Advertisement

Componentising a Scientific Application for the Grid

  • Nikos Parlavantzas
  • Vladimir Getov
  • Matthieu Morel
  • Francoise Baude
  • Fabrice Huet
  • Denis Caromel

Abstract

Building and evolving grid applications is complex. A promising approach to managing this complexity is component-based development, currently attracting growing interest in the grid community. Evaluating the effectiveness of component-based development requires real-world experience. To this end, this paper presents a case study in reengineering a high performance numerical solver to become a component-based grid application. The adopted component model is an extension of the generic Fractal model that specifically targets grid environments. The paper provides qualitative and quantitative evidence that componentisation has improved the modifiability and reusability of the application without significantly affecting performance.

Keywords

Grid component model component-based development scientific applications componentisation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    H. Algestam, M. Offesson, L. Lundberg, “Using Components to Increase Maintainability in a Large Telecommunication System,” Ninth Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC’02), 2002, p. 65.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    B.A. Allan, R.C. Armstrong, A.P. Wolfe, J. Ray, D.E. Bernholdt, and J.A. Kohl, “The CCA core specifications in a distributed memory SPMD framework,” Concurrency Comput. Pract. Exp., no. 5, 2002, vol. 14, pp. 323-345.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    B.A. Allan, S. Lefantzi, J.Ray, “ODEPACK++: Refactoring the LSODE Fortran Library for Use in the CCA High Performance Component Software Architecture,” Ninth International Workshop on High-Level Parallel Programming Models and Supportive Environments (HIPS’04), 2004, pp. 109-119.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. Baduel, F. Baude, D. Caromel, C. Delbe, S. Kasmi, N. Gama, and S. Lanteri. “A Parallel Object-Oriented Application for 3D Electromagnetism”, 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, IEEE Computer Society, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, April 2004.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    F. Baude, D. Caromel, and M. Morel. “From distributed objects to hierarchical grid components”, In International Symposium on Distributed Objects and Applications (DOA), Springer, Catania, Italy, volume 2888 of LNCS, 2003, pages 1226 – 1242.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D.E. Bernholdt, B.A. Allan, R. Armstrong, F. Bertrand, K. Chiu, et al., “A Component Architecture for High Performance Scientific Computing”, ACTS Collection special issue, Intl. J. High-Perf. Computing Applications, 20 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    E. Bruneton, T. Coupaye, and J. B. Stefani, “Recursive and dynamic software composition with sharing”, In Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Component-Oriented Programming (WCOP2002), 2002.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    F. Cappello, F. Desprez, M. Dayde, E. Jeannot, et al, “Grid’5000: A Large Scale, Reconfigurable, Controlable and Monitorable Grid Platform”, 6th IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Grid Computing, Grid’2005, Seattle, Washington, USA, November 13-14, 2005.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    CCA Forum Home Page, The Common Component Architecture Forum, 2004. http://www.cca-forum.org.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Grid Component Model (GCM) Proposal, CoreGRID Deliverable, D.PM.002, Nov. 2005.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    S.D. Kim, S.H. Chang, “A Systematic Method to Identify Software Components”, 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC’04), 2004, pp. 538-545.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    S. Krishnan and D. Gannon. “XCAT3: A Framework for CCA Components as OGSA Services”, 9th Intl Workshop on High-Level Parallel Programming Models and Supportive Environments, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    O. Layaida, A.E. Özcan, and J.B. Stefani. “A Component-based Approach for MPSoC SW Design: Experience with OS Customization for H.264 Decoding”, 3rd Workshop on Embedded Systems for Real-Time Multimedia under CODES+ISSS, New York, USA, 2005.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    F. Lüders, I. Crnkovic, P. Runeson, “Adopting a Component-Based Software Architecture for an Industrial Control System – A Case Study, Component-Based Software Development for Embedded Systems”, Springer, LNCS 3778, ISBN: 3-540-30644-7, 2005, p 232-248Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    B.L. Massingill, T.G. Mattson, and B.A. Sanders. “Patterns for parallel application programs”, In Proceedings of the Sixth Pattern Languages of Programs Workshop (PLoP99), 1999Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    B. Norris, S. Balay, S. Benson, L. Freitag, P. Hovland, L. McInnes and B. Smith, “Parallel components for PDEs and optimization: some issues and experiences”, Parallel Computing, Volume 28, Issue 12, December 2002, pp 1811-1831.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    ProActive web site, http://www.inria.fr/oasis/ProActive/Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nikos Parlavantzas
    • 1
  • Vladimir Getov
    • 1
  • Matthieu Morel
    • 2
  • Francoise Baude
    • 2
  • Fabrice Huet
    • 2
  • Denis Caromel
    • 2
  1. 1.Harrow School of Computer ScienceUniversity of WestminsterHA1 3TPU.K
  2. 2.INRIA Sophia AntipolisFrance

Personalised recommendations