Organizational Semiotics pp 91-108 | Cite as
Translation, Betrayal and Ambiguity in IS Development
Abstract
This paper uses semiotic theories to model how meaning is constructed during an IS development project. Conventionally, shared meanings among all project stakeholders are regarded as a prerequisite for success. Based on an analysis of documents relating to a flexible learning pilot project developed at an Australian university, a model of meaning was built combining actor-network theory and Foucault’s theory of discourse. Important scripts were identified from internal working documents and their meaning discussed with a variety of human actors. Scripts within the actor network were interpreted with reference to expert discourses familiar to the various actors. Further analysis using this model shows how mistranslation can occur in at least two distinct ways as scripts pass between actors; through apparent acceptance of espoused scripts and the pragmatic betrayal of scripts-in-use. In our case study project these two types of mistranslation were used to maintain ambiguity over certain key issues throughout the life of the project, and this ambiguity contributed significantly to project’s success.
Key words
Information systems development Actor-network theory Foucault AmbiguityReferences
- Akrich, M. Latour, B. (1992) “A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies” in Bijker, Wiebe E. Law, John (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society, MIT Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
- Anderson, D. (2001) Review of The Faculty, TV Guide, Sydney Morning Herald, 22nd OctoberGoogle Scholar
- Argyris, C. (1978) Organizational Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading MAGoogle Scholar
- Chaplin, C. (1936) Modem Times (film), United ArtistsGoogle Scholar
- Ciborra, C.U. (1996) “Introduction: What does Groupware Mean for Organizations Hosting it?” in Ciborra, C.U. (ed) Groupware Teamwork: Invisible Hand or Technical Hindrance?, Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Davis, G.B. Olson, M.H. (1984) Management Information Systems, McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Deleuze, G. Guattari, F. (1988) A Thousand Plateaus, Athlone, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Deleuze, G. Pamet, C. (1987) Dialogues, Athlone, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Falkenberg, E.D., Hesse, W. Olive, A. (1995) Information Systems Concepts: Towards a Consolidation of Views, Chapman Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge, Tavistock, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge, Pantheon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hawryszkiewycz (2001) Systems Analysis and Design (5 edn), Prentice Hall, Sydney Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA Latour, B. ( 1993 ) We Have Never Been Modem, Harvester, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Latour, B. (1996) ARAMIS or The Love of Technology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MAGoogle Scholar
- March, J.G. Olsen, J. (1976) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations, Universitetvorlaget, BergenGoogle Scholar
- Nöth, W. (1990) Handbook of Semiotics, Indiana University, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
- Oehler (1987) “An Outline of Peirce’s Semiotics” in Krampen, Martin et al (eds) Classics of Semiotics, Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Spinks, C.W. (1991) Peirce and Triadomania, Mouton de Gruyter, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stamper, R. (1973) Information, Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Stamper, R. (1992) “Signs, Organisations, Norms and Information Systems” in MacGregor, R. (ed) Proceedings of Third Australian Conference on Information Systems, Department of Business Systems, WollongongGoogle Scholar
- Winder, R.L., Prober, S.K. Beeson, I.A. (eds) (1997) Philosophical Aspects of Information Systems, Taylor Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Zuboff, Shoshana (1996) “Forward” in Ciborra, C.U. (ed) Groupware Teamwork: Invisible Hand or Technical Hindrance?, Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar