Regulation of Biotechnology for Specialty Crops

  • Kent J. Bradford
  • Julian M. Alston
  • Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 30)

Abstract

While crops improved using biotechnology (recombinant DNA methods) have been widely adopted in soybeans, cotton, maize, and canola, only a few varieties of horticultural or specialty crops have been commercialized. Numerous traits developed through biotechnology would be valuable for specialty crops. However, commericalization of these traits is limited by the diversity of species involved, multiple niche markets, small production windows per cultivar, requirements of processors, distributors and retailers, and access to intellectual property required for developing transgenic varieties. Regulatory requirements for biotech crops, particularly the separate regulation of each transgenic event, are also uniquely burdensome for specialty crops. Targeted assistance with the regulatory process, analogous to the IR-4 program for the registration of agricultural chemicals for minor crops, is recommended as a way to encourage the commercialization of biotech specialty crops. Continuing development of biotech specialty crops in China, India, and other countries may eventually open international markets to these products.

Key words

Biotechnology specialty crops vegetables fruits ornamental plants regulation 

References

  1. Alston, J.M. 2004. “Horticultural Biotechnology Faces Significant Economic and Market Barriers.” California Agriculture 58(2): 80–88.Google Scholar
  2. Alston, J.M, K.J. Bradford, and N. Kalaitzanctonakes. 2006. “The Economics of Horticultural Biotechnology.” Journal of Crop Improvement 16 (in press).Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R.C., R.N. Beachy, G. Conway, F.A. Cordova, M.A. Fox, K.A. Holbrook, D.F. Klessig, R.L. McCormick, P.M. McPherson, H.R. Rawlings III, R. Rapson, L.N. Vander-hoef, J.D. Wiley, and C.E. Young. 2003. “Public Sector Collaboration for Agricultural IP Management.” Science 301(5630): 174–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradford, K.J., and J.M. Alston. 2004a. “Diversity of Horticultural Biotech Crops Contributes to Market Hurdles.” California Agriculture 58(2): 84–85.Google Scholar
  5. ____. 2004b. “Horticultural Biotechnology: Challenges for Commercial Development.” Chronica Horliculturae 44(4): 4–8.Google Scholar
  6. Bradford, K.J., A. Van Deynze, N. Gutterson, W. Parrott, and S.H. Strauss. 2005. “Regulating Transgenic Crops Sensibly: Lessons from Plant Breeding, Biotechnology and Genomics.” Nature Biotechnology 23(4): 439–444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, D., H. Klee, and A. Dandekar. 2004. “Despite Benefits, Commercialization of Transgenic Horticultural Crops Lags.” California Agriculture 58(2): 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J.I. 2005. “Poorer Nations Turn to Publicly Developed GM Crops.” Nature Biotechnology 23(1): 27–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook, R.L. 2004. “Transgenic Produce Slow to Enter Evolving Global Marketplace.” California Agriculture 58(2): 82–83.Google Scholar
  10. Delmer, D.P., C. Nottenburg, G.D. Graff, and A.B. Bennett. 2003. “Intellectual Property Resources for International Development in Agriculture.” Plant Physiology 133(4): 1666–1670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driver, J., J. Castillón, and A. Dandekar. 2004. “Transgenic Trap Crops and Rootstocks Show Potential.” California Agriculture 58(2): 96–97.Google Scholar
  12. Gianessi, L. 2004. “Biotechnology Expands Pest-Management Options for Horticulture.” California Agriculture 58(2): 94–95.Google Scholar
  13. Gianessi, L., S. Sankula, and N. Reigner. 2003. Plant Biotechnology: Potential Impact for improving Pest Management in European Agriculture. A Summary of Nine Case Studies. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. Available online at www.ncfap.org (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  14. Gianessi L.P., C.S. Silvers, S. Sankula S, and J.E. Carpenter. 2002. Plant Biotechnology: Current and Potential Impact for Improving Pest Management in U.S. Agriculture—An Analysis of 40 Case Studies. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. Available online at www.ncfap.org (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  15. Goldner, W., A.M. Thro, and J.W. Radin (eds.). 2005. “Public Research and the Regulatory Review of Small-market (Specialty) Biotechnology-Derived Crops Workshop.” Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Riverdale, Maryland. Available online at www.csrees.usda.gov/nea/biotech/pdf/small_mkt.pdf (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  16. Gonsalves, D. 2004. “Virus-Resistant Transgenic Papaya Helps Save Hawaiian Industry.” California Agriculture 58(2): 92–93.Google Scholar
  17. Graff, G., B. Wright, A. Bennett, and D. Zilberman. 2004. “Access to Intellectual Property Is a Major Obstacle to Developing Transgenic Horticultural Crops.” California Agriculture 58(2): 120–126.Google Scholar
  18. Hoa, T.T.C., S. Al-Babili, I. Potrykus, and P. Beyer. 2003. “Golden Indica and Japonica Rice Lines Amenable to Deregulation.” Plant Physiology 133(1): 161–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holm, R.E., and D. Kunkel. 2004. “IR-4 Project Targets Specialty Crops.” California Agriculture 58(2): 110–112.Google Scholar
  20. Huang, J., and S. Rozelle. 2004, “China Aggressively Pursuing Horticulture and Plant Biotechnology.” California Agriculture 58(2): 112–113.Google Scholar
  21. Information Systems for Biotechnology. 2004. “Field Test Releases in the U.S.” Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA. Available online at www.isb.vt.edu/cfdocs/fieldtests1.cfm (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  22. James, C. 2004. “Preview: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2004.” ISAAA Briefs No. 32, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY. Available online at www.isaaa.org (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  23. Jerardo, A. 2004. Economist, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Personal communication.Google Scholar
  24. Kalaitzandonakes, N. (ed.). 2003. Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective. New York: Kluwer-Plenum Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Landsmann, J., C. van der Hoeven, and A. Dietz-Pfeilstter. 1996. “Variability of Organ-Specific Expression of Reporter Genes in Transgenic Plants.” In E.R. Schmidt and T. Hankeln, eds., Transgenic Organisms and Biosafety. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Miller, H.I., and G. Conko. 2004. The Frankenfood Myth: How Protest and Politics Threaten the Biotech Revolution. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2004. “Statistical Information.” U.S. Department of Agriculture, NASS, Washington, D.C. Available online at www.usda.gov/nass/ (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  28. National Biological Information Infrastructure. 2004, “U.S. Database of Completed Regulatory Agency Reviews.” United States Regulatory Agencies Unified Biotechnology Website, http://usbiotechreg.nbii.gov (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  29. National Research Council. 2004. Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods: Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press. Available online at http://books.nap.edu/catalog/10977.html (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  30. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. 2004. Issues in the Regulation of Genetically Engineered Plants and Animals. Washington, D.C: The Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. Available online at www.pcwagbiotech.org/research/regulation (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  31. ____. 2005. Impacts of Biotech Regulation on Small Business and University Research: Possible Barriers and Potential Solutions. Washington, D.C: The Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. Available online at http://pewagbiotech.org/events/0602/proceedings.pdf (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  32. Redenbaugh, K., and A. McHughen. 2004. “Regulatory Challenges Reduce Opportunities for Horticultural Biotechnology.” California Agriculture 58(2): 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Runge, C.F., and B. Ryan. 2004. “The Global Diffusion of Plant Biotechnology: International Adoption and Research in 2004.” University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN. Available online at www.apec.urnn.edu/faculty/frunge/globalbiotech04.pdf (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  34. Syngenta. 2005. “Following Syngenta-initiated Investigation of Unintended Corn Release, EPA and USDA Conclude Existing Food Safety Clearance Applies, No Human Health or Environmental Concerns.” Syngenta International AG, Basel, Switzerland. Available online at www.syngenta.com/en/downloads/Final_Syngenta_March_21_Statemcnt_e.pdf (accessed May 18, 2005).Google Scholar
  35. Ursin, V.M. 2003. “Modification of Plant Lipids for Human Health: Development of Functional Land-Based Omega-3 Fatty Acids.” Journal of Nutrition 133(12): 4271–4274.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. van Harten, A.M. 1998. Mutation Breeding. Theory and Practical Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kent J. Bradford
    • 1
  • Julian M. Alston
    • 1
  • Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaDavis
  2. 2.University of Missouri-ColumbiaColumbia

Personalised recommendations