Advertisement

Benefits and Drawbacks of Open Source Software: An Exploratory Study of Secondary Software Firms

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 234)

Abstract

Much of the assessment of OSS benefits and drawbacks has been based on anecdotal evidence appearing in practitioner publications, white papers, web articles etc. To a greater extent this research has tended to concentrate more on the technical benefits and drawbacks of OSS rather than their business counterparts. Furthermore, public administrations and companies operating within the primary software sector have traditionally been the focus for research on OSS benefits and drawbacks. Taking the viewpoint of IS/IT managers in 13 companies operating in the secondary software sector in Europe, this paper examines their experiences of the benefits/drawbacks of OSS.

Keywords

Open Source Software Secondary Software Sector Benefits Drawbacks 

References

  1. 1.
    Agerfalk, P.J., Deverell, A. Fitzgerald, B. and Morgan, L. (2005) Assessing the Role of Open Source Software in the European Secondary Software Sector: A Voice from Industry, First International Conference on Open Source Systems, Genova, 11–15 July 2005, 82–87.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Overby, E.M., Bharadwaj, A.S., Bharadwaj, S.G. (2006) An Investigation of Firm-Level Open Source Adoption: Theoretical and Practical Implications. In R.K. Jain (ed.), Open Source Software in Business-Issues and Perspectives, Hyderabad, India: ICFAI University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Forge, S. (2006) The rain forest and the rock garden: the economic impacts of open source software, www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/146366906 10664633Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Varian, H.R. and Shapiro, C. (2003) Linux Adoption in the Public Sector: An Economic Analysis. Working Paper, University of California, Berkley.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coppola, C. and Neelley, E. (2004) Open source — open learns: Why open source makes sense for education, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa4011/is_200401/ai_n9466456/pg_5Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krishnamurthy, S. (2003) A Managerial Overview of Open Source Software, Business Horizons, 46(5), September—October, 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kenwood, C.A. (2001) A Business Case Study of Open Source Software, (http://www.mitre.org/support/papers/tech_papers_01/kenwood_software/kenwood_software.pdf)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Open Source Initiative (OSI) (2006) The Open Source Definition, http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.phpGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    IDC Research (2005) Western European End-User Survey: 2005 Spending Priorities, Outsourcing, Open Source, and Impact of Compliance, http://www.itworldcanada.com/Pages/Docbase/ViewArticle.aspx?id=idgml-8f87ddb3-bfe 0-4b69=90323Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stafford, J. 2006: Time to plan your company’s escape from Microsoft. http://searchopensource.techtarget.com/columnItem/0,294698,sid39_gci1163576,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wheeler, D. (2005) Why Open Source Software/Free Sofware (OSS/FL, FLOSS, or FOSS)? Look at the Numbers! http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Forrester Report (2000) Open Source Cracks the Code, www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Report/0,1338,9851,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Webb, M. (2001) Going with Open Source Software: Is it the Right Choice for yourOrganisation?http://www.techsoup.org/howto/articles/software/page1124.cfm.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guth, S. (2006) Limiting factors for the adoption of open source software, http://claweb.cla.unipd. it/home/sguth/pdfs/OSS_gov_cons.pdfGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Herbsleb, J. (2002) Research Priorities in Open Source Software Development, www.infonomics.nl/FLOSS/workshop/papers/herbsleb.htmGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Forrester (2004) The Costs and Risks of Open Source, www.forrester.com/Research/Document/0,7211,34146,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stevenson, J. (2005) Open Source Software: The Drawbacks, www.academon.com/lib/essay/open-source-software.htmlGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parsons, A. Case Against Open Source, http://www.builderau.com.au/program/windows/soa/Case_against_open_source/0,339024644,320265682,00.htmGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Information Society Technologies Results (2005) FLOSSing can make EU tech leader http://istresults.cordis.europa.eu/index.cfm/section/news/tpl/article/BrowsingType/Features/ID/80607Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Davini, E., Faggioni, E. and Tartari, D. Open Source Software in Public Administration. A real example OSS for e-government Observatories, First International Conference on Open Source Systems, Genova, 11–15 July 2005, 119–124.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ven, K. and Verelst, J. (2006) The Organisational Adoption of Open Source Server Software by Belgian Organisations, Proceedings of IFIP 8.2 Foundation on Open Source Software Conference, 08–10 June 2006, Como, Italy, 111–122, Springer.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marshall, C. and Rossman, G. (1989) Designing Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, California.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LimerickIreland
  2. 2.University College CorkIreland

Personalised recommendations