Elite Theory and Elites

  • John Higley
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Elite theory's origins lie most clearly in the writings of Gaetano Mosca (1858–1941), Vilfredo Pareto (1848–1923), Robert Michels (1876–1936), and MaxWeber (1864–1920). Mosca emphasized the ways in which tiny minorities out-organize and outwit large majorities, adding that “political classes” — Mosca's term for political elites — usually have “a certain material, intellectual, or even moral superiority” over those they govern(1923/1939: 51). Pareto postulated that in a society with truly unrestricted social mobility, elites would consist of the most talented and deserving individuals; but in actual societies, elites are those most adept at using the two modes of political rule, force and persuasion, and who usually enjoy important advantages such as inherited wealth and family connections(1916/1935: 2031– 2034, 2051). Pareto sketched alternating types of governing elites, which he likened, following Machiavelli, to foxes and lions (see Marshall 2007). Michels rooted elites (“oligarchies”) in the need of large organizations for leaders and experts, in order to operate efficiently; as these individuals gain control of funds, information flows, promotions, and other aspects of organizational functioning, power becomes concentrated in their hands(1915/1962; see Linz 2006). Weber held that political action is always determined by “the principle of small numbers, that means, the superior political maneuverability of small leading groups. In mass states, this Caesarist element is ineradicable” (1978: 1414).

References

  1. Alexander, G. (2002). The sources of democratic consolidation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aron, R. (1950). Social structure and ruling class. British Journal of Sociology, 1, 1–16 and 126–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barone, M. (2007). Our first revolution. The remarkable British upheaval that inspired America's founding fathers. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Beer, S. (1965). British politics in the collectivist age. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books. (Re-issued with a new foreword, 1999.)Google Scholar
  6. Best, H., & Cotta, M. (Eds.) (2000). Parliamentary representatives in Europe 1848–2000. Legislative careers in eleven European countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brinton, C. (1938). The anatomy of revolution. New York: Random House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burton, M., & Higley, J. (1987). Elite settlements. American Sociological Review, 52, 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christiansen, Peter Munck, Birgit Möller, and Lise Togeby (2001). Den danske elite. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  10. Cotta, M., & Best, H. (Eds.) (2007). Democratic representation in Europe. Diversity, change, and convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dahrendorf, R. (1967). Society and democracy in Germany. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  12. Dogan, M. (2003). Is there a ruling class in France? In M. Dogan (Ed.), Elite configurations at the apex of power (pp. 17–90). Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  13. Dye, T.R. (2002). Who's running America? The Bush restoration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Etzioni-Halévy, E. (1993). The elite connection. Problems and potential in Western democracy. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Femia, J. (2001). Against the masses. Varieties of anti-democratic thought since the French revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Field, G.L., & Higley, J. (1980). Elitism. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. (1974). Elites in the British class structure. In A. Giddens & P. Stanworth (Eds.), Elites and power in British society (pp. 1–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gulbrandsen, T., & Engelstad, F. (2002). Norske makteliter. Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  19. Gunther, R. (1992). Spain: the very model of a modern elite settlement. In J. Higley & R. Gunther (Eds.), Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe (pp. 33–80). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Higley, J., & Burton, M. (2006). Elite foundations of liberal democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  21. Higley, J., Deacon, D., & Smart, D. (1979). Elites in Australia. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  22. Higley, J., Hoffmann-Lange, U., Kadushin, C., & Moore, G. (1991). Elite integration in stable democracies: a reconsideration. European Sociological Review, 7, 35–53.Google Scholar
  23. Hoffmann-Lange, U. (1992). Eliten, macht und konflikt in der Bundesrepublik. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller, S. (1963). Beyond the ruling class. Strategic elites in modern society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  25. Körösényi, A. (2005). Political representation in leader democracy. Government and Opposition, 40, 358–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knight, A. (1992). Mexico's elite settlement: conjuncture and consequences. In J. Higley & R. Gunther (Eds.), Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe (pp. 113–145). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Linz, J.J. (2006). Robert Michels, political sociology, and the future of democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Edited by H.E. Chehabi.)Google Scholar
  28. Linz, J.J., & Stepan, A. (1995). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Marshall, A.J. (2007). Vilfredo Pareto's sociology. A framework for political psychology. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  30. Michels, R. (1915/1962). Political parties. A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracies. New York: Collier Books. (Introduction by S.M. Lipset.)Google Scholar
  31. Mosca, G. (1923/1939). The ruling class. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Mueller, J. (2004). The remnants of war. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pareto, V. (1901/1968). The rise and fall of elites. An application of theoretical sociology. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press. (Introduction by Hans L. Zetterberg.)Google Scholar
  34. Pareto, V. (1916/1935). The mind and society. A treatise on general sociology. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  35. Pareto, V. (1921/1984). The transformation of democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. (Edited by Charles H. Powers.)Google Scholar
  36. Parry, G. (1969/2005). Political elites. New York: Praeger (2nd ed. with new introduction, Essex UK: ECPR Classics).Google Scholar
  37. Paxton, R.O. (2004). The anatomy of fascism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  38. Power, T. (2000). The political right in postauthoritarian Brazil. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Putnam, R.D. (1976). The comparative study of political elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Thoenes, P. (1966). The elite in the welfare state. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  41. Tilly, C. (2004). Contention & democracy in Europe, 1650–2000. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  43. Weingast, B. (1997). The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. American Political Science Review, 91, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Welsh, W.A. (1979). Leaders and elites. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Higley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GovernmentThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations