Trehalose As a “Chemical Chaperone”

Fact and Fantasy
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 594)

Abstract

Trehalose is a disaccharide of glucose that is found at high concentrations in a wide variety of organisms that naturally survive drying in nature. Many years ago we reported that this molecule has the remarkable ability to stabilize membranes and proteins in the dry state. A mechanism for the stabilization rapidly emerged, and it was sufficiently attractive that a myth grew up about trehalose as a universal protectant and chemical chaperone. Many of the claims in this regard can be explained by what is now known about the physical properties of this interesting sugar. It is emerging that these properties may make it unusually useful in stabilizing intact cells in the dry state.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Crowe JH, Crowe LM, Jackson SA. Preservation and functional activity in lyophilized sarcoplasmic reticulum. Arch Biochem Biophys 1983; 220:477–484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crowe M, Mouradian R, Crowe JH et al. Effects of carbohydrates on membrane stability at low water activities. Biochim Biophys Acta 1984; 769:141–150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crowe JH, Crowe LM, Oliver AE et al. The trehalose myth revisited: Introduction to a symposium on stabilization of cells in the dry state. Cryobiology 2001; 43:89–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matsuo T. Trehalose protects corneal epithelial cells from death by drying. British J Ophthalmol 2001; 85:610–612.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norcia M. Compositions and methods for wound management. Off Gaz US Patent and Trademark Office 2000; 1232:424–448.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Higashiyama T. Novel functions and applications of trehalose. Pure Appl Chem 2002; 74:1263–1269.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benaroudj N, Lee DL, Goldberg AL. Trehalose Accumulation during cellular stress protects cells and cellular proteins from damage by oxygen radicals. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:24261–24267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen Q, Haddad GG. Role of trehalose phosphate synthase and trehalose during hypoxia: From flies to mammals. J Exp Biol 2004; 207:3125–3129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neta T, Takada K, Hirasawa M. Low-cariogenicity of trehalose as a substrate. Dent 2000; 28:571–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gimeno-Alcañiz JV, Pèrez-Ortìn JE, Matallana E. Differential pattern of trehalose accumulation in wine yeast strains during the microvinification process. Biotechnology Lett 1999; 21:271–274.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pataro C, Guerra JB, Gomes FCO et al. Trehalose accumulation, invertase activity and physiological characteristics of yeasts isolated from 24 h fermentative cycles during the production of artisanal Brazilian cachaça. Brazilian J Microbiol 2002; 33:202–208.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Komes D, Lovri T, Kovaevi Gani T et al. Study of trehalose addition on aroma retention in dehydrated strawberry puree. Food Technol Biotechnol 2003; 41:111–119.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garg AK, Kim JK, Owens TG et al. Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2002; 99:15898–15903.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nishizaki Y, Yoshizane C, Toshimori Y et al. Disaccharide-trehalose inhibits bone resorption in ovariectomized mice. Nutr Res 2000; 20:653–664.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yoshizane C, Arai N, Arai C et al. Trehalose suppresses osteoclast differentiation in ovariectomized mice: Correlation with decreased in vitro interleukin-6 production by bone marrow cells. Nutr Res 2000; 20:1485–1491.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tanaka M, Machida Y, Niu S et al. Trehalose alleviates polyglutamine-mediated pathology in a mouse model of Huntington disease. Nat Med 2004; 10:148–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Couzin J. Huntington’s disease. Unorthodox clinical trials meld science and care. Science 2004; 304:816–817.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crowe JH, Crowe LM, Carpenter JF et al. Stabilization of dry phospholipid bilayers and proteins by sugars. Biochem J 1987; 242:1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crowe JH, Crowe LM. Preservation of liposomes by freeze drying. In: Gregoriadis G, ed. Liposome Technology, 2nd ed. CRC Press Inc., 1992.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hays LM, Crowe JH, Wolkers W et al. Factors affecting leakage of trapped solutes from phospholipid vesicles during thermotropic phase transitions. Cryobiology 2001; 42:88–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crowe JH, Crowe LM. Factors affecting the stability of dry liposomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1988; 939:327–334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Crowe JH, Carpenter JF, Crowe LM. The role of vitrification in anhydrobiosis. Annu Rev Physiol 1998; 6:73–103.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Crowe JH, Crowe LM, Chapman D. Preservation of membranes in anhydrobiotic organisms: The role of trehalose. Science 1984; 223:701–703.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Allison SD, Manning MC, Randolph TW et al. Optimization of storage stability of lyophilized actin using combinations of disaccharides and dextran. J Pharm Sci 2000; 89:199–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Anchordoquy TJ, Izutsu KI, Randolph TW et al. Maintenance of quaternary structure in the frozen state stabilizes lactate dehydrogenase during freeze-drying. Arch Biochem Biophys 2001; 390:35–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cleland JL, Lam X, Kendrick B et al. A specific molar ratio of stabilizer to protein is required for storage stability of a lyophilized monoclonal antibody. J Pharm Sci 2000; 90:310–321.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Belton PS, Gil AH. IR and Raman spectroscopic studies of the interaction of trehalose with hen egg lysozyme. Biopolymers 1994; 34:957–961.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cottone G, Cicotti G, Cordone L. Protein-trehalose-water structures in trehalose coated carboxy-myoglobn. J Cell Phys 2002; 117:9862–9866.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lins RD, Pereira CS, Hunenberger PH. Trehalose-protein interactions in aqueous solutions. Proteins 2004; 55:177–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sun WQ, Leopold AC. Cytoplasmic vitrification and survival of anhydrobiotic organisms. Comp. Biochem Physiol 1997; 117A:327–333.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sun WQ, Leopold AC, Crowe LM et al. Stability of dry liposomes in sugar glasses. Biophys J 1996; 70:1769–1776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee CWB, Waugh JS, Griffin RG. Solid-state NMR study of trehalose/1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-phosphatidylcholine interactions. Biochemistry 1986; 25:3737–3742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nakagaki M, Nagase H, Ueda H. Stabilization of the lamellar structure of phosphatidylcholine by complex-formation with trehalose. J Mem Sci 1992; 73:173–180.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tsvetkova NM, Phillips BL, Crowe LM et al. Effect of sugars on headgroiup mobility in freeze-dried dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine bilayers: Solid-state P-31 NMR and FTIR studies. Biophys J 1998; 75:2947–2955.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Luzardo MD, Amalfa F, Nunez AM et al. Effect of trehalose and sucrose on the hydration and dipole potential of lipid bilayers. Biophys J 2000; 78:2452–2458.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ricker JV, Tsvetkova NM, Wolkers WF et al. Trehalose maintains phase separation in an air-dried binary lipid mixture. Biophys J 2003; 84:3045–3051.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chandrasekhar I, Gaber BP. Stabilization of the biomembrane by small molecules: Interaction of trehalose with the phospholipid bilayer. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1988; 5:1163–1171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rudolph BR, Chandrasekhar I, Gaber BP et al. Molecular modeling of saccharide-lipid interactions. Chem Phys Lipids 1990; 53:243–261.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sum AK, Faller F, de Pablo JJ. Molecular simulation of phospholipid bilayers and insights of the interactions with disaccharides. Biophys J 2003; 85:2830–2844.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pereira CS, Lins RD, Chandrasekhar I et al. Interaction of the disaccharide trehalose with a phospholipid bilayer: A molecular dynamics study. Biophys J 2004; 86:2272–2285.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Brown DA. Seeing is believing: Visualization of rafts in model membranes. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2001; 98:10517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brown DA, London E. Structure and origin of ordered lipid domains in biological membranes. J Mem Biol 1998; 164:103–114.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    London E. Insights into lipid raft structure and formation from experiments in model membranes. Curr Opinion Struct Biol 2002; 12:480.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Horejs V. Membrane rafts in immunoreceptor signaling: New doubts, new proofs? Trends Immunol 2002; 23:562–564.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Heerklotz H. Triton promotes domain formation in lipid raft mixtures. Biophys J 2002; 83:2693–2697.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shogomori H, Brown DA. Use of detergents to study membrane rafts: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Biol Chem 2003; 384:1259–1263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Draber P, Draberova L. Lipid rafts in mast cell signaling. Mol Immunol 2002; 38:1247–1253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Horejsi V. The roles of membrane microdomains (rafts) in T cell activation. Immunol Rev 2003; 191:148–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    FukI IV, Meyer ME, Williams KJ. Transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of syndecan mediate a multi-step endocytic pathway involving detergent-insoluble membrane rafts. Biochem J 2001; 351:607–613.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ono A, Freed EO. Plasma membrane rafts play a critical role in HIV-1 assembly and release. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2001; 98:13925–13929.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vincent S, Gerlier D, Manié SN. Measles virus assembly within membrane rafts. J Virology 2000; 74:9911–9916.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gil T, Ipsen JH, Mouritsen OG et al. Theoretical analysis of protein organization in lipid membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998; 1376:245–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Killian JA. Hydrophobic mismatch between proteins and lipids in membranes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998; 137:401–416.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Leidy C, Gousset K, Ricker JV et al. Lipid phase behavior and stabilization of domains in membranes of platelets. Cell Biochem Biophys 2004; 40:123–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mabrey S, Sturtevant JM. Investigation of phase transitions of lipids and lipid mixtures by sensitivity differential scanning calorimetry. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1976; 73:3862–3879.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mabrey S, Mateo PL, Sturtevant JM. High-sensitivity scanning calorimetric study of mixtures of cholesterol with dimyristoyl-and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholines. Biochemistry 1978; 17:2464–2468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Womersley C. Dehydration survival and anhydrobiotic potential of entomopathogenic nematodes. In: Gaugler R, Kaya HK, eds. Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Biological Control. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1990:117–130.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Westh P, Ramløv H. Trehalose accumulation in the tardigrade Adorybiotus coronifer during anhydrobiosis. J Exp Zool 1991; 258:303–311.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lapinski J, Tunnacliffe A. Anhydrobiosis without trehalose in bdelloid rotifers. FEBS Lett 2003; 553:387–390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Caprioli M, Katholm AK, Melone G et al. Trehalose in desiccated rotifers: A comparison between a bdelloid and a monogonont species. Comp Biochem Physiol A 2004; 139:527–532.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tunnacliffe A, Lapinski J. Resurrecting Van Leeuwenhoek’s rotifers: A reappraisal of the role of disaccharides in anhydrobiosis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 2003; 358:1755–1771.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Crowe JH, Oliver AE, Hoekstra FA et al. Stabilization of dry membranes by mixtures of hydroxyethyl starch and glucose: The role of vitrification. Cryobiology 1997; 3:20–30.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hill DR, Keenan TW, Helm RF et al. Extracellular polysaccharide of Nostoc commune (Cyanobacteria) inhibits fusion of membrane vesicles during desiccation. J Applied Phycol 1997; 9:237–248.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Buitink J, Walters-Vertucci C, Hoekstra FA et al. Calorimetric properties of dehydrating pollen: Analysis of a desiccation-tolerant and an-intolerant species. Plant Physiol 1996; 111:235–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hincha DK, Hellwege EM, Meyer AG et al. Plant fructans stabilize phosphatidylcholine liposomes during freeze-drying. Eur J Biochem 2000; 267:535–540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Vereyken IJ, Chupin V, Hoekstra FA et al. The effect of fructan on membrane lipid organization and dynamics in the dry state. Biophys J 2003; 84:3759–3766.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hincha DK, Zuther E, Heyer AG. The preservation of liposomes by rafflnose family oligosaccha-rides during drying is mediated by effects on fusion and lipid phase transitions. Biochim Biophys Acta 2003; 1612:172–177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hincha DK, Hagemann M. Stabilization of model membranes during drying by compatible solutes involved in the stress tolerance of plants and microorganisms. Biochem J 2004; 383:277–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hoekstra FA, Golovina EA. The role of amphiphiles. Comp Biochem Physiol 2002; 131A:527–533.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Goodrich RP, Crowe JH, Crowe LM et al. Alteration in membrane surfaces induced by attachment of carbohydrates. Biochemistry 1991; 30:2313–2318.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Popova AV, Hincha DK. Effects of the sugar headgroup of a glyoglycerolipid on the phase behavior of phospholipid model membranes in the dry state. Glycobiology 2005; 15:1150–1155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Leslie SB, Israeli E, Lighthart B et al. Trehalose and sucrose protect both membranes and proteins in intact bacteria during drying. Econ Env Microbiol 1995; 61:3592–3597.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Esteves MI, Quintilio W, Sato RA et al. Stabilisation of immunoconjugates by trehalose. Biotechnol Lett 2001; 22:417–420.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Crowe LM, Reid DS, Crowe JH. Is trehalose special for preserving dry biomaterials? Biophys J 1996; 71:2087–2093.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Green JL, Angell CA. Phase relations and vitrification in saccharide-water solutions and the trehalose anomaly. J Phys Chem 1989; 93:2880–2882.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Li S, Patapoff TW, Overcashier et al. Effects of reducing sugars on the chemical stability of human relaxin in the lyophilized state. J Pharm Sci 1996; 85:873–877.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    O’Brien J. Stability of trehalose, sucrose and glucose to nonenzymatic browning in model systems. J Food Sci 1996; 61:679–682.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Schebor C, Burin L, del Pilar Bueras M et al. Stability to hydrolysis and browning of trehalose, sucrose and raffinose in low-moisture systems in relation to their use as protectants of dry biomaterials. Lebensm-Wiss u-Technol 1999; 32:481–485.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Buitink J, van den Dries IJ, Hoekstra FA et al. High critical temperature above Tg may contribute to the stability of biological systems. Biophys J 2000; 79:1119–1128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Buitink J, Heminga MA, Hoekstra FA. Is there a role for oligosaccharides in seed longevity? An assessment of intracellular glass stability. Plant Physiology 2000; 122:1217–1224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Buitink J, Leprince O. Glass formation in plant anhydrobiotes: Survival in the dry state. Cryobiology 2004; 48:215–228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Koste KL. Glass formation and desiccation tolerance in seeds. Plant Physiol 1991; 96:302–304.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Wolkers WF, Tetteroo FAA, Alberda M et al. Changed properties of the cytoplasmic matrix associated with desiccation tolerance of dried carrot somatic embryos. An in situ Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study. Plant Physiol 1999; 120:153–163.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Wolkers WF, Alberda M, Koornneef M et al. Properties of proteins and the glassy matrix in maturation-defective mutant seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 1998; 16:133–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wolkers WF, Oldenhof H, Alberda M et al. A Fourier transform infrared study of sugar glasses: Application to anhydrobiotic higher plant cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998; 1379:83–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Walters C, Reid JL, Walker-Simmons MK. Heat soluble proteins extracted from wheat embryos have tightly bound sugars and unusual hydration properties. Seed Sci Res 1997; 7:125–134.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Eroglu A, Russo MJ, Bieganski R et al. Intracellular trehalose improves the survival of cryopreserved mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 2000; 18:163–167.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Guo NI, Puhlev DR, Brown J et al. Trehalose expression confers desiccation tolerance on human cells. Nat Biotechnol 2000; 18:168–171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wolkers WF, Walker NJ, Tablin F et al. Human platelets loaded with trehalose survive freeze-drying. Cryobiology 2001; 42:79–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Oliver AE, Jamil K, Crowe JH et al. Loading human mesenchymal stem cells with trehalose by fluid-phase endocytosis. Cell Preservation Tech 2004; 2:35–49.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Lloyd JB. Lysosome membrane permeability: Implications for drug delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2000; 41:189–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Tablin F, Oliver AE, Walker NJ et al. Membrane phase transitions of intact human platelets: Correlation with cold-induced activation. J Cell Physiol 1996; 168:305–313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Tablin F, Wolkers WF, Walker NJ et al. Membrane reorganization during chilling: Implications for long term storage. Cryobiology 2001; 43:114–123.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Oliver AE, Tablin F, Walker NJ et al. The internal calcium concentration of human platelets increases during chilling. Biochim Biophys Acta 1999; 1416:349–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Crowe JH, Tablin F, Tsvetkova NM et al. Are lipid phase transitions responsible for chilling damage in human platelets? Cryobiology 1999; 38:180–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Crowe JH, Tablin F, Wolkers WF et al. Stabilization of membranes in human platelets freeze-dried with trehalose. Chem Phys Lipids 2003; 122:41–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Tsvetkova NM, Walker NJ, Crowe JH et al. Lipid phase separation correlates with activation in platelets during chilling. Mol Mem Biol 2001; 17:209–218.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Auh JH, Wolkers WF, Looper SA et al. Calcium mobilization in freeze-dried human platelets. Cell Preservation Tech 2004; 2:180–187.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Ma X, Jamil K, MacRae TH et al. A small stress protein acts synergistically with trehalose to confer desiccation tolerance on mammalian cells. Cryobiology 2005; 51:15–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Clegg JS, Jackson SA, Warner AH. Extensive intracellular translocations of a major protein accompany anoxia in embryos of Artemia franciscana. Exp Cell Res 1994; 212:77–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Liang P, Amons R, Clegg HS et al. Purification, structure and in vitro molecular-chaperone activity of Artemia p26, a small heat-shock/alpha-crystallin protein. Eur J Biocheml 997; 243:225–32.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Liang P, Amons R, Clegg HS et al. Molecular characterization of a small heat shock/alpha-crystallin protein in encysted Artemia embryos. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:19051–19058.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Liang P, MacRae TH. The synthesis of a small heat shock/oc-crystallin protein in Artemia and its relationship to stress tolerance during development. Devel Biol 1999; 207:445–456.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    MacRae TH. Molecular chaperones, stress resistance and development in Artemia franciscana. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2003; 14:251–258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Willsie JK, Clegg JS. Nuclear p26, a small heat shock/α-crystallin protein, and its relationship to stress resistance in Artemia franciscana embryos. J Exp Biol 2001; 204:2339–2350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Day RM, Gupta JS, MacRae TH. A small heat shock/alpha-crystallin protein from encysted Artemia embryos suppresses tubulin denaturation. Cell Stress and Chaperones 2003; 8:183–193.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Sun Y, Mansour M, Crack JA et al. Oligomerization, chaperone activity, and nuclear localization of p26, a small heat shock protein from Artemia franciscana. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:39999–40006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Viner RI, Clegg JS. Influence of trehalose on the molecular chaperone activity of p26, a small heat shock/α-crystallin protein. Cell Stress and Chaperones 2001; 6:126–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Collins CH, Clegg JS. A small heat-shock protein, p26, from the crustacean Artemia protects mammalian cells (Cos-1) against oxidative damage. Cell Biol Intl 2004; 28:449–455.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Singer MA, Lindquist S. Multiple effects of trehalose on protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cell 1998; 1:639–648.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Singer MA, Lindquist S. Thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The Yin and Yang of trehalose. Trends Biotech 1998; 1:460–468.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Ristic Z, Williams G, Yang G et al. Dehydration, damage to cellular membranes, and heat-shock proteins in maize hybrids from different climates. J Plant Physiol 1996; 149:424–432.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Hayward SAL, Rinehart JP, Denlinger DL. Desiccation and rehydration elicit distinct heat shock protein transcript responses in the flesh fly pupae. J Exp Biol 2004; 207:963–971.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: From nascent chain to folded protein. Science 2002; 295:1852–1858.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Barral JM, Broadley SA, Schaffar G et al. Roles of molecular chaperones in protein misfolding diseases. Sem Cell Devel Biol 2004; 15:17–29.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Trent JD, Kagawa HK, Paavola CD et al. Intracellular localization of a group II chaperonin indicates a membrane-related function. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003; 100:15589–15594.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Torok Z, Horvath I, Goloubinoff P et al. Evidence for a liposhaperonin: Association of active protein-folding GroESLj oligomers with lipids can stabilize membranes under heat shock conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1997; 94:2192–2197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Torok Z, Tsvetkova NM, Balogh G et al. Heat shock protein coinducers with no effect on protein denaturation specifically modulate the membrane lipid phase. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2003; 100:3131–3136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Torok Z, Goloubinoff P, Horvath I et al. Synechocystis HSP17 is an amphitropic protein that stabilizes heat-stressed membranes and binds denatured proteins for subsequent chaperone-mediated refolding. Proc Natl Adad Sci 2001; 98:3098–3103.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Tsvetkova NM, Horvath I, Torok Z et al. Small heat-shock proteins regulate membrane lipid polymorphism. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2002; 99:13504–13509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Vigh L, Maresca B, Harwood JL. Does the membrane’s physical state control the expression of heat shock and other genes? Trends Bio Sci 1998; 23:369–374.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Horvath I, Glatz A, Varvasovszki V et al. Membrane physical state controls the signaling mechanism of the heat shock response in Synechocystis PCC 6803: Identification of hsp17 as a “fluidity gene”. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1998; 95:3513–3518.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Beere HM, Green DR. Stress management-Heat shock protein-70 and the regulation of apoptosis. Trends Cell Biol 2001; 11:6–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Concannon CG, Gorman AM, Samali A. On the role of Hsp27 in regulating apoptosis. Apoptosis 2003; 8:61–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Samali A, Orrenius S. Heat shock proteins: Regulators of stress response and apoptosis. Cell Stress and Chaperones 1998; 3:228–236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Downs CA, Jones LR, Heckathorn SA. Evidence for a novel set of small heat-shock proteins that associates with the mitochondria of murine PC12 cells and protects NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase from heat and oxidative stress. Arch Biochem Biophys 1999; 365:344–350.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Gill RR, Gbur CJ, Fisher BJ et al. Heat shock provides delayed protection against oxidative injury in cultured human umbilical nein endothelial cells. J Molec Cell Cardiol 1998; 30:2739–2749.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Park YM, Han MY, Blackburn RV et al. Overexpression of HSP25 reduces the level of TNFalpha-induced oxidative DNA damage biomarker, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, in L929 cells. J Cell Physiol 1998; 174:27–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Jamil K, Crowe JH, Tablin F et al. Arbutin enhances recovery and osteogenic differentiation in dried and rehydrated human mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Preservation Tech 2005; 3:244–255.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Oliver AE, Hincha DK, Crowe JH. Looking beyond sugars: The role of amphiphilic solutes in preventing adventitious reactions in anhydrobiotes at low water contents. Comp Biochem Physiol 2002; 131A:515–525.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Crowe JH. Anhydrobiosis: An unsolved problem. Am Nat 1971; 105:563–573.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section of Molecular and Cellular BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations