A Heuristic Approach to Future Disasters and Crises: New, Old, and In-Between Types

  • E.L. Quarantelli
  • Patrick Lagadec
  • Arjen Boin
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

Disasters and crises have been part of the human experience since people started living in groups. Through the centuries, however, new hazards and risks have emerged that have added to the possibilities of new disasters and crises arising from them. Only a very small fraction of risks and hazards actually lead to a disaster or crisis, but they are usually a necessary condition for such surfacing. New types have emerged while older ones have not disappeared. The development of synthetic chemicals in the 19th century and nuclear power in the 20th century created the risk of toxic chemical disasters and crises from radioactive fallouts. Ancient disasters such as floods and earthquakes remain with us today. This chapter raises the question of whether we are at another important historical juncture with the emergence of a new distinctive class of disasters and crises not seen before.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Picou, J., & Gill, D. (1996). The Exxon Valdez oil spill and chronic psychological stress. In E. Rice, R. Spies, D. Wolfe, & B. Wright (Eds.), Proceedings of the Evon Symposium (pp. 100–110). Alaska: American Fisheries Symposium.Google Scholar
  2. Lowenstein, R. (2004). When genius fails. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Mileti, D. (1999). Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ballman, J. (2003). The great blackout of 2003. Disaster Recovery, 10, 17–18.Google Scholar
  5. Lang, B. (1985). Non-semitic deluge stories and the Book of Genesis. A bibliographic and critical survey. Anthropos, 80, 605–616.Google Scholar
  6. Aristotle (1952). Meteorologica. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ingleton, J., Ed. (1999). Natural disaster management. A presentation to commemorate the international decade for natural disaster reduction (IDNDR), Leicester, England: Tudor Rose.Google Scholar
  8. Post, J. (1977). The last great subsistence crisis in the Western world. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Quarantelli, E.L. (1998b). Epilogue: Where we have been and where we might go. In E.L. Quarantelli (Ed.), What is a disaster: Perspective on the question (pp. 234–273). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Sowina, U. (2002). Les eaux qui Charrient la mort et les desastres: inondation et pollution des eaux dans les villes polonaises aux Xve et XVIe siecles. In G. Massard-Guilbaud, H. Platt, & D. Schott (Eds.), Cities and catastrophes: Coping with emergency in European history (pp. 43–62). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  11. Peek, L., & Sutton, J. (2003). An exploratory comparison of disasters, riots and terrorist acts. Disasters, 27, 319–335.Google Scholar
  12. McAneney, J. (2005). December 26, 2004 Sumatra earthquake and tsunami. Risk Frontiers Newsletter, 1,3.Google Scholar
  13. Smith, K. (1992). Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Rees, M. (2004). Our final hour: A scientist’s warning: How terror, error and environmental disaster threaten humankind’s future in this century–on Earth and beyond. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Boin, R.A., ‘t Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Blumer, H. (1948). Public opinion and public opinion polling. American Sociological Review, 13, 542–552.Google Scholar
  18. Glickman, T., Golding, D. & Silverman, E. (1992). Acts of God and acts of man: Recent trends in natural disasters and major industrial accidents. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  19. Boin, R.A. (2005). From crisis to disaster: Towards an integrative perspective. In R.W. Perry & E.L. Quarantelli (Eds.), What is a disaster? New answers to old questions (pp. 153–172). Philadelphia: Xlibris.Google Scholar
  20. Vale, L., & Campanella, T. (2004). The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disasters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Neiman, S. (2005). The moral cataclysm: Why we struggle to think and feel differently about natural and man-made disasters. New York Times Magazine, January 16, 15–16.Google Scholar
  22. Boin, R.A., Kofman-Bos, C., & Overdijk, W. (2004). Crisis simulations: Exploring tomorrow’s vulnerabilities and threats. Simulation & Gaming, 35, 378–393.Google Scholar
  23. Hewitt, K., & Burton, I. (1971). The hazardousness of a place. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  24. Blumer, H. (1939). Collective behavior. In R. Park (Ed.), Principles of sociology (pp. 65–121). New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  25. Mulcahy, M. (2002). Urban catastrophes and imperial relief in the eighteenth-century British Atlantic world: Three case studies. In G., Massard-Guilbaud, H. Platt, & D. Schott (Eds.). Cities and catastrophes: Coping with emergency in European history (pp. 105–122). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  26. Farazmand, A. (2001). Handbook of crisis and emergency management. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  27. Drabek, T.E., & Quarantelli, E.L. (1967). Scapegoats, villains, and disasters. Transaction, 4, 12–17.Google Scholar
  28. Kasperson, J., & Kasperson, R. (Eds.). (2005). The social contours of risk: Risk communication and the social amplification of risk. New York: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  29. Fritz, C.E. (1961b).Disaster and community therapy. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  30. Burt, C. (2004). Extreme weather, A guide & record book. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  31. Perry, R.W. (2004). Disaster exercise outcomes for professional emergency personnel and citizen volunteers. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 12, 63–75.Google Scholar
  32. Wenger, D.E. (1985). Mass media and disasters. Preliminary Paper No. 98. Newark, DE: Disaster Research Center.Google Scholar
  33. Tierney, K.J. (1994). Research overview: Emergency response. In P. Vaziri (Compiler), Proceedings of the NEHRP conference and workshop on the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994—Volume IV: Social science and emergency management (pp. IV-9–IV-15). Richmond, CA: California Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering.Google Scholar
  34. Nuzzo, J. (2004). The next pandemic? Biosecurity Bulletin, 6, 1–8.Google Scholar
  35. Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schorr, J. (1987). Some contributions German Katastrophensoziologie can make to the sociology of disaster. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 5, 115–135.Google Scholar
  37. Oliver-Smith, A. (1994). Peru’s five hundred year earthquake: Vulnerability in historical context. In A. Varley (Ed.). Disasters, development and environment. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Murria, J. (2004). A disaster by any other name. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 22, 117–129.Google Scholar
  39. Lagadec, P. (2005). Crossing the Rubicon. Crisis Response, 1, 38–41.Google Scholar
  40. Schoff, J.L. (2004) (Ed.). Crisis management in Japan & the United States: Creating opportunities for cooperation amid dramatic change. The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis, Inc. Dulles, VA: Brassey’s.Google Scholar
  41. Tierney, K.J., Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  42. Rosenthal, U., Boin, R.A., & Comfort, L.K. (Eds.). (2001). Managing crises: Threats, dilemmas, opportunities. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  43. Dynes, R.R., DeMarchi, B., & Pelanda, C. (Eds.). (1987). Sociology of disasters: Contributions of sociology to disaster research. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  44. Quarantelli, E.L. (2005a). A social science research agenda for the disasters of the 21st century. In R.W. Perry & E.L. Quarantelli (Eds.), What is a disaster? New answers to old questions (pp. 325–396). Philadelphia: Xlibris.Google Scholar
  45. Kendra, J., Wachtendorf, T., & Quarantelli, E. (2003). The evacuation of lower Manhattan by water transport on September 11: An unplanned success. Joint Commission of Quality and Safety, 29, 316–318.Google Scholar
  46. Alexander, D.A. (2005). An interpretation of disaster in terms of changes in culture, society and international relations. In R.W. Perry, & E.L. Quarantelli (Eds.), What is a disaster: New answers to old questions (pp. 25–38). Philadelphia: Xlibris.Google Scholar
  47. Wenger, D.E., James, T.F., & Faupel, C.E. (1985). Disaster beliefs and emergency planning. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  48. Jones, N., Noji, E., Smith, G., & Wagner, R. (1993). Casualty in earthquakes. In K. Tierney & J. Nigg (Eds.), Socioeconomic Impacts. 1993 National Earthquake Conference (pp. 19–68). Memphis: Central United States Earthquake Consortium.Google Scholar
  49. Noji, E. (2000). Public health consequences of disasters. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 15, 21–31.Google Scholar
  50. Yerolympos, A. (2002). Urban space as “field” aspects of late Ottoman town planning after fire. In G. Massard-Guilbaud, H. Platt, & D. Schott (Eds.), Cities and catastrophes: Coping with emergency in European history (pp. 223–236). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  51. Barber, J., & Schweithelm, J. (2000). Trial by fire: Forest fires. New York: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  52. Boin, R.A., & Lagadec, P. (2000). Preparing for the future: Critical challenges in crisis management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 8, 185–191.Google Scholar
  53. Stallings, R.A. (1988). Conflict in natural disasters: A codification of consensus and conflict theories. Social Science Quarterly, 69, 569–586.Google Scholar
  54. Hayashi, H. (2004). A comparison of the emergency management system between Japan and the United States. In K. Meguro (Ed.), Assessment of post-event management processes using multi-media disaster simulation (pp. 2-25–2-30). Kyoto: US–Japan Cooperative Research on Urban Earthquake Disaster Mitigation Project.Google Scholar
  55. Massard-Guilbaud, G., Platt, H., & Schott, D. (Eds.). (2002). Cities and catastrophes: Coping with emergency in European history. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  56. Dynes, R.R., & Tierney K. (Eds.). (1994). Disasters, collective behavior and social organization. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
  57. Perry, R.W., Lindell, M., & Prater, C. (2005). Introduction to emergency management in the United States. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.Google Scholar
  58. Cutter, S. (1994). Environmental risks and hazards. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  59. Joy, B. (2000). Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired, 8, 238–262.Google Scholar
  60. Donahue, A. (2003). Incident management teams: All-risk operations and management study. Storrs, CT: Center for Policy Analysis and Management, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  61. Thorson, A., & Ekdahl, K. (2005). Avian influenza—Is the world on the verge of a pandemic and can it be stopped? Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 13, 21–28.Google Scholar
  62. Klinenberg, E. (2002). Heat wave: A social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Erikson, K. (1994). A new species of trouble: Explorations in disaster, trauma, and community. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  64. Birkland, T.A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Bucher, R. (1957). Blame and hostility in disaster. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 467–475.Google Scholar
