Advertisement

Influence of a New Backpack Design on Kinematics and Dynamics of Walking

  • Christophe Gillet
  • Matthieu Foissac
  • Sébastien Leteneur
  • Philippe Freychat
  • Franck Barbier

Abstract

The backpacks influence the posture of the walkers. The object of this study is to quantify the modifications of the posture but also the modifications during gait, in differs configurations load: (a) without backpack, (b) with a commercial backpack, and with a prototype of which it is possible to make move part of the load, (c) behind of the trunk and (d) in front of the trunk. To evaluate this new design, 13 subjects were asked to walk, in straight line at their natural walking speed. Kinematics and dynamics data were recorded by a Vicon optoelectronic system and 2 force platforms (Kistler). The results show that the forward load condition (d) allows the raising of the walker trunk. Consequently, the postural attitude of the walker is closer to normal walk attitude (without load). For the dynamic data, no significant difference was noted between the 3 conditions of walk with backpack.

Keywords

Force Platform Load Carriage Postural Attitude Trunk Inclination Good Comfort 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barbier, F., Salom, O. & Angué, J.C. (1998) Assessing the ergonomics of 2. rucksacks. The Engineering of Sport, Editor S.J. Hake, Blackwell Science, pp. 243–250, ISBN 0-632-05048-9.Google Scholar
  2. Bobet, J & Norman, R.W. (1984) Effects of load placement on back muscle activity in load carriage. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 53, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook, T.M., Neumann, D. A. (1987) The effects of load placement on the EMG activity of the low back muscles during load carrying by men and women. Ergonomics. 30(10), 1413–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Guelton, K., Gillet, C., Delporte, L., Barbier, F., Lepoutre, FX. (2002) An easy method to determine the centre of gravity of some lifeless body with a motion analysis system. Arch. of Physiology and Biochemistry. 110, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Holewijn, M. (1990) Physical strain due to load carrying. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 61, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kinoshita, H. (1985) Effects of different loads and carrying systems on selected biomechanical parameters describing walking gait. Ergonomics. 28(9), 1347–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knapik, J., Harman, E., Reynolds, K. (1996) Load carriage using packs: a review of physiological, biomechanical and medical aspects. Appl. Ergon. 27(3), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. LaFiandra, M., Wagenaar, R.C., Holt, K.G., Obusek, J.P. (2003) How do load carriage and walking speed influence trunk coordination and stride parameters? J. Biomech. 36(1) 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lafiandra, M., Harman, E. (2004) The distribution of forces between the upper and lower back during load carriage. Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 36(3), 460–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Legg, S.J., Pehanty, A. (1985) Comparison of five modes of carrying a load close to the trunk. Ergonomics. 28(12), 1653–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Legg, S.J., Perko, L. & Campbell, P. (1997) Subjective perceptual methods for comparing backpacks. Ergonomics. 40(8), 809–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lloyd, R. and Cooke, C.B. (2000) The oxygen consumption associated with unloaded walking and load carriage using two different backpack designs. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 81(6), 486–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin, E. & Nelson, R.C. (1986) The effects of carried loads on the walking patterns of men and women. Ergonomics. 29 (10), 1191–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Quesada, P.M., Mengelkoch, L.J., Hale R.C. & Simon S.R. (2000) Biomechanical and metabolic effects of varying backpack loading on simulated marching. Ergonomics. 43 (3), 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christophe Gillet
    • 1
  • Matthieu Foissac
    • 2
  • Sébastien Leteneur
    • 1
  • Philippe Freychat
    • 2
  • Franck Barbier
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Automatique, de Mécanique et d’Informatique Industrielles et HumainesUniversité de ValenciennesFrance
  2. 2.Decathlon Research CenterVilleneuve d’AscqFrance

Personalised recommendations