EDOS Distribution System: a P2P architecture for open-source content dissemination

  • Serge Abiteboul
  • Itay Dar
  • Radu Pop
  • Gabriel Vasile
  • Dan Vodislav
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 234)


The open-source software communities currently face an increasing complexity of managing the software content among theirs developers and contributors. This is mainly due to the continuously growing size of the software, the high frequency of the updates, and the heterogeneity of the participants. We propose a distribution system that tackles two main issues in the software content management: efficient content dissemination through a P2P system architecture, and advanced information system capabilities, using a distributed index for resource location.


Query Processing Distribute Hash Table Data Unit Distribute Information System Content Dissemination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    ActiveXML web page. Scholar
  2. 2.
    BitTorrentprotocolspecification. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Codeen. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conary software provisioning system. Scholar
  5. 5.
    EDOS project: Environment for the development and Distribution of OpenSource software. Scholar
  6. 6.
    KadoP web page. Scholar
  7. 7.
    EDOS deliverable 4.1: Distribution of code and binaries over the Internet, 2005. Scholar
  8. 8.
    EDOS deliverable 4.2.2: Report on the p2p dissemination system, 2006. Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Abiteboul, O. Benjelloun, I. Manolescu, T. Milo, and R. Weber. Active XML: Peer-to-Peer Data and Web Services Integration. In VLDB, 2002.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Abiteboul, I. Manolescu, and N. Preda. Constructing and querying peer-to-peer warehouses of XML resources. In V.T. ChrisBussler, editor, Second International Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases (SWDB). Springer-Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Androutsellis-Theotokis and D. Spinellis. A survey of peer-to-peer content distribution technologies. In ACM Computing Surveys, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Cohen. Incentives Build Robustness in BitTorrent. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2003.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Freedman, E. Freudenthal, and D. Mazieres. Democratizing content publication with coral. In 1st USENIX/ACM Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, 2004. A. Rowstron and P. Druschel. Pastry: Scalable, distributed object location and routing for large-scale peer-to-peer systems. In IFIP/ACM Middleware, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Witty. Best practices for deploying and managing linux with RH Network.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Serge Abiteboul
    • 1
  • Itay Dar
    • 2
  • Radu Pop
    • 3
  • Gabriel Vasile
    • 1
  • Dan Vodislav
    • 4
  1. 1.INRIA FutursFrance
  2. 2.Tel Aviv UniversityTel Aviv
  3. 3.INRIA-MandrivaParisFrance
  4. 4.CEDRIC-CNAMParisFrance

Personalised recommendations