  66. Lagadec, P. (2000). Ruptures creatrics. Paris: Editions d’Organisation.Google Scholar
  67. Jigyasu, R. (2005b). Cultural heritage concerns in WCDR. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 23(1), 141–160.Google Scholar
  68. Kreps, G.A. (1984). Sociological inquiry and disaster research. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 309–330.Google Scholar
  69. Quarantelli, E.L. (2000). Disaster research. In E. Borgatta, & R. Montgomery (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sociology. (pp 682–688). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  70. Berg, J. (1988). Uncovering Soviet disasters. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  71. Wright, J.D., & Rossi, P.H. (Eds.). (1981). Social science and natural hazards. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.Google Scholar
  72. Bosner, L. (2002). Disaster preparedness: How Japan and the United States compare. Asia Perspectives, 4(2), 17–20.Google Scholar
  73. Mann, M. (1997). Has globalization ended the rise of the nation-state? Review of International Political Economy, 4, 472–496.Google Scholar
  74. Waterbury, J. (1979). Hydopolitics of the Nile Valley. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disaster (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  76. Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (2001). Community innovation in hazardous materials management: Profess in implementing SARA Title III in the United States. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 88, 169–194.Google Scholar
  77. McGuire, W. (2000). Apocalypse. London: Blanford.Google Scholar
  78. Balter, M. (2005). The seeds of civilization. Smithsonian, 36, 68–74.Google Scholar
  79. Schnitter, N. (1994). A history of dams. Brookfield: Balkema.Google Scholar
  80. Schneider, J. & Susser, I. (Eds.), (2003). Wounded cities: Destruction and reconstruction in a globalized world. New York: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  81. Perry, R.W., & Quarantelli, E.L. (2005). What is a disaster? New answers to old questions. Philadelphia: Xlibris.Google Scholar
  82. Scanlon T.J. (2001). Increasingly intolerable boundaries: Future control of environmental pollution. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 86(1–3), 121–133.Google Scholar
  83. Nakamura, A. (2000). The need and development of crisis management in Japan’s Public Administration: Lessons from the Kobe Earthquake. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 8(1), 23–29.Google Scholar
  84. Tenner, E. (1996). Why things bite back. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  85. Castenfors, K., & Svedin, L. (2001). Crisis communication: Learning from the 1998 LPG near miss in Stockholm. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 88, 235–254.Google Scholar
  86. Lenski, G., Lenski, J., & Nolan, P. (1991). Human societies: An introduction to macrosociology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  87. Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Guehenno, J. (1995). The end of the nation state. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  89. Cutter, S. (1991). Fleeing from harm: International trends in evacuation from chemical accident. International Journal from Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 9, 267–285.Google Scholar
  90. Dynes, R.R. (2003). Finding order in disorder: Continuities in the 9–11 response. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 21, 9–23.Google Scholar
  91. Gans, H. (1980). Deciding what’s news. New York: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
  92. Stallings, R.A.(2002c). Weberian political sociology and sociological disaster studies. Sociological Forum, 17, 281–305.Google Scholar
  93. Ullberg, S. (2004). The Buenos Aires blackout: Argentine crisis management across the public–private divide. Stockholm: Crismart.Google Scholar
  94. Pidgeon, N., Kasperson, R.E., & Slovic, P. (Eds.). (2003). The social amplification of risk. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Walters, L.M., Wilkins, L., & Walters T. (Eds.). (1989). Bad tidings communications and catastrophe. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  96. Smelser, N.J. (1963). Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  97. Smelser, N.J. (2004). September 11, 2001, as cultural trauma. In J. Alexander, R. Eyerman, B. Giesen, N. Smelser & P. Sztompka. Cultural trauma and collective Identity. (pp. 263–278). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  98. Cunningham, S. (2005). Incident, accident, catastrophe: Cyanide on the Danube. Disasters, 29, 99–128.Google Scholar
  99. Quarantelli, E.L. (1989c). Human behavior in the Mexico City earthquake: Some implications from basic themes in survey findings. Preliminary Paper No. 37. Newark, Delaware: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  100. Fischer, H. (2003). The sociology of disaster: Definitions, research questions and measurements. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 21, 91–108.Google Scholar
  101. Humphrey, C. (2003). Rethinking infrastructure: Siberian cities and the great freeze of January 2001. In J. Schneider & I. Susser (Eds.), Wounded cities: Destruction and reconstruction in a globalized world. (pp. 91–107). New York: Berg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • E.L. Quarantelli
    • 1
  • Patrick Lagadec
    • 2
  • Arjen Boin
    • 3
  1. 1.Disaster Research Center, Department of Sociology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Ecole PolytechniqueParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of Public AdministrationLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations