Advertisement

Ontology-Based Knowledge Management In The Steel Industry

Arcelor’s use cases
  • José Arancón
  • Luis Polo
  • Diego Berrueta
  • François-Marie Lesaffre
  • Nicolàs de Abajo
  • Antonio Campos
Part of the Semantic Web And Beyond Computing for Human Experience book series (ADSW, volume 6)

Keywords

Supply Chain Description Logic Steel Industry Business Rule Ontology Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F. and W. Nutt (2002). Basic Description Logics. Description Logic Handbook. F. Baader, D. Calvanese, D. L. McGuinness, D. Nardi and P.F. Patel-Schneider, Cambridge University Press: 47-100.Google Scholar
  2. Baeza-Yates, R. and B. Ribeiro-Neto (1999). Modern Information Retrieval. Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Barrero, D. F., M. R. Moreno, et al. (2005). SEARCHY: A Metasearch Engine for Heterogeneus Sources in Distributed Environments. International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  4. Berners-Lee, T., J. Hendler, et al. (2001). “The Semantic Web”. Scientific American. May 2001: 34-43.Google Scholar
  5. Bray, T., J. Paoli et al. (2006). Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition). W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/.Google Scholar
  6. CPV(2002). Common Procurement Vocabulary. http://simap.eu.int/shared/docs/simap/nomenclature/l_34020021216en00010562.pdf.Google Scholar
  7. Cuenca, B., B. Parsia et al (2005). “Combining OWL Ontologies using E-Connections”. Elsevier’s Journal of Web Semantics, vol. 4(1): 40-59.Google Scholar
  8. DCMI (2006). Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. http://dublincore.org/.Google Scholar
  9. De Bruijn, J., editor (2005). The Web Service Modeling Language WSML. ESSI WSML working group. http://www.wsmo.org/TR/d16/d16.1/v0.21/Google Scholar
  10. Fayez, M., L. Rabelo and et al. (2005). Ontologies for Supply Chain Simulation Modeling. 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Fellbaum, C., editor (1998). WordNet: an electronic lexical database. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gruber, T.R. (1995). “Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing”. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 43:907-928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hepp, M. (2006) The True Complexity of Product Representation in the Semantic Web. 14th European Conference on Information System, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
  14. ISCO (1988). International Standard Classification of Occupations. Eurostat.Google Scholar
  15. Leukel, J., V. Schmitz, et al. (2002). A Modeling Approach for Product Classification Systems. 13th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Aix-en-Provence, France: 868-874.Google Scholar
  16. Malone, T.W. et al. (2004). “The future of work”. Harvard Business School Press.41-54.Google Scholar
  17. Manola, F., and E. Miller (2004). RDF Primer, W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/.Google Scholar
  18. Masolo, C., L. Vieu, et al. (2004). Social roles and their descriptions. 9th International Conference of Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Whistler, Canada: 267-277.Google Scholar
  19. Masolo, C., S. Borgo, et al. (2003). Wonderweb deliverable d18: the wonderweb library of foundational ontologies. Technical Report. LOA-CNR. http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org/deliverables/documents/D18.pdf.Google Scholar
  20. McGuinness, D., F. Van Harmelen (2004). OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.Google Scholar
  21. Miles, A. and D. Brickley (2005). SKOS Core Guide, W3C Working Draft, http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-guide-20051102/.Google Scholar
  22. Mochol M., R. Oldakowski, et al. (2004). Ontology Based Recruitment Process; Workshop: Semantische Technologien für Informationsportale, at INFORMATIK, Ulm, Germany, September 2004: 198-202.Google Scholar
  23. Niles, I., and A. Pease (2001). Towards a standard upper ontology. 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Ogunquit, Maine, USA.Google Scholar
  24. OKAR Working Group (2005). Ontology for Knowledge Activity Resources Guide. Fujitsu Laboratories and Ricoh Company. http://www.ricoh.com/src/rd/img2/ds_okar_draft_20050204_en.pdf. Google Scholar
  25. Protégé (2006). Protégé Ontology Editor. http://protege.stanford.edu/.Google Scholar
  26. Prud’hommeaux, E., and A. Seaborne (2006). SPARQL Query Language for RDF. W3C Working Draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.Google Scholar
  27. PSL (2006). Process Specification Language. http://www.mel.nist.gov/psl/ontology.html.Google Scholar
  28. Rector, A.L. (2003) Modularisation of domain ontologies implemented in Description Logics and related formalisms including OWL. 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, Sanibel Islandm, FL, USA: 121-128.Google Scholar
  29. Supply Chain Council (2003). Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model V.6.0.Google Scholar
  30. UNSPSC (2006). United Nations Standard Products and Services Code. http://www.unspsc.org/.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Arancón
    • 1
  • Luis Polo
    • 2
  • Diego Berrueta
    • 2
  • François-Marie Lesaffre
    • 3
  • Nicolàs de Abajo
    • 1
  • Antonio Campos
    • 2
  1. 1.Arcelor Research Knowledge Innovation Center (KIN),ArcelorMittal SpainjoseAvilésSpain
  2. 2.CTIC Foundation,GijónSpain
  3. 3.ArcelorMittal,FosFrance

Personalised recommendations