Mediating Academic Language Learning Through Classroom Discourse

  • Pauline Gibbons
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 15)


For school-aged students who are learning ESL, the discourse of the classroom must simultaneously construct curriculum knowledge and be a site for second language development. This chapter focuses on academic language learning in the ESL school context, in particular on how language learning is mediated through classroom discourse. While linguistic, social, and sociocognitive traditions have interpreted the nature of interaction differently, it is seen in all of them as playing a major part in learning and language development. The chapter draws on research in sociocultural approaches to pedagogy, systemic functional linguistics (SFL), and second language acquisition (SLA) studies in examining the relationship between classroom discourse and the development of ESL students’ academic language learning. It argues that interactions should be examined both for their effectiveness in fostering language development and also for the impact these interactions have on how students view themselves. The chapter concludes with some implications for classroom practice, which suggest how teachers can orchestrate classroom discourse for academic language learning.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker, K. (1992, Winter, Spring). Review of forked tongue. Bilingual Basics, 6–7.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Bellack, A., Kliebard, H., Hyman, R., & Smith, F. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  4. Biber, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62, 384–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigelow, B., Christensen, L., Karp, S., Miner, B., & Peterson, B. (1994). Rethinking our classrooms: Teaching for justice and equity. Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Breen, M. (2001). Navigating the discourse: On what is learned in the classroom. In C. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context, (pp. 306–322). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  8. Brooks, F. (1992). Communicative competence and the conversation course: A social interaction perspective. Linguistics and Education, 4, 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruner, J. (1975). Language as an instrument of thought. In A. Davies (Ed.), Problems of language and learning, (pp. 61–68). London: Heimemann.Google Scholar
  10. Canale, M. (1983). On some dimensions of language proficiency. In J. Oiler (Ed.), Issues in language testing research, (pp. 333–342). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  11. Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  12. Christie, F. (1994). On pedagogic discourse. Melbourne: Australian Research Council.Google Scholar
  13. Collier, V. (1989). How quickly can immigrants become proficient in school English? Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 5, 26–28.Google Scholar
  14. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  15. Cummins, J. (1986). Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Education Review, 15, 18–36.Google Scholar
  16. Cummins, J. (1996). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society. Los Angeles: California Association for Bilingual Education.Google Scholar
  17. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy. Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  18. Darder, A. (1991). Culture and power in the classroom: A critical foundation for bicultural education. New York: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  19. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–298.Google Scholar
  20. Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  21. Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.Google Scholar
  22. Dillon, J. (1983). Teaching and the art of questioning. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Cappa Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Dillon, J. (1985). Using questions to foil discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. Glasgow: Collins.Google Scholar
  25. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research, (pp. 33–56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Press.Google Scholar
  26. Donato, R. (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language classroom. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, (pp. 27–50). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  28. Engstrom, Y., & Middleton, D. (Eds.). (1996). Cognition and communication at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Floriani, A. (1993). Negotiating what counts: Roles and relationships, texts and contexts, content and meaning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 241–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gallas, K. (1995). Talking their way into science: Hearing children’s questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  31. Gibbons, P. (2001). Learning a new register in a second language. In C. Candlin & N. Mercer (Eds.), English language teaching in its social context (pp. 258–270), London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  33. Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly 37(2), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goodman, K., & Goodman, Y. (1994). Vygotsky in a whole language perspective. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 223–250). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Green, J., & Dixon, C. (1994). Talking knowledge into being: Discursive and social practices in classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 5(3–4), 231–239.Google Scholar
  36. Gutiérrez, K. (1994). How talk, context and script shape contexts for learning: A cross-case comparison of journal sharing. Linguistics and Education 5, 335–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gutiérrez, K., Larson, J., & Kreuter, B. (1995). Cultural tensions in the scripted classroom: The value of the subjugated perspective. Urban Education, 29(4), 410–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gutiérrez, K., Rymes B., & Larson, J. (1995). Script, counterscript, and underlife in classrooms: James Brown vs. Brown vs. Board of Education. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 445–471.Google Scholar
  39. Gutiérrez, K. & Stone, L. (2000). Synchronic and diachronic dimensions of social practice: An emerging methodology for cultural-historical perspectives on literacy learning. In C. Lee. & P. Smagorinsky, Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative enquiry (pp. 150–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hall, J. (1995). (Re)creating our worlds with words: A sociohistorical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics, 16, 206–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hall, J. (1998). Differential teacher attention to student utterances: The construction of different opportunities for learning in the IRF. Linguistics and Education 9(3), 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Halliday, M. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  43. Hammond, J. (1990). Is learning to read and write the same as learning to speak? In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy for a Changing World (pp. 26–53). Victoria: ACER.Google Scholar
  44. Kasermann, M. (1991). Obstruction and dominance: Uncooperative moves and their effect on the course of conversation. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (Eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 101–123). Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  45. Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lee, C., & Smagorinsky, P. (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative enquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. (1996). Interactional patterns of linguistically diverse students and teachers: Insights for promoting science learning. Linguistics and Education, 8, 269–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lemke, J. (1988). Genres, semantics and classroom education. Linguistics and Education, 1(1) 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  50. Lin, L. (1994). Language of and in the classroom: Constructing patterns of social life. Linguistics and Education, 5, 367–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Martin, J. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Children writing, study guide, 21–29. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Martin, J. (1990). Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. In F. Christie (Ed.), Literacy for a changing world (pp. 79–117). Hawthorn, Victoria: ACER.Google Scholar
  54. Martin, J., Christie, F., & Rothery, J. (1987). Social processes in education: A reply to Sawyer and Watson (and others). In I. Reid (Ed.), The Place of genre in learning: Current debates (pp. 58–82). Geelong, Victoria: Centre for Studies in Literary Education, Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Martin, J. & Veel, R. (1998). Reading science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Stierer, B. (1992). Scaffolding learning in the classroom. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project (pp. 186–195). London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  57. McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. McKay, P., Davies, A., Devlin, B., Clayton, J., Oliver, R., & Zammit, S. (1997). The bilingual interface project report. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
  59. McLaren, P. (1994). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  60. Mehan, B. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Mercer, N. (1994). Neo-Vygotskian theory and classroom education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  62. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  63. Michaels, S. (1981). ’sharing time’: Children’s narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10, 423–442.Google Scholar
  64. Mohan, B. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  65. Mohan, B. (2002). The second language as a medium of learning. In B. Mohan, C. Leung & C. Davison (Eds.), English as a second language in the mainstream (pp. 107–126). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  66. Moll, L. (1994). Vygotsky and education. Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Nieto, S. (1996). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (2nd Ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  68. Nieto, S. (1999). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  69. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How high schools structure inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Ohta, A. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 93–121.Google Scholar
  71. Ohta, A. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence in learner-learner classroom interaction. In L. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and language learning, Monograph Series, Vol. 8 (pp. 223–242). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  72. Ohta, A. (1999). Interactional routines and the socialisation of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1493–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ohta, A. (2000). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.Google Scholar
  74. Olson, D. R. (1977) From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.Google Scholar
  75. Phillips, T. (1985). Beyond lip-service: Discourse development after the age of nine. In G. Wells & J. Nicholls (Eds.), Language and learning: An interactional perspective (pp. 59–82). East Sussex: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  76. Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Pattinois, D., & Linell, J. (1996). Language learners’ interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of language learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Putney, L., Green, J., Dixon, C., Duran R., & Yeager, B. (2000). Consequential progressions: Exploring collective-individual development in a bilingual classroom. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky, Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative enquiry (pp. 86–126). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Rowe, M. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up. Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Smagorinsky, P. (1993). The social environment of the classroom: A Vygotskian perspective on small group process. Communication Education, 42(2) 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Smagorinsky, P., & O’Donnell-Allen, C. (2000). Idiocultural diversity in small groups: The role of the relational framework in collaborative learning. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  83. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlehofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Lantolf, J. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1990). Aspects of the sociolinguistic performance of early and late French immersion students. In R. Scarcella, E. Andersen, & S. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 41–54). New Work: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  86. Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Toohey, K. (2000). Learning English at school: Identity, social relations and classroom practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  88. Torr, J. (1993). Classroom discourse: Children from English speaking and non-English speaking backgrounds. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 37–56.Google Scholar
  89. Tough, J. (1977). Talking and learning: Schools council communication skills in early childhood project. London: Ward Lock Educational in association with Drake Educational Associates.Google Scholar
  90. Unsworth, L. (Ed.). (2000). Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistics perspectives. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  91. van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  92. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–260). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works, Volume 1, including Thinking and speaking. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  95. Walsh, C. (1991). Issues of language, power and schooling for Puerto Ricans. Toronto: OISE Press.Google Scholar
  96. Walsh, C. (Ed.). (1996). Education reform and social change: Multicultural voices, struggles and visions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  97. Webster, A., Beveridge, M., & Reed, M. (1996). Managing the literacy curriculum. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Wegerif, R. & Mercer, N. (1996). Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education, 10(1), 47–64.Google Scholar
  99. Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  100. Wells, G. (1992). The centrality of talk in education. In K. Norman (Ed.), Thinking voice: The work of the National Oracy Project. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  101. Wells, G. (1996). Using the tool-kit of discourse in the activity of learning and teaching. Mind, Culture and Language, 3(2), 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry. Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 51–85). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Wells, G., & Chang-Wells, G. (1992). Constructing knowledge together: Classrooms as centers of inquiry and literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  105. Wilkinson, A. M. (1965). Spoken English. Birmingham: University of Birmingham School of Education.Google Scholar
  106. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pauline Gibbons
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Technology SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations