Social Issues of Wearables

  • Joseph L. Dvorak

Keywords

Cell Phone Personal Space Wearable Device Social Convention Wearable Computer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Mann, WEARABLE COMPUTING as means for PERSONAL EMPOWERMENT, Keynote Address for The First International Conference on Wearable Computing, ICWC-98, May 12-13, Fairfax VAGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, B., and Mark G., 1998, Social Conventions in Collaborative Virtual Environments, CVE’98, Manchester 17th-19th June, pp.47-55, available at http://wwwcs.uni-paderborn.de/∼ bbecker//Becker98.1.pdf, accessed March 26. 2006Google Scholar
  3. I. De Sol Pool, Forecasting the telephone: A Retrospective Technology Assessment. Ablex Publishing Corp., Norwood, NJ, 1983, pp. 129 - 148Google Scholar
  4. Kanellos. M., 2007, Here comes the terabyte hard drive, January 4, 2007, cnetnews.com, http://news.com.com/2100-1041_3-6147409.htmlGoogle Scholar
  5. Intille S. S. and Intille A. M., 2003, New Challenges for Privacy Law: Wearable Computers that Create Electronic Digital Diaries, September 15, 2003 MIT House_n Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  6. Henderson K., 1996, No Dogs Allowed? Federal Policies on Access for Service Animals, Animal Welfare Information Center Newsletter, Summer 1996, Vol. 7 No. 2, http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/newsletters/v7n2/7n2hende.htm.Google Scholar
  7. Slobogin C., 2002, “Modern studies in privacy law: searching for the meaning of fourth amendment privacy after Kyllo v. United States,” Minnesota Law Review, vol. 86, pp. 1393, 2002Google Scholar
  8. Gill v. Hearst Publishing Co. (1953) 40 C2d 224, California Supreme Court, Feb., 17, 1953, http://online.ceb.com/calcases/C2/40C2d224.htmGoogle Scholar
  9. Prosser W. L., 1960, “Privacy,” Califorina Law Review, vol. 48, pp. 383, 1960.Google Scholar
  10. Scheeres J., 2004, Caught With Their Pants Down, Wired News, Nov, 01, 2004, http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,65502-0.htmlGoogle Scholar
  11. Supreme Court of the United States, Wyoming v. Houghton (98-184), 1999. The decision can be read at http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/98-184.ZS.htmlGoogle Scholar
  12. U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES V. DI RE , 332 U.S. 581 (1948), available at http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=332&invol=581, accessed March 26, 2006Google Scholar
  13. Rosen C., 2004, Our Cell Phones, Ourselves, The New Atlantis, Denville, NJ, Summer 2004, pp. 26-45.Google Scholar
  14. Subcommittee on Aviation Hearing on Cell Phones On Aircraft: Nuisance Or Necessity?, 2005, US House of Representatives Transportation Committee, July 15, 2005Google Scholar
  15. Gergen K. J., Cell Phone Technology and the Challenge of Absent Presence, http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/kgergen1/web/page.phtml?id=manu32&st=manuscripts&hf=1Google Scholar
  16. Tech Digest, 2006, CES 2006: Motorola’s tiny Bluetooth headset, available at http://www.techdigest.tv/2006/01/ces_2006_motoro_2.html, accessed March 26, 2006Google Scholar
  17. Rhrodes, B,, 1997, The Proceedings of The First International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC ’97), Cambridge, Mass, October 1997, pp. 123-128Google Scholar
  18. McAtamney G. and Parker C., 2006, An Examination of the Effects of a Wearable Display on Informal Face-To-Face Communication, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems, April 22-27, 2006, Montréal, Québec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  19. Post, R. E. and Orth, M., 1997, Smart Fabric, or Washable Computing, First IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, October 13-14, 1997, Cambridge, Massachusetts. An expanded version is available at http://www.media.mit.edu/∼ rehmi/cloth/Google Scholar
  20. Dallas Semiconductor Corp., http://www.ibutton.com/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  21. Casio Computer Co., Ltd., http://www.casio.com/timepiecesGoogle Scholar
  22. Fossil Wrist PDA FX2008, 2005, CNET Reviews, http://reviews.cnet.com/Fossil_ Wrist_PDA_FX2008/4505-3512_7-31278887.htmlGoogle Scholar
  23. Miller, H., 1995 The Social Psychology of Objects, Understanding the Social World Conference, University of Huddersfield,. A summary is at http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/7165/objects.htmGoogle Scholar
  24. Krantz M., The Ubiquitous Chip, Time.com, December 29, 1997 / January 5, 1998 Vol. 150 No. 28, http://www.time.com/time/moy/daily3.htmlGoogle Scholar
  25. Wearable Computing FAQ, http://wearables.www.media.mit.edu/projects/wearables/FAQ/FAQ.txt, accessed March 26, 2006Google Scholar
  26. Jebara T., Schiele B., Oliver N., et.. al., 1998, DyPERS: Dynamic Personal Enhanced Reality System, Proceedings of the 1998 Image Understanding Workshop, Monterrey CA.Google Scholar
  27. PhysOrg, 2006, Cell phone survey shows love-hate relationship, http://www.physorg.com/copyright.phpGoogle Scholar
  28. Tae-gyu K., 2005, Mobile Phone Addiction Emerging as New Problem: Poll, The Korea Times, July 19, 2005Google Scholar
  29. Rauh S., Detox For Video Game Addiction?, CBS News, July 3, 2006, http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/03/health/webmd/main1773956.shtmlGoogle Scholar
  30. Guernsey L., 2002, At Airport Gate, a Cyborg Unplugged, New York Times Technology, March 14, 2002Google Scholar
  31. Norman D., 1989, The Design of Everyday Things, Currency Doubleday, New York, pp. 197-198.Google Scholar
  32. The Bunker, Security, Bluetooth, 2004, Security Briefs, http://www.thebunker.net/security/index.htmGoogle Scholar
  33. Heun C., 2006, Coming Soon To Your Cell Phone: Text Emergency Alerts, InternetWeek, July 20, 2006, http://internetweek.cmp.com/190900447Google Scholar
  34. Digital Divide: What It Is and Why It Matters, DigitalDivide.org, http://www.digitaldivide.org/digitaldivide.htmlGoogle Scholar
  35. Gemperle F., Kasabach C., Stivoric J., et.. al., 1998, Design For Wearability, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Wearable Computing, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  36. Cell Phone Edges Alarm Clock As Most Hated Invention, Yet One We Cannot Live Without, 2004, Lemelson-MIT Program, January 21, 2004, http://web.mit.edu/invent/n-pressreleases/n-press-04index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph L. Dvorak
    • 1
  1. 1.MotorolaUSA

Personalised recommendations