Radiation Protection of Technologists and Ancillary Personnel



Because PET-CT employs both radioactive material and x-rays in the same imaging suite, it presents special challenges for radiation protection. Diligent application of the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle can minimize radiation doses to PET-CT technologists, ancillary personnel, and patients. Specifically, technologists should minimize the time spent in close proximity to patients following the administration of PET radiopharmaceuticals and during interventional CT localization procedures. Shielding PPE must be worn if there is a potential of exposure to scattered x-rays; tungsten-based shielding equipment should be employed to reduce hand and body exposure to annihilation photons during dose calibration and administration. Thorough documentation of standard operating procedures, training, personnel dose monitoring, receipt and disposal of radioactive material, shielding design, and the results of contamination surveys help ensure regulatory compliance.


Radioactive Material Nuclear Regulatory Commission Annihilation Photon Effective Dose Equivalent Minimize Radiation Exposure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Paulsen EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS, et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation doses to radiologists. Radiology 2001;220:161–167.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buls N, Pagés J, deMey J, et al. Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions. Health Phys 2003;85:165–173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biran T, Weininger J, Malchi S, et al. Measurements of occupational exposure for a technologist performing 18F FDG PET scans. Health Phys 2004;87:539–544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robinson CN, Young JG, Wallace AB, Ibbetson VJ. A study of the personal radiation dose received by nuclear medicine technologists working in a dedicated PET center. Health Physics 2005;88(Suppl 1):S17-S21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stabin MG, Stubbs JB, Toohey RE. Radiation dose estimates for radiopharmaceuticals. Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kachelreiss, M, Watzke O, Kalender WA. Generalized ­multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT. Med Phys 2001;28:275–490.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fuchs T, Kachelreiss M, Kalender WA. Technical advances in multi-slice spiral CT. Eur J Radiol 2000;36:69–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fricke BL, Donnelly LF, Frush DP, et al. In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: effects on radiation dose and image ­quality using experimental and clinical data. AJR 2003;180:407–411.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Radiation Safety DivisionDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations