What Went Wrong with Walras? The Econometric Transformation Process of Walrasian Economics during the 1920s and 1930s
This paper will address the issue of the reception and transformation of Lé on Walras’s work among some econometricians during the 1920s and 1930s. As set out in the paper, the reception of Walras’s work is related to the importance of the role of statistics, the dynamic representations of a changing reality and the consistency of simultaneous equations modelling.
The main contribution of this article lies perhaps in detecting these (different) reasons ‘what went wrong with Walras’ but should also be seen in the light of an extrapolated discussion of the current relevance of Léon Walras work and his legacy for modern political economy.
The conclusion is that the reception of Walras’s work by the early econometricians (statisticians and mathematicians together) was lukewarm, partly because it represented the wrong ideas and partly because of ignorance. When and where Walras’s work was discussed it was mainly as a starting point to illustrate the relevance of the changes suggested by the newly founded econometric discipline. At the end of the day, this may illustrate the development of the economic discipline, but perhaps even more importantly it may reveal the need for weaving Walras’s applied and social economics into our present-day Walrasian texture.
Keywords:Walras Statistics Economic Dynamics
JEL classification:B13 B23 B31
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Hilferding, R. (1981). Finance Capital, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Ingrao, B. and Israel, G. (1987). The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jolink, A. (1996). The Evolutionist Economics of Léon Walras, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Menger, K. (1998). Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums, edited by E. Dierker and K. Sigmund, Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
- Moore, H.L. (1911). Laws of Wages: An essay in Statistical Economics, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Moore, H.L. (1925). “A moving equilibrium of demand and supply”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, 357–371.Google Scholar
- Moore, H.L. (1929). Synthetic Economics, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Tinbergen, J. (1925). “Opmerkingen over konkurrentie”, Kentering, (1), 7/8.Google Scholar
- Tinbergen, J. (1926). “Opmerkingen over de arbeidswarde”, Kentering, (2)2. 80 JolinkGoogle Scholar
- Tinbergen, J. (1928). “Opmerkingen over Ruiltheorie”, De Socialistische Gids, 13, 431–445 and 539-548. ai]Tinbergen, J. (1929). Minimumproblemen in de natuurkunde en de ekonomie, Amsterdam: H.J. Paris.Google Scholar
- Tinbergen, J. (1939). Statistical Testing of Business-cycle Theories: Business Cycles in the United States of America 1919-1932, Geneva: League of Nations Publications.Google Scholar
- Walras, L. (1965). Correspondence of Léon Walras and Related Papers, edited by W. Jaffé, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar