Urban Ecology pp 519-535 | Cite as

Characteristics, Causes, and Effects of Sprawl: A Literature Review

  • Reid H. Ewing


costs public services urban sprawl pattern of development Florida open space subsidies policy farmland 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achimore, A. (1993) “Putting the Community Back into Community Retail,” Urban Land 52(8), pp. 33–38.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, R.W. (1973) “Land Speculation and Scattered Development: Failures in the Urban-Fringe Market,” Urban Studies 10, pp. 367–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audirac, I. and M. Zifou (1989) “Urban Development Issues: What is Controversial in Urban Sprawl? An Annotated Bibliography of Often-Overlooked Sources,” Council of Planning Librarians Bibliography No. 247. Chicago, III.Google Scholar
  4. Audirac, I., A.H. Shoemyen and M.T. Smith (1989) “Consumer Preference and the Compact Development Debate,” paper presented at the National Planning Conference of the American Planning Association, Atlanta, Ga., Apr. 29-May 3, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. Bahl, R.W. (1968) “A Land Speculation Model: The Role of the Property Tax as a Constraint to Urban Sprawl,” Journal of Regional Science 8(2), pp. 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baltimore Regional Council of Governments (1992) Impact of Land Use Alternatives on Transportation Demand. Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
  7. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. (1975) Comparative Evaluation of New Community Growth versus Trend Development Growth. Charles County, Md.Google Scholar
  8. Bellomo, S.J., R.B. Dial and A.M. Voorhees (1970) “Factors, Trends, and Guidelines Related to Trip Length,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 89. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Berg, M. and E.A. Medrich (1980) “Children in Four Neighborhoods: The Physical Environment and Its Effect on Play and Play Patterns,” Environment and Behavior 12(3), pp. 320–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berry, D. and T. Plaut (1978) “Retaining Agricultural Activities under Urban Pressures: A Review of Land Use Conflicts and Policies,” Policy Sciences 9, pp. 153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Binkley, C. et al. (1975) Interceptor Sewers and Urban Sprawl. Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.Google Scholar
  12. Boal, F.W. and D.B. Johnson (1968) “Nondescript Streets,” Traffic Quarterly 22(3), pp. 329–344.Google Scholar
  13. Bookout, L.W. (1992) “Neotraditional Town Planning: The Test of the Marketplace,” Urban Land 51(6), pp. 12–17.Google Scholar
  14. Boyce, R.R. (1963) “Myth versus Reality in Urban Planning,” Land Economics 39(3), pp. 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Breslaw, J.A. (1990) “Density and Urban Sprawl: Comment,” Land Economics 66(4), pp. 464–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brueckner, J.K. and D.A. Fansler (1983) “The Economics of Urban Sprawl: Theory and Evidence on the Spatial Size of Cities,” Review of Economics and Statistics 65(3), pp. 479–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burns, L.D. and T.F. Golob (1976) “The Role of Accessibility in Basic Transportation Choice Behavior,” Transportation 5, pp. 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cameron, M. (1991) Transportation Efficiency: Tackling Southern California’s Air Pollution and Congestion. Environmental Defense Fund, Oakland, Cal.Google Scholar
  19. Carp, F.M. (1980) “Environmental Effects Upon the Mobility of Older People,” Environment and Behavior 12(2), pp. 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carp, F.M. (1988) “Significance of Mobility for the Well-Being of the Elderly,” Transportation Research Board Special Report 218, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  21. Center for Urban Policy Research (1992) Impact Assessment of the New Jersey Interim State Development Plan—Executive Summary. New Jersey Office of State Planning, Trenton, N.J.Google Scholar
  22. Cervero, R. (1988) “Land Use Mixing and Suburban Mobility,” Transportation Quarterly 42, pp. 429–446.Google Scholar
  23. Cervero, R. (1989) “Jobs-Housing Balancing and Regional Mobility,” Journal of the American Planning Association 55(2), pp. 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cervero, R. (1991a) “Congestion Relief: The Land Use Alternative,” Journal of Planning Education and Research 10, pp. 119–129.Google Scholar
