On Authentication, Digital Signatures and Signature Laws

  • Per Kaijser
Chapter
Part of the IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 23)

Abstract

The public debate arising from the introduction of signature laws in North America, Europe and elsewhere has prompted this paper. This paper analyses and compares the closely interrelated concepts of authentication, digital signatures and electronic signature laws and tries to explain and resolve some of the ambiguities. Non-trivial problems and issues not much seen in the debate are discussed together with some suggestions as to how to overcome them. The aim of the paper is to help the promotion of both digital signatures and electronic signatures in order to improve the trust and confidence in, and acceptability of, documents in electronic form.

Keywords

Authentication digital signature electronic signature signature law 

References

  1. [1]
    ISO 7498–2 (1988) Information Processing Systems — Open Systems Interconnection Reference Model — Part 2: Security ArchitectureGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    COM(1998)297 final: Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on a common framework for electronic signatures (May 13,1998)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    RFC 2459 (1999) Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and CRL ProfileGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    ITU-T Recommendation X.509, Information Technology — Open Systems Interconnection — The Directory: Authentication Framework (1996)Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Section 11 a) in the Swedish Customs Act (1987:1065)Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    The Utah Digital Signature Act (1995)Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    The German Digital Signature Act — Signaturgesetz — SigG (1997)Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    The proposed Implementation of the Government Paperwork Elimination Act http://www.access.gpo.gov/su_docs/aces/fr-cont.html (March 5, 1999)Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) Pub. L. 105–277, Title XVII (October 21, 1998 )Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. Nilsson and D. Pinkas, Validation of Electronic Signatures, http://www.openmaster.com/whitepaper/es_validation.pdfGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    ISO/IEC 10646–1 (1993) Information Technology — Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set (UCS) — Part 1: Architecture and Basic Multilingual PlaneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per Kaijser
    • 1
  1. 1.SIEMENS AGMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations