Free/Open Source Software Adoption, Public Policies and Development Indicators: An International Comparison

  • Harald Schmidbauer
  • Mehmet Gençer
  • Vehbi Sinan Tunalıo_lu
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 234)


Despite the growing body of research on the inner workings of FOSS development, there are few studies on its relation with broader developments in society. In this study we have attempted a preliminary investigation of (1) how FOSS prevalence is related to economic and human development indicators of countries, (2) whether public policies regarding FOSS emerge in a consistent relation with these indicators in several clusters of countries constructed from the United Nation’s human development index, and (3) the relation of software piracy to development indicators. Our results point to relative significance of non-economic factors in FOSS adoption, lack of consistent policies among public agencies, and irrelevance of non-economic factors on software piracy. In addition, the study demonstrates the possibility of developing FOSS indices for larger scale diagnosis and strategizing.


Gross Domestic Product Open Source Software Human Development Index Development Indicator United Nations Development Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Comino S, Manenti FM (2005) Government Policies Supporting Open Source Software for the Mass Market. Review of Industrial Organization 26(2):217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dalle JM, Jullien N (2003) Libre software: turning fads into institutions? Research Policy 32(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garud R, Kumaraswamy A. (1993) Changing competitive dynamics in network industries: an exploration of Sun Microsystems’ open systems strategy. Strategic Management Journal 14(5):351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hippel Ev, Krogh Gv (2003) Open source software and the private-collective innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organization Science 14(2):209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kelley AC (1991) The Human Development Index: “Handle with Care’”. Population and Development Review 17(2):315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kogut B, Metiu A (2001) Open source software development and distributed innovation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17(2):248–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Srinivasan TN (1994) Human Development: A New Paradigm or Reinvention of the Wheel? The American Economic Review 84(2):238–243.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Streeten P (1994) Human Development: Means and Ends. The American Economic Review 84(2):232–237.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Transparency International (2004) Annual Report 2004-The Coalition Against Corruption. Transparency InternationalGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    UNDP (1990) Human Development Report 1990. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    West J (2003) How open is open enough: melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Research Policy 32(7):1259–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harald Schmidbauer
    • 1
  • Mehmet Gençer
    • 2
  • Vehbi Sinan Tunalıo_lu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of International FinanceIstanbul Bilgi ÜniversityIstanbul
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceIstanbul Bilgi ÜniversityIstanbul

Personalised recommendations