## Abstract

Traditionally, in computed tomography practiced in radiology, the resolution of the reconstruction is expressed in terms of the number of evenly spaced projections required for the faithful reconstruction of an object that has a given diameter (see equation (10) below).The tacit assumption is that projection data have a sufficient spectral signal-to-noise ratio (SSNR) in the whole frequency range in order to reproduce the object faithfully. In electron microscopy, the situation is dramatically different, as the electron dose limitations result in very low SSNR in the individual projections. The suppression of signal is particularly severe in high spatial frequencies, where the signal is affected by the envelope function of the microscope and the high amount of ambient noise, as well as in some low spatial frequency regions (due to the influence of the contrast transfer function (CTF) of the electron microscope). In single-particle reconstruction, a satisfactory level of the SSNR in the 3D reconstruction is achieved by including a large number of 2D projections (tens to hundreds of thousands) that are averaged during the reconstruction process. Except for rare cases (Boisset et al., 1998), the angular distribution of projections is not an issue, as the large number of molecules and the randomness of their orientations on the support grid all but guarantee uniform coverage of angular space. The concern is whether the number of projections per angular direction is sufficient to yield the desired SSNR or whether the angular distribution of projections is such that the oversampling of the 3D Fourier space achieved during the reconstruction process will yield the desired SSNR.

## Keywords

Spatial Frequency Tilt Angle Electron Tomography Fourier Space Tomographic Reconstruction## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Boisset, N., Penczek, P. A., Taveau, J. C., You, V., Dehaas, F. and Lamy, J. (1998). Overabundant single-particle electron microscope views induce a three-dimensional reconstruction artifact.
*Ultramicroscopy***74**:201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Böttcher, B., Wynne, S.A. and Crowther, R.A. (1997). Determination of the fold of the core protein of hepatitis B virus by electron cryomicroscopy.
*Nature***386**:88–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Bracewell, R. N. and Riddle, A. C. (1967). Inversion of fan-beam scans in radio astronomy.
*Astrophys. J.***150**:427–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Carazo, J. M. (1992). The fidelity of 3D reconstruction from incomplete data and the use of restoration methods. In
*Electron Tomography*(J. Frank, ed.). Plenum, New York, pp. 117–166.Google Scholar - Carazo, J.M. and Carrascosa, J. L. (1986). Information recovery in missing angular data cases: an approach by the convex projections method in three dimensions.
*J. Microsc.***145**:23–43.Google Scholar - Carazo, J. M. and Carrascosa, J. L. (1987). Restoration of direct Fourier three-dimensional reconstructions of crystalline specimens by the method of convex projections.
*J. Microsc.***145**:159–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar - Cardone, G., Grünewald, K. and Steven, A.C. (2005). A resolution criterion for electron tomography based on cross-validation.
*J. Struct. Biol.***151**:117–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Conway, J. F., Cheng, N., Zlotnick, A., Wingfield, P.T., Stahl, S. J. and Steven, A. C. (1997). Visualization of a 4-helix bundle in the hepatitis B virus capsid by cryo-electron microscopy.
*Nature***386**:91–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Crowther, R. A., DeRosier, D. J. and Klug, A. (1970). The reconstruction of a three-dimensional structure from projections and its application to electron microscopy.
*Proc. R. Soc. A***317**:319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Faridani, A. (2003). Introduction to the mathematics of computed tomography. In
*Inside Out: Inverse Problems and Applications*, vol. 47 (G. Uhlmann, ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar - Frank, J. (2006).
*Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies*. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar - Frank, J. and Al-Ali, L. (1975). Signal-to-noise ratio of electron micrographs obtained by cross correlation.
*Nature***256**:376–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Keinert, F. (1989). Inversion of
*k*-plane transforms and applications in computer-tomography.*SIAM Rev.***31**:273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Lanzavecchia, S., Cantele, F., Bellon, P., Zampighi, L., Kreman, M., Wright, E. and Zampighi, G. (2005). Conical tomography of freeze-fracture replicas: a method for the study of integral membrane proteins inserted in phospholipid bilayers.
*J. Struct. Biol.***149**:87–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Louis, A. K. (1984). Nonuniqueness in inverse Radon problems-the frequency-distribution of the ghosts.
*Math. Z.***185**:429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Maass, P. (1987). The X-ray transform—singular value decomposition and resolution.
*Inverse Probl*.**3**:729–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Natterer, F. (1986).
*The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography*. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar - Natterer, F. and Ritman, E. L. (2002). Past and future directions in x-ray computed tomography (CT).
*Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol.***12**:175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Natterer, F. and Wübbeling, F. (2001).
*Mathematical Methods in Image Reconstruction*. SIAM, Philadelphia.Google Scholar - Orlov, S. S. (1976). Theory of three-dimensional reconstruction 1. Conditions for a complete set of projections.
*Soviet Phys. Crystallogr.***20**:312–314.Google Scholar - Penczek, P. (1998). Measures of resolution using Fourier shell correlation.
*J. Mol. Biol.***280**:115–116.Google Scholar - Penczek, P., Marko, M., Buttle, K. and Frank, J. (1995). Double-tilt electron tomography.
*Ultramicroscopy***60**:393–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Penczek, P. A. (2002). Three-dimensional spectral signal-to-noise ratio for a class of reconstruction algorithms.
*J. Struct. Biol.***138**:34–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Penczek, P. A., Renka, R. and Schomberg, H. (2004). Gridding-based direct Fourier inversion of the three-dimensional ray transform.
*J. Opt. Soc. Am. A***21**:499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Radermacher, M. (1988). Three-dimensional reconstruction of single particles from random and nonrandom tilt series.
*J. Electron Microsc. Tech.***9**:359–394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Saxton, W.O. (1978).
*Computer Techniques for Image Processing of Electron Microscopy*. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar - Saxton, W. O. and Baumeister, W. (1982). The correlation averaging of a regularly arranged bacterial envelope protein.
*J. Microsc.***127**:127–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar - Saxton, W. O., Baumeister, W. and Hahn, M. (1984). Three-dimensional reconstruction of imperfect two-dimensional crystals.
*Ultramicroscopy***13**:57–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sezan, M. I. (1992). An overview of convex projections theory and its application to image recovery problems.
*Ultramicroscopy***40**:55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Sezan, M. I. and Stark, H. (1982). Image restoration by the method of convex projections. II. Applications and numerical results.
*IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging***1**:95–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar - Stewart, A. and Grigorieff, N. (2004). Noise bias in the refinement of structures derived from single particles.
*Ultramicroscopy***102**:67–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Unser, M., Sorzano, C. O., Thevenaz, P., Jonic, S., El-Bez, C., De Carlo, S., Conway, J. F. and Trus, B. L. (2005). Spectral signal-to-noise ratio and resolution assessment of 3D reconstructions.
*J. Struct. Biol.***149**:243–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Unser, M., Trus, B. L. and Steven, A. C. (1987). A new resolution criterion based on spectral signal-to-noise ratios.
*Ultramicroscopy***23**:39–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar - Vainshtein, B. K. and Penczek, P. A. (2006). Three-dimensional reconstruction. In
*International Tables for Crystallography*3rd edn., vol. B*Reciprocal Space*(U. Shmueli, ed.).Google Scholar - van Heel, M. (1987). Similarity measures between images.
*Ultramicroscopy***21**:95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Wade, R.H. (1992). A brief look at imaging and contrast transfer.
*Ultramicroscopy***46**:145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Youla, D. C. and Webb, H. (1982). Image restoration by the method of convex projections. 1. Theory.
*IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging***1**:81–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar