What’s the Story?

Explanations and Narratives in Civil Jury Decisions
  • Reid Hastie

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, T., & Twining, W. (1991). Analysis of evidence. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  2. Gates, H.L. (1998). Thirteen ways of looking at a black man. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  3. Hart, H.L.A., & Honore, A.M. (1959). Causation in the law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hastie, R. (1999). The role of “stories” in civil jury judgments. Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 32(2), 1–13.Google Scholar
  5. Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (1996). The O.J. Simpson stories: Behavioral scientists look at The People v. O.J. Simpson trial. University of Colorado Law Review, 67, 957–976.Google Scholar
  6. Hastie, R., & Pennington, N. (2000). Explanation-based decision making. In T. Connolly, H.R. Arkes, & K.R. Hammond (Eds.), Judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary reader (2nd ed., pp. 212–228). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hastie, R., Schkade, D.A., & Payne, J.W. (1998). A study of juror and jury judgments in civil cases: Deciding liability for punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 287–314. (Also: Hastie, R., Schkade, D.A., & Payne, J.W. (1999). Reply to Vidmar. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 715–718)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mauet, T.A. (1992). Fundamentals of trial techniques (3rd ed.) Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  9. McKenzie, C.R.M., Lee, S.M., & Chen, K.K. (2002). When negative evidence increases confidence: Change in belief after hearing two sides of a dispute. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mixon, K.D., Foley, L.A., & Orme, K. (1995). The influence of racial similarity on the O.J. Simpson trial. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 481–490.Google Scholar
  11. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1981). Juror decision making models: The generalization gap. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 246–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: The effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 521–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1991). A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The Story Model. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519–557.Google Scholar
  15. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition, 49, 123–163. (Reprinted in P.N. Johnson-Laird & E. Shafir (Eds.). (1994). Reasoning and decision making. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell)Google Scholar
  17. Roese, N.J., & Olson, J.M. (Ed.). (1995). What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  18. Spellman, B.A. (1997). Crediting causality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 323–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Toobin, J. (1995). A horrible human event. The New Yorker, 40 (October 23), 41–49.Google Scholar
  20. Wells, G.L., & Gavanski, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reid Hastie
    • 1
  1. 1.Professor of Behavioral Science Graduate School of BusinessUniversity of ChicagoChicago

Personalised recommendations