Otoacoustic Emissions: Concepts and Origins

  • David T. Kemp
Part of the Springer Handbook of Auditory Research book series (SHAR, volume 30)

References

  1. Abbas PJ, Sachs MB (1976) Two tone suppression in auditory nerve fibres: Extension of a stimulus-response relationship. J Acoust Soc Am 59:112–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen JB, Fahey PF (1993) A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 94:809–8016.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson SD, Kemp DT (1979) The evoked cochlear mechanical response in laboratory primates. A preliminary report. Arch Oto Laryngol 224:47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boege P, Janssen TH (2002) Pure tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission I/O-functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears. J Acoust Soc Am 111:1810–1818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown AM, Kemp DT (1984) Suppressibility of the 2f1 − f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res 13:29–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown AM, Gaskill SA, Williams DM (1992) Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear. Proc Biol Sci 250:29–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown AM, Harris FP, Beveridge HA (1996) Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 100:3260–3267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brownell WE (1983) Observations on a motile response in isolated outer hair cells. In: Webster DB and Aitkin LM (eds) Neural Mechanisms of Hearing. Clayton, Australia: Monash U.P., pp. 5–10.Google Scholar
  9. Brownell WE, Bader CR, Bertrand D, de Ribaupierre Y (1985) Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear hair cells. Science 227:194–196.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collet L, Kemp DT, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Moulin A, Morgon A (1990) Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 43:251–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper MA, Dultsev FN, Minson T, Ostanin VP, Abell C, Klenerman D (2001) Direct and sensitive detection of a human virus by rupture event scanning. Nat Biotechnol 19:833–837PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dallos PJ (1966) On the generation of odd-fractional subharmonics. J Acoust Soc Am 40:1381–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis H (1983) An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 9:79–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliot E (1958) A ripple effect on the audiogram. Nature (Lond) 181:1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans EF, Wilson JP (1975) Cochlear tuning properties: concurrent basilar membrane and single nerve fiber measurements. Science 190:1218–1221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans EF, Wilson JP, Borerwe TA (1981) Animal models of tinnitus. In: Tinnitus. Evered D, Lawrenson G (eds) Ciba Foundation Symposium 85. London: Pitman Books, pp. 108–138.Google Scholar
  17. Fettiplace R, Crawford, AC (1980) The origin of tuning in turtle cochlear hair cells. Hear Res 2:447–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fettiplace R, Hackney CM (2006) The sensory and motor roles of auditory hair cells. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:19–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flock A (1980) Contractile proteins in hair cells. Hear Res 2:411–412.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Flottorp G (1953) Pure-tone tinnitus evoked by acoustic stimulation: the idiotone effect. Acta Oto Laryngol 43:396–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glanville JD, Coles RR, Sullivan BM (1971) A family with high-tonal objective tinnitus. J Laryngol Otol 85:1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gold T (1948) Hearing II. The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc R Soc Lond B135:492–498.Google Scholar
  23. Gold T (1980) Letter to D. J. Pye on recent developments in auditory science and Gold’s positive feedback theory. Unpublished private correspondence.Google Scholar
  24. Gold T (1989) Historical background to the proposal 40 years ago of an active model for cochlear frequency analysis. In: Wilson JP, Kemp DT (eds) Cochlear Mechanisms: Structure, Function and Models. London: Plenum Press, pp. 299–306.Google Scholar
  25. Gold T, Kemp DT (2003) Recorded discussion between Thomas Gold and David Kemp on the topic of Gold’s auditory and other technical research in the 1940s and 30s (unpublished).Google Scholar
  26. Gold T, Pumphrey RJ (1948) Hearing I. The cochlea as a frequency analyser. Proc R Soc B135: 462–491.Google Scholar
  27. Kanis LJ, Boer E de (1997) Frequency dependence of acoustic distortion products in a locally active model of the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 101:1527–1531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kashar B, Brownell WE, Altschuler R, Fex J (1986) Electrokinetic shape changes of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature 322:356–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kemp DT (1971) A new technique for the analysis of transient ELF electromagnetic disturbances within the Earth-ionosphere cavity. J Atmos Terr Pys 33:567–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kemp DT (1978) Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 64:1386–1391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kemp DT (1979) The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure—evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol Suppl 9:35–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kemp DT (1980) Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes. Hear Res 2:533–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kemp DT (1981) Physiologically active cochlear micromechanics-one source of tinnitus. In: Tinnitus. Ciba Foundation Symp, D Evered, G Lawrenson (Eds), London: Pitman Books Ltd. pp. 54–81Google Scholar
  34. Kemp DT (1982) Cochlear echoes: Implications for noise-induced hearing loss. In: Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi R (eds) New Perspectives on Noise-Induced Hearing Loss. New York: Raven Press, pp. 189–207.Google Scholar
  35. Kemp DT (1986) Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res 22:95–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kemp DT (1998) Otoacoustic emissions:distorted echoes of the cochlea’s traveling wave. In: Berlin C (ed), Otoacoustic Emissions—Basic Science and Clinical Applications. San Diego: Singular Press, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
  37. Kemp DT (2001) Exploring Cochlear Status with OAE—the potential for new clinical applications. In: Robinette M and Glattke TJ (eds), Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Theime, pp. 1–47.Google Scholar
  38. Kemp DT (2003) The OAE Story. Hatfield, UK: Otodynamics.Google Scholar
  39. Kemp DT (2007) Otoacoustic emissions—the basics, the science and the future potential. In: Robinette M and Glattke TJ (eds) Otoacoustic Emisions: Clinical Applications, 3rd ed. New York: Theime, Chapter 1.Google Scholar
  40. Kemp DT, Anderson SD (eds) (1980) Proceedings of the symposium on Active and Nonlinear Mechanical processes in the Cochlea. Hear Res 2:533–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kemp DT, Brown AM (1983a) A comparison of mechanical nonlinearities in the cochleae of man and gerbil from ear canal measurements. In: Klinke R, Hartmann R (eds) Hearing—Physiological Bases and Psychophysics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 82–88.Google Scholar
  42. Kemp DT, Brown AM (1983b) An integrated view of cochlear mechanical nonlinearities observable from the ear canal. In: Boer E de, Viergever MA (eds), Mechanics of Hearing. Delft: Delft University Press, pp. 75–82.Google Scholar
  43. Kemp DT, Brown AM (1986) Wideband analysis of otoacoustic intermodulation. In: Allen JB, Hall JL, Hubbard A, Neely ST, Tubis A (eds) Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 306–313.Google Scholar
  44. Kemp DT, Brill O (2007) Slow oscillatory cochlear adaptation to brief low frequency over stimulation: the human OAE “bounce” effect revisited. Midwinter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Abstract No. 412.Google Scholar
  45. Kemp DT, Chum R (1980a) Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear Res 2:213–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kemp DT, Chum R (1980b) Observations on the generator mechanism of stimulus frequency acoustic emissions, two-tone suppression. In: Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioural Studies in Hearing, van den Brink G, Bilsen FA (eds), Delft: Delft University Press, pp. 34–41.Google Scholar
  47. Kemp DT, Knight RD (1999) Virtual reflectors explains DPOAE wave and place fixed dichotomy. Midwinter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Abstract No. 396.Google Scholar
  48. Kemp DT, Martin JA (1976) Active Resonant Systems in Audition. Abstracts of XIII International Congress of Audiology Firenze 1976. International Society of Audiology, Geneva. pp. 64–65Google Scholar
  49. Kemp DT, Tooman PF (2006) DPOAE Micro and Macrostructure—their origin and significance. In: Nuttall A, Ren, T, Gillespie, P, Grosh, K, de Boer E. (eds) Auditory Mechanisms: Processes and Models. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific, pp. 308–314.Google Scholar
  50. Kemp DT, Bray P, Alexander L, Brown AM (1986) Acoustic emission cochleography-practical aspects. Scand Audiol Suppl 25:71–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Khanna SM, Leonard DGB (1982) Basilar membrane tuning in the cat cochlea. Science 215:305–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kim DO (1980a) Cochlear mechanics: implications of electrophysiological and acoustical observations. Hear Res 2:297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kim DO (1980b) Transcript of the mid-symposium discussion of the symposium on nonlinear and active mechanical processes in the cochlea. Hear Res 2:581–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim DO, Seigel JH, Molnar CE (1977) Cochlear distortion product: Inconsistency with linear motion of the cochlear partition. J Acoust Soc Am 61:S2(A)Google Scholar
  55. Kim DO, Molnar, CE, Matthews, JW (1979) Cochlear mechanics: nonlinear behaviour in two-tone responses as reflected in ear-canal pressure and cochlear-nerve-fiber responses J Acoust Soc Am 65:S28(A)Google Scholar
  56. Kim DO, Neely, ST Molnar CE, Matthews JW (1980) An active cochlear model with negative damping in the partition; comparison with Rhode’s ante- and post-mortem observations. In: Brink G van den, Bilsen FA (eds) Psychophysical, Physiological and Behavioural Studies in Hearing. Delft: Delft University Press, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
  57. Kirk DL, Moleirinho A, Patuzzi RB (1997) Microphonic and DPOAE measurements suggest a micromechanical mechanism for the “bounce” phenomenon following low frequency tones. Hear Res 112:69–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Knight RD, Kemp DT (2001) Wave and Place fixed DPOAE maps of the human ear. J Acoust Soc Am 109:1513–1525.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. LePage EL, Johnstone BM (1980) Nonlinear mechanical behaviour of the basilar membrane in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 2:183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Long G, Tubis A (1982) Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. J Acoust Soc Am 84(4):1343–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lukashkin AN, Russell IJ (2005) Dependence of the DPOAE amplitude pattern on acoustical biasing of the cochlear partition. Hear Res 203:45–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mahoney CF, Kemp DT (1995) Distortion product otoacoustic emission delay measurement in human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 97:3721–3735.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Maison SF, Liberman MC (2000) Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength. J Neurosci 20:4701–4707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Manley GA (1983) Frequency spacing of acoustic emissions: a possible explanation. In: Webster W R, Aitken L M (eds), Mechanisms of Hearing. Melbourne, Australia pp. 36–39.Google Scholar
  65. Manley GA (2001) Evidence for an active process and a cochlear amplifier in nonmammals. J Neurophysiol 86:541–549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Møller AR (1960) Improved technique for detailed measurement of the middle ear impedance. J.Acoust Soc Am 32:250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Neely ST Kim DO (1986) A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. J Acoust Soc Am 79:1472–1480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. O’Beirne GA, Patuzzi RB (2002) Modelling the role of outer hair cells in cochlear regulation and tinnitus. In: Patuzzi R (ed), Proceedings of the Seventh International Tinnitus Seminar Perth: University of Western Australia, pp. 62–67.Google Scholar
  69. Pye JD (1980) The nonlinear spiral. Nature 283:137–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ren T (2004). Reverse propagation of sound in the gerbil cochlea. Nat Neurosci 7: 333–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rhode WS (1971) Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkey using the Mossbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 49:1218–1231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ruggero MA (1980) Systematic errors in the direct estimates of basilar membrane travel times. J Acoust Soc Am 67:707–710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ruggero M, Temchin AN (2005) Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:18614–1869.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ruggero M, Temchin AN (2006) Traveling-wave delays in the human cochlea are not exceptionally long. Midwinter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Abstract No. 1175.Google Scholar
  75. Rutten WLC (1980) Evoked acoustic emissions from within normal and abnormal human ears: comparison with audiometric and electrocochleographic findings. Hear Res 2: 263–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sellick PM, Russel IJ (1979) Two-tone suppression in cochlear hair cells. Hear Res 1:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sellick PM, Patuzzi RB, Johnstone BM (1982) Measurement of basilar membrane motion in the guinea pig using the Mossbauer technique. J Acoust Soc Am 72(1):131–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shera CA (2003) Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves. J Acoust Soc Am 114:244–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shera CA, Guinnan JJ (1999) Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms. J Acoust Soc Am 105:782–798.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Siegel JH, Kim DO (1982) Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics? Olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear mechanical nonlinearity. Hear Res 6:171–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Siegel JH, Cerka AJ, Recio-Spinosa A, Temchin AN, van Dijk P, Ruggero MA (2005) Delays of stimulus frequency emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering. J Acoust Soc Am 118:2434–2443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Strube HW (1989) Evoked otoacoustic emissions as cochlear Bragg reflections. Hear Res 38:35–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Thomas LB (1975) Microstructure of the pure tone threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 57:26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. van den Brink G (1970) Experiments in binaural diplacusis and tonal perception. In: Plomp R, Smoorenburg GF (eds), Frequency Analysis and Periodicitiy Detection in Hearing. Leiden: A.W. Sijthoff, pp. 362–374.Google Scholar
  85. van Dijk P, Wit HP, (1990) Amplitude and frequency fluctuations of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 88:1779–1793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. von Békésy G (1960) Experiments in Hearing. Wever EG (ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  87. Ward WD (1955) Tonal monaural diplacusis. J Acoust Soc Am 27:365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wegel RL (1931) A study of tinnitus. Arch Oto Laryngol 14:158–165.Google Scholar
  89. Wilson JP (1980a) Recording of the Kemp Echo and tinnitus from the ear canal without averaging. J Physiol 298:8–9P.Google Scholar
  90. Wilson JP (1980b) Evidence for a cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus. Hear Res 2:233–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wilson JP (1980c) Model for cochlear echoes and tinnitus based on an observed electrical correlate. Hear Res 2: 527–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wilson JP, Sutton GJ (1981) Acoustic correlates of tonal tinnitus. In: Evered D, Lawrenson G (eds) Tinnitus. Ciba Foundation Symposium 85. London: Pitman Books, pp. 82–107.Google Scholar
  93. Wit HP, Ritsma RJ (1979) Stimulated acoustic emissions from the human ear. J Acoust Soc Am 66:911–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wit HP, Ritsma RJ (1980) Evoked acoustical responses from the human ear: some experimental results. Hear Res 2:253–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yates GK, Withnel RH (1999) The role of intermodulation distortion in transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 136:49–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zweig G, Shera CA (1995) The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 98:2018–2047.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zwicker E (1979) A model describing nonlinearities in hearing by active processes with saturation at 40 dB. Biol Cybern 35:243–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Zwicker E (1981) Masking period patterns and cochlear acoustic responses. Hear Res 4(2):195–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zwicker E, Manley G (1981) Acoustic responses and suppression- period patterns in guinea pigs. Hear Res 4:43–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zwislocki JJ (1983) Sharp vibration maximum in the cochlea without wave reflection. Hear Res 9:103–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Zurek PM (1981) Spontaneous narrowband acoustic signals emitted by human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 69:514–523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • David T. Kemp

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations