Cereals pp 3-98 | Cite as

Maize

Chapter
Part of the Handbook of Plant Breeding book series (HBPB, volume 3)

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays L.) originated from teosinte (Zea mays L. spp Mexicana) in the Western Hemisphere about 7,000 to 10,000 years ago. Maize was widely grown by Native Americans (e.g. it was the first crop in North Dakota) in the U.S. during the 1600s and 1700s. The practical value of hybrid vigor or heterosis traces back to the controlled hybridization of U.S. southern Dents and northern Flints by farmers in the 1800s. Inbreeding and hybridization studies in the public sector dramatically change maize breeding. The Long Island (led by Shull) and Connecticut (led by East) public research groups created the inbred-hybrid concept (hybrid maize) which allowed industry to exploit the practical and economical value of heterosis. The hybrid maize technology was rapidly adopted by U.S. farmers and generated genetic gains for grain yield at a rate of 1.81 kg ha−1 year−1. However, emphasis on the exploiting the inbred-hybrid concept detracted from further improvements on open-pollinated cultivars and their cultivar crosses.

Maize breeding is the art and science of compromise. Multi-trait selection, multi-stage testing, and multi-progeny evaluation are common for discarding thousands of lines and hybrids. Maize breeding has unique features that are different from any extensively cultivated self-pollinated crop. Breeding techniques from both self and cross-pollinated crops are utilized in maize. The fundamentals of maize breeding remain the same: germplasm improvement (e.g. recurrent selection), development of pure-lines by self-pollination, production of crosses between derived lines, identification of hybrids having consistent and reliable performance across an extensive number of environments, and production of the best hybrid for use by the farmer. Each successful hybrid has its own unique combination of genetic effects and allelic frequencies often limiting sample sizes for QTL experiments relative to classical quantitative genetic studies. The main limitation of traditional methods of maize breeding is to determine the genetic worth of lines in hybrid combinations. Most of the economically important traits in maize breeding are inherited quantitatively. Their importance is recognized by molecular geneticists through their emphasis in QTL experiments, molecular markers, marker-assisted selection to predict early and late generation combining abilities, and/or ultimately gene-assisted selection through specific genome selection (e.g. metaQTL analyses) and/or association mapping. Information in maize genetics has significantly expanded in the past 50 years until the unraveling of the genome sequence in 2008. However, the limiting factor for genetic improvement remains the same: good choice of germplasm. The most sophisticated breeding methods and/or technologies carrying all of the genetic information available will have limited success if poor choices of germplasm are made. Biotechnology continues to be an important addition to the breeding process for single-gene traits while conventional breeding continues to be the key for improving economically important traits of quantitative inheritance. This chapter starts with a general introduction followed by pre-breeding and the incorporation of exotic germplasm, currently led by the USDA-GEM network. The integration of recurrent selection methods with inbred line development programs follows with the classical example of B73, the public line derived from BSSS that generated billions of dollars to the hybrid industry. The chapter continues with the inheritance of quantitative traits, and methods of line development and hybrids. Finally, the concepts of heterotic groups, heterotic patterns, and inbred line recycling are detailed for exploiting heterosis and hybrid stability including multi-trait selection utilizing indices. A summary is included at the end of the chapter.

References

  1. Acosta, A.E. and P.L. Crane. 1972. Further selection for lower ear height in maize. Crop Sci. 12:165–167.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M.W. and D.B. Shank. 1959. The relation of heterozygosity to homeostasis in maize hybrids. Genetics 44:777–786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrecht, B. and J.W. Dudley. 1987. Evaluation of four maize populations containing different proportions of exotic germplasm. Crop Sci. 27:480–486.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous. 1972. Genetic vulnerability of major crops. NRC-NAS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. Bailey, T.B., Jr. 1977. Selection limits in self-fertilizing populations following the cross of homozygous lines. pp. 399–412. E. Pollak, O. Kempthorne, and T.B. Bailey, (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Quantitative Genetics. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, T.B., Jr. and R.E. Comstock. 1976. Linkage and the synthesis of better genotypes in self-fertilizing species. Crop Sci. 16:363–370.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, R.J. 1974. Selection indices without economic weights for animal breeding. Can. J. Anal. Sci. 54:1–8.Google Scholar
  8. Baker, R.J. 1986. Selection Indices in Plant Breeding. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  9. Bauman, L.F. 1959. Evidence of non-allelic gene interaction in determining yield, ear height, and kernel row number in corn. Agron. J. 51:531–534.Google Scholar
  10. Bauman, L.F. 1981. Review of methods used by breeders to develop superior corn inbreds. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf. 36:199–208.Google Scholar
  11. Beal, W.J. 1880. Indian corn. pp. 279–289. Rep. Michigan Board Agric.Google Scholar
  12. Bernardo, R. 1990. Identifying populations useful for improving parents of a single cross based on net transfer of alleles. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:349–352.Google Scholar
  13. Bernardo, R. 1991. Correlation between testcross performance of lines at early and late selfing generations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:17–21.Google Scholar
  14. Bernardo, R. 1992. Retention of genetically superior lines during early-generation of testcrossing in maize. Crop Sci. 32:933–937.Google Scholar
  15. Bernardo, R. and A. Charcosset. 2006. Usefulness of gene information in marker-assisted recurrent selection: A simulation appraisal. Crop Sci. 46:614–621.Google Scholar
  16. Betran, F.J. and A.R. Hallauer. 1996. Hybrid improvement after reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Maydica 41:25–33.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, W.L. 1953. Sources of germplasm for hybrid corn. Proc. Annu. Hybrid Corn Ind. Res. Conf. 8:11–16.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, W.L. 1975. A broader germplasm base in corn and sorghum. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. 30:81–89.Google Scholar
  19. Burton, G.W. 1951. Quantitative inheritance in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Agron. J. 43:409–417.Google Scholar
  20. Campbell, M.R., L.M. Pollak, and P.J. White. 1995a. Genetic variation for starch thermal and functional properties among nonmutant maize inbreds. Cereal Chem. 77:281–286.Google Scholar
  21. Campbell, M.R., P.J. White, and L.M. Pollak. 1995b. Properties of sugary-2 maize starch: Influence of exotic background. Cereal Chem. 72:389–392.Google Scholar
  22. Carena, M.J. 2005a. Maize commercial hybrids compared to improved population hybrids for grain yield and agronomic performance. Euphytica 141:201–208.Google Scholar
  23. Carena, M.J. 2005b. Registration of NDSAB(MER-FS)C13 maize Germplasm. Crop Sci. 45:1670–1671.Google Scholar
  24. Carena, M.J. and C. Eno. (in press). Registration of NDBS11(FR-M)C3, NDBS1011, and NDBSK(HI-M)C3 maize germplasms. J. Plant Reg.Google Scholar
  25. Carena, M.J. and A.R. Hallauer. 2001a. Response to inbred progeny selection in Leaming and Midland Yellow Dent maize populations. Maydica 46:1–10.Google Scholar
  26. Carena, M.J. and A.R. Hallauer. 2001b. Expression of heterosis in Leaming and Midland Corn Belt dent populations. J. Iowa Acad. Sci. 108:73–78.Google Scholar
  27. Carena, M.J. and Z.W. Wicks III. 2006. Maize early maturing hybrids: An exploitation of U.S. temperate public genetic diversity in reserve. Maydica 51:201–208.Google Scholar
  28. Carena, M.J., I. Santiago, and A. Ordás. 1998. Direct and correlated response to recurrent selection for prolificacy in maize at two planting densities. Maydica 43:95–102.Google Scholar
  29. Castellanos, J.S., A.R. Hallauer, and H.S. Cordova. 1998. Relative performance of testers to identify elite lines of corn (Zea mays L.). Maydica 43:217–226.Google Scholar
  30. Caton, H.G. 1999. Conversion of elite subtropical maize germplasm to temperate environments. Ph.D. Diss. Iowa State University, Ames, IA (Diss. Abstr. DAI-B 60/8, p. 3629, February 2000).Google Scholar
  31. Chase, S.S. 1949. Monoploid frequencies in a commercial double cross hybrid maize, and its component single cross hybrids and inbred lines. Genetics 34:328–332.Google Scholar
  32. Chase, S.S. 1952. Production of homozygous diploids of maize from monoploids. Agron. J. 44:263–267.Google Scholar
  33. Christensen, D.W. 1984. Utility of zein-isoelectric focusing for predicting heterosis in maize. Ph.D. Diss. University Minnesota, St. Paul, MN (Diss. Abstr. DAI-B 45/05, p. 1374, November 1984).Google Scholar
  34. CIMMYT. 1984. CIMMYT research highlights 1984. CIMMYT, El Batan, Mexico.Google Scholar
  35. Cockerham, C.C. 1954. An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariance among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics 39:859–882.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Cockerham, C.C. 1956a. Analysis of quantitative gene action. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 9:53–68.Google Scholar
  37. Cockerham, C.C. 1956b. Effects of linkage on the covariances between relatives. Genetics 41:138–141.Google Scholar
  38. Cockerham, C.C. 1961. Implications of genetic variances in a hybrid breeding program. Crop Sci. 1:47–52.Google Scholar
  39. Cockerham, C.C. 1963. Estimation of genetic variances. pp. 53–94. In W.D. Hanson and H.F. Robinson (eds.) Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. NAS-NRC Publication 982.Google Scholar
  40. Collins, G.N. 1909. The importance of broad breeding in corn. USDA Bureau Plant Ind. Bull. 141. Part 4:33–42.Google Scholar
  41. Compton, W.A. and R.E. Comstock. 1976. More on modified ear-to-row selection. Crop Sci. 16:122.Google Scholar
  42. Compton, W.A. and J.H. Lonnquist. 1982. A multiplicative selection index applied to four cycles of full-sib recurrent selection in maize. Crop Sci. 22:981–983.Google Scholar
  43. Comstock, R.E. and H.F. Robinson. 1952. Estimation of average dominance of genes. pp. 496–516. J.W. Gowen (ed.) Heterosis. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  44. Comstock, R.E., H.F. Robinson, and P.H. Harvey. 1949. A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. Agron. J. 41:360–367.Google Scholar
  45. Cook, K.A. 1998. Linkage disequilibrium in maize F2 populations. Ph.D. Diss. Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  46. Coors, J.G. and J.G. Lauer. 2001. Silage corn. pp. 347–392. A.R. Hallauer (ed.) Special Corns, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  47. Coors, J.G. and S. Pandey (eds.). 1999. Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  48. Covarrubias-Prieto, J., A.R. Hallauer, and K.R. Lamkey. 1989. Intermating F2 populations of maize. Genetika 21:111–126.Google Scholar
  49. Crabb, A.R. 1947. The Hybrid Corn Makers. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
  50. Cress, C.E. 1967. Reciprocal recurrent selection and modifications in simulated populations. Crop Sci. 7:561–567.Google Scholar
  51. Crosbie, T.M., J.J. Mock, and O.S. Smith. 1980. Comparison of gains predicted by several selection methods for cold tolerance traits of two maize populations. Crop Sci. 20:649–655.Google Scholar
  52. Cross, H.Z., J.R. Chyle, Jr., and J.J. Hammond. 1987. Divergent selection for ear moisture in early maize. Crop Sci. 27:914–918.Google Scholar
  53. Crossa, J. 1989. Theoretical considerations for the introgression of exotic germplasm into adapted maize populations. Maydica 34:53–62.Google Scholar
  54. Crossa, J., C.O. Gardner, and R.F. Mumm. 1987. Heterosis among populations of maize (Zea mays L.) with different levels of exotic germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 73:445–450.Google Scholar
  55. Crossa, J., S. Taba, and E.J. Wellhausen. 1990. Heterotic patterns among Mexican races of maize. Crop Sci. 30:1182–1190.Google Scholar
  56. Cunningham, E.P. 1969. The relative efficiencies of selection indexes. Acta. Agric. Scandinavica 19:45–48.Google Scholar
  57. Darrah, L.L. 1986. Evaluation of population improvement in the Kenya maize breeding methods study. pp. 160–175. In B. Gelaw (ed.) To Feed Ourselves. Proc. First Eastern, Central, and Southern Africa Regional Maize Workshop, Lusaka, Zambia. March 10–17, 1985. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
  58. Darrah, L.L. and L.H. Penny 1975. Inbred line extraction from improved breeding populations. E. Afr. Agric. For. J. 41:1–8.Google Scholar
  59. Darrah, L.L., S.A. Eberhart, and L.H. Penny. 1978. Six years of maize selection in Kitale Synthetic II, Ecuador 573, and Kitale Composite A using methods of the comprehensive breeding systems. Euphytica 27:191–204.Google Scholar
  60. Dekker, J.C.M. and P. Settar. 2004. Long-term selection with known quantitative trait loci. pp. 311–335. J. Janick (ed.) Long-term Selection: Maize. Part 1. Plant Breed. Rev. Vol. 24. John Wiley ' Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  61. DeKruif, P. 1928. Maize. pp. 165–259. In Hungar Fighters. Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  62. Dhillon, B.S. and A.S. Khehra. 1989. Modified S1 recurrent selection in maize improvement. Crop Sci. 29:226–228.Google Scholar
  63. Douglas, A.G., J.W. Collier, M.F. El-Ebrasly, and J.S. Rogers. 1961. An evaluation of three cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection in a corn improvement program. Crop Sci. 1:157–161.Google Scholar
  64. Dowswell, C.R., R.L. Paliwal, and R.P. Cantrell. 1996. Maize in the Third World. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  65. Dudley, J.W. 1982. Theory for transfer of genes. Crop Sci. 22:631–637.Google Scholar
  66. Dudley, J.W. 1984a. Theory for the identification and use of exotic germplasm maize breeding programs. Maydica 29:391–407.Google Scholar
  67. Dudley, J.W. 1984b. A method of identifying lines for use in improving parents of a single cross. Crop Sci. 24:355–357.Google Scholar
  68. Dudley, J.W. 1987. Modification of methods for identifying inbred lines useful for improving parents of elite single crosses. Crop Sci. 27:940–943.Google Scholar
  69. Dudley, J.W. 1997. Quantitative genetics and plant breeding. Adv. Agron. 59:1–23.Google Scholar
  70. Dudley, J.W. and R.J. Lambert. 2004. 100 generations of selection for oil and protein in corn. pp. 79–100. J. Janick (ed.) Plant Breed. Rev. 24, Part 1. John Wiley ' Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  71. Dudley, J.W. and R.H. Moll. 1969. Interpretations and uses of estimates of heritability and genetic variances in plant breeding. Crop Sci. 9:257–262.Google Scholar
  72. Duvick, D.N. 1992. Genetic contributions to advances in yield of U.S. maize. Maydica 37:69–79.Google Scholar
  73. Duvick, D.N. 1999. Heterosis: Feeding people and protecting natural resources. pp. 19–29. J.G. Coors and S. Pandey (eds.) Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  74. Duvick, D.N. 2004. Long-term selection in a commercial hybrid maize breeding program. pp. 109–151. J. Janick (eds.) Plant Breed. Rev. 24, Part 2. John Wiley ' Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  75. Duvick, D.N., J.S.C. Smith, and M. Cooper. 2004 . Changes in performance, parentage, and genetic diversity of successful corn hybrids, 1930–2000. pp. 65–97. In C.W. Smith, J. Betran, and E.C.A. Runge (eds.) Corn: Origin, History, and Production. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboden, NJ.Google Scholar
  76. Eagles, H.A. and A.K. Hardacre. 1990. Genetic changes from introgression of highland Mexican germplasm into a Corn Belt dent population of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 79:543–549.Google Scholar
  77. East, E.M. 1908. Inbreeding in corn. pp. 419–428. In Connecticut Agricultural Experiments Station Report 1907.Google Scholar
  78. East, E.M. and H.K. Hayes. 1911. Inheritance in corn. Conn. Agr. Exp. Stn. Bull. 167:1–41.Google Scholar
  79. Eathington, S.R., J.W. Dudley, and G.F. Rufener II. 1997. Usefulness of marker-QTL associations in early generation selection. Crop Sci. 37:1686–1693.Google Scholar
  80. Eberhart, S.A. 1964. Least squares method for comparing progress among recurrent selection methods. Crop Sci. 4:230–231.Google Scholar
  81. Eberhart, S.A. 1970. Factors affecting efficiencies of breeding methods. African Soils 15:669–680.Google Scholar
  82. Eberhart, S.A. and W.A. Russell. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6:36–40.Google Scholar
  83. Eberhart, S.A., M.N. Harrison, and F. Ogada. 1967. A comprehensive breeding system. Züchter 37:169–174.Google Scholar
  84. Echandi, C.R. and A.R. Hallauer. 1996. Evaluation of U.S. Corn Belt and adapted maize cultivars and their diallel crosses. Maydica 41:317–324.Google Scholar
  85. Eckhardt, R.C. and A.A. Bryan. 1940. Effect of method of combining the four inbred lines of a double-cross of maize upon the yield and variability of the resulting double crosses. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 32:347–353.Google Scholar
  86. Elston, R.C. 1963. A weight free index for the purpose of ranking or selection with respect to several traits at a time. Biometrics 19:85–97.Google Scholar
  87. Eyherabide, G.H. and A.R. Hallauer. 1991. Reciprocal full-sib selection in maize. I. Direct and indirect responses. Crop Sci. 31:952–959.Google Scholar
  88. Falconer, D.S. 1960. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Ronald Press, New York.Google Scholar
  89. Findlay, K.W. and G.N. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian J. Agric. Res. 14:742–754.Google Scholar
  90. Fountain, M.O. and A.R. Hallauer. 1996. Genetic variation within maize breeding populations. Crop Sci. 36:26–32.Google Scholar
  91. Freeman, G.H. and J.M. Perkins. 1971. Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. VIII. Relation between genotypes grown in different environments and measures of these environments. Heredity 27:15–23.Google Scholar
  92. Galinat, W.C. 1988. The origin of corn. pp. 1–31. G.F. Sprague and J.W. Dudley (eds.) Corn and Corn Improvement. 3rd ed. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  93. Gama, E.E.G. and A.R. Hallauer. 1977. Relation between inbred and hybrid traits in maize. Crop Sci. 17:703–706.Google Scholar
  94. Gamble, E.E. 1962. Gene effects in corn (Zea mays L.). I. Selection and relative importance of gene effects for yield. Can. J. Plant Sci. 42:339–348.Google Scholar
  95. Gardner, C.O. 1961. An evaluation of effects of mass selection and seed irradiation with thermal neutrons on yields of corn. Crop Sci. 1:241–245.Google Scholar
  96. Gardner, C.O. 1963. Estimates of genetic parameters in cross-fertilizing plants and their implications in plant breeding. pp. 225–248. In W.D. Hanson and H.F. Robinson (eds.) Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. NAS-NRC Publication 982. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  97. Gardner, C.O. 1976. Quantitative genetic studies and population improvement in maize and sorghum. pp. 475–489. E. Pollak, O. Kempthorne, and T.B. Bailey (eds.) Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Genetics. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  98. Genter, C.F. 1976. Mass selection in a composite of intercrosses of Mexican races of maize. Crop Sci. 16:556–558.Google Scholar
  99. Gepts, P. 2004. Crop domestication as a long-term selection experiment. pp. 1–44. J. Janick (ed.) Long-term Selection: Crops, Animals, and Bacteria. Plant Breed. Rev. Part 2, Vol. 24. John Wiley ' Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  100. Gerdes, J.T., C.F. Behr, J.G. Coors, and W.F. Tracy. 1994. Compilation of North American Maize Breeding Germplasm. CSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  101. Gerloff, J.E. and O.S. Smith. 1988. Choice of method for identifying germplasm with superior alleles. Theor. Appl. Genet. 76:209–216.Google Scholar
  102. Gerrish, E.E. 1983. Indications from a diallel study for interracial maize hybridization in the Corn Belt. Crop Sci. 23:1082–1084.Google Scholar
  103. Gethi, J.G., J.A. Labate, K.R. Lamkey, M.E. Smith, and S. Kresovich. 2002. SSR variation in important U.S. inbred lines. Crop Sci. 42:951–957.Google Scholar
  104. Getschman, R.J. and A.R. Hallauer. 1991. Genetic variation among and within S1 progenies of maize. J. Iowa Acad. Sci. 98:127–133.Google Scholar
  105. Gevers, H.O. 1975. Three cycles of reciprocal recurrent selection in maize under two systems of plant selection. Agroplante 7:107–108.Google Scholar
  106. Goldman, I.L. 1999. Inbreeding and outbreeding in the development of a modern heterosis concept. pp. 7–18. J.G. Coors and S. Pandey (eds.) Genetics and Explortation of Heterosis in Crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  107. Good, R.L. and A.R. Hallauer. 1977. Inbreeding depression in maize by selfing and full-sibbing. Crop Sci. 17:735–740.Google Scholar
  108. Goodman, M.M. 1965. Estimates of genetic variance in adapted and exotic populations of maize. Crop Sci. 5:87–90.Google Scholar
  109. Goodman, M.M. 1985. Exotic maize germplasm: Status, prospects, and remedies. Iowa State J. Res. 59:497–527.Google Scholar
  110. Goodman, M.M. 1999a. Developing temperate inbreds from tropical germplasm: Rationale, results, and conclusions. Illinois Corn Breeders' School 35:1–19.Google Scholar
  111. Goodman, M.M. 1999b. Broadening the genetic diversity in maize breeding by use of exotic germplasm. pp. 139–148. J.G. Coors and S. Pandey (eds.) Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  112. Goodman, M.M. and W.L. Brown. 1988. Races of corn. pp. 33–79. G.F. Sprague and J.W. Dudley (eds.) Corn and Corn Improvement. 3rd ed. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  113. Goodsell, S. 1961. Male sterility in corn by androgenesis. Crop Sci. 1:227–228.Google Scholar
  114. Gowen, J.W. (ed.). 1952. Heterosis. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  115. Griffing, B. and E.W. Lindstrom. 1954. A study of combining abilities of corn inbreds having varying proportions of Corn Belt and non-Corn Belt germplasm. Agron. J. 46:845–852.Google Scholar
  116. Gutierrez-Gaitan, M.A., H. Cortez-Mendoza, E.N. Wathika, C.O. Gardner, M. Oyervides-Garacia, A.R. Hallauer, and L.L. Darrah. 1986. Testcross evaluations of Mexican maize populations. Crop Sci. 26:99–104.Google Scholar
  117. Hadi, G. 2004. Improvement of commercial maize lines through the integration of genes and gene combinations from elite lines. Acta Agron. Hungarica 52:69–74.Google Scholar
  118. Hainzelin, E. 1998. Exotic introgression incidence on two elite tropical maize populations. Maydica 43:19–26.Google Scholar
  119. Hallauer, A.R. 1985. Compendium of recurrent selection methods and their application. Critical Rev. Plant Sci. 3(1):1–33.Google Scholar
  120. Hallauer, A.R. 1987. Maize. pp. 249–294. W.R. Fehr (ed.) Principles of Cultivar Development. Vol. 2. Macmillan Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar
  121. Hallauer, A.R. 1990. Methods used in developing maize inbreds. Maydica 55:1–16.Google Scholar
  122. Hallauer, A.R. 1992. Recurrent selection in maize. Plant Breed. Rev. 9:115–179.Google Scholar
  123. Hallauer, A.R. 1994. Corn genetics and breeding. Encycl. Agric. Sci. 1:455–467. Academic Press, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  124. Hallauer, A.R. 1999a. Temperate maize and heterosis. pp. 353–36. J.G. Coors and S. Pandey (eds.) The Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  125. Hallauer, A.R. 1999b. Conversion of tropical germplasm for temperate area use. Illinois Corn Breeders' School 35:20–36.Google Scholar
  126. Hallauer, A.R. (ed.). 2001. Specialty Corns. 2nd ed. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  127. Hallauer, A.R. 2002. Integration of germplasm improvement with corn breeding. Illinois Corn Breeders' School 38:11–41.Google Scholar
  128. Hallauer, A.R. 2003. Conversion of tropical germplasm for temperate area. Proc. Annual Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf. 58:187–200.Google Scholar
  129. Hallauer, A.R. 2004. Specialty corns. pp. 897–933. C.W. Smith, J. Betran, and E.C.A. Runge (eds.) Corn: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. John Wiley ' Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  130. Hallauer, A.R. 2006. Defining and achieving plant-breeding goals. pp. 73–89. K.R. Lamkey and M. Lee (eds.) Plant Breeding: The Arnel R. Hallauer International Symposium. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  131. Hallauer, A.R. in press. History, contribution and future of quantitative genetics in plant breeding: Lessons from maize. In R. Bernardo (ed.) Internationl Plant Breeding Symposium. August 20–26, 2006, Mexico City.Google Scholar
  132. Hallauer, A.R. and S.A. Eberhart. 1970. Reciprocal full-sib selection. Crop Sci. 10:315–316.Google Scholar
  133. Hallauer, A.R. and E. Lopez-Perez. 1979. Comparisons among testers for evaluating lines of corn. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf. 34:57–75.Google Scholar
  134. Hallauer, A.R. and J.B. Miranda, Fo. 1988. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. 2nd ed. Iowa State University Press. Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  135. Hallauer, A.R. and J.H. Sears. 1969. Mass selection for yield in two varieties of maize. Crop Sci. 9:47–50.Google Scholar
  136. Hallauer, A.R. and J.H. Sears. 1973. Changes in quantitative traits associated with inbreeding in a synthetic variety of maize. Crop Sci. 13:327–330.Google Scholar
  137. Hallauer, A.R., W.A. Russell, and O.S. Smith. 1983. Quantitative analysis of Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthtic. pp. 105–118. In J.P. Gustafson (ed.) 15th Stadler Genetics Symposium. Columbia, MO.Google Scholar
  138. Hallauer, A.R., W.A. Russell, and K.R. Lamkey. 1988. Corn breeding. pp. 463–564. G.F. Sprague and J.W. Dudley (eds.) Corn and Corn Improvement. 3rd ed. CSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  139. Hallauer, A.R., A.J. Ross, and M. Lee. 2004. Long-term divergent selection for ear length in maize. pp. 153–168. J. Janick (ed.) Plant Breed. Rev. Vol. 24, Part 2. John Wiley ' Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  140. Hameed, A., L.M. Pollak, and P.N. Hinz. 1994. Evaluation of Cateto maize accessions for grain yield and other agronomic traits in temperate and tropical environments. Crop Sci. 34:270–275.Google Scholar
  141. Hammond, J.J. and M.J. Carena. 2008. A breeding plan with molecular markers. In Agronomy Abstracts [CD-ROM computer file]. ASA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  142. Han, G. and A.R. Hallauer. 1989. Estimates of genetic variability in F2 maize populations. J. Iowa Acad. Sci. 96:277–313.Google Scholar
  143. Hanson, W.D. 1959. The breakup of initial linkage blocks under selected mating systems. Genetics 44:857–868.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. Hanson, W.D. 1963. Heritability. pp. 125–140. In W.D. Hanson and H.F. Robinson (eds.) Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. NAS-NCR Publication 982.Google Scholar
  145. Harrison, M.N. 1967. Selection of source material and methods of formation of composites for maize breeding. Paper presented at Eastern African Cereals Research Conference.Google Scholar
  146. Hartley, C.P. 1908. Utilization of Corn Variations. pp. 13–27. Ohio Crop Imp. Association Annual Report.Google Scholar
  147. Hawbaker, M.S., W.H. Hill, and M.M. Goodman. 1997. Application of recurrent selection for low moisture content in tropical maize (Zea mays L.). I. Testcross yield trials. Crop Sci. 37:1650–1655.Google Scholar
  148. Hayes, H.K. 1956. I Saw Hybrid Corn Develop. Annu. Corn ' Sorghum Res. Conf. Proc. 11:48–55.Google Scholar
  149. Hayman, B.I. 1958. The separation of epistatic from additive and dominance in generation means. Heredity 12:371–390.Google Scholar
  150. Hayman, B.I. 1960. The separation of espistatic from additive and dominance variation in generation means. II. Genetica 31:133–146.Google Scholar
  151. Hazel, L.N. and J.L. Lush. 1942. The efficiency of three methods of selection. J. Hered. 33:393–399.Google Scholar
  152. Henderson, C.R. 1963. Selection index and expected genetic advances. pp. 141–163. In W.D. Hanson and H.F. Robinson (eds.) Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. NAS-NRC Publication 982.Google Scholar
  153. Hofbeck, M.D., S.J. Openshaw, J.L. Geadelmann, R.H. Peterson, and D.D. Stuthman. 1995. Backcrossing and intermating in an exotic × adapted cross of maize. Crop Sci. 35:1359–1364.Google Scholar
  154. Holland, J.B. and M.M. Goodman. 1995. Combining ability of tropical maize accessions with U.S. germplasm. Crop Sci. 35:767–773.Google Scholar
  155. Holley, R.N. and M.M. Goodman. 1988a. Stalk quality and stalk rot resistance of tropical hybrid maize derivatives. Plant Dis. 72:321–324.Google Scholar
  156. Holley, R.N. and M.M. Goodman. 1988b. Yield potential of tropical maize derivatives. Crop Sci. 28:213–218.Google Scholar
  157. Holley, R.N., P.B. Hamilton, and M.M. Goodman. 1989. Evaluation of tropical germplasm for resistance to kernel colonization by Fusarium moniliforme. Plant Dis. 73:578–580.Google Scholar
  158. Hopkins, C.G. 1899. Improvement in the chemical composition of the corn kernel. Bull. Ill. Agric. Exp. Stn. 55:205–240.Google Scholar
  159. Horner, E.S., E. Magloire, and J.A. Morera. 1989. Comparison of selection for S2 progeny vs. testcross performance for population improvement in maize. Crop Sci. 29:868–874.Google Scholar
  160. Hudson, J.C. 1994. Making the Corn Belt. Indiana University Press, Bloomington ' Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
  161. Hull, F.H. 1945. Recurrent selection and specific combining ability in corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 37:134–145.Google Scholar
  162. Ito, G.M. and J. Brewbaker. 1981. Genetic advance through mass selection for tenderness in corn. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:496–499.Google Scholar
  163. Janick, J. (ed.). 2004. Long-term selection: Maize. Plant Breed. Rev. Vol. 24, Part 1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  164. Jenkins, M.T. 1928. Correlation studies with inbred and crossbred strains of maize. J. Agric. Res. 39:677–721.Google Scholar
  165. Jenkins, M.T. 1934. Methods of estimating the performance of double crosses in corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 26:199–204.Google Scholar
  166. Jenkins, M.T. 1935. The effect of inbreeding and of selection within inbred lines of maize upon hybrids made after successive generations of selfing. Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 9:429–450.Google Scholar
  167. Jenkins, M.T. 1936. Corn improvement. pp. 455–522. In Yearbook of Agriculture, 1936. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  168. Jenkins, M.T. 1940. The segregation of genes affecting yield of grain in maize. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 32:55–63.Google Scholar
  169. Jenkins, M.T. and A.M. Brunson. 1932. Methods of testing inbred lines of maize in crossbred combinations. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 24:523–530.Google Scholar
  170. Jenkins, M.T., A.L. Robert, and W.F. Findley, Jr. 1954. Recurrent selection as a method for concentrating genes for resistance to Helminthosporium turcicum leaf blight in corn. Agron. J. 46:89–94.Google Scholar
  171. Jensen, S.D., W.E. Kuhn, and R.L. McConnell. 1983. Combining ability in elite U.S. maize germplasm. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf. 38:87–96.Google Scholar
  172. Johnson, G.R. 1982. Two-locus theory in recurrent selection for general combining ability in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 61:279–283.Google Scholar
  173. Johnson, G.R. 2004. Marker-assisted selection. pp. 293–309. J. Janick (ed.) Plant Breed. Rev. 24, Part 1. John Wiley ' Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  174. Johnson, E.C., K.S. Fisher, G.O. Edmeades, and A.F.E. Palmer. 1986. Recurrent selection for reduced plant height in lowland tropical maize. Crop Sci. 26:253–260.Google Scholar
  175. Jones, D.F. 1918. The effects of inbreeding and cross breeding upon development. Connecticut Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 207:5–100.Google Scholar
  176. Jones, L.P., W.A. Compton, and C.O. Gardner. 1971. Comparison of full-sib and half-sib recurrent selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 41:36–39.Google Scholar
  177. Jumbo, M.B., and M.J. Carena. 2007. Combining ability, maternal, and reciprocal effects of elite early-maturing maize population hybrids [online]. Euphytica. Available at http://springerlink.com/content/x4455x4657455803.
  178. Kaeppler, S. 2004. Biotechnology: New horizons. pp. 399–425. C.W. Smith, J. Betran, and E.C.A. Runge (eds.) Corn: Origin, History, and Production. John Wiley ' Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  179. Kauffmann, K.D. and J.W. Dudley. 1979. Selection indices for corn grain yield, percent protein and kernel weight. Crop Sci. 19:583–588.Google Scholar
  180. Kauffmann, K.D., C.W. Crum, and M.F. Lindsey. 1982. Exotic germplasm in a corn breeding program. Illinois Corn Breeders School 18:6–39.Google Scholar
  181. Keeratinijakal, V. and K.R. Lamkey. 1993. Responses to reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci. 33:73–77.Google Scholar
  182. Kermicle, J.L. 1969. Androgenesis conditioned by a mutation in maize. Science 166:1422–1424.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  183. Kim, S.K., J.L. Brewbaker, and A.R. Hallauer. 1988. Insect and disease resistance from tropical maize for use in temperate zone hybrids. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. 43:194–226.Google Scholar
  184. Knapp, S.J. 1998. Marker-assisted selection as a strategy for increasing the probability of selecting superior genotypes. Crop Sci. 38:1164–1174.Google Scholar
  185. Kraja, A., J.W. Dudley, and D.G. White. 2000. Identification of tropical and temperate maize populations having favorable alleles for disease resistance. Crop Sci. 40:948–954.Google Scholar
  186. Kramer, H.H. and A.J. Ullstrup. 1959. Preliminary evaluations of exotic maize germplasm. Agron. J. 51:687–689.Google Scholar
  187. Lambert, R.J. 1984. Reciprocal recurrent selection of maize in a high-yield environment. Maydica 29:419–430.Google Scholar
  188. Lamkey, K.R. and M. Lee. 1993. Quantitative genetics, molecular markers, and plant improvement. pp. 104–115. In B.C. Imire and J.B. Hacker (eds.) Focused Plant Improvement; Towards Responsible and Sustainable Agriculture. Proceedings of the 10th Australian Plant Breeding Conference. April 18–23, 1993. Gold Coast, Canberra.Google Scholar
  189. Larkin, P.J. and W.R. Scowcroft. 1981. Somaclonal variation – A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60:197–214.Google Scholar
  190. Lee, M. 1995. DNA markers and plant breeding programs. Adv. Agron. 55:265–344.Google Scholar
  191. Lee, M., J.L. Geadelmann, and R.L. Phillips. 1988. Agronomic evaluation of inbred lines derived from tissue cultures of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75:841–849.Google Scholar
  192. Lee, E.A., A. Singh, M.J. Ash, and B. Good. 2006 . Use of sister lines and the performance of modified single-cross maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 46:312–320.Google Scholar
  193. Lile, S.M. and A.R. Hallauer. 1994. Relation between S2 and later generation testcrosses of two corn populations. J. Iowa Acad. Sci. 101:19–23.Google Scholar
  194. Lindstrom, E.W. 1939. Analysis of modern maize breeding principles and methods. Proc. 7th Intl. Genet. Congress 7:191–196.Google Scholar
  195. Lonnquist, J.H. 1964. A modification of the ear-to-row procedure for the improvement of maize populations. Crop Sci. 4:227–228.Google Scholar
  196. Lonnquist, J.H. 1967. Mass selection for prolificacy in maize. Züchter 37:185–188.Google Scholar
  197. Lonnquist, J.H. 1974. Consideration and experiences with recombinations of exotic and Corn Belt maize germplasm. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. 29:102–117.Google Scholar
  198. Lush, J.L. 1945. Animal Breeding Plans. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  199. Mahmud, I. and H.H. Kramer. 1951. Segregation for yield, height, and maturity following a soybean cross. Agron. J. 43:605–609.Google Scholar
  200. Majaya, M.J. and R.J. Lambert. 1992. Improving performance of adapted corn hybrid using exotic inbred. Indonesian J. Crop Sci. 7:55–62.Google Scholar
  201. Mangelsdorf, P.C. 1974. Corn: Its Origin, Evolution, and Improvement. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  202. Marks, R.E. 1993. Cortés: The Great Adventurer and the Fate of Aztec Mexico. A.A. Knopf. New York.Google Scholar
  203. Marquez-Sanchez, F. 1982. Modifications to cyclic hybridization in maize with single-eared plants. Crop Sci. 22:314–319.Google Scholar
  204. Marquez-Sanchez, F. and N. Gomez-Montrel. 1988. Seed increase of half-sib families in the modified ear-to-row method of selection in maize with additional genetic gain. Maydica 33:223–226.Google Scholar
  205. Marquez-Sanchez, F. and A.R. Hallauer. 1970a. Influence of sample size on the estimation of genetic variances in a synthetic variety of maize. I. Grain yield. Crop Sci. 10:357–361.Google Scholar
  206. Marquez-Sanchez, F. and A.R. Hallauer. 1970b. Influence of sample size on the estimation of genetic variances in a synthetic variety of maize. II. Plant and ear characters. Iowa State J. Sci. 44:423–436.Google Scholar
  207. Mather, K. 1949. Biometrical Genetics. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  208. Melani, M.D. and M.J. Carena. 2005. Alternative maize heterotic patterns for the Northern Corn Belt. Crop Sci. 45:2186–2194.Google Scholar
  209. Melchinger, A.E., M.M. Messmer, M. Lee, W.L. Woodman, and K.R. Lamkey. 1991. Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci. 31:669–678.Google Scholar
  210. Menz, M.A. and A.R. Hallauer. 1997. Reciprocal recurrent selection of two tropical corn populations adapted to Iowa. Maydica 42:239–246.Google Scholar
  211. Menz, M.A., A.R. Hallauer, and W.A. Russell. 1999. Comparative response to selection of two reciprocal recurrent selection procedures in BS21 and BS22 maize populations. Crop Sci. 39:89–97.Google Scholar
  212. Mertz, E.T., L.S. Bates, and O.E. Nelson. 1964. Mutant gene that changes protein composition and increases lysine content of maize endosperm. Science 145:279–280.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  213. Michelini, L.A. and A.R. Hallauer. 1993. Evaluation of exotic and adapted maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm crosses. Maydica 38:275–282.Google Scholar
  214. Mikel, M.A. 2006. Availability and analysis of proprietary dent corn inbred lines with expired U.S. Plant Variety Protection. Crop Sci. 46:2555–2560.Google Scholar
  215. Mikel, M.A. and J.W. Dudley. 2006. Evolution of North American dent corn from public to proprietary germplasm. Crop Sci. 46:1193–1206.Google Scholar
  216. Miles, J.W., J.W. Dudley, D.G. White, and R.J. Lambert. 1981. Response to selection for resistance to four diseases in two corn populations. Crop Sci. 21:980–983.Google Scholar
  217. Mishra, T.N. 1977. Classification of maize populations into heterotic groups. M. Ag. University Minnesota., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
  218. Mock, J.J. and R.B. Pearce. 1975. An ideotype of maize. Euphytica 24:613–623.Google Scholar
  219. Moll, R.H. and W.D. Hanson. 1984. Comparisons of effects of intrapopulation vs. interpopulation selection in maize. Crop Sci. 24:1047–1052.Google Scholar
  220. Moll, R.H. and H.F. Robinson. 1966. Observed and expected response in four selection experiments in maize. Crop Sci. 319–324.Google Scholar
  221. Moll, R.H. and C.W. Stuber. 1971. Comparisons of response to alternative selection procedures initiated with two populations of maize. Crop Sci. 11:706–711.Google Scholar
  222. Moll, R.H. and C.W. Stuber. 1974. Quantitative genetics. Empirical results relative to plant breeding. Adv. Agron. 26:277–313.Google Scholar
  223. Moll, R.H., W.S. Salhuana, and H.F. Robinson. 1962. Heterosis and genetic diversity in variety crosses of maize. Crop Sci. 2:197–198.Google Scholar
  224. Moll, R.H., J.H. Lonnquist, J.V. Fortuno, and E.J. Johnson. 1965. The relationship of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 42:139–144.Google Scholar
  225. Moll, R.H., C.W. Stuber, and W.D. Hanson. 1975. Correlated responses and responses to index selection involving yield and ear height of maize. Crop Sci. 15:243–248.Google Scholar
  226. Moll, R.H., A. Bari, and C.W. Stuber. 1977. Frequency distribution of maize yield before and after reciprocal selection. Crop Sci. 17:794–796.Google Scholar
  227. Mongoma, C. and L.M. Pollak. 1988. Heterotic patterns among 10 Corn Belt and exotic maize populations. Crop Sci. 28:500–504.Google Scholar
  228. Moreno-Gonzalez, J. and J.W. Dudley. 1981. Epistasis in related and unrelated maize hybrids determined by three methods. Crop Sci. 21:644–651.Google Scholar
  229. Moreno-Gonzalez, J. and A.R. Hallauer. 1982. Combined S2 and crossbred family selection in full-sib reciprocal recurrent selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 61:353–358.Google Scholar
  230. Mulamba, N.N. and J.J. Mock. 1978. Improvement of yield potential of the Eto Blanco maize (Zea mays L.) population by breeding for plant traits. Egypt. J. Genet. Cytol. 7:40–51.Google Scholar
  231. Narro, L.N. 1990. Direct and correlated response for earliness in a tropical maize population. Ph.D. Diss. Iowa State University, Ames, IA (Diss. Abstr. DAI-B 51/07, p. 3196, January 1991).Google Scholar
  232. Nelson, H.G. 1972. The use of exotic germplasm in practical corn breeding programs. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf. 27:115–118.Google Scholar
  233. Neuffer, M.G., L. Jones, and M.S. Zuber. 1968. Mutants of Maize. CSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  234. Obaidi, M., B.B. Johnson, L.D. Van Vleck, S.D. Kachman, and O.S. Smith. 1998. Family per se response in selfing and selection in maize based on testcross performance: A simulation study. Crop Sci. 38:367–371.Google Scholar
  235. Obilana, A.T. and A.R. Hallauer. 1974. Estimation of variability of quantitative traits in BSSS by using unselected maize inbred lines. Crop Sci. 14:99–103.Google Scholar
  236. Odhiambo, M.O. and W.A. Compton. 1987. Twenty cycles of divergent mass selection for seed size in corn. Crop Sci. 27:113–116.Google Scholar
  237. Oyervides-Garcia, M., A.R. Hallauer, and H. Cortez-Mendoza. 1985. Evaluation of improved maize populations in Mexico and U.S. Corn Belt. Crop Sci. 25:115–120.Google Scholar
  238. Pandey, S. and C.O. Gardner. 1992. Recurrent selection for population, variety, and hybrid improvement in tropical maize. Adv. Agron. 48:1–87.Google Scholar
  239. Paterniani, E. and R. Vencovsky. 1977. Reciprocal recurrent selection (Zea mays L.) based on testcrosses of half-sib families. Maydica 22:141–152.Google Scholar
  240. Paterniani, E. and R. Vencovsky. 1978. Reciprocal recurrent selection based on half-sib progenies and prolific plants in maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica 23:209–219.Google Scholar
  241. Peiris, B.L. and A.R. Hallauer. 2005. Comparison of half-sib and full-sib reciprocal recurrent selection and their modifications in simulated populations. Maydica 50:1–13.Google Scholar
  242. Pesek, J. and R.J. Baker. 1969. Desired improvement in relation to selection indices. Can. J. Plant Sci. 49:803–804.Google Scholar
  243. Peterson, P.A. 1986. Mobile elements in maize: A force in evolutionary and plant breeding processes. pp. 47–78. J.P. Gustafson, G.L. Stebbens, and F.J. Ayala (eds.) Genetics, Development, and Evolution: 17th Stadler Genet. Sym. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  244. Peterson, P.A. 1987. Mobile elements in plants. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 6(2):105–208.Google Scholar
  245. Plaisted, R.L. and L.C. Peterson. 1959. A technique for evaluating the ability of selections to yield consistently in different locations or seasons. Potato J. 36:381–385.Google Scholar
  246. Pollak, L.M. 2003. The history and success of the public-private project on germplasm enhancement of maize (GEM). Adv. Agron. 78:45–87.Google Scholar
  247. Pollak, L.M. and W. Salhuana. 1999. Lines for improved yield and value-added traits – Results from GEM. Annu. Corn Sorghum Ind. Res. Conf. 53:143–158.Google Scholar
  248. Rawlings, J.O. 1970. Present status of research on long and short term recurrent selection in finite populations – Choice of population size. pp. 1–15. In Proc. 2nd Meet. Work Group Quant. Genet., Sec. 22. IUFRO, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  249. Rawlings, J.C. and D.L. Thompson. 1962. Performance level as criterion for the choice of maize testers. Crop Sci. 2:217–220.Google Scholar
  250. Richey, F.D. 1922. The experimental basis for the present status of corn breeding. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 14:1–17.Google Scholar
  251. Richey, F.D. 1944. The shattered dreams of a corn breeder. Agron. J. 44:267–268.Google Scholar
  252. Richey, F.D. 1950. Corn breeding. Adv. Genet. 3:159–192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  253. Rodriguez, O.A. and A.R. Hallauer. 1991. Variation among full-sib families of corn in different generations of inbreeding. Crop Sci. 31:43–47.Google Scholar
  254. Russell, W.A. 1971. Types of gene action at three gene loci in sublines of a maize inbred line. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 13:322–334.Google Scholar
  255. Russell, W.A. 1991. Genetic improvements in maize yields. Adv. Agron. 46:245–298.Google Scholar
  256. Russell, W.A. and S.A. Eberhart. 1970. Effects of three gene loci in the inheritance of quantitative characters in maize. Crop Sci. 10:165–169.Google Scholar
  257. Russell, W.A. and S.A. Eberhart. 1975. Hybrid performance of selected maize lines from reciprocal recurrent and testcross selection programs. Crop Sci. 15:1–4.Google Scholar
  258. Russell, W.A. and A.R. Hallauer. 1980. Corn. pp. 299–312. W.R. Fehr and H.H. Hadley (eds.) Hybridization of Crop Plants. ASA and CSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  259. Salhuana, W., R. Sevilla, and S.A. Eberhart. 1997. Latin American Maize Project (LAMP) Final Report. Pioneer Hi-Bred International Spec. Publ.Google Scholar
  260. Schmidt, D.H. and A.R. Hallauer. 1995. Inheritance and number of genes affecting quantitative traits within F2 maize populations. J. Iowa Acad. Sci. 102:32–40.Google Scholar
  261. Schnell, F.W. 1975. Type of variety and average performance in hybrid maize. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg 74:177–188.Google Scholar
  262. Schnicker, B.J. and K.R. Lamkey. 1993. Interpopulation genetic variance after reciprocal recurrent selection in BSSS and BSCB1 maize populations. Crop Sci. 33:90–95.Google Scholar
  263. Shamel, A.D. 1905. The effect of inbreeding in plants. pp. 377–392. U.S. Dep. Agric. Yearbook.Google Scholar
  264. Shank, D.B. and M.W. Adams. 1960. Environmental variability within inbred lines and single crosses of maize. J. Genet. 57:119–126.Google Scholar
  265. Shull, G.H. 1908. The composition of a field of maize. Am. Breeders' Assoc. Rep. 4:296–301.Google Scholar
  266. Shull, G.H. 1909. A pure-line method of corn breeding. Am. Breeders' Assoc. Rep. 5:51–59.Google Scholar
  267. Shull, G.H. 1910. Hybridization methods in corn breeding. Am. Breeders' Mag. 1:98–107.Google Scholar
  268. Silva, J.C. and A.R. Hallauer. 1975. Estimation of epistatic variance in Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic maize. J. Heredity 66:290–296.Google Scholar
  269. Smith, H.F. 1936. A discrimnant function for plant selection. Annu. Eugen. 7:240–250.Google Scholar
  270. Smith, O.S. 1979. A model for evaluating progress from recurrent selection. Crop Sci. 19:223–226.Google Scholar
  271. Smith, O.S. 1983. Evaluation of recurrent selection in BSSS, BSCB1, and BS13 maize populations. Crop Sci. 13:35–40.Google Scholar
  272. Smith, O.S. 1986. Covariance between line per se and testcross performance. Crop Sci. 26:540–543.Google Scholar
  273. Smith, J.S.C. 1988. Diversity of United States hybrid maize germplasm; isozymic and chromatographic evidence. Crop Sci. 28:63–69.Google Scholar
  274. Smith, J.S.C. and O.S. Smith. 1991. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms can differentiate among U.S. maize hybrids. Crop Sci. 31:893–899.Google Scholar
  275. Smith, D.R. and D.G. White. 1988. Diseases of corn. pp. 687–766. G.F. Sprague and J.W. Dudley (eds.) Corn and Corn Improvement. 3rd ed. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  276. Smith, O.S., A.R. Hallauer, and W.A. Russell. 1981. Use of index selection in recurrent selection programs in maize. Euphytica 30:611–618.Google Scholar
  277. Smith, J.S.C., M.M. Goodman, and C.W. Stuber. 1985. Genetic variability within U.S. maize germplasm. II. Widely-used inbred lines 1970 to 1979. Crop Sci. 25:681–685.Google Scholar
  278. Snape, J.W. 1989. Doubled haploid breeding: Theoretical basis and practical applications. pp. 19–30. A. Mujeeb-Kazi and L.A. Sitch (eds.) Rev. Adv. in Plant Biotech., 1985–1988. 2nd Int'l. Sym. Genet. Manipulation in Crops. CIMMYT Mexico and IRRS, Philippines.Google Scholar
  279. Spitko, T., L. Sagi, J. Printer, L.C. Marton, and B. Barnabas. 2006. Haploid regeneration aptitude of maize (Zea mays L.) lines of various origin and of their hybrids. Maydica 34:537–542.Google Scholar
  280. Sprague, G.F. 1946a. Early testing of inbred lines. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 38:108–117.Google Scholar
  281. Sprague, G.F. 1946b. The experimental basis for hybrid maize. Biol. Rev. 21:101–120.Google Scholar
  282. Sprague, G.F. 1955. Corn breeding. pp. 221–292. G.F. Sprague (ed.) Corn and Corn Improvement. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  283. Sprague, G.F. and W.T. Federer. 1951. A comparison of variance components in corn yield trials. II. Error, year × variety, location × variety, and variety components. Agron. J. 43:535–541.Google Scholar
  284. Sprague, G.F. and L.A. Tatum. 1942. General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 34:923–932.Google Scholar
  285. Stringfield, G.H. 1947. Grouping of inbred lines for breeding purposes. p. 25. In Rep. 9th Corn Impr. Conf. North Central Region. Cincinnati, OH. November 16, 1947.Google Scholar
  286. Stringfield, G.H. 1974. Developing heterozygous parent stocks for hybrids. DeKalb AgResearch, DeKalb, IL.Google Scholar
  287. Stuber, C.W. 1978. Exotic sources for broadening genetic diversity in corn breeding programs. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. 33:35–47.Google Scholar
  288. Sturtevant, E.L. 1899. Varieties of corn. USDA Off. Exp. Stn. Bull. 57:1–108.Google Scholar
  289. Subandi, W.A.Compton, and L.T. Empig. 1973. Comparison of the efficiencies of selection indices for three traits in two variety crosses of corn. Crop Sci. 13:184–186.Google Scholar
  290. Suwataradon, K., S.A. Eberhart, J.J. Mock, J.C. Owens, and W.D. Guthrie. 1975. Index selection for several agronomic traits in the BSSS2 maize population. Crop Sci. 15:827–833.Google Scholar
  291. Tallury, S.P. and M.M. Goodman. 1999. Experimental evaluation of the potential of tropical germplasm for temperate maize improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98:54–61.Google Scholar
  292. Tanksley, S.D. 1993. Mapping polygeness. Annu. Rev. Genet. 27:205–233. Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  293. Tanner, A.H. and O.S. Smith. 1987. Comparison of half-sib and S1 recurrent selection in Krug Yellow Dent maize populations. Crop Sci. 27:509–513.Google Scholar
  294. Tatum, L.A. 1971. The southern corn leaf blight epidemic. Science 171:1113–1116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  295. Thompson, D.L. 1954. Combining ability of homozygous diploids of corn relative to lines derived by inbreeding. Agron. J. 46:133–136.Google Scholar
  296. Thompson, D.L. 1968. Sileage yield of exotic corn. Agron. J. 60:579–581.Google Scholar
  297. Torregroza, M. 1973. Response of a highland maize synthetic to eleven cycles of divergent mass selection for ears per plant. p. 16. Agron. Abstr., ASA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  298. Troyer, A.F. 1999. Background of U.S. hybrid corn. Crop Sci. 39:601–626.Google Scholar
  299. Troyer, A.F. 2001. Temperate corn – Background, behavior, and breeding. pp. 393–466. A.R. Hallauer (ed.) Specialty Corns. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  300. Troyer, A.F. 2004a. Background of U.S. hybrid corn. II: Breeding, climate and food. Crop Sci. 44:370–380.Google Scholar
  301. Troyer, A.F. 2004b. Persistent and popular germplasm in seventy centuries of corn evolution. pp. 133–231. C.W. Smith, J. Betran, and E.C.A. Runge (eds.) Corn: Origin, History, and Production. John Wiley ' Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  302. Troyer, A.F. 2006. Adaptedness and heterosis in corn and mule hybrids. Crop Sci. 46:528–543.Google Scholar
  303. Troyer, A.F. and W.L. Brown. 1972. Selection for early flowering in corn. Crop Sci. 12:301–304.Google Scholar
  304. Troyer, A.F. and W.F. Brown. 1976. Selection for early flowering in corn: Seven late synthetics. Crop Sci. 16:767–772.Google Scholar
  305. Uhr, D.V. and M.M. Goodman. 1995. Temperate maize inbreds from tropical germplasm. I. Testcross yield trials. Crop Sci. 35:779–784.Google Scholar
  306. Vasal, S.K., A. Ortega, and S. Pandey. 1982. CIMMYT's maize germplasm management, improvement, and utilization program. CIMMYT, El Batán, Mexico.Google Scholar
  307. Vasal, S.K., H. Cordova, S. Pandey, and G. Srinivasan. 1999. Tropical maize and heterosis. pp. 363–373. J.G. Coors and S. Pandey (eds.) Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  308. Wallace, W.A. and W.L. Brown. 1988. Corn and Its Early Fathers. Iowa State University Press (Rev. ed.), Ames, IA.Google Scholar
  309. Warner, J.N. 1952. A method for estimating heritability. Agron. J. 44:427–430.Google Scholar
  310. Weatherspoon, J.H. 1970. Comparative yields of single, three-way and double crosses of maize. Crop Sci. 10:157–159.Google Scholar
  311. Weber, C.R. and B.R. Morthy. 1952. Heritable on nonheritable relationships and variability of oil content and agronomic characters in the F2 generation of soybean crosses. Agron. J. 44:204–209.Google Scholar
  312. Wellhausen, E.J. 1956. Improving American corn with exotic germplasm. Proc. Annu. Corn Ind. Res. Conf. 11:85–96.Google Scholar
  313. Wellhausen, E.J. 1965. Exotic germplasm for improvement of Corn Belt maize. Proc. Annu. Corn Sorghum Res. Conf. 20:31–45.Google Scholar
  314. West, D.R., W.A. Compton, and M.A. Thomas. 1980. A comparison of replicated S1 per se vs. reciprocal full-sib selection in corn. I. Indirect response to population densities. Crop Sci. 20:35–42.Google Scholar
  315. Westgate, M.E., M.E. Otegui, and F.H. Andrade. 2004. Physiology of the corn plant. pp. 235–303. C.W. Smith, J. Betran, and E.C.A. Runge (eds.) Corn: Origin, History, and Produciton. John Wiley ' Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  316. Weyhrich, R.A., K.A. Lamkey, and A.R. Hallauer. 1998 . Responses to seven methods of recurrent selection in the BS11 maize population. Crop Sci. 38:308–321.Google Scholar
  317. Whitehead, F.C. 2002. Backcross introgression and two-stage testing for conversion of improved tropical germplasm to temperate environments. Ph.D. Diss. Iowa State University, Ames, IA (Diss. Abstr. DAI-B 63/04, p. 1617, Oct. 2002).Google Scholar
  318. Whitehead, F.C., H.G. Caton, A.R. Hallauer, S. Vasal, and H. Cordova. 2006. Incorporation of elite subtropical and tropical maize germplasm into elite temperate germplasm. Maydica 51:43–56.Google Scholar
  319. Widstrom, N.W. 1974. Selection indices for resistance to corn earworm based on realized gains in corn. Crop Sci. 14:673–675.Google Scholar
  320. Widstrom, N.W., B.R. Wiseman, and W.W. McMillan. 1982. Response to index selection in maize resistant to ear damage by corn earworm. Crop Sci. 22:843–846.Google Scholar
  321. Wilkes, G. 2004. Corn, strange, and marvelous: But is a definitive origin known? pp. 3–63. C.W. Smith, J. Betran, and E.C.A. Runge (eds.) Corn: Origin, History, Technology, and Production. Wiley ' Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  322. Williams, W.P. and F.M. Davis. 1983. Recurrent selection for resistance in corn to tunneling by the second-brood southwestern corn borer. Crop Sci. 23:169–171.Google Scholar
  323. Williams, T.R. and A.R. Hallauer. 2000. Genetic diversity among maize hybrids. Maydica 45:163–171.Google Scholar
  324. Wolf, D.P. and A.R. Hallauer. 1997. Triple testcross analysis to detect epistasis in maize. Crop Sci. 37:763–770.Google Scholar
  325. Wolf, D.P., L.A. Peternelli, and A.R. Hallauer. 2000. Estimates of genetic variance in an F2 population. J. Hered. 91:384–391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  326. Wricke, W. 1962. Uber eine method zurerlassung der kologischen kologischen streubreite in felduersuchen. Z. Pflazurcht 47:92–96.Google Scholar
  327. Zuber, M.S., M.L. Fairchild, A.J. Keaster, V.L. Fergason, G.F. Krause, E. Hildebrant, and P.J. Loesch, Jr. 1971. Evaluation of 10 generations of mass selection for corn earworm resistance. Crop Sci. 11:16–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North Dakota State University Corn Breeding & GeneticsDept. of Plant SciencesUSA

Personalised recommendations