Beyond the Classroom and into the Community: The Role of the Teacher in Expanding the Pedagogy of Cooperation

  • Rachel Hertz-Lazarowitz
Part of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning book series (CULS, volume 8)

The chapter presents four systemic cooperative learning (CL) long-term programs conducted in northern Israel, with Arabs and Jewish schools in mixed cities or neighboring communities. In each of those programs the teachers-educators expanded their roles implementing reforms based on cooperation. The first program extended the classic method of Group Investigation (GI) to Innovative Technology (IT) sites of learning. The second program expanded the “face to face” model of “The Six Mirrors of the Classroom” to classrooms using complex investigations in the open spaces and the highway of technology. The third broadened the role of teachers to become facilitators of a CL school-family partnership within the school and across schools. The fourth, formed a principals community of leaders, who based on cooperation transformed their vision, skills and knowledge to generate a vision of critical cooperative pedagogy aimed to empower and bring equality to the schools and the community at large.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrami, P. C., Poulsen, C. & Chambers, B. (2004). Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: Factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24 (2), 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Haj, M. (1998). Education, Empowerment and Control: The Case of the Arabs in Israel. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  3. Almog, T. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1999). Teachers as peer learners: Investigation in an advanced technological learning environment. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning (pp. 285–313). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Aronson, E. (2000). Nobody Left to Hate. New York: W.H. Freeman and company.Google Scholar
  5. Azaiza, F., Mor-Sommerfeld, A., Zelniker, T. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (in press). A critical multicultural perspective: The segregated educational saga of the State of Israel 1948–2006. The Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies (JCEPS).Google Scholar
  6. Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1927). The School and Society. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dwairy, M. (2004). Culturally sensitive education: Adapting self-oriented assertiveness training to collective minorities. Journal of Social Issues, 60 (2), 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eden, D. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2002). The political power of school principals in Israel: A case study. Journal of Educational Administration. 40 (3), 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, J. L. & Sanders, M.G. (2006). Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Peabody Journal of Education, 81 (2), 81–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillies, R. M. & Ashman, A. F. (Eds.). (2003). Co-Operative Learning: The Social and Intellectual Outcomes of Learning in Groups. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  12. Gillies, R. M. & Boyle, M. (2005). Teachers’ scaffolding behaviours during cooperative learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33 (3), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giroux, H. (1988). Teachers as Intellectuals. New York: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  14. Gordon, D. (1996). Restructuring and holism as principles of systemic change: The case of the 36-community project in Israel, Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports, Jerusalem (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  15. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1992). Understanding students’ interactive behavior: Looking at six mirrors of the classroom. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in Cooperative Groups (pp. 71–102). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1999). Cooperative learning and group investigation in Israel’s Jewish-Arab schools: A community approach. Theory into Practice 38 (2), 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2001). Success for all (SFA) in Israel: A community research and evaluation model. In R. E. Slavin & N. A. Madden (Eds.), Success for All: Research and Reform in Elementary Education (pp. 149–177). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2004). Existence and Co-existence in Acre: The Power of Educational Activism. Journal of Social Issues, 60 (2), 357–373. http://construct.haifa.ac.il/ rachelhl/index.htm.
  19. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2005).Cooperative Learning in Israel. IASCE Newsletters. http://www.iasce.net.
  20. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. & Bar Natan, I. (2002). Writing development of Arab and Jewish students using cooperative learning (CL) and computer mediating communication (CMC). Computers and Education, 39, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. & Calderon, M. (1994). Implementing cooperative learning in the elementary schools: The facilitative voice for collaborative power. In: Sharan, S. (Ed.). Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods (pp. 300–318). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  22. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. & Horovitz, H. (2002). The impact of School-Family Partnership (SFP) on parents’ attitudes and children reading and writing in first grade. Paper presented at the 11th International Roundtable on School, Family and Community Partnerships (in cooperation with AERA). New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  23. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. & Schaedel, B. (2003). Literacy Development and Cooperative Learning: Research and Development in Arab and Jewish Schools. Haifa: Ach Publishers (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  24. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. & Zelniker, T. (1995). Cooperative learning in the Israeli context: Historical, educational and cultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Zelniker. T., White-Stephan, C. & Stephan, W. G. (2004).. (Eds.). Arab-Jewish coexistence programs. Journal of Social Issues, 60 (2), 237–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, R. T., Johnson D. W. & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative Learning Methods: A Meta-Analysis. University of Minnesota. http://www.co-operation.org/pages/cl-methods.html.
  27. Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (1986). Models of teaching. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Kagan, S. (2001). Teaching for Character and Community, Educational Leadership, 59 (2), 50–55.Google Scholar
  29. Khalil, M. & Lazarowitz, R. (2002). Developing a learning unit on the science-technology-environment-peace-society mode. Students’ cognitive achievements and attitudes toward peace. The Annual Meeting of The National Association of Research in Science Teaching, (NARST). New Orleans, 7–10 April.Google Scholar
  30. Kohn, A. (2000). The schools our children deserve: Moving beyond Traditional Classrooms and “Tougher Standards”, Boston: Houghton Mifflin. http://books.google.com/books?id = NXead57GHSwC&dq = Kohn + a.&psp = 9.
  31. Lazarowitz, R. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1998). Cooperative learning in science curriculum. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 449–471). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Lazarowitz, R.G. (2007). High School Biology Curricula Development: Implementation, Teaching and Evaluation. From the 20th to 21st Century. In: Sandra K. Abell & Norman G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 561–598). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Lockhorst, D. (2004). Design Principles for a CSCL Environment in Teacher Training. Proefschrift Universiteit Utrecht, Nederlands. http://elearning.surf.nl/docs/e-learning/proefschrift_lockhorst.pdf.
  34. Morton, C. (1996). The modern land of Laputa. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(6), 416–419.Google Scholar
  35. O’Donnell, A.M. & King, A. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Oplatka, I. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (Eds.). (2006). Women principals in a multicultural society: New insights into feminist educational leadership. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. Resta, P., Christal, M., Ferneding, K. & Kennedy Puthoff, A. (1999). CSCL as a Catalyst for Changing Teacher Practice. Computer Support for Collaborative Learning.http://sll.stanford.edu/projects/CSCL99/papers/wednesday/Paul_Resta_488.pdf#search = %22role%20of%20 teacher%20in%20cscl%22.
  38. Ron, S . & Lazarowitz, R. (1995).Learning Environment and Academic Achievement of High School Students Who Learned Evolution in a Cooperative Mode. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Francisco, CA., April 22–25.Google Scholar
  39. Ronen, M., Kohen-Vacs, D. & Raz-Fogel, N. (2006). Adopt & Adapt: Structuring, Sharing and Reusing Asynchronous Collaborative Pedagogy. International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS 2006 Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  40. Salomon, G. (2002). Technology and pedagogy: Why don’t we see the promised revolution? Educational Technology, 42 (2), 71–75.Google Scholar
  41. Schonmann, S. (2006). Theatrical representations of teaching as performance. In J. Brophy & S. Pinnegar (Eds.). Learning from Research on Teaching: Perspective, Methodology, and Representation: Advances in Research Theory, Volume 11, (pp. 287–316), Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sharan, S. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (1981). Changing schools: The Small Group Teaching (SGT) Project in Israel. Tel Aviv: Ramot Publishing, Tel Aviv University, Second Edition: 1984. (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  43. Sharan, S., Kussel, P., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., Raviv, S., Bejerano, Y. & Sharan, Y. (1984). Cooperative Learning in the Classroom: Research in Desegregated Schools. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Sharan, S. & Sharan Y. (1992). Expanding Cooperative Learning through Group-Investigation. New York: Teacher College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  45. Slavin, R.E. & Calderon, M. (2001). (Eds.). Effective programs for Latino students.Google Scholar
  46. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Slavin, R.E., Hurley, E. & Chamberlain, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement: Theory and research. In W. Reynolds & G. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology. Vol 7 (pp. 177–198). New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  48. Thelen, H. (1960). Education and the human quest. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  49. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Webb, N., Nemer, K. M. & Ing, M. (2006). Small-Group Reflections: Parallels Between Teacher Discourse and Student Behavior in Peer-Directed Groups, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2006, 15, 63–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zelniker, T. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2005). School-family partnership for coexistence in the city of acre; promoting Arab and Jewish parents’ role as facilitators of children’s literacy development and as agents of coexistence. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 18 (1), 114–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zelniker, T. & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2006). Long Term effects of Community Empowerment and Leadership Building in An Arab-Jewish City in Israel. Paper presented in the International Society for the Study of Organization Behavior and Work Values (ISSOW), Tallinn, Estonia, June 25–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel Hertz-Lazarowitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationHaifa UniversityIsrael

Personalised recommendations