodic processes and almost periodic solutions of evolutional equations, In: Proc. Univ. Florida, Intern. Symp., New York Acad. Press, 1977, pp. 43–57.Google Scholar

C. R. Doering, J. D. Gibbon, D. D. Holm, and B. Nicolaenco, Low-dimensional behavior in the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation, Nonlinearity 1 (1988), 279–309.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

C. R. Doering, J. D. Gibbon, and C. D. Levermore, Weak and strong solutions of the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation, Physica D 71 (1994), 285–318.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. Douady and J. Oesterlé, Dimension de Hausdorff des attracteurs [in French], C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I textbf290, (1980), 1135–1138.Google Scholar

A. Eden, C. Foias, and R. Temam, Local and global Lyapunov exponents, J. Dyn. Differ. Equations 3 (1991), no. 1, 133–177.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. Eden, C. Foias, B. Nicolaenco, and R. Temam, Exponential Attractors for Dissipative Evolution Equations, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1995.Google Scholar

M. Efendiev, A. Miranville, and S. Zelik, Exponential attractors for a nonlinear reaction-diffusion system in ℝ³, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I 330 (2000), 713–718.Google Scholar

M. Efendiev, S. Zelik, and A. Miranville, Exponential attractors and finite-dimensional reduction for nonautonomous dynamical systems, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A, Math. 135 (2005), no. 4, 703–730.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. Efendiev and S. Zelik, Attractors of the reaction–diffusion systems with rapidly oscillating coefficients and their homogenization, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire 19 (2002), no. 6, 961–989.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

P. Fabrie and A. Miranville, Exponential attractors for nonautonomous first-order evolution equations, Discr. Cont. Dyn. Syst. 4 (1998), no. 2, 225–240.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

E. Feireisl, Attractors for wave equations with nonlinear dissipation and critical exponent, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I 315 (1992), 551–555.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

E. Feireisl, Exponentially attracting finite-dimensional sets for the processes generated by nonautonomous semilinear wave equations, Funk. Ekv. 36 (1993), 1–10.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

E. Feireisl, Finite-dimensional behavior of a nonautonomous partial differential equation: Forced oscillations of an extensible beam, J. Differ. Equations 101 (1993), 302–312.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

C. Foias and R. Temam, Some analytic and geometric properties of the solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations, J. Math. Pures Appl. 58, 3 (1979), 339–368.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

C. Foias and R. Temam, Finite parameter approximative structure of actual flows, In Nonlinear Problems: Problems and Future (A. R. Bishop, D. K. Campbell, and B. Nicolaenco, Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.Google Scholar

C. Foias and R. Temam, Asymptotic numerical analysis for the Navier–Stokes equations, InL Nonlinear Dynamics and Turbulence (G. I. Barenblatt, G. Iooss, D. D. Joseph, Eds.), Pitman, London, 1983, pp. 139–155.Google Scholar

C. Foias, O. Manley, R. Rosa, and R. Temam, Navier–Stokes Equations and Turbulence, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001.MATHGoogle Scholar

F. Gazzola and M. Sardella, Attractors for families of processes in weak topologies of Banach spaces, Discr. Cont. Dyn. Syst. 4 (1998), no. 3, 455–466.Google Scholar

J. M. Ghidaglia and B. Héron, Dimension of the attractors associated to the Ginzburg–Landau partial differential equation, Physica 28D (1987), 282–304.Google Scholar

J. M. Ghidaglia and R. Temam, Attractors for damped nonlinear hyperbolic equations, J. Math. Pures Appl. 66 (1987), 273–319.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. Yu. Goritsky and M. I. Vishik, Integral manifolds for nonautonomous equations, Rend. Accad. Naz. Sci. XL Mem. Mat. Appl. 115^ˆ 21 (1997), 109–146.Google Scholar

M. Grasselli and V. Pata, On the damped semilinear wave equation with critical exponent, Discr. Cont. Dyn. Syst. (2003), 351–358.Google Scholar

J. K. Hale, Asymptotic behavior and dynamics in infinite dimensions, Research Notes Math. 132 (1985), 1–42.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

J. K. Hale, Asymptotic behavior of dissipative systems, %Math. Surveys and Mon., 25, Am. Math. Soc., Providence RI, 1988.Google Scholar

J. K. Hale and J. Kato, Phase space of retarded equations with infinite delay, Tohôku Math. J. 21 (1978), 11–41.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

J. K. Hale and S. M. Verduyn-Lunel, Averaging in infinite dimensions, J. Int. Eq. Appl. 2 (1990), no. 4, 463–494.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

A. Haraux, Two remarks on dissipative hyperbolic problems, In: Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Their Applications (H. Brezis and J. L. Lions, Eds.) Pitman, 1985, pp.161–179.Google Scholar

A. Haraux, Attractors of asymptotically compact processes and applications to nonlinear partial differential equations, Commun. Partial Differ. Equations 13 (1988), 1383–1414.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. Haraux, Systèmes Dynamiques Dissipatifs et Applications [in French], Masson, Paris etc., 1991.Google Scholar

D. Henry, Geometric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equations, Lect. Notes Math. 840, Springer-Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar

B. Hunt, Maximal local Lyapunov dimension bounds the box dimension of chaotic attractors, Nonlinearity 9 (1996), 845–852.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Yu. S. Ilyashenko, Weakly contracting systems and attractors of Galerkin approximation for the Navier–Stokes equations on a two-dimensional torus, Sel. Math. Sov. 11 (1992), no. 3, 203–239.Google Scholar

A. A. Ilyin, Lieb–Thirring inequalities on the N-sphere and in the plane and some applications, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 67 (1993), 159–182.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. A. Ilyin, Attractors for Navier–Stokes equations in domain with finite measure, Nonlinear Anal., Theory Methods Appl. 27 (1996), no. 5, 605–616.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. A. Ilyin, Averaging principle for dissipative dynamical systems with rapidly oscillating right-hand sides, Sb. Math. 187 (1996), 5, 635-677.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. A. Ilyin, Global averaging of dissipative dynamical systems, Rend. Acad. Naz. Sci. XL, Mem. Mat. Appl. 116^ˆ 22 (1998), 167–191.Google Scholar

L. V. Kapitanskii, Minimal compact global attractor for a damped semilinear wave equations, Commun. Partial Differ. Equations 20 (1995), no. 7–8, 1303–1323.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

J. L. Kaplan and J. A. Yorke, Chaotic behavior of multi-dimensional difference equations, In: Functional Differential Equations and Approximations of Fixed Points (H. O. Peitgen and H. O. Walter Eds.), Lect. Notes Math. 730 (1979), p. 219.Google Scholar

A. Kolmogorov and V. Tikhomirov, ε -entropy and ε -capacity of sets in functional spaces, [in Russian], Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 14 (1959), 3–86; English transl.: Selected Works of A. N. Kolmogorov. III, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar

N. Kopell and L. N. Howard, Plane wave solutions to reaction-diffusion equations, Stud. Appl. Math. 52 (1973), no. 5, 291–328; 3–86.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

I. P. Kornfeld, Ya.G. Sinai, and S. V. Fomin, % Ergodic Theory [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow, 1980.Google Scholar

Y. Kuramoto and T. Tsuzuki, On the formation of dissipative structures in reaction-diffusion systems, Reduction Perturbation Approach, Progr. Theor. Phys. 54 (1975), 687–699.Google Scholar

O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, The Mathematical Theory of Viscous Incompressible Flow, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1969.MATHGoogle Scholar

O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, On the dynamical system generated by the Navier–Stokes equations, J. Soviet Math. 34 (1975), 458–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, On finite dimension of bounded invariant sets for the Navier–Stokes system and other dynamical systems, J. Soviet Math. 28 (1982), no. 5, 714–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, On finding the minimal global attractors for the Navier–Stokes equations and other PDEs, Russian Math. Surv. 42 (1987), no. 6, 27-73.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

O. A. Ladyzhenskaya, Attractors for Semigroups and Evolution Equations, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge–New York, 1991.MATHGoogle Scholar

B. Levitan and V. Zhikov, Almost Periodic Functions and Differential Equations, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1982.MATHGoogle Scholar

P. Li and S.–T. Yau, On the Schrödinger equation and the eigenvalue problem, Commun. Math. Phys. 8 (1983), 309–318.Google Scholar

E. Lieb and W. Thirring, Inequalities for the moments of the eigenvalues of Schrödinger equations and their relations to Sobolev inequalities, In: Studies in Mathematical Physics, essays in honour of Valentine Bargmann, Princeton Univ. Press, 1976, pp. 269–303.Google Scholar

J.-L. Lions and E. Magenes, Problèmes aux Limites non Homogènes et Applications. Vol. 1, Dunod, Paris, 1968.Google Scholar

J.-L. Lions, Quelques Méthodes de Résolution des Problèmes aux Limites non Linéaires, Dunod, Paris, 1969.Google Scholar

V. X. Liu, A sharp lower bound for the Hausdorff dimension of the global attractor of the 2D Navier–Stokes equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 158 (1993), 327–339.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

S. Lu, Attractors for nonautonomous 2D Navier–Stokes equations with less regular normal forces, J. Differ. Equations 230 (2006), 196–212.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

S. Lu, H. Wu, and C. Zhong, Attractors for nonautonomous 2D Navier–Stokes equations with normal external forces, Discr. Cont. Dyn. Syst. 13 (2005), no. 3, 701–719.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

G. Métivier, Valeurs propres d’opérateurs définis sur la restriction de systèmes variationnels à des sous-espaces, J. Math. Pures Appl. 57 (1978), 133–156.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. Mielke, The Ginzburg–Landau equation and its role as a modulation equation, In: Handbook of Dynamical Systems, Vol.2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2002, pp. 759–834.Google Scholar

A. Mielke, Bounds for the solutions of the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation in terms of the dispersion parameters, Physica D 117 (1998), no. 1-4, 106–116.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. Mielke, The complex Ginzburg–Landau equation on large and unbounded domains: sharper bounds and attractors, Nonlinearity 10 (1997), 199–222.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

R. K. Miller, Almost periodic differential equations as dynamical systems with applications to the existence of almost periodic solutions, J. Differ. Equations 1 (1965), 337–395.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

R. K. Miller and G. R. Sell, Topological dynamics and its relation to integral and nonautonomous systems. In: International Symposium. Vol. I, 1976, Academic Press, New York, 223–249.Google Scholar

A. Miranville, Exponential attractors for a class of evolution equations by a decomposition method, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I 328 (1999), 145–150.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

A. Miranville and X. Wang, Attractors for nonautonomous nonhomogeneous Navier–Stokes equations, Nonlinearity 10 (1997), 1047–1061.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

X. Mora and J. Sola Morales, Existence and nonexistence of finite-dimensional globally attracting invariant manifolds in semilinear damped wave equations, In: Dynamics of Infinite-Dimensional Systems (ed. N. S. Chow and J. K. Hale), Springer-Verlag, 1987, 187–210.Google Scholar

Sh. M. Nasibov, On optimal constants in some Sobolev inequalities and their applications to a nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Soviet Math. Dokl. 40 (1990), 110–115.Google Scholar

V. Pata, G. Prouse, and M. I. Vishik, Travelling waves of dissipative nonautonomous hyperbolic equations in a strip, Adv. Differ. Equ. 3 (1998), 249–270.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

V. Pata and S. Zelik, A remark on the weakly damped wave equation, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 5 (2006), 609–614.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

J. C. Robinson, Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge–New York, 2001.Google Scholar

G. R. Sell, Nonautonomous differential equations and topological dynamics I, II Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 127 (1967), 241–262; 263–283.Google Scholar

G. R. Sell, Lectures on Topological Dynamics and Differential Equations, Princeton, New York, 1971.Google Scholar

G. Sell and Y. You, Dynamics of Evolutionary Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.MATHGoogle Scholar

M. W. Smiley, Regularity and asymptotic behavior of solutions of nonautonomous differential equations, J. Dyn. Differ. Equations 7 (1995), no. 2, 237–262.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

R. Temam, On the Theory and Numerical Analysis of the Navier–Stokes Equations, North-Holland, 1979.Google Scholar

R. Temam, Navier–Stokes Equations and Nonlinear Functional Analysis, Philadelphia, 1995.Google Scholar

R. Temam, Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems in Mechanics and Physics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997.MATHGoogle Scholar

P. Thieullen, Entropy and the Hausdorff dimension for infinite-dimensional dynamical systems, J. Dyn. Differ. Equations 4 (1992), no. 1, 127–159.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

H. Triebel, Interpolation Theory, Functional Spaces, Differential Operators, North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1978.Google Scholar

M. I. Vishik, Asymptotic Behavior of Solutions of Evolutionary Equations, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar

M. I. Vishik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Attractors of nonautonomous dynamical systems and estimations of their dimension, Math. Notes 51 (1992), no. 6, 622–624.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. I. Vishik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Attractors of periodic processes and estimates of their dimensions, Math. Notes 57 (1995), no. 2, 127–140.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. I. Vishik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Kolmogorov ε -entropy estimates for the uniform attractors of nonautonomous reaction-diffusion systems, Sb. Math. 189 (1998), no. 2, 235–263.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. I. Vishik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Averaging of trajectory attractors of evolution equations with rapidly oscillating terms, Sb. Math. 192 (2001), no. 1, 11-47.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. I. Vishik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Kolmogorov epsilon-entropy in the problems on global attractors for evolution equations of mathematical physics, Probl. Inf. Transm. 39 (2003), no. 1, 2-20.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. I. Vishik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Approximation of trajectories lying on a global attractor of a hyperbolic equation with exterior force rapidly oscillating in time, Sb. Math. 194 (2003), no. 9, 1273–1300.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. I. Vishik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Nonautonomous Ginzburg–Landau equation and its attractors, Sb. Math. 196 (2005), no. 6, 17–42.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. I. Vishik and V. V. Chepyzhov, Attractors of dissipative hyperbolic equation with singularly oscillating external forces, Math. Notes 79 (2006), no. 3, 483-504.Google Scholar

M. I. Vishik and B. Fiedler, Quantitative homogenization of global attractors for hyperbolic wave equations with rapidly oscillating terms, Russian Math. Surv. 57 (2002), no. 4, 709–728.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. I. Vishik and A. V. Fursikov, Mathematical Problems of Statistical Hydromechanics, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dortrecht–Boston–London, 1988.MATHGoogle Scholar

M. I. Vishik and S. V. Zelik, The trajectory attractor of a nonlinear elliptic system in a cylindrical domain, Sb. Math. 187 (1996), no. 12, 1755–1789.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. Weinstein, Nonlinear Schrödinger equations and sharp interpolation estimates, Commun. Math. Phys. 87 (1983), 567–576.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

M. Ziane, Optimal bounds on the dimension of the attractor of the Navier–Stokes equations, Physica D 105 (1997), 1–19.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

S. V. Zelik, The attractor for a nonlinear reaction-diffusion system with a supercritical nonlinearity and it’s dimension, Rend. Accad. Naz. Sci. XL Mem. Mat. Appl. 24 (2000), 1–25.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar