Probabilities: Intelligence

  • Michael A. G. Michaud


Intelligence may be the most controversial factor in the Drake equation. Schilling found that the question of whether intelligence is inevitable is currently what most polarizes the discussion about SETI; there seems to be no middle ground. Some scientists see it as the crucial bottleneck in the Drake equation.2


Brain Size Large Brain High Intelligence Pigmy Chimpanzee Intelligent Life 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    From “The War of the Worlds,” in The Complete Science Fiction Treasury of H.G. Wells, New York, Avenel, 266.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schilling, “The Chance of Finding Aliens,” 41; Michael D. Papagiannis, “Colonies in the Asteroid Belt, or A Missing Term in the Drake Equation,” in Hart and Zuckerman, editors, 77–86.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carl Sagan and Frank Drake, “The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence,” Scientific American, May 1975, 80–90; Casti, 403–404. Carter produced a statistical argument showing that the existence of other intelligences is highly improbable because evolutions to intelligence are likely to take longer than the lifetime of a host star on the main sequence.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morris, Life’s Solution, xii, 298–299; Brian McConnell, Beyond Contact, Sebastopol, CA, O’Reilly, 2001, 71.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    George Gaylord Simpson, “The Nonprevalence of Humanoids,” Science, Vol. 143 (1964), 769, reprinted in Goldsmith, editor, 214–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Project Cyclops, 24.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stephen Jay Gould, “The Wisdom of Casey Stengel,” Discover, March 1983, 62–65.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stephen Jay Gould, “The Evolution of Life on the Earth,” Scientific American, October 1994, 85–91.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clarke, in Bova and Preiss, editors, 310–311.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davies, Are We Alone?, 103, 106–107, 128; Billingham, et al., editors, Social Implications, 45.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sagan, editor, CETI, 87–91, 105.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thore J. Bergman, et al., “Hierarchical Classification by Rank and Kinship in Baboons,” Science, Vol. 302 (14 November 2003), 1234–1236; Rood and Trefi l, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gary F. Marcus, “Before the Word,” Nature, Vol. 431 (14 October 2004), 745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ernst Mayr, Letters column, Science, Vol. 259 (12 March 1993), 1522; Letters column, Science, Vol. 260 (23 April 1993), 474–475; Mayr, in Regis, editor, 24. The texts of the Mayr-Sagan debate were published in The Planetary Society’s Bioastronomy News, Vol. 7 (Fourth Quarter 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frank Drake, “Methods of Communication,” in Cyril Ponnamperuma and A.G.W. Cameron, editors, Interstellar Communication: Scientific Perspectives, Boston, Houghton-Miffl in, 1974, 118–139.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frank Drake, “On Intelligence: A Wave of the Past and Future,” Cosmic Search, Vol. 3, Number 2 (Spring 1981), 5.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dale A. Russell, “Speculations on the Evolution of Intelligence in Multicellular Organisms,” in Billingham, editor, Life in the Universe, 259–270; Richard G. Klein with Blake Edgar, The Dawn of Human Culture, New York, Wiley, 2002, 22; Oliver Curry, “A Change of Mind?” (review of Buller’s Adapting Minds), Nature, Vol. 435 (26 May 2005), 425–426; Lovejoy, in Billingham, editor, Life in the Universe, 326; Hansell H. Stedman, et al., “Myosin Gene Mutation Correlates with Anatomical Changes in the Human Lineage,” Nature, Vol. 428 (25 March 2004) 415–418; Pete Currie, “Muscling in on Hominid Evolution,” Nature, Vol. 428 (25 March 2004), 373–374.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blake Edgar, The Dawn of Human Culture, New York, Wiley, 2002 Klein and Edgar, 8, 252; Jean-Jaques Hublin, “An Evolutionary Odyssey” (review of Klein’s book The Human Career), Nature, Vol. 403 (27 January 2000, 363; Carel Van Schaik, “Why Are Some Animals So Smart?”, Scientific American, April 2006, 65–71.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ann Gibbons, “Bone Sizes Trace the Decline of Man (and Woman)”, Science, Vol. 276 (9 May 1997) 896–897; C. Owen Lovejoy, “Evolution of Man and its Implications,” in Billingham, editor, Life in the Universe, 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    “Big Brains Rule the Roost,” Science, Vol. 307 (25 March 2005), 1867; Fred Hoyle, The Intelligent Universe, 229.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lovejoy, in Billingham, editor, Life in the Universe, 326.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    William H. Calvin, “The Emergence of Intelligence,” Scientific American, October 1994, 101–107; Morris, 246; Stephen Mithen, The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art and Science, London, Thames and Hudson, 1996, 209–210.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Christian de Duve, “Lessons of Life,” in Dick, editor, Many Worlds, 3–13; John H. Mauldin, Prospects for Interstellar Travel, San Diego, American Astronautical Society, 1992, 279.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    William H. Calvin, A Brain for All Seasons: Human Evolution and Abrupt Climate Change, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2002; Emma Bakes, “DNA as a Mechanism for SETI,” SETI Institute News, Vol. 11 (Fourth Quarter 2002), 1–3.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Darling, 100.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Seth Shostak and Alex Barnett, Cosmic Company, New York, Oxford University Press, 2003, 63.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ian Tattersall, “Once We Were Not Alone,” Scientific American, January 2000, 56–62; Ian Tattersall and Jeffrey Schwartz, Extinct Humans, Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 2000; Ann Gibbons, “Homo erectus in Java: A 250,000 Year Anachronism,” Science, Vol. 274 (13 December 1996), 1841–1842; John Noble Wilford, “3 Human Species Coexisted On Earth, New Data Suggest,” The New York Times, 3 December 1996.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M.J. Morwood, et al., “Archaeology and Age of a New Hominin from Flores in Eastern Indonesia,” Nature, Vol. 431 (28 October 2004), 1087–1091; P. Brown, et al., “A New Small-Bodied Hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia,” Nature, Vol. 431 (28 October 2004), 1055–1061; Marta Mirazon Lahr and Robert Foley, “Human Evolution Writ Small,” Nature, Vol. 431 (28 October 2004), 1043–1044; Kate Wong, The Littlest Human, Scientific American, February 2005, 56–65; Nicholas Wade, “Miniature People Add Extra Pieces to Evolutionary Puzzle,” The New York Times, 9 November 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Michel Balter, “Small But Smart? Flores Hominid Shows Signs of Advanced Brain,” Science, Vol. 307 (4 March 2005), 1386–1389; Ann Gibbons, “Bone Sizes Trace the Decline of Man (and Woman), Nature, Vol 387 (8 May 1997), 896–897; John Kappelman, “They Might be Giants,” Nature, Vol. 387 (8 May 1997), 126–127; Felipe Fernandez-Armesto, Humankind: A Brief History, New York, Oxford University Press, 2004, 82.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ann Gibbons, “The Mystery of Humanity’s Missing Mutations,” Science, Vol. 267 (6 January 1995), 35–36; “Stone Age Sophistication,” Scientific American, June 2005, 89; Jorge A. Vazquez and Mary R. Reid, “Probing the Accumulation History of the Voluminous Toba Magma,” Science, Vol. 305 (13 August 2004), 991–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    John C. Lilly, Man and Dolphin, New York, Pyramid, 1961, 154.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    Morris, Life’s Solution, 247–260. Also see Diana Reiss, “The Dolphin: An Alien Intelligence,” in Bova and Preiss, editors, 31–40.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gregory Benford, “Alien Technology,” in Bova and Preiss, editors, 165–177.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Morris, Life’s Solution, 247–248; Seth Shostak, “The Drake Equation Revisited,” SETI Institute Explorer, Special Edition, January 2005, 4.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nathan J. Emery and Nicola S. Clayton, “The Mentality of Crows: Convergent Evolution of Intelligence in Corvids and Apes,” Science, Vol. 306 (10 December 2004), 1903–1907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    In Bova and Preiss, editors, 39.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mark Derr, “Brainy Dolphins Pass the Human Mirror Test,” The New York Times, 1 May 2001; Morris, 258; Ian L. Boyd, review of Hal Whitehead’s book Sperm Whales: Social Evolution in the Ocean, Science, Vol. 302 (7 November 2003), 990–991; Clive D. L. Wynne, Do Animals Think?, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 2004, and Sara Shettleworth’s review in Nature, Vol. 430 (8 July 2004), 148; Roulet, 161–162. Other species besides humans and dolphins engage in vocal imitation—other primates, some birds, bats, and elephants. Researchers speculate that mimicry helps maintain social bonds in fluid societies. Joyce H. Poole, et al., “Elephants Are Capable of Vocal Learning,” Nature, Vol. 434 (24 March 2005), 455–456.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Morris, Life’s Solution, 260.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jill Tarter, “Searching for Extraterrestrials,” in Regis, editor, 171.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Norman H. Sleep, “Out, Out, Brief Candle?” (book review), Nature, Vol. 422 (17 April 2003), 663–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bruce E. Fleury, “The Aliens in Our Oceans: Dolphins as Analogs,” Cosmic Search, Vol. 2, Number 2 (Spring 1980), 2–5.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fleury, “The Aliens in Our Oceans;” N.J. Berrill, Worlds Without End, New York, Macmillan, 1964, 207; Lilly, 128.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    William L. Abler, Letter to the Editor, Nature, Vol. 438 (24 November 2005), 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ze Cheng, et al., “A Genome-Wide Comparison of Recent Chimpanzee and Human Segmental Duplications,” Nature, Vol. 437 (1 September 2005), 88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Duane M. Rumbaugh and David A. Washburn, Intelligence of Apes and Other Rational Beings, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 2003. Also see Andrew Whiten’s review in Nature, Vol. 425 (2 October 2003), 454.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    David Premack, “Is Language the Key to Human Intelligence?,” Science, Vol. 303 (16 January 2004), 318–320; Amy Poremba, et al., “Species-Specific Calls Evoke Asymmetric Activity in the Monkey’s Temporal Poles,” Nature, Vol. 427 (29 January 2004), 448–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Craig Stanford, Significant Others: The Ape-Human Continuum and the Quest for Human Nature, New York, Basic Books, 2002; circular letter from the Jane Goodall Institute, April 2004; Peter D. Walsh, et al., “Catastrophic Ape Decline in Western Equatorial Africa,” Nature, Vol. 422 (10 April 2003), 611–613.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Edward Harrison, Masks of the Universe, 115.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    De Duve, in Dick, editor, Many Worlds, 10–11; Morris, Life’s Solution, 253.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    “Why Life May Be Common—and Intelligence Rare,” Sky and Telescope, February 2003, 26; MacGowan and Ordway, 189; David Brin, “Xenology: The New Science of Asking Who’s Out There,” Analog Science Fiction/ Science Fact, May 1983, 64–82.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Drake and Sobel, 209.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dale A. Russell and R. Seguin, “Reconstruction of the Small Cretaceous Therapod Stenonychsaurus inequalis and a Hypothetical Dinosaurid,” Syllogeus, Vol. 37 (1982), 1–43; David M. Raup, “ETI Without Intelligence,” in Regis, editor, 31–42; Darling, 144. For excellent pictures of this reconstruction, see Terence Dickinson and Adolf Schaller, Extraterrestrials: A Field Guide for Earthlings, Camden, Ontario, Camden House, 1994, 32–33.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mark Greene, et al., “Moral Issues of Human-Non-Human Primate Neural Grafting,” Science, Vol. 309 (15 July 2005), 385–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Doris and David Jonas, Other Senses, Other Worlds, New York, Stein and Day, 1978.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. G. Michaud

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations