Characterising Distributed Haptic Virtual Environment Network Traffic Flows

  • K. M. Yap
  • A Marshall
  • W Yu
  • G Dodds
  • Q Gu
  • Rima T’faily Souayed
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 229)

Abstract

The effective transmission of haptic data in Distributed Haptic Virtual Environment (DHVEs) is a new research area which presents a number of challenges to the underlying network. The transmission of reflected force in these applications has the potential to change the way humans interact with machines and communicate with each other. The future Internet will have to carry multiple DHVE type traffic and it is now established that the best effort service offered by current IP networks is insufficient to meet the needs of these type of applications, which require specific Quality of Service (QoS) from network. The aim of the work presented here is to characterise the traffic generated by multiple DHVE network connections. The approach taken is to develop a simulation model of DHVE traffic based on empirical measurements. Both synchronous and asynchronous real world DHVE traffic is analyzed, quantified and imported into a network simulation. Probability Density Function (PDF) models are subsequently derived for each type of traffic in the DHVE system. The results show the network simulation model compares favourably with the physical network, and can be used to generate a scalable haptic network model where multiple DHVE connections may be examined.

Keywords

haptic distribution virtual environment traffic characteristics tele-operation network simulation 

References

  1. [1]
    Rima Tfaily Souayed, Gaiti, D., Pujolle, G., Wai Yu, Qiang Gu, & Marshall, A. (2003). Haptic virtual environment performance over IP networks: a case study. Proceedings Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications, 23–25 Oct. 2003, 181–9.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Souayed R., Gaiti D., Yu W., Dodds G., and Marshall A. “Experimental Study of Haptic Interaction in Distributed Virtual Environments”, (2004) Eurohapics 2004.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    ZTI Telecom, http://www.zti-telecom.com/pages/main-ip.htmGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    SenSAble Technologies. http://www.sensable.comGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kessler, G. D., & Hodges, L. F. (1996). Network communication protocol for distributed virtual environment systems. Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 virtual reality annual international symposium, mar 30–apr 3 1996, 214–221.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kyoung Shin Park, & Kenyon, R. V. (1999). Effects of network characteristics on human performance in a collaborative virtual environment. Proceedings of virtual reality, 13–17 march 1999, 104–11.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Manuel, O., Jesper, M., Joel, J., Anthony, S., & Mel, S. Considerations in the design of virtual environment systems: A case study.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Mejdi, E., Nicolas, D. G., José, R. G., & Dimitrios, M. A scalable network architecture for distributed virtual environments with dynamic QoS over IPv6. Eighth IEEE international symposium on computers and communications.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Shirmohammadi, S., & Georganas, N. D. (2000). Collaborating in 3D virtual environments: a synchronous architecture. Proceedings of WET ICE 2000. 9th IEEE international workshops on enabling technologies: infrastructure for collaborative enterprises, 14–16 June 2000, 35–42.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Tom, D., Dan, S., Maxine, B., Dave, P., Josephine, A., & Mike, B. et al. (1999). Technologies for virtual reality/ tele-immersion applications: issues of research in image display and global networking.. EC/NSF workshop on research frontiers in virtul environments and human-centered computing, chateau de bonas, france, France.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    OPNET 11.0A, Product Documentation, Methodologies and Case Studies, www.opnet.com.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    H.G. Hoffman, T. Richard, B. Coda, A. Richards, SR. Sharar, “The Illusion of Presence in Immersive Virtual Reality during an FMRI Brain Scan”, Cyberpsychol Behavior, vol 6, No2, pp. 127–31, Apr. 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Buttolo, O. Roberto and H. Blake, “Architectures for Shared haptic Virtual Environments”, special issue of Computer & Graphics, vol. 21, No.4, PP. 421–429, July–Aug 1997.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, W. Weiss, RFC 2475, “An Architecture for Differentiated Services”.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. M. Yap
    • 1
  • A Marshall
    • 1
  • W Yu
    • 1
  • G Dodds
    • 1
  • Q Gu
    • 1
  • Rima T’faily Souayed
    • 2
  1. 1.Virtual Engineering Centre Northern Ireland Technology Centre School of Electrical & Electronic EngineeringQueen’s University BelfastBelfast
  2. 2.Université de Technologies de TroyesFrench

Personalised recommendations