  25. Cervero, R. (1991b) “Land Uses and Travel at Suburban Activity Centers,” Transportation Quarterly 45(4), pp. 479–491.Google Scholar
  26. Clawson, M. (1962) “Urban Sprawl and Speculation in Suburban Land,” Land Economics 38(2), pp. 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Clawson, M. (1971) Suburban Land Conversion in the United States: An Economic and Governmental Process. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, Md.Google Scholar
  28. Correll, M.R., J.H. Lillydahl and L.D. Singell (1978) “The Effects of Greenbelts on Residential Property Values: Some Findings on the Political Economy of Open Space,” Land Economics 54, pp. 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dalvi, M.Q. and K.M. Martin (1976) “The Measurement of Accessibility: Some Preliminary Results,” Transportation 5, pp. 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Darling, A.H. (1973) “Measuring Benefits Generated by Urban Water Parks,” Land Economics 49, pp. 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. DeCorla-Souza, P. (1991) “Peak Period Tolls: One Cure for Urban Congestion,” ITE 1991 Compendium of Technical Papers. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  32. DeCorla-Souza, P. (1992) “The Impacts of Alternative Urban Development Patterns on Highway System Performance,” issue papers for the 1992 ITE International Conference. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  33. Didato, B. (Jan. 1990), “The Paths Less Traveled—A Wrapup on the Nation’s Greenways,” Planning 56, pp. 6–10.Google Scholar
  34. Downing, P.B. and R.D. Gustely (1977) “The Public Service Costs of Alternative Development Patterns: A Review of the Evidence,” in P.B. Downing (ed.), Local Service Pricing Policies and Their Effect on Urban Spatial Structure. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C.Google Scholar
  35. Downs, A. (1992) Stuck in Traffic—Coping with Peak-Hour Traffic Congestion. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., pp. 79–120.Google Scholar
  36. Dunphy, R.T. and K.M. Fisher (1994) “Transportation, Congestion, and Density: New Insights,” paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  37. Ewing, R. (1991) Developing Successful New Communities. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  38. Ewing, R. (1994) “Getting Around a Traditional City, a Suburban PUD, and Everything In-Between,” paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  39. Fischel, W.A. (1982) “The Urbanization of Agricultural Land: A Review of the National Agricultural Lands Study,” Land Economics 58(2), pp. 236–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fischel, W.A. (1991) “Good for the Town, Bad for the Nation? A Comment,” Journal of the American Planning Association 57(3), pp. 341–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Frank, J.E. (1989) The Costs of Alternative Development Patterns: A Review of the Literature. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  42. Frank, L. (1994) “The Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on the Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: The Single Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking,” paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  43. Gardner, B.D. (1977) “The Economics of Agricultural Land Preservation,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (Dec.), pp. 1026–1036.Google Scholar
  44. Garrison, W.L. et al. (1959) Studies of Highway Development and Geographic Change. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Wash.Google Scholar
  45. Gilbert, G. and J.S. Dajani (1974) “Energy, Urban Form and Transportation Policy,” Transportation Research 8, pp. 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Giuliano, G. (1989) “Literature Synthesis: Transportation and Urban Form,” report prepared for the Federal Highway Administration under Contract DTFH61-89-P-00531.Google Scholar
  47. Gordon, P. and H.L. Wong (1985) “The Costs of Urban Sprawl—Some New Evidence,” Environment and Planning A 17(5), pp. 661–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gordon, P., A. Kumar and H.W. Richardson (1989) “The Influence of Metropolitan Spatial Structure on Commuting Time,” Journal of Urban Economics 26, pp. 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gordon, P., H.W. Richardson, and M.J. Jun (1991) “The Commuting Paradox—Evidence from the Top Twenty,” Journal of the American Planning Association 57(4), pp. 416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Guest, A.M. and C. Cluett (1976) “Analysis of Mass Transit Ridership Using 1970 Census Data,” Traffic Quarterly 30(1), pp. 143–161.Google Scholar
  51. Haines, V. (1986) “Energy and Urban Form: A Human Ecological Critique,” Urban Affairs Quarterly 21(3), pp. 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hammer, T.R., R.E. Coughlin and E.T. Horn (1974) “The Effect of a Large Urban Park on Real Estate Value,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 40, pp. 274–277.Google Scholar
  53. Hansen, W.G. (1959) “How Accessibility Shapes Land Use,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25, pp. 73–76.Google Scholar
  54. Hanson, M.E. (1992a) “Automobile Subsidies and Land Use: Estimates and Policy Responses,” Journal of the American Planning Association 58(1), pp. 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hanson, M.E. (1992b) Results of a Literature Survey and Summary of Findings: The Nature and Magnitude of Social Costs of Urban Roadway Use. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  56. Hanson, S. and M. Schwab (1987) “Accessibility and Intraurban Travel,” Environment and Planning A 19, pp. 735–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Harvey, G. and E. Deakin (1991) “Toward Improved Regional Transportation Modeling Practice,” paper prepared for the National Association of Regional Councils, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  58. Harvey, R.O. and W.A.V. Clark (1965) “The Nature and Economics of Urban Sprawl,” Land Economics 41(1), pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hendon, W.S. (1971) “The Park as a Determinant of Property Values,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 30, pp. 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hekkila, E.J. and R.B. Peiser (1992) “Urban Spawl, Density, and Accessibility,” Papers in Regional Science 71(2), pp. 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Holtzclaw, J. (1991) Explaining Urban Density and Transit Impacts on Auto Use. Sierra Club, San Francisco, Cal.Google Scholar
  62. Howard County Planning Commission (1967) Howard County 1985. Howard County, Md.Google Scholar
  63. Ingram, D.R. (1971) “The Concept of Accessibility: A Search for an Operational Form,” Regional Studies 5(2), pp. 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Koenig, J.G. (1980) “Indicators of Urban Accessibility: Theory and Application,” Transportation 9, pp. 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Koenig, J. (1989) “Should We Halt Urban Sprawl?” Florida Trend 31(12), pp. 28–31.Google Scholar
  66. Kulash, W. (1990) “Traditional Neighborhood Development—Will the Traffic Work?” paper presented at the Eleventh Annual Pedestrian Conference, Bellevue, Wash.Google Scholar
  67. Larsen, P. (Spring-Summer 1992) “Open Space That Sells,” Land Development 5, pp. 22–25.Google Scholar
  68. Leake, G.R. and A.S. Huzayyin (1980) “The Impact of Accessibility on Trip Production and Trip Attraction Models,” Engineering and Traffic Control 21(10), pp. 469–471.Google Scholar
  69. Lee, D.B. Jr. (1979) “Land Use Planning as a Response to Market Failure,” in J.I. de Neufville (ed.), The Land Use Policy Debate in the United States. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  70. Lessinger, J. (1962) “The Case for Scatterization,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 28(3), pp. 159–169.Google Scholar
  71. Levinson, H.S. and F.H. Wynn (1963) “Effects of Density on Urban Transportation Requirements,” Highway Research Record No. 2, pp. 38–64.Google Scholar
  72. Lowry, I.S. (1988) “Planning for Urban Sprawl,” Transportation Research Board Special Report No. 220, pp. 275–312.Google Scholar
  73. MacKenzie, J.J. (1994) “The Going Rate: What It Really Costs to Drive,” paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  74. McKee, D.L. and G.H. Smith (1972) “Environmental Diseconomies in Suburban Expansion,” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 31(2), pp. 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. McLeod, P.B. (1984) “The Demand for Local Amenity: An Hedonic Price Analysis,” Environment and Planning A 16, pp. 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (1991) Transportation Demand Impacts of Alternative Land Use Scenarios, Final Report. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  77. Middlesex Somerset Mercer Regional Council (1991) The Impact of Various Land Use Strategies on Suburban Mobility, Final Report. Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  78. Millas, A.J. (1980) “Planning for the Elderly within the Context of a Neighborhood,” Ekistics 283, pp. 264–273.Google Scholar
  79. Mills, D.E. (1981) “Growth, Speculation, and Sprawl in a Monocentric City,” Journal of Urban Economics 10, pp. 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Morris, J.M., P.L. Dumble and M.R. Wigan (1979) “Accessibility Indicators for Transport Planning,” Transportation Research 13A, pp. 91–109.Google Scholar
  81. Moss, W.G. (1977) “Large Lot Zoning, Property Taxes, and Metropolitan Area,” Journal of Urban Economics 4(4), pp. 408–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Neels, K. et al. (1977) “An Empirical Investigation of the Effects of Land Use on Urban Travel,” Working Paper 5049–17–1. The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  83. Nelson, A.C. (1986) “Towards a Theory of the American Rural Residential Land Market,” Journal of Rural Studies 2, pp. 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Nelson, A.C. (1990) “Economic Critique of Prime Farmland Preservation Policies in the United States,” Journal of Rural Studies 6(2), pp. 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Nelson, A.C. (1992) “Preserving Prime Farmland in the Face of Urbanization—Lessons from Oregon,” Journal of the American Planning Association 58(4), pp. 467–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Neuman, M. (1991) “Utopia, Dystopia, and Diaspora,” Journal of the American Planning Association 57(3), pp. 344–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Newman, P.W.G. and J.R. Kenworthy (1988) “The Transport Energy Trade-Off: Fuel-Efficient Traffic versus Fuel-Efficient Cities,” Transportation Research A 22A(3), pp. 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Newman, P.W.G. and J.R. Kenworthy (1989) Cities and Automobile Dependence. Gower Technical, Aldershot, Eng.Google Scholar
  89. North Central Texas Council of Governments (1990) Urban Form/Transportation System Options for the Future: Dallas/Fort Worth Case Study. Arlington, Tex.Google Scholar
  90. Ohls, J.C. and D. Pines (1975) “Discontinuous Urban Development and Economic Efficiency,” Land Economics 51(3), pp. 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Ottensmann, J.R. (1977) “Urban Sprawl, Land Values, and the Density of Development,” Land Economics 53(4), pp. 389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Peiser, R.B. (1984) “Does It Pay to Plan Suburban Growth?” Journal of the American Planning Association 50(4), pp. 419–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Peiser, R.B. (1989) “Density and Urban Sprawl,” Land Economics 65(3), pp. 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Peiser, R.B. (1990) “Density and Urban Sprawl—Reply,” Land Economics 66(4), pp. 469–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Peterson, G.E. and H. Yampolsky (1975) Urban Development and the Protection of Metropolitan Farmland. The Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  96. Pirie, G.H. (1979) “Measuring Accessibility: A Review and Proposal,” Environment and Planning A 11, pp. 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Plaut, T. (1976) “The Effects of Urbanization on the Loss of Farmland at the Rural-Urban Fringe: A National and Regional Perspective,” Regional Science Research Institute Discussion Paper Series No. 94. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.Google Scholar
  98. Pollard, R. (1982) “View Amenities, Building Heights, and Housing Supply,” in D.B. Diamond and G.S. Tolley (eds.), The Economics of Urban Amenities. Academic Press, New York, N.Y., pp. 105–123.Google Scholar
  99. Popenoe, D. (1977) The Suburban Environment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, III.Google Scholar
  100. Popenoe, D. (1979) “Urban Sprawl—Some Neglected Sociological Considerations,” Sociology and Social Research 63(2), pp. 255–268.Google Scholar
  101. Prevedouros, P.D. (1991) “Trip Generation: Different Rates for Different Densities,” paper presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  102. Priest, D. et al. (1977) Large-Scale Development: Benefits, Constraints, and State and Local Policy Incentives. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C., pp. 37–45.Google Scholar
  103. Puget Sound Council of Governments (1990) Summary and Comparison Between Alternatives. Vision 2020, Seattle, Wash.Google Scholar
  104. Pushkarev, B.S. and J.M. Zupan (1977) Public Transportation and Land Use Policy. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Ind., pp. 24–63.Google Scholar
  105. Raup, P.M. (1975) “Urban Threats to Rural Lands,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 41(Nov.), pp. 371–378.Google Scholar
  106. Real Estate Research Corporation (1974) The Costs of Sprawl, Detailed Cost Analysis. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  107. Renner, M. (1988) Rethinking the Role of the Automobile. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  108. Richardson, A.J. and W. Young (1982) “A Measure of Linked-Trip Accessibility,” Transportation Planning and Technology 7, pp. 73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Richardson, H.W. and P. Gordon (1993) “Market Planning—Oxymoron or Common Sense?” Journal of the American Planning Association 59(3), pp. 347–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. San Diego Association of Governments (1991a) “The Relationship Between Jobs/Housing Balance and Travel Patterns in the San Diego Region,” Regional Growth Management Strategy, Appendix 2. San Diego, Cal.Google Scholar
  111. San Diego Association of Governments (1991b) “Jobs/Housing Balance and Transportation Corridor Densities,” Regional Growth Management Strategy, Appendix 3. San Diego, Cal.Google Scholar
  112. Schaeffer, K.H. and E. Sclar (1975) Access for All. Penguin Books, Baltimore, Md., pp. 103–120.Google Scholar
  113. Scheuernstuhl, G.J. and J. May (1979) “Analysis of Air Quality Sensitivity to Development Pattern Changes and Growth Levels,” Transportation Research Record 714, pp. 12–17.Google Scholar
  114. Schneider, K.R. (1970) “The Destruction of Urban Space,” Traffic Quarterly 24, pp. 59–76.Google Scholar
  115. Sinclair, R. (1967) “Von Thunen and Urban Sprawl,” Annuals of the Association of American Geographers 57, pp. 72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Smith, W.S. (1986) “Interactions Between Transportation and High-Rise, High-Density Living,” Ekistics 320/321, pp. 336–344.Google Scholar
  117. Spillar, R.J. and G.S. Rutherford (1990) “The Effects of Population Density and Income on Per Capita Transit Ridership in Western American Cities,” ITE 1991 Compendium of Technical Papers. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  118. Steiner, R.L. (1994) “Residential Density and Travel Patterns: A Review of the Literature and Methodological Approach,” paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  119. Stone, P.A. (1973) The Structure, Size, and Costs of Urban Settlements. Cambridge University Press, London, Eng.Google Scholar
  120. U.S. Department of Transportation (1976) Urban Transportation and Land Use. Washington, D.C., pp. 55–78.Google Scholar
  121. Vickerman, R.W. (1974) “Accessibility, Attraction, and Potential: A Review of Some Concepts and Their Use in Determining Mobility,” Environment and Planning A 6(6), pp. 675–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Voorhees, M.T. (1991) “The True Costs of the Automobile: A Basis for Comparison,” Grass Roots to Green Modes. Proceedings of the 12th International Pedestrian Conference, Boulder, Colo., pp. 231–236.Google Scholar
  123. Wachs, M. and J.G. Koenig (1979) “Behavioral Modelling, Accessibility, Mobility and Travel Need,” in D.A. Hensher and P.R. Stopher (eds.), Behavioral Travel Modeling. Croom Helm, London, Eng., pp. 698–710.Google Scholar
  124. Weibull, J.W. (1976) “An Axiomatic Approach to the Measurement of Accessibility,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 6, pp. 357–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Weicher, J.C. and R.H. Zerbst (1973) “The Externalities of Neighborhood Parks: An Empirical Investigation,” Land Economics 49, pp. 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Whyte, W.H. Jr. (1957) “Urban Sprawl” in The Exploding Metropolis. Doubleday & Company, Garden City, N.Y., pp. 115–139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reid H. Ewing
    • 1
  1. 1.National Center for Smart Growth Preinkert Field HouseUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations