Advertisement

An Interdisciplinary Approach to Forensic IT and Forensic Psychology Education

  • Clare Wilson
  • Vasilios Katos
  • Caroline Strevens
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 237)

Abstract

In WISE 4, Armstrong [1] presented a multidisciplinary view in computer forensics education. The view was primarily focusing solely on the education of computer forensics students, which was indeed along the lines of multidisciplinarity. However, this view does not involve integration between the different disciplines. In this paper, the scope of the approach is extended in order to allow a two- or three-way relationship between the disciplines of Computing, Psychology and Law and thus create an interdisciplinary perspective. It is shown how the study material was integrated and developed to suit the three disciplines.

Keywords

computer forensics forensic psychology expert testimony 

References

  1. 1.
    Armstrong, C., 2005, Computer Forensics Education — A Multi-Discipline View, WISE 4 Proceedings, Moscow, 18–20 May, pp. 205–212.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Browne, M., 2002, The Mandate for Interdisciplinarity in Science Education: The Case of Economic and Environmental Sciences, Science & Education, 11, pp. 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gardner, S. Chamherlin, G., Heestad, D., Stowe, C., 2002, Interdisciplinary Didactic Instruction at Academic Health Centers in the United States: Attitudes and Barriers. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 7, pp. 179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gritzalis, D., Theoharidou, M., Kalimeri, E. 2005, Towards an Interdisciplinary Information Security Education Model., WISE 4 Proceedings, Moscow, 18–20 May, pp. 22–35.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yasinsac, A., Erbacjer, F., Marks, G., Pollitt, M., Sommer, M., 2003, Computer Forensics Education, IEEE Security and Privacy, 1(4) pp. 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morillo, F., Bordons, M., Gomez, I., 2003, Interdisciplinarity in Science: A Tentative Typology of Disciplines and Research Areas, Journal of the Americal Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), pp. 1237–1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barker, R., Gilbreath, G., Stone, W. 1998, The Interdisciplinary needs of Organisations: Are New Employees Adequately Equipped?, Journal of Management Development, 17(3), pp. 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dodge, R., Hoffman, L., Ragsdale, D., Rosenberg, T., 2005, Exploring a Cyber Security Exercise, WISE 4 Proceedings, Moscow, 18–20 May, pp. 94–101.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO), Good Practice Guide for Computer based Electronic Evidence, National High Tech Crime Unit. Available at: http://www.acpo.police.uk/asp/policies/Data/gpg_computer_based_evidence_v3_OnlinePDF.pdf

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clare Wilson
    • 1
  • Vasilios Katos
    • 2
  • Caroline Strevens
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of PortsmouthUK
  2. 2.School of ComputingUniversity of PortsmouthUK
  3. 3.Department of Accounting and LawUniversity of PortